Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison results of the segmentation of infected regions on our internal (50 cases) and external (19 cases) benchmarks

From: Automatically transferring supervised targets method for segmenting lung lesion regions with CT imaging

Method

#Pseudolabel

Tested with 50 benchmark

Tested with external 19 benchmark

DSC (%)

95HD

(voxel)

DSC (%)

95HD (voxel)

U-Net

0

70.02 ± 20.59

29.97 ± 46.38

69.30 ± 12.29

25.29 ± 25.31

100 (1:0.5)

68.29 ± 23.23

30.29 ± 45.65

68.22 ± 13.82

25.98 ± 27.72

200 (1:1)

67.87 ± 23.88

31.14 ± 45.12

63.51 ± 12.01

26.85 ± 28.10

400 (1:2)

64.16 ± 25.12

33.64 ± 37.32

60.23 ± 15.62

28.33 ± 29.52

600 (1:3)

59.47 ± 26.89

34.55 ± 45.65

58.40 ± 15.47

30.49 ± 28.73

UA-MT

100 (1:0.5)

76.71 ± 22.78

30.32 ± 35.54

73.69 ± 14.51

16.43 ± 18.89

200 (1:1)

77.02 ± 19.99

29.12 ± 34.28

75.15 ± 11.34

15.67 ± 16.74

400 (1:2)

78.36 ± 20.31

27.76 ± 36.57

76.10 ± 10.09

13.40 ± 14.23

600 (1:3)

78.22 ± 19.69

28.31 ± 35.92

76.27 ± 10.21

12.87 ± 13.17

DAST

100 (1:0.5)

79.28 ± 15.72

17.23 ± 18.19

76.45 ± 12.36

14.35 ± 16.81

200 (1:1)

80.19 ± 13.96

15.82 ± 16.29

78.60 ± 11.62

13.21 ± 15.54

400 (1:2)

80.41 ± 14.20

15.60 ± 17.83

79.72 ± 11.73

15.43 ± 13.39

600 (1:3)

81.54 ± 13.58

14.68 ± 15.36

80.54 ± 10.54

16.69 ± 14.28

ATST

100 (1:0.5)

79.34 ± 13.58

15.81 ± 30.78

79.45 ± 10.07

11.35 ± 10.92

200 (1:1)

82.46 ± 14.07

14.41 ± 26.18

80.60 ± 9.33

13.21 ± 9.14

400 (1:2)

83.56 ± 12.10

11.19 ± 16.41

82.67 ± 8.04

12.69 ± 11.14

600 (1:3)

82.82 ± 13.38

12.85 ± 20.29

81.72 ± 9.29

13.43 ± 11.72

  1. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. The default # of manual annotated samples is 200. Bold font indicated the best results obtained for each algorithm