Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 4

From: CrMP-Sol database: classification, bioinformatic analyses and comparison of cancer-related membrane proteins and their water-soluble variant designs

Fig. 4

The pairwise hydrophobic surface patch (brown) predictions of 5 cancer-related membrane proteins with their water-soluble QTY variants. For clarity, both extracellular and intracellular regions are removed. The native proteins are on top (A–D). A MGAT3 (top) versus MGAT3QTY (bottom), B GPR35 (top) versus GPR35QTY (bottom), C GPR37 (top) versus GPR37QTY (bottom), D SLC10A1 (top) versus SLC10A1QTY (bottom), and E NPC1L1 (left) versus NPC1L1QTY (right). F Global RH–HƳ distribution of the 1309 QTY designs for all cancer-related membrane proteins in the database. The RH indicates the content of α-helices in a protein. The hydrophobicity (HƳ) was calculated using the ProPAS and used for evaluating the water solubility of a protein. The Tm index shown in color gradient was calculated using a sequence-based method, which qualitatively represents the stability of a protein. The original membrane proteins are denoted by circles, and the QTY-designed variants are denoted by diamonds. The thin black line shows the corresponding relationship between the original protein and its variant

Back to article page