Table 1 Table of comparison between Iggy and MajS for two benchmarks
From: Predicting weighted unobserved nodes in a regulatory network using answer set programming
Benchmark 1 | Benchmark 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
MajS | Iggy | MajS | Iggy | |
Predicted nodes | 51 | 30 | 56 | 56 |
Coverage of predicted nodes | 100.0 % | 59.00 % | 100.0 % | 100.0 % |
Number of predicted nodes: common VS different | 22 VS 8 | 48 VS 8 | ||