 Software
 Open Access
 Published:
BioPhysConnectoR: Connecting Sequence Information and Biophysical Models
BMC Bioinformatics volume 11, Article number: 199 (2010)
Abstract
Background
One of the most challenging aspects of biomolecular systems is the understanding of the coevolution in and among the molecule(s).
A complete, theoretical picture of the selective advantage, and thus a functional annotation, of (co)mutations is still lacking. Using sequencebased and information theoretical inspired methods we can identify coevolving residues in proteins without understanding the underlying biophysical properties giving rise to such coevolutionary dynamics. Detailed (atomistic) simulations are prohibitively expensive. At the same time reduced molecular models are an efficient way to determine the reduced dynamics around the native state. The combination of sequence based approaches with such reduced models is therefore a promising approach to annotate evolutionary sequence changes.
Results
With the R package BioPhysConnectoR we provide a framework to connect the information theoretical domain of biomolecular sequences to biophysical properties of the encoded molecules  derived from reduced molecular models. To this end we have integrated several fragmented ideas into one single package ready to be used in connection with additional statistical routines in R. Additionally, the package leverages the power of modern multicore architectures to reduce turnaround times in evolutionary and biomolecular design studies. Our package is a first step to achieve the above mentioned annotation of coevolution by reduced dynamics around the native state of proteins.
Conclusions
BioPhysConnectoR is implemented as an R package and distributed under GPL 2 license. It allows for efficient and perfectly parallelized functional annotation of coevolution found at the sequence level.
Background
One of the biggest challenges in the postgenome era [1] is to understand how proteins evolve, fold, and structurally encode their function. Understanding the underlying coupling of protein sequence evolution and biomechanics is the first step to develop new drugs and annotate molecular evolution in physical space. Exploring the accessible sequence space of a protein provides insights into its evolutionary history and phylogenetic relations. Mutual information (MI), an informationtheoretical approach, is widely used to detect coevolution [2–9] at the sequence level within a protein or among several molecules. Such statistical methods allow highthroughput investigations, but the biophysical/chemical implications of protein sequence changes are not revealed by these methods.
In general a sequence change is fixated in molecular evolution, if it has proven to be useful in the physical realm by benefitial biophysical properties and functions. Interactions between proteins as well as functional aspects of monomers are largely conserved throughout evolution, which implies coevolution among residues. Such coevolution contributes to maintain crucial interactions between these coevolving residues. To explore the physical realm, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and related methods are routinely employed. Their applicability is restricted to just a few mutants due to severe computational demands of MD. To overcome this drawback a number of coarsegrained models have been developed in recent years [10–12]. In contrast to MD simulations, these models allow highthroughput screening of natural and unnatural mutations.
Hamacher [13] developed a protocol to integrate both the information from sequencedriven methods and the mechanical aspects derived by biophysical interaction theories, eventually bridging the gap between statistical bioinformatics and molecular dynamics/biophysics. Connecting both points of view proved to be essential for the construction of molecular interaction networks [12] and helps to understand thermodynamical properties and evolutionary changes [14]. The purpose of BioPhysConnectoR is to provide evolutionary biologists and other bioinformatics researchers with these protocols and allow for future development of new protocols to integrate information space and physical space in a holistic picture of molecular evolution.
Implementation
The BioPhysConnectoR package is an addon package to the statistical software R version 2.8+ [15]. BioPhysConnectoR includes source code from the bio3d [16] package and uses functions from the matrixcalc [17] and the snow [18] package. To address runtime features we integrated native C/C++routines for more complex computational tasks that are callable from within the R environment. We provide lowlevel routines to account for specific tasks as well as highlevel routines to process complete protocols. These can be customized via various arguments. BioPhysConnectoR includes utilities to perform the following tasks:

1.
An alignment given in fasta format can be read and information theoretical measures such as MI and entropy can be computed. It is possible to compute a null model [19] to estimate the statistical relevance of the derived MI values.

2.
It is possible to read a pdb file and compute the Hessian as well as the covariance matrix for a coarsegrained anisotropic network model (ANM) [10, 11], thus computing reduced dynamical properties of the molecule. This is done in the ANM in a harmonic approximation of the full, atomistic potential. The actual computation is performed by a singular value decomposition (SVD). Additionally Bfactors can be extracted from the covariance matrix.

3.
In silico experiments can be performed by changing the underlying protein sequence or "breaking" amino acid contacts for the computation of biophysical properties. For given alignments, the outcome can be combined with the respective MI or joint entropy values.

4.
The selfconsistent pair contact probability (SCPCP) [20] method is included as an additional method to derive Bfactors and further biophysical properties from a coarsegrained approach.

5.
Some additional matrix routines are implemented.
