Skip to main content

Table 3 Results on PharmaCoNER Corpus

From: Improving deep learning method for biomedical named entity recognition by using entity definition information

Models

Features

Precision

Recall

F1-score

Xiong et al. [44]

Yes

0.9123

0.9088

0.9105

Stoeckel et al. [47]

No

0.9079

0.9030

0.9052

Sun et al. (2019) [48]

No

0.9046

0.8806

0.8924

Lange et al. [49]

Yes

0.8895

0.8827

0.8861

Hakala et al. [50]

No

0.8758

0.8719

0.8738

Lahuerta et al. [51]

No

0.9022

0.8366

0.8682

Sohrab et al. [52]

Yes

0.8688

0.8665

0.8676

MRC_rule

0.915

0.9055

0.9109

MRC_guideline

0.9225

0.9050

0.9137*

SOne (w/o entity definition)

0.9158

0.8974

0.9065

SOne_rule

0.9153

0.9088

0.912

SOne_guideline

0.9135

0.9121

0.9128

SOne_w2v

0.9167

0.9023

0.9094

  1. The method with the highest F-score among all methods is highlighted in bold
  2. * Compared with the model without any feature, this is a significant improvement (t-test < 0.05)