Peer Review reports
From: Machine learning and statistics shape a novel path in archaeal promoter annotation
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
16 Dec 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 Jan 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
9 Jan 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
20 Jan 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Scheila Avila e Silva |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
20 Jan 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
3 Feb 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Scheila Avila e Silva |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
3 Feb 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Feb 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Scheila Avila e Silva |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
21 Feb 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
3 Apr 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
11 Apr 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Scheila Avila e Silva |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
11 Apr 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
12 Apr 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Scheila Avila e Silva |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
12 Apr 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
13 Apr 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Scheila Avila e Silva |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
13 Apr 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
3 May 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Publishing | ||
5 May 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
10 May 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12859-022-04714-x |
You can find further information about peer review here.