Skip to main content

Table 3 Predictive accuracy through the comparison of predicted fluxes and measured fluxes in four conditions (DataS1) for both the DC and AC model

From: ICON-GEMs: integration of co-expression network in genome-scale metabolic models, shedding light through systems biology

Conditions

Predictive accuracy

DC model

AC model

E-flux

E-flux2

ICON-GEMs

E-flux

E-flux2

ICON-GEMs

0 mM

0.9266

0.9643

0.9074

0.4093

0.4509

0.5666

100 mM

0.9508

0.9825

0.9850

0.4219

0.6141

0.5857

200 mM

0.5979

0.8807

0.9872

0.4123

0.4554

0.9417

300 mM

0.9763

0.9763

0.9959

0.4231

0.4244

0.4149

Mean

0.8629

0.9522

0.9689

0.4167

0.4862

0.6272

Standard Deviation

0.1539

0.0421

0.0357

0.0059

0.0748

0.2715

  1. The bold numbers indicate the highest predictive accuracy values for each condition
  2. These conditions correspond to different concentrations of acetoin in S. cerevisiae; specifically, at 0 mM (as reference (RF)), 100 mM, 200 mM, and 300 mM