Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of simulation predictions from the discrete and continuous microPop:Colon models

From: Examination of hydrogen cross-feeders using a colonic microbiota model

 

Discrete model (values at 100 hours)

Continuous model (values at set time points)

Literature data

References

Alpha

Beta

Alpha

Beta

pH

6.4

6.4

5.7

5.7

6.37, 6.61, 7.04 (66 non-fasted subjects)

4.9/5.8, 6.2/5.7, 6.7/6* (2 recently deceased subjects)

Mean 6.5, range 5-8 (20 fasted subjects)

[16]

[18]

[17]

6.8

6.8

5.8

5.7

7.1

7.1

6.3

6.3

SCFA concentrations (mM)

      

 Acetate concentration

15.4

15.9

23.1

24

97.5/98*^

[18]

11.7

12.9

26.7

33

78.4/74.6*^

7.8

11

15.3

19.1

53.8/50.7*^

 Propionate concentration

7.6

7.5

13.6

8.6

34.5/30*^

[18]

5.7

5.7

15.2

11.4

26.7/28.5*^

4.1

4.4

7.2

5.7

17.9/19.2*^

 Butyrate concentration

0.3

0.2

5.6

7.7

41.5/36*^

[18]

0.6

0.2

8.1

9.3

35.8/32.1*^

1.3

0.4

3.9

4.2

16.4/25.8*^

 SCFA ratio (Acetate: Propionate: Butyrate)

      
 

66:33:1

67:32:1

55:32:13

60:21:19

56:20:24/60:18:22*

[18]

65:32:3

69:30:1

54:30:16

62:21:17

56:19:25/55:21:24*

59:31:10

70:28:2

58:27:15

66:20:14

61:20:19/53:20:27*

SCFA absorption (g d-1)

      

 Acetate

2.11

2.56

4.54~

5.45~

95% (≃9.4 g d-1 total for Alpha discrete and ≃13 g d-1 total for Beta discrete; ≃16.3 g d-1 total for Alpha continuous and ≃17.3 g d-1 total for Beta discrete) of total produced SCFAs

[19]

 Propionate

1.63

1.66

3.64~

2.78~

 Butyrate

0.43

0.15

2.81~

3.27~

 Total

4.17

4.37

10.99

11.5

 MFG relative abundance (%)#

      

 Bacteroides

98

97

48

27

23 (mean value; Bacteroidetes)

11 (mean value; Bacteroides)

16, 35 (mean values using different techniques; Bacteroidetes)

26, 3 (mean values; lean, obese individuals; Bacteroidetes)

[67]

[68]

[69]

[70]

95

95

42

24

88

89

42

25

 NoButyStarchDeg

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.2

0.2

4 (mean value; Ruminococcus bromii)

[71]

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.1

0.2

<1e−10

1e−10

0.1

0.2

 NoButyFibreDeg

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.1

0.2

11, 27 (mean values; lean, obese individuals; Ruminococcus)

[70]

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.2

0.2

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.2

0.2

 LactateProducers

<1e−10

1.8

20

36

5 (mean value; Actinobacteria)

4 (mean value; Actinobacteria)

2, 5 (mean values using different techniques; Bifidobacteria)

<1, 4 (mean values; lean, obese individuals; Actinobacteria)

[67]

[68]

[69]

[70]

<1e−10

3.5

21

39

<1e−10

7

21

39

 ButyrateProducers1

<1e−10

0.9

16

22

3 (mean value; Roseburia)

4 (mean values; Roseburia intestinalis)

[67]

[72]

<1e−10

2

19

23

<1e−10

4

19

23

 ButyrateProducers2

2

<1e -10

2

1

5 (mean value; Faecalibacterium)

2 (mean value; Faecalibacterium prausnitzii)

[67]

[72]

4

<1e−10

2

1

11

<1e−10

3

1

 PropionateProducers

<1e−10

<1e−10

14

13

4, 4 (mean values using different techniques; Veillonella)

[69]

0.2

0.2

15

11

0.5

0.7

15

11

 ButyrateProducers3

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.1

0.1

0.04 (mean value; Eubacterium hallii)

0.5 (mean value; Eubacterium hallii)

[73]

[72]

0.001

0.003

0.1

0.09

0.004

0.004

0.1

0.08

 Acetogen

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.04

0.04

Found in all regions

of the colon, but

abundance varies slightly between regions and individuals (104-105 gene copies g-1 in mucosal biopsies). More abundant than methanogens and SRB in faeces.

1 (mean value; Blautia)

[44]

[74]

[67]

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.05

0.03

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.05

0.03

 Methanogen

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.05

0.06

Found in all individuals, but not found in all regions of each individual. Increased population size distally.

[44]

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.03

0.06

0.06

0.01

0.04

0.2

 SRB

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.05

0.05

Found in all regions of the colon, but abundance varies widely between regions and individuals (102-109 gene copies g−1 in mucosal biopsies)

0.02 (mean value; Desulfovibrio)

0.1, 0.03 (mean values; lean, obese individuals; Desulfovibrio)

[44]

[75]

[70]

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.04

0.04

<1e−10

<1e−10

0.06

0.05

  1. Font style denotes values specific to the proximal, transverse and distal regions of the colon
  2. *Data from Macfarlane et al. [18] is displayed as Subject1/Subject 2, for the two subjects analysed
  3. ^mM concentrations were calculated from mmol kg−1 reported data assuming 1 kg faecal contents has approximately 1 L volume [76]
  4. #Literature data for relative abundance was obtained from studies on faecal samples using a wide variety of techniques and various groups of faecal donors. Unless otherwise stated, the data is for healthy adults and the mean value for the indicated taxonomic group has been included, which corresponds to the assigning of MFGs to taxa in Kettle et al. [11]. These values are included for comparison only and should not be interpreted as representative means for all individuals
  5.  ~ Values from the model were tripled to give the daily total, since only one third of the daily metabolite influx into the colon was modelled using the continuous model