Skip to main content

Table 7 Results of the proposed model on different combinations of omics and networks at 500 genes using the TCGA pan-cancer dataset

From: A multimodal graph neural network framework for cancer molecular subtype classification

Data

Network

GAT

GCN

Accu.e

F1

Accu.e

F1

mRNAa

Intra-omicc

77.0% ± 1.9%

0.75 ± 0.03

76.1% ± 0.9%

0.73 ± 0.01

miRNAb

Intra-omicd

74.0% ± 0.4%

0.70 ± 0.01

68.2% ± 4.1%

0.63 ± 0.04

mRNA+CNVa

Intra-omicc

79.1% ± 1.4%

0.77 ± 0.03

77.1% ± 0.7%

0.76 ± 0.01

mRNA+miRNA

Inter-omic

76.1% ± 1.6%

0.73 ± 0.03

75.4% ± 0.7%

0.73 ± 0.01

Intra-omic

77.3% ± 1.6%

0.75 ± 0.03

76.8% ± 0.7%

0.74 ± 0.01

mRNA+CNV+miRNA

Inter-omic

80.3% ± 1.6%

0.80 ± 0.02

77.4% ± 0.6%

0.74 ± 0.01

Intra-omic

80.5% ± 1.2%

0.80 ± 0.02

78.2% ± 0.6%

0.75 ± 0.01

  1. The bold font indicates the highest values and the values after ± sign are the standard deviations.
  2. aData contains no miRNA-based nodes, so only 500 gene nodes in the graph
  3. bData contains no gene-based nodes, so only 100 miRNA nodes in the graph
  4. cThe graph contains only gene-gene connections
  5. dThe graph contains only miRNA-miRNA meta-path connections
  6. eAccu. stands for accuracy