Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Rescuing biologically relevant consensus regions across replicated samples

Original Submission
9 Jun 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
3 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
4 Jul 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maxwell W. Libbrecht
3 Aug 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
24 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Oct 2022 Author responded Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Oct 2022 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maxwell W. Libbrecht
11 Nov 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
1 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
27 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Jan 2023 Author responded Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona
Resubmission - Version 5
31 Jan 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
13 Feb 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maxwell W. Libbrecht
1 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
5 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona
Resubmission - Version 6
5 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
7 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona
Resubmission - Version 7
7 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
16 May 2023 Editorially accepted
7 Jun 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12859-023-05340-x

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page