Peer Review reports
From: Rescuing biologically relevant consensus regions across replicated samples
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
9 Jun 2022 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
3 Jul 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
4 Jul 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maxwell W. Libbrecht |
3 Aug 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
24 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
24 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Oct 2022 | Author responded | Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
28 Oct 2022 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
8 Nov 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maxwell W. Libbrecht |
11 Nov 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
1 Dec 2022 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
27 Jan 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Jan 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
31 Jan 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
31 Jan 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
13 Feb 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Maxwell W. Libbrecht |
1 Mar 2023 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
5 Apr 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
5 Apr 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
7 Apr 2023 | Author responded | Author comments - Marzia Angela Cremona |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
7 Apr 2023 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
16 May 2023 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Jun 2023 | Article published | 10.1186/s12859-023-05340-x |
You can find further information about peer review here.