Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | BMC Bioinformatics

Fig. 1

From: Reply: Correspondence on NanoVar’s performance outlined by Jiang T. et al. in ‘Long-read sequencing settings for efficient structural variation detection based on comprehensive evaluation’

Fig. 1

Benchmarking of the SV callers using 5× simulated datasets generated from different versions of VISOR. The F1-scores, precision, and recall for each SV caller were evaluated on four different datasets: A from our previous paper, B regenerated from VISOR v1.0, C from C.Y.T. et al., and D regenerated from VISOR v1.1. Additionally, we also evaluated the F1-scores, precision, and recall of two versions of Sniffles v1.0.12 on the data of Exp2 to Exp4, which are presented in (E to G)

Back to article page