Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison with the state-of-the-art methods

From: DGDTA: dynamic graph attention network for predicting drug–target binding affinity

Dataset

Methods

CI

MSE

\({\textbf{r}}_{\textbf{m}}^{2}\)

Davis

DeepDTA [8]

0.878

0.261

0.631

 

DeepCDA [35]

0.891

0.248

0.652

 

MATT-DTI [34]

0.890

0.229

0.688

 

GraphDTA(GAT) [26]

0.892

0.232

0.689

 

GraphDTA(GAT-GCN) [26]

0.881

0.245

0.667

 

CPInformer [6]

0.874

0.277

0.621

 

DeepGLSTM [33]

0.893

0.236

0.679

 

DGDTA-CL (ours)

0.889

0.237

0.672

 

DGDTA-AL (ours)

0.899*

0.225

0.707

KIBA

DeepDTA [8]

0.863

0.194

0.673

 

DeepCDA [35]

0.889

0.176

0.682

 

MATT-DTI [34]

0.889

0.150

0.762

 

GraphDTA(GAT) [26]

0.866

0.179

0.738

 

GraphDTA(GAT-GCN) [26]

0.891

0.139

0.789

 

CPInformer [6]

0.867

0.183

0.678

 

DeepGLSTM [33]

0.890

0.143

0.789

 

DGDTA-AL (ours)

0.881

0.162

0.762

 

DGDTA-CL (ours)

0.902

0.125

0.809

  1. *Bold values represent the best result