Method | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | MCC |
---|
TooT-M | 92.71 | 94.4 | 93.57 | 0.87 |
MemType-2L | 91.00 | 94.4 | 92.7 | 0.85 |
- This table compares the performance of TooT-M with the state-of-the-art MemType-2L predictor [2] on the same dataset, DS2. The best performance for each metric is highlighted in italics. TooT-M achieved a higher sensitivity, accuracy and MCC than MemType-2L and the same specificity