Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 1

From: High-throughput analysis suggests differences in journal false discovery rate by subject area and impact factor but not open access status

Fig. 1

Relationship between JIF and false discovery rate by subject area. Estimated linear mixed effects regression from the stratified models with 95% bootstrapped confidence bands. General medicine journals (red), oncology journals (blue); solid line is the predicted relationship between false discovery rate and natural log of JIF adjusting for year and open access status. The dashed blue line represents extrapolated predictions beyond the observed maximum JIF of 26.51 for oncology journals

Back to article page