Skip to main content

Table 4 Statistical significance of five methods over eighteen test-cases determined through Friedman tests with Hommel’s post-hoc analysis at α=0.05

From: Decoy selection for protein structure prediction via extreme gradient boosting and ranking

Top Basins

Method

Average Rank

p value

p Hommel

B1

PR

3.889

2.101E-6

0.0125

 

Basin-Size

3.306

2.76E-4

0.0167

 

PR+PC

3.306

2.76E-4

0.025

 

Basin-Size+Energy

3.11

0.001

0.05

 

ML-select

1.389

-

-

B1−2

PR

4.028

5.53E-7

0.0125

 

Basin-Size

3.417

1.19E-4

0.0167

 

PR+PC

3.139

8.99E-4

0.025

 

Basin-Size+Energy

3.028

0.002

0.05

 

ML-Select

1.389

-

-

B1−3

PR

3.833

7.47E-6

0.0125

 

Basin-Size

3.444

1.83E-4

0.0167

 

PR+PC

3.306

5.04E-4

0.025

 

Basin-Size+Energy

2.944

0.005

0.05

 

ML-Select

1.472

-

-

  1. The best method is marked with an asterisk (*), while the boldface presents the significance of the respective method when compared with the best method