Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance of binary classification for the subtypes of breast cancer

From: Classifying breast cancer subtypes on multi-omics data via sparse canonical correlation analysis and deep learning

Breast Cancer Subtypes

Ensemble RF

Ensemble EN

Concate RF

Concate EN

DIABLO

SMPSL

DeepMo

DSCCN

Accuracy

Basal vs Her2

0.826

0.870

0.826

0.782

0.857

0.913

0.912

0.926

Basal vs LumA

0.946

0.959

0.946

0.919

0.911

0.959

0.941

0.982

Basal vs LumB

0.923

0.929

0.952

0.952

0.935

0.786

0.948

0.965

Her2 vs LumA

0.905

0.921

0.921

0.952

0.920

0.825

0.910

0.951

Her2 vs LumB

0.839

0.839

0.839

0.839

0.864

0.774

0.908

0.926

LumA vs LumB

0.756

0.732

0.829

0.841

0.814

0.732

0.783

0.844

AUC

Basal vs Her2

0.795

0.921

0.779

0.772

0.812

0.909

0.989

0.982

Basal vs LumA

0.889

0.929

0.907

0.857

0.850

0.850

0.939

0.997

Basal vs LumB

0.921

0.929

0.952

0.950

0.811

0.735

0.978

0.997

Her2 vs LumA

0.625

0.688

0.643

0.700

0.620

0.775

0.983

0.948

Her2 vs LumB

0.643

0.723

0.662

0.770

0.536

0.755

0.938

0.951

LumA vs LumB

0.778

0.695

0.797

0.769

0.670

0.751

0.838

0.857

F1 score

Basal vs Her2

0.875

0.875

0.875

0.828

0.761

0.929

0.914

0.933

Basal vs LumA

0.875

0.875

0.882

0.833

0.985

0.824

0.927

0.988

Basal vs LumB

0.914

0.914

0.950

0.947

0.987

0.640

0.957

0.974

Her2 vs LumA

0.400

0.400

0.444

0.571

0.983

0.560

0.837

0.973

Her2 vs LumB

0.444

0.444

0.444

0.667

0.914

0.667

0.917

0.956

LumA vs LumB

0.811

0.804

0.875

0.896

0.740

0.784

0.664

0.883

  1. The best results are marked in bold