Fig. 5
![Fig. 5](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12859-021-04480-2/MediaObjects/12859_2021_4480_Fig5_HTML.png)
Comparison of quality evaluation methods on Chinese hamster genome assemblies. A Comparison of the EvalDNA ranking of the multiple CH genome assemblies to a manual ranking, and rankings from ALE and FRCbam. The highest quality assembly is given a rank of 1. B EvalDNA and ALE scores for the CH assemblies as well as the rankings from Rupp et al. and FRCbam were normalized (scaled to be between [0, 1]). FRCbam normalized scores were derived using the x-value (feature threshold) where the y-value (percent approximate coverage) was maximum for each FRCbam curve