Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 4

From: A comparison of three programming languages for a full-fledged next-generation sequencing tool

Fig. 4

Runtimes of phases in the C++17 implementation. Average elapsed wall-clock times in minutes for the two main phases of an elPrep pipeline in the C++17 implementation, and the deallocation pause in between phase 1 and 2 caused by the reference counting mechanism, with confidence intervals. The second row depicts the same averages as in the first now, but without the deallocation pause. The sum of the two phases in the second row is very close to the Go runtimes shown in Fig. 1

Back to article page