Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of statistical measures of CTF and other methods on the DIP dataset

From: Identification of essential proteins based on edge features and the fusion of multiple-source biological information

 

SN

SP

PPV

NPV

F

ACC

BC

0.3710

0.7860

0.3401

0.8079

0.3549

0.6909

NC

0.4670

0.8146

0.4281

0.8372

0.4467

0.7349

CoEWC

0.4653

0.8141

0.4266

0.8366

0.4451

0.7341

PeC

0.4225

0.8013

0.3873

0.8236

0.4041

0.7145

WDC

0.4893

0.8212

0.4485

0.8440

0.4680

0.7451

ION

0.5441

0.8372

0.4984

0.8607

0.5203

0.7701

LAC

0.4739

0.8164

0.4341

0.8392

0.4531

0.7379

LBCC

0.2464

0.7382

0.2160

0.7699

0.2302

0.6065

TEO

0.4919

0.8220

0.4509

0.8448

0.4705

0.7463

esPOS

0.5064

0.8260

0.4639

0.8492

0.4842

0.7528

TEGS

0.5176

0.8296

0.4745

0.8526

0.4951

0.7581

JDC

0.4859

0.8199

0.4451

0.8429

0.4646

0.7434

DSN

0.5287

0.8327

0.4843

0.8560

0.5055

0.7630

MON

0.5433

0.8370

0.4976

0.8604

0.5195

0.7697

CTF

0.5458

0.8609

0.5385

0.8645

0.5421

0.7887

  1. Bold values indicate the best reults in contrast experiments