Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of IBS cluster analysis articles

From: Subtyping irritable bowel syndrome using cluster analysis: a systematic review

Study, year [reference]

Study design

Population

Diagnostic criteria

Variables

Data collection

Black et al. 2021 [59]

Cross-sectional (two groups of patients)

1375 IBS patients: mean age, 49.2 (18–86); 1157 females (84.1%); 1080 met ROME III; 811 met ROME IV

ROME III or ROME IV

Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, mood, extraintestinal symptoms, GI symptom-specific anxiety, stress

IBS-SSS, PHQ-12, HADS-A, HADS-D, CPSS, VSI

Han et al. 2019 [60]

Cross-sectional (two groups)

332 IBS patients aged 18–70 (283 females, 85.2%), 224 patients in group 1 mean age 43.4 (193 females, 86.2%) 108 patients in group 2 mean age 39.7 (90 females, 83.3%

ROME II in group 1 ROME III in group 2

Daily diary of GI and non-GI symptoms, cognitive beliefs, QoL

26-item daily diary, CSFBD, 42-item IBS QoL scale

Lackner et al. 2013 [61]

Cross-sectional (1 group)

98 IBS patients mean-aged 46.7 (female 88%)

ROME II

GI symptoms, QoL

IBS-SSS, UCLA-SSS

Nevé et al. 2013 [63]

Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT)

43 IBS patients aged 18–71(35 female), 29 healthy controls aged 22–62 (20 female)

ROME III

GI symptoms, psychological symptoms, exhaled H2 and CH4

GSRS, HAD, QuinTron Breath Tracker (measure exhaled H2 and CH4)

Eslick et al. 2004 [42]

Cross-sectional

897 patients: mean aged, 44; 577 females (64%); 212 IBS patients (24.5%)

Diagnose by the physicians

GI symptoms

BDQ

Guthrie et al. 2003 [51]

Prospective cohort study (2 groups)

107 IBS patients aged 18–65 (88 females, 82%) and 23 healthy controls aged 20–45 (17 females)

ROME I

Bowel symptoms, psychological assessments, QoL, physiological assessments

BDQ, 11-items Lickert Scale, SCAN, SCL-90-R, a validated screening questionnaire developed by Leserman and colleagues, IIP-32, SF-36, well-lubricated tube for sensory response to rectal distention

Ragnarsson et al. 1999 [52]

Prospective cohort (2 groups)

2 samples

Sample 1: 63 IBS patients aged 17–74 (40 females,23 male)

Sample 2: 52 IBS patients aged 19–76 (39 females, 13 males)

ROME I

Bowel habits, pain, and, bloating

Daily records of their symptoms for 6 weeks in sample 1 and a week in sample 2

Howard Mertz et al. 1995 [57]

Prospective cohort study (2 groups)

100 IBS patients mean aged 44 (22–88), 69 females

15 healthy controls mean aged 37 (28–50), 7 females

ROME criteria

Anorectal sensory, motor function, GI, and psychological symptoms

The volume-displacement device, anorectal manometry, BDQ, SCL-90

Ragnarsson et al. 1999 [53]

Prospective cohort study

52 IBS patients aged 19–76

Confirmed the diagnosis by gastroenterologist and ROME criteria

Anal sphincter function, anal canal motility, the sensory function of the rectum, RAIR, rectal reservoir function, and rectal motility. GI symptoms, pain, and distention

1-week diary record card, pre and postprandial anorectal manovolumetry

Bouchoucha et al. 1999 [54]

Prospective cohort Study (2 groups)

60 IBS patients aged 21–72 (4 males, 7%)

20 healthy control females aged 22–65

ROME criteria

Anal pressure waves in rest and distention state

Standard manometry

Bouchoucha et al. 2006 [55]

Prospective cohort study (2 groups)

(148 healthy controls and 1385 IBS patients)

ROME II

Colon Transit Time (CTT)

CTT by Prodimed Le Plessis-Bouchard

Bennet et al. 2018 [62]

Cross-sectional (2 groups)

246 IBS patients mean-aged 33 (25–45) (77.2% female), 21 healthy control mean-aged 30 (26.5–43.5) (100% female)

ROME II

Systemic cytokines level, colonic sensory and motility testing, individual assessment questionnaire

High sensitivity multiplex assays, a combined mano-reentry and a barostat, IBS-SSS, IBS QoL, comorbid conditions, brief symptom inventory

Johanna Sundin et al. 2019 [56]

Prospective cohort (2 groups)

43 IBS patients aged 25–44, 20 healthy controls aged 24–38

ROME III

Visceral sensitivity, IgE levels, IBS symptoms, mood, mast cell microscopy and quantification, fecal protease activity assay, mucosal gene expression analysis

Immunoassay, dual drive barostat, IBS_SSS, GSRS-IBS, HADS, VSI, immuno-fluorescence, quantitative reverse transcription PCR

Ian et al. 2014 [58]

Prospective cohort study (2 groups)

37 patients: mean age, 37; 26 females

20 healthy controls (matched age and gender)

ROME II

Microbial composition, GI and psychological symptoms, QoL, rectal sensitivity test, and, CTT

Bioinformatics processes, HADS, GSRS-IBS, SF_36, BSFS, rectal barostat, radio-opaque markers

  1. IBS-SSS irritable bowel syndrome severity scale score, PHQ-12 patient health questionnaire-12, HADS-A hospital anxiety and depression scale- anxiety, HADS-D hospital anxiety and depression scale-depression, CPSS cohen perceived stress scale, VSI visceral sensitivity index, GSRS gastrointestinal symptoms rating scale, UCLA-SSS global severity of GI symptoms scale, CSFBD cognitive scale for functional bowel disorders, SCAN schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry, SCL-90-R symptom check-list-90-R, IIP-32 inventory of interpersonal problems-32 items, SF-36 the 36 item short form survey, BDQ bowel disease questionnaire, RAIR recto anal inhibitory reflex