| | | MCC | TPR | FDR | PPV | BalAcc |
---|
DUP + DEL | Full | MC | 0.18 | 0.34 | 0.90 | 0.10 | 0.67 |
ED | 0.26 | 0.36 | 0.81 | 0.19 | 0.68 |
Sub | MC | 0.49 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.69 | 0.67 |
ED | 0.48 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.62 | 0.69 |
DUP | Full | MC | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.67 | 0.62 |
ED | 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.62 |
Sub | MC | 0.40 | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.67 | 0.62 |
ED | 0.38 | 0.27 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.63 |
DEL | Full | MC | 0.18 | 0.64 | 0.95 | 0.05 | 0.82 |
ED | 0.22 | 0.56 | 0.91 | 0.09 | 0.78 |
Sub | MC | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.29 | 0.71 | 0.83 |
ED | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.47 | 0.53 | 0.78 |
- Calls are subdivided by duplications (DUP) and deletions (DEL). ‘Full’ gives performance across the full pool; ‘Sub’ gives the performance excluding the poorly correlated samples NCG_00790 and NCG_00851 (gray rows). ‘MCC’ is Matthew’s correlation coefficient, ‘TPR’ is true positive rate/sensitivity, ‘FDR’ is false discovery rate, ‘PPV’ is positive predictive value, ‘BalAcc’ is balanced accuracy. Exons with any overlap of the repetitive and low-complexity regions, as defined in the Trost et al. manuscript, omitted from analysis