Skip to main content

Table 2 Performances of DDI-PULearn and the benchmark methods evaluated by 20 runs of 3-fold cross-validation and 5-fold cross-validation

From: DDI-PULearn: a positive-unlabeled learning method for large-scale prediction of drug-drug interactions

Evaluation

Method

Precision

Recall

F1-score

3-fold CV

Vilar’s substructure-based method

0.145

0.535

0.229

 

Vilar’s interaction-fingerprint-based method

0.377

0.553

0.447

 

Zhang’s weighted average ensemble method

0.782

0.703

0.740

 

Zhang’s L1 classifier ensemble method

0.788

0.717

0.751

 

Zhang’s L2 classifier ensemble method

0.784

0.712

0.746

 

DDI-PULearn

0.902

0.822

0.860

5-fold CV

Vilar’s substructure-based method

0.145

0.535

0.229

 

Vilar’s interaction-fingerprint-based method

0.377

0.553

0.447

 

Zhang’s weighted average ensemble method

0.775

0.659

0.712

 

Zhang’s L1 classifier ensemble method

0.785

0.670

0.723

 

Zhang’s L2 classifier ensemble method

0.783

0.665

0.719

 

DDI-PULearn

0.904

0.824

0.862