Skip to main content

Table 1 List of tested segmentation methods and all-in-one segmentation tools and definition of abbreviations

From: Cell segmentation methods for label-free contrast microscopy: review and comprehensive comparison

Segmentation step

Abbreviation

Description

Setable parameters

Computational time

Ref.

All in one tools

 

aioFasright

Nucleus editor of Farsight toolkit

N/A

4.96 s

[2]

 

aioCellX

segmentation, fluorescence quantification, and tracking tool CellX

N/A

10.30 s

[3]

 

aioFogbank

single cell segmentation tool FogBank according Chalfoun

N/A

12.00 s

[4]

 

aioFastER

fastER - user-friendly tool for ultrafast and robust cell segmentation

N/A

0.42 s

[5]

 

aioCellProfiler

tool for cell analysis pipelines including single cell segmentation

N/A

11.8 s

[10]

 

aioDMGW

Dry mass-guided watershed method, (Q-PHASE, Tescan)

 

1.00 s

 

Reconstruction

 

rDIC-Koos

DIC/HMC image reconstruction according Koos

2

36.60 min

[12]

 

rDIC-Yin

DIC/HMC image reconstruction according Yin

2

2.10 s

[13]

 

rPC-Yin

PC image reconstruction according Yin

4

13.10 min

[14]

 

rPC-Tophat

PC image reconstruction according Thirusittampalam and Dewan

1

0.17 s

[15, 16]

Foreground-background segmentation

 

sST

simple thresholding

1

<0.01 s

 
 

sOtsu

thresholding using Gaussian distribution

0

<0.01 s

[17]

 

sPT

thresholding using Poisson distribution

0

<0.01 s

[2]

 

sEGT

empirical gradient threshold

3

0.24 s

[18]

 

sPC-Juneau

Feature extraction approach according Juneau

3

0.26 s

[19]

 

sPC-Topman

Feature extraction approach according Topman

4

0.35 s

[20]

 

sPC-Phantast

Phantast toolbox developed by Jaccard

5

0.35 s

[21]

 

sLS-Caselles

Level-set with edge-based method

2

31.40 s

[22]

 

sLS-ChanVese

Level-set with region-based method

2

11.10 s

[23]

 

sGraphCut

Graph-Cut applied on recosntructed and raw data

2

15.80 s

[24]

 

sWekaGraphCut

Graph-Cut applied on probability maps generated by Weka

2

31.80 min**

[24]

 

sIlastikGraphCut

Graph-Cut applied on probability maps generated by Ilastik

2

31.52 min**

[24]

 

sIlastik

machine learning tool by Sommer

N/A

31.20 min+21 s*

[25].

 

sWeka

machine learning tool by Arganda-Carreras

N/A

27.60 min+2.20 min*

[26]

Cell detection (seed-point extraction)

 

dLoGm-Peng

multiscale LoG by Peng

4

3.60 s

[27]

 

dLoGm-Kong

multiscale LoG by Kong

5

4.20 s

[28]

 

dLoGg-Kong

generalized LoG filter by Kong

2

46.40 s

[28]

 

dLoGg-Xu

generalized LoG filter by Xu

3

5.10 s

[29]

 

dLoGh-Zhang

Hessian analysis of LoG images by Zhang

1

8.90 s

[30]

 

dFRST

fast radial-symmetry transform

5

153.10 s

[31]

 

dGRST

generalized radial-symmetry transform

5

572.30 s

[32]

 

dRV-Qi

radial voting methods by Qi et al.

5

95.00 s

[33]

 

dDT-Threshold

distance transform by Thirusittampalam, threshold-generated foreground

4

0.11 s

[15]

 

dDT-Weka

distance transform by Thirusittampalam, sWeka-generated foreground

3

0.11 s

[15]

 

dMSER

maximally stable extremal region method (MSER)

3

2.10 s

[34]

 

dCellDetect

machine learning method based on MSER

1

141.70 s/60.20 s*

[35]

Single cell (instance) segmentation

 

MCWS

Marker-conttrolled watershed

0

1.40 s

 
 

MCWS-dDT

Marker-conttrolled watershed on DT image

0

1.41 s

 
  1. For detailed list of optimized parameters see Additional file 1. * computational time for learning based approaches indicated as two values for learning and classification. ** computational time for Weka+Graph cut combination shown as sum time of these methods. not includes time for Weka probability map creation, indicate final segmentation step following foreground-background segmentation and seed-point extraction. Number of parameters in “all-in-one” approaches not shown because of the GUI-based nature, similarly, not shown for learning-based approaches, see Methods section for details. Computational time shown for one 1360 ×1024 DIC field of view