Skip to main content

Table 1 Evaluation results in K562 cells, based on annotated protein-coding gene TSSs. From left to right, the number of total positive predictions of each algorithm is shown, the number of TPs and FPs in both CAGE- and gene-oriented benchmarks as well as the performance in terms of precision and sensitivity on default parameters

From: DeepTSS: multi-branch convolutional neural network for transcription start site identification from CAGE data

Algorithm

Total positive predictions

All predictions in query zone

Gene − oriented set of predictions

Protein-coding TSS annotation

TP

FP

TP

FP

Precision

Sensitivity

DeepTSS

31,443

6398

123

3122

91

0.98

0.96

ADAPT-CAGE

31,177

6294

172

3091

125

0.97

0.94

CAGER

14,465

6489

1771

3102

1003

0.97

0.78

PARACLU

9453

4016

129

2258

95

0.97

0.60

RECLU

11,558

6257

1649

3082

970

0.93

0.79

TOMETOOLS

30,689

5765

228

3016

174

0.96

0.86

iTiSS

1734

98

37

118

40

0.72

0.01