Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of KluDo’s performance with that of four automatic methods over ASTRAL40 separated by the number of domains

From: Assignment of structural domains in proteins using diffusion kernels on graphs

 

1-domain

2-domain

3-domain

4-domain

Total

SCOP

CATH

SCOP

CATH

SCOP

CATH

SCOP

CATH

KluDo (LED, KK)

91.1

92.4

70.3

78.1

44.7

48.2

16.5

27.7

84.0

KluDo (LED, SP)

91.1

93.2

66.9

76.4

51.1

52.1

39.6

41.1

84.7

DomainParser

93.1

94.7

76.4

75.3

76.8

56.9

38.9

35.1

85.5

PDP

85.8

89.3

78.4

74.4

76.4

57.8

58.3

47.0

82.1

DDomain

95.0

96.2

72.1

69.1

69.3

50.7

47.2

43.6

84.7

SWORD

90.1

93.1

74.9

71.6

73.9

53.1

50.7

35.1

83.2

  1. KluDo’s accuracy in the case of using the LED kernel with the two clustering methods is compared against four automated methods over ASTRAL40 based on the OL score (considering an 85% boundary consistency threshold). The results are presented both overall and separated by the number of domains according to both SCOP and CATH. The maximum accuracy in each column is depicted in bold. KK and SP stand for kernel k-means and spectral clustering, respectively