Methods
Informationtheoretical approach
As a measure for coevolution among residues we use MI [2–9], defined as [21]:
where x and y are realizations of the random variables X_{ i }and Y_{ j }drawn from a set , taken from a multiple sequence alignment as columns i and j  resulting in an MI matrix (MI_{ ij }). For proteins we are concerned with the symbol set of the 20 standard amino acids _{ AA }, which can be expanded to include the gap character and an extra character for nonstandard amino acids . The probabilities p_{ i }(x), p_{ j }(y), and p_{ ij }(x, y) are obtained as the relative frequencies of amino acids within the columns of a multiple sequence alignment.
Biophysical approach
Reduced molecular models [10, 11] are obtained by using only a coarsegrained representation of amino acids, such that each amino acid is represented by a bead at the center of its respective C_{ α }atom.
Interactions between amino acids in contact with one another are modeled as harmonic springs, with one spring constant, K, weighting the strength of interactions between adjacent amino acids in the sequence (i and i + 1), and individual "sequencedependent" spring constants, κ_{ ij }, controlling other interactions. The total potential for a protein in any conformation is thus
where s_{i, i+1}is the distance of the C_{ α }atoms at adjacent positions (i.e. covalently attached pairs) at a time point in a test conformation, and is the distance of the same atoms in the native structure. C contains all pairs of residue positions i and j with noncovalent contacts that are within a given cutoff. The amino acidspecific statistical contact potential matrices of Miyazawa and Jernigan (MJ) [22] and Keskin et. al. (KE) [23] were used for the noncovalent spring constants, κ_{ ij }to provide for sequence specificity [11]. Using MJ and KE, the ANM was shown to improve the correspondence to experimental results [11, 12]. Other weighting schemes for amino acids contacts can be provided by the user as arguments to the respective function in BioPhysConnectoR.
For the investigation of the mechanics of the molecule, we construct the Hessian matrix of the potential V. Via SVD we compute the eigenmodes and frequencies to derive the covariance matrix M. The entry reads:
for α, β = x, y, z. The eigenvalues of the Hessian are denoted with λ_{ k }and the respective eigenvectors with . i, j are the indices of the residues.
M includes all mechanodynamical information obtainable by the model in eq. 2. The covariance matrix turns out to be the inverse of the Hessian in this model. Considering three translational and three rotational degrees of freedom, the sum over k leaves out the first six eigenvalues that vanish. Thus we effectively compute the MoorePenrose pseudoinverse [24, 25]. The isotropic Bfactors can directly be derived from this matrix as
Introducing mutations leads to changes in the physical realm and thus to a covariance matrix M^{mut} different from the "wildtype" one M^{wt}. The impact of a specific mutation on the biomechanical behavior of the molecule can be estimated determining the Frobenius norm (FN) of the respective covariance matrices as follows
Such elastic network models were extended to include thermodynamics  including phase transitions indicating folding/unfolding events. The extension we implemented is the SCPCP approximation first proposed by Micheletti et al. [20] and later used by Hamacher et al. [12] to investigate binding free energies of ribosomal subunits. The SCPCP can produce nonharmonic effects beyond properties one usually would expect in simple models. In particular it can show finitesize equivalents of "phase transitions", e.g. protein unfolding.
Results and Discussion
In this section we present an example application of the BioPhysConnectoR package to the HIV1 protease [PDB:1KZK]. The molecule is a homodimer with 99 amino acids in each chain. We show the work flow of the employed protocol in Figure 1. To illustrate the usage of the BioPhysConnectoR routines we provide a code example (see Figure 2) as well. The pdb file serves as input for the computation of the biophysical properties. To gain insight into evolutionary features, we use data provided by Chen et al. [26]. The nucleotide sequences were translated into amino acid sequences. As we are concerned with about 45160 sequences, we do not need to consider finite size effects [19] in the MI results.
The alignment is read and MI values are computed. We then pick those residue pairs with the highest MI values that are noncovalently in contact within the cutoff of 13Å. The pdb is read and the C_{ α }atoms of the first chain are selected. We compute the covariance matrix M^{wt} for this system. Afterwards we "break" the contact for each previously selected amino acid pair (a, b), one at a time, and compute a respective new covariance matrix M^{mut, (a, b)}. The corresponding change in the mechanical behavior can be annotated by the Frobenius norm f (see eq. 5) between these two matrices.
