Table 11 The comparing results (%) of different methods on the LISC, BCCD, and Raabin test sets
Dataset | Model | OA | AP | AR | AF1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LISC | ResNet [45] | 93.88 | 95.48 | 92.50 | 92.98 |
DenseNet [46] | 97.96 | 98.33 | 97.50 | 97.80 | |
Inception v3 [54] | 75.51 | 74.88 | 74.57 | 73.74 | |
Jiang [55] | 97.96 | 98.46 | 97.50 | 97.87 | |
Sharma [56] | 95.92 | 96.79 | 95.00 | 95.47 | |
Our model | 97.96 | 98.33 | 97.50 | 97.80 | |
BCCD | ResNet [45] | 84.71 | 87.06 | 84.73 | 85.15 |
DenseNet [46] | 87.14 | 89.36 | 87.16 | 87.48 | |
Inception v3 [54] | 62.80 | 67.71 | 62.79 | 63.52 | |
Jiang [55] | 86.77 | 89.28 | 86.79 | 87.10 | |
Sharma [56] | 87.02 | 89.15 | 87.03 | 87.31 | |
Our model | 88.44 | 90.84 | 88.45 | 88.73 | |
Raabin | ResNet [45] | 96.36 | 92.87 | 96.15 | 94.28 |
DenseNet [46] | 97.12 | 94.02 | 97.07 | 95.42 | |
Inception v3 [54] | 89.56 | 78.39 | 88.31 | 82.47 | |
Jiang [55] | 96.13 | 91.69 | 97.00 | 93.97 | |
Sharma [56] | 95.99 | 92.62 | 95.08 | 93.50 | |
Our model | 98.71 | 97.18 | 98.42 | 97.78 |