Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison with the literature

From: ENTAIL: yEt aNoTher amyloid fIbrils cLassifier

Methods

ACC (%)

SP (%)

SN (%)

MCC

AUC

Type of dataset

Pafig

81

80

82

0.63

–

balanced

PredAmyl-MLP

91.59

95.00

83.6

0.798

–

Unbalanced

ReRF-Pred

80.10

83.1

73.4

0.552

–

Unbalanced

RFAmyloid

89.19

92.7

78.10

0.739

–

Unbalanced

AmyloGram

–

79

86.5

0.63

0.90

Unbalanced

Budapest Amyloid Predictor

73–86

–

–

–

0.89

Unbalanced

ENTAIL (test set)

81.80

63.63

100

0.683

0.83

Balanced