We plotted the MI value of each residue pair (a, b) against the Frobenius norm f^{(a, b)}when breaking this specific contact in Figure 3. The figure shows the separation into four cases as discussed in [13]. We classify entries by the proximity to the four points located at angles 45°, 135°, 225°, 315° respectively. Pairs with low MI values have undergone little coevolution and thus coevolve less than those with higher values. If these pairs show also small FN scores, their contact has no relevant meaning. The low coevolution can be explained by the rather unimportant impact the interaction of such a pair has on the overall molecular dynamics. On the other hand, high FN values indicate large changes in the covariance matrix within the modeling framework we implemented. These changes in the covariance matrix suggest in turn relevant changes in the mechanics of the molecule when "breaking" this specific contact. Details of this protocol can be found in [13]. Note that our protocol allows the annotation of the noncorrelating MIFNvalue pairs: usually one would not expect correlation. Instead one is interested why particular high MI appears for pairings. One out of several biophysical aspects stems from the dynamics of around the native state  computable by BioPhysConnectoR. Additional effects might include e.g. electrostatics or binding partner recognition capabilities.
We tested the efficiency of the code for this particular example using different numbers of cores (see Figure 4) in the parallelization provided by the snow package. Figure 4 suggests efficient parallelization up to 8 cores in accordance with Amdahl's law [27].
Furthermore we determined the temperature factors (or Bfactors), using the ANM and the SCPCP. The results are shown in Figure 5. As can be concluded from this graphic, the ANM detects larger flexible regions than the SCPCP.
Future Trends & Intended Use
R [15] is a widely used and powerful environment for interactive analysis of statistical data in bioinformatics offering lots of additional software packages (e.g. from the Bioconductor [28] software project). We implemented the BioPhysConnectoR package in R to make the routines and underlying concepts accessible to a wide community allowing fast and parallelized networkbased analysis of protein structures. Work is in progress to develop more efficient algorithms to compute covariance matrices for mutated systems and for biomolecular design [29] in the elastic network framework.
Conclusions
In the BioPhysConnectoR package we provide routines to compare an original protein system to subsequently altered ones with mutated amino acid sequences or "broken" noncovalent contacts. Using sequence alignments we are able to score sequence changes and coevolution by the biomechanical ramifications of these changes. We can then use the biophysical modeling to annotate signals of coevolution in the sequence data. We include several options to alter the protocol of [13]: I) parametrization of bonds and contacts can be changed; II) including the wellknown MJ and KE weighting scheme [22, 23]; individual interactions in the structure can be altered; III) details on how to analyze mechanical changes can be modified by computing FNs just for subsets of residues; IV) dynamical and thermodynamical properties can be computed. Changes in the molecular mechanics for different scenarios (including mutations) can then be computed e.g. by the FN of the respective covariance matrices. The evolutionary connection of residues (indicated by high MI values) can be annotated by biophysical properties of the encoded molecule. In addition, a thermodynamical, reduced model is included to correlate the variability of protein sequences and thermodynamical implications. The package can furthermore be combined with state of the art optimization schemes to design molecules [29, 30].
Availability and requirements
Project name: BioPhysConnectoR
Project home page: http://bioserver.bio.tudarmstadt.de/software/BioPhysConnectoR and CRAN at http://cran.rproject.org/
Operating system: crossplatform
Programming language: R and C/C++
Requirements: The R packages snow and matrixcalc are automatically installed from the CRAN repository.
License: GPL 2 license
Any restrictions to use by nonacademics: none
References
 1.
Lengauer T: Bioinformatics: From the Pregenomic to the Postgenomic Era. ERCIM News 2000, 43: 6–7.
 2.
Korber BTM, Farber RM, Wolpert DH, Lapedes AS: Covariation of mutations in the V3 loop of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein: An information theoretic analysis. PNAS 1993, 90: 7176–7180. 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7176
 3.
Pollock DD, Taylor WR, Goldman N: Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J Mol Biol 1999, 287: 187–198. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2601
 4.
Hild KE, Erdogmus D, Principe J: Blind source separation using Renyi's mutual information. Signal Process Lett 2001, 8: 174–176. 10.1109/97.923043
 5.
Pham DT: Blind separation of instantaneous mixture of sources via the Gaussian mutual information criterion. Signal Process 2001, 81: 855–870. 10.1016/S01651684(00)002607
 6.
Boba P, Weil P, Hoffgaard F, Hamacher K: Coevolution in HIV enzymes. BIOINFORMATICS2010 2010, 39–47.
 7.
Ramani AK, Marcotte EM: Exploiting the Coevolution of Interacting Proteins to Discover Interaction Specifity. J Mol Biol 2003, 327: 273–284. 10.1016/S00222836(03)001141
 8.
Almeida LB: Linear and nonlinear ICA based on mutual information. Method Signal Process 2004, 84: 231–245. 10.1016/j.sigpro.2003.10.008
 9.
Gloor GB, Martin LC, Wahl LM, Dunn SD: Mutual Information in Protein Multiple Sequence Alignments Reveals Two Classes of Coevolving Positions. Biochemistry 2005, 44: 7156–7165. 10.1021/bi050293e
 10.
