Peer Review reports
From: BoostMEC: predicting CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage efficiency through boosting models
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 Apr 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 15 Jun 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 30 Jun 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 9 Jul 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 5 Sep 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Ji-Ping Wang |
| 8 Sep 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Ji-Ping Wang |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 5 Sep 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 10 Sep 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Ji-Ping Wang |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 10 Sep 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 30 Sep 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 6 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 8 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Ji-Ping Wang |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 14 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 18 Oct 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 21 Oct 2022 | Editorially accepted | |
| 26 Oct 2022 | Article published | 10.1186/s12859-022-04998-z |
You can find further information about peer review here.