Table 11 For each read and its counterpart, we find the number of unique candidate positions found for given seeds and the number of positions having the maximum number of matches with the read
\(S_1\) | \(\overline{S_3}\) | \(N_2\) | \(N_3\) | \(N_4\) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percentage of reads having at least given number of matches | |||||
95 | 96.49413 | 96.55955 | 95.88331 | 96.41693 | 96.54956 |
96 | 96.23315 | 96.26387 | 95.77562 | 96.20613 | 96.26404 |
97 | 95.81032 | 95.81777 | 95.56522 | 95.81777 | 95.81777 |
98 | 94.98875 | 94.98875 | 94.98875 | 94.98875 | 94.98875 |
99 | 92.66636 | 92.66636 | 92.66636 | 92.66636 | 92.66636 |
100 | 81.17036 | 81.17036 | 81.17036 | 81.17036 | 81.17036 |
Total number of positions having the maximum number of matches | |||||
95 | 24,673 | 30,124 | 5,743 | 18,078 | 29,184 |
96 | 88,548 | 95,152 | 28,715 | 76,571 | 96,154 |
97 | 271,116 | 272,204 | 165,624 | 272,204 | 272,204 |
98 | 1,072,182 | 1,072,182 | 1,072,182 | 1,072,182 | 1,072,182 |
99 | 6,505,597 | 6,505,597 | 6,505,597 | 6,505,597 | 6,505,597 |
100 | 52,432,760 | 52,432,760 | 52,432,760 | 52,432,760 | 52,432,760 |
Total number of candidate positions to be checked | |||||
95 | 2,999,321 | 7,694,425 | 62,080 | 534,856 | 5,075,260 |
96 | 6,484,344 | 15,560,907 | 183,070 | 1,785,944 | 10,215,791 |
97 | 16,738,989 | 35,342,085 | 975,884 | 6,106,930 | 23,375,078 |
98 | 49,957,296 | 94,777,228 | 6,591,836 | 22,966,268 | 66,288,831 |
99 | 206,562,418 | 374,668,653 | 42,466,387 | 101,753,217 | 268,804,889 |
100 | 1,140,090,415 | 1,980,598,089 | 306,980,283 | 593,471,736 | 1,467,713,805 |
Averaged ratio of candidate positions to best positions | |||||
95 | 334.88 | 790.87 | 10.37 | 50.87 | 535.79 |
96 | 414.02 | 1039.40 | 7.57 | 100.63 | 677.69 |
97 | 493.92 | 1164.11 | 14.72 | 115.13 | 744.46 |
98 | 486.19 | 1087.47 | 22.87 | 137.82 | 704.10 |
99 | 465.90 | 1001.87 | 31.37 | 140.65 | 662.25 |
100 | 412.66 | 848.60 | 38.46 | 137.69 | 575.35 |