Atilgan A, Durrell S, Jernigan R, Demirel M, Keskin O, Bahar I: Anisotropy of fluctuation dynamics of proteins with an elastic network model. Biophys J 2001, 80: 505–515. 10.1016/S00063495(01)76033X
 11.
Hamacher K, McCammon JA: Computing the Amino Acid Specificity of Fluctuations in Biomolecular Systems. J Chem Theory Comput 2006, 2(3):873–878. 10.1021/ct050247s
 12.
Hamacher K, Trylska J, McCammon JA: Dependency Map of Proteins in the Small Ribosomal Subunit. PLoS Computational Biology 2006, 2: e10. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020010
 13.
Hamacher K: Relating Sequence Evolution of HIV1Protease to Its Underlying Molecular Mechanics. Gene 2008, 422: 30–36. 10.1016/j.gene.2008.06.007
 14.
Hamacher K: Temperature dependence of fluctuations in HIV1protease. Eur Biophys J 2009.
 15.
R Development Core Team:R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; 2008. ISBN 3–900051–07–0 [http://www.Rproject.org] ISBN 3900051070
 16.
Grant BJ, Rodrigues APC, ElSawy KM, McCammon JA, Caves LSD: Bio3d: an R package for the comparative analysis of protein structures. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2006, 22(21):2695–2696. [PMID: 16940322] [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16940322] [PMID: 16940322] 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl461
 17.
Novomestky F:matrixcalc. 2008. [http://cran.rproject.org/]
 18.
Tierney L, Rossini AJ, Li N: Snow: A Parallel Computing Framework for the R System. Int J of Parallel Computing 2009, 37: 78–90. 10.1007/s1076600800772
 19.
Weil P, Hoffgaard F, Hamacher K: Estimating Sufficient Statistics in CoEvolutionary Analysis by Mutual Information. Comp Biol Chem 2009, 33: 440–444. 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2009.10.003
 20.
Micheletti C, Banavar JR, Maritan A: Conformations of Proteins in Equilibrium. Physical Review Letters 2001, 87(8):088102–1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.088102
 21.
MacKay DJC: Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press; 2003.
 22.
Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL: ResidueResidue Potentials with a Favorable Contact Pair Term and an Unfavorable High Packing Density Term, for Simulation and Threading. J Mol Biol 1996, 256: 623–644. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0114
 23.
Keskin O, Bahar I, Badretdinov A, Ptitsyn O, Jernigan R: Empirical solventmediated potentials hold for both intramolecular and intermolecular interresidue interactions. Prot Sci 1998, 7: 2578–2586. 10.1002/pro.5560071211
 24.
Moore EH: Bull Am Math Soc. 1920, 26: 394–395.
 25.
Penrose R: A generalized inverse for matrices. Proc Cambr Philos Soc 1955, 51: 406–413. 10.1017/S0305004100030401
 26.
Chen L, Perlina A, Lee CJ: Positive Selection Detection in 40,000 Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Type 1 Sequences Automatically Identifies Drug Resistance and Positive Fitness Mutations in HIV Protease and Reverse Transcriptase. J Virol 2004, 78(7):3722–3732. 10.1128/JVI.78.7.37223732.2004
 27.
Amdahl G: Validity of the Single Processor Approach to Achieving LargeScale Computing Capabilities. AFIPS Conference Proceedings 1967, 30: 483–485.
 28.
Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JYH, Zhang J: Bioconductor: Open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biology 2004, 5: R80. [http://genomebiology.com/2004/5/10/R80] 10.1186/gb2004510r80
 29.
Hamacher K: Information Theoretical Measures to Analyze Trajectories in Rational Molecular Design. J Comp Chem 2007, 28(16):2576–2580. 10.1002/jcc.20759
 30.
Hamacher K: Adaptive Extremal Optimization by Detrended Fluctuation Analysis. J Comp Phys 2007, 227(2):1500–1509. 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.09.013
 31.
Urbanek S:multicore. 2009. [http://www.rforge.net/multicore]
 32.
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K: VMD  Visual Molecular Dynamics. Journal of Molecular Graphics 1996, 14: 33–38. 10.1016/02637855(96)000185
Acknowledgements
KH was supported by the Fonds der chemischen Industrie through a grant for junior faculty. The authors are grateful to anonymous referees for their suggestions.
Author information
Additional information
Authors' contributions
KH supplied the protocol for connecting sequence information and biophysical properties as well as for computing the SCPCP. The R implementation (including the C/C++ code) was carried out by FH and in parts by PW. All authors participated in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Received
Accepted
Published
DOI
Keywords
 Covariance Matrix
 Mutual Information
 Singular Value Decomposition
 Biophysical Property
 Frobenius Norm