Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparative study of the number of correct mappings, sensitivity, precision, and running time by different methods, Minimap, Minimap2, lordFAST, MUMmer4, conLSH, and S-conLSH, for a total of 146,932 reads simulated from five different human chromosomes

From: S-conLSH: alignment-free gapped mapping of noisy long reads

Chr#

#Reads

Mapper

#Mapped reads

#Correct mapping

Sensitivity (%)

Precision (%)

Indexing time (s)

Mapping time (s)

Chr1

32,290

Minimap

31,591

31,585

97.82

99.99

15

30

Minimap2

32,290

31,863

98.69

98.69

10

61

lordFAST

32,290

29,313

90.79

90.79

192

206

MUMmer4

31,940

31,645

98.01

99.08

-

310

conLSH

31,945

29,620

91.73

92.72

08

235

S-conLSH

32,111

31,964

99

99.55

51

38

Chr2

34,309

Minimap

33,623

33,613

97.98

99.98

16

33

Minimap2

34,309

33,864

98.71

98.71

10

64

lordFAST

34,309

31,173

90.87

90.87

170

216

MUMmer4

34,056

33,914

98.85

99.59

-

312

conLSH

34,082

31,230

91.03

91.63

10

229

S-conLSH

34,153

34,008

99.13

99.58

54

44

Chr3

28,109

Minimap

27,481

27,477

97.76

99.99

15

25

Minimap2

28,109

27,698

98.55

98.55

8

52

lordFAST

28,109

25,513

90.77

90.77

135

167

MUMmer4

27,894

27,791

98.87

99.64

-

253

conLSH

27,899

25,603

91.08

91.77

07

198

S-conLSH

27,957

27,863

99.13

99.67

45

30

Chr4

26,871

Minimap

26,307

26,301

97.88

99.98

16

23

Minimap2

26,871

26,501

98.63

98.63

8

51

lordFAST

26,871

24,403

90.82

90.82

129

158

MUMmer4

26,638

26,533

98.75

99.61

-

248

conLSH

26,650

24,449

90.98

91.74

07

180

S-conLSH

26,748

26,650

99.18

99.64

41

29

Chr5

25,353

Minimap

24,859

24,849

98.02

99.96

14

21

Minimap2

25,353

25,056

98.84

98.84

7

48

lordFAST

25,353

23,069

91

91

123

149

MUMmer4

25,126

24,951

98.42

99.31

-

234

conLSH

25,149

23,106

91.14

91.87

06

167

S-conLSH

25,242

25,155

99.22

99.66

39

23

  1. Italic values are the best results in each category