Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 5

From: EvalDNA: a machine learning-based tool for the comprehensive evaluation of mammalian genome assembly quality

Fig. 5

Comparison of quality evaluation methods on Chinese hamster genome assemblies. A Comparison of the EvalDNA ranking of the multiple CH genome assemblies to a manual ranking, and rankings from ALE and FRCbam. The highest quality assembly is given a rank of 1. B EvalDNA and ALE scores for the CH assemblies as well as the rankings from Rupp et al. and FRCbam were normalized (scaled to be between [0, 1]). FRCbam normalized scores were derived using the x-value (feature threshold) where the y-value (percent approximate coverage) was maximum for each FRCbam curve

Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us