Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodology of IBS cluster analysis articles

From: Subtyping irritable bowel syndrome using cluster analysis: a systematic review

Study, year [reference]

Preprocessing methods

Determination of clusters number

Clustering algorithms

Validation

Interpretation of results

Black et al. 2021 [59]

T-test and partially overlapping z-test

Bayesian information criterion of the log-likelihood (BIC(LL))

Latent class analysis

tenfold cross-validation

χ2 test, ANOVA

Han et al. 2019 [60]

EFA using the principal component method

likelihood‐based criteria and model entropy

Latent class analysis

NR

Χ2 test, ANOVA

R2 and Cohen’s d

Lackner et al. 2013 [61]

Simple linear transformation, CFA based on maximum likelihood methods, EFA based on principal components extraction

Successive solutions that increment the value of k by 1

K-means cluster analysis

Exploratory cluster analysis

Squared semi-partial correlation

Nevé et al. 2013 [63]

PFA

A natural break in distance jumps

Ascending hierarchical cluster analysis

Silhouette coefficient

ANOVA, correlation matrix, and scatterplots

Eslick et al. 2004 [42]

Factor analysis, PCA, varimax rotation

Euclidian distance

K-means cluster analysis

NR

Describing a cluster profile that comprised the mean score per factor per cluster and, no cluster could be made up of less than 5% of the entire sample

Guthrie et al. 2003 [51]

NR

Euclidian distance

K-means cluster analysis

Bonferroni corrected pairwise comparisons

ANOVA or × 2 tests, Pearson correlation coefficients

Ragnarsson et al. 1999 [52]

Transformed, to have a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1

Euclidian distance

K-means cluster analysis

NR

Mann–Whitney and Kruskal– Wallis tests,

ANOVA

Howard Mertz et al. 1995 [57]

unpaired Student's t-test, standardized

Pseudo f statistic

K-means cluster analysis

NR

Pearson r correlation coefficient, χ2 analysis

Ragnarsson et al. 1999 [53]

Transformed, to have a mean of 0 and standard deviation of 1

Squared Euclidian distance

K-means cluster analysis

NR

Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis tests, ANOVA, Wilcoxon signed-rank test

Bouchoucha et al. 1999 [54]

Normalized by subtracting the pressure of the first measured point from the measured values in each experiment

NR

K-mean cluster analysis

NR

Mann–Whitney test, Wilcoxon signed rank test., correlation coefficient used spearman r

Bouchoucha et al. 2006 [55]

NR

Pseudo-f statistic

K-means cluster analysis

NR

Chi-square test, GLM, ANOVA

Bennet et al. 2018 [62]

NR

NR

Hierarchical cluster analysis

Q2

Mann–Whitney u test, Kruskal Wallis followed by Dunn’s test, hoteling’s T2, OPLS-DA, PCA, Non-parametric spearman’s rank coefficient

Johanna Sundin et al. 2019 [56]

NR

NR

Hierarchical cluster analysis

Cross-validation by Q2 parameter

OPLS‐ DA, Mann‐Whitney, and Kruskal‐Wallis followed by Dunn's test, Hoteling’s T2

Ian et al. 2014 [58]

Normalized by scaling to an intensity of 1 to control for differing numbers of reads

NR

Unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis

NR

Pearson correlation coefficient test, Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney test, Blast method, PMANOVA

  1. EFA exploratory factor analysis, GLM generalized linear model, OPLS-DA orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis, ANOVA one-way analysis of variance, CFA confirmatory factor analysis, PFA principle factor analysis, PCA principle component analysis