Modelling and visualizing fine-scale linkage disequilibrium structure
- David Edwards^{1}Email author
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-179
© Edwards; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 7 March 2013
Accepted: 29 May 2013
Published: 6 June 2013
Abstract
Background
Detailed study of genetic variation at the population level in humans and other species is now possible due to the availability of large sets of single nucleotide polymorphism data. Alleles at two or more loci are said to be in linkage disequilibrium (LD) when they are correlated or statistically dependent. Current efforts to understand the genetic basis of complex phenotypes are based on the existence of such associations, making study of the extent and distribution of linkage disequilibrium central to this endeavour. The objective of this paper is to develop methods to study fine-scale patterns of allelic association using probabilistic graphical models.
Results
An efficient, linear-time forward-backward algorithm is developed to estimate chromosome-wide LD models by optimizing a penalized likelihood criterion, and a convenient way to display these models is described. To illustrate the methods they are applied to data obtained by genotyping 8341 pigs. It is found that roughly 20% of the porcine genome exhibits complex LD patterns, forming islands of relatively high genetic diversity.
Conclusions
The proposed algorithm is efficient and makes it feasible to estimate and visualize chromosome-wide LD models on a routine basis.
Background
Alleles at two loci are said to be in linkage disequilibrium (LD) when they are correlated or statistically dependent. The term refers to the idea that in a large homogeneous population subject to random mating, recombination between two loci will cause any initial association between them to vanish over time. In observed data, however, non-zero allelic associations are pervasive, particularly at short distances, but also at long distances and even between chromosomes. These associations arise in a complex interplay between processes such as mutation, selection, genetic drift and population admixture, and are broken down by recombination. The patterns of association are of interest, partly because they underpin the relation of genotype to phenotype at the population level, and partly because they reflect population history.
Patterns of LD may be represented in different ways. A common method is to display pairwise measures of LD as triangular heatmaps [1, 2]: in these displays, LD blocks (genomic intervals within which all loci are in high LD) stand out clearly. Early work in the HapMap project led researchers to hypothesize that the human genome consists of a series of disjoint blocks, within which there is high LD, low haplotype diversity and little recombination, and that are punctuated by short regions with high recombination (recombination hotspots) [3-6]. Subsequently various authors [7, 8] reported that genetic variation follows more complex patterns, for which richer models are required.
Discrete graphical models [9] (also known as discrete Markov networks) provide a rich family of statistical models to describe the distribution of multivariate discrete data. They may be represented as undirected graphs in which the nodes represent variables (here, SNPs) and absent edges represent conditional independence relations, in the sense that two variables that are not connected by an edge are conditionally independent given some other variables. To motivate this focus on conditional rather than marginal associations, consider three loci ${s}_{1},\dots {s}_{3}$, and suppose that initially s_{2} is polymorphic and s_{1} and s_{2} monomorphic, so that two haplotypes (1,1,1) and (1,2,1) are initially present. Suppose further that a mutation subsequently occurs at s_{1} in the haplotype (1,1,1), and another at s_{3} in the haplotype (1,2,1), so that the population now contains the four haplotypes (1,1,1), (1,2,1), (2,1,1) and (1,2,2). Observe that in general s_{1} and s_{3} are marginally associated (are in LD), but in the subpopulations corresponding to s_{2}=1 and s_{2}=2 they are unassociated: in other words, they are conditionally independent given s_{2}. More complex mutation histories give rise to more complex patterns of conditional independences that can be represented as graphical models [8].
Other authors have used graphical models for the joint distributions of allele frequencies. Usually, in high-dimensional applications, attention is restricted to a tractable subclass, the decomposable graphical models [10]. In the first use of decomposable models in this context [11], models were selected using a greedy algorithm based on significance tests. In [8, 12] methods and programs for selecting decomposable graphical models using Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) sampling were described. These methods are computationally feasible for modest numbers of markers (say, several hundreds), but not for modern SNP arrays with hundreds of thousands of SNPs per chromosome. To improve efficiency, the search space may be restricted to graphical models whose dependence graphs are interval graphs[13, 14]. These are graphs for which each vertex may be associated with an interval of the real line such that two vertices are connected by an edge if and only if their intervals overlap. In this context the ordering of SNPs along the real line is their physical ordering along the chromosome. MCMC sampling from this model class may be performed more efficiently [13, 14]. This work was extended in [15] to a more general subclass of decomposable models, namely those in which distant marker pairs (i.e., with more than a given number of intervening markers) are conditionally independent given the intervening markers.
In an alternative approach [16-18] latent mixtures of forests have been applied, in order to accommodate short-, medium- and long-range LD patterns. Also directed graphs (Bayesian networks) have been applied, selecting edges and their directions using causal discovery algorithms [19]. There are close links between decomposable models and Bayesian networks ([10], Sect. 4.5.1).
A rather different approach to modelling the joint distribution of allele frequencies [20, 21] is implemented in the software package BEAGLE [22], which is widely used to process data from SNP arrays. The approach is based on a class of models arising in the machine learning literature called acyclic probabilistic finite automata (APFA) [23]. These are related to time-variant variable length Markov chains. For phase estimation and imputation BEAGLE uses an iterative scheme analogous to the EM algorithm, alternating between sampling from a haplotype-level model given the observed genotype data (the E-step) and selecting a haplotype-level model given the samples (the M-step). A similar computational scheme for decomposable graphical models has been described and implemented in the FitGMLD program [15].
- 1.
Insight into the population history of different genomic intervals. Under simplifying assumptions, the ancestral history of a short genomic interval can be reconstructed from a decomposable graphical model for the SNPs in the interval [8].
- 2.
Quality control of genome assembly, in that some motifs may suggest errors in SNP positioning.
- 3.
- 4.
Derivation of more informative covariates involving multiple loci to plug into genomic prediction models [20].
- 5.
Use in pedigree simulation to model LD in founders, for example in connection with gene drop simulation [14] and assessment of SNP streak statistics [24].
In this paper decomposable graphical models are used to model fine-scale, local LD patterns. By local is meant that the proposed methods are designed to capture short-range associations between loci, but not long range ones. The same is true of other approaches [13-15] mentioned above. Here, an efficient, linear-time algorithm is developed to select a model using a penalized likelihood criterion, and it is shown how such a model may conveniently be displayed, allowing fine-scale LD structure to be visualized.
Methods
Graphs and graphical models
The following notation and terminology is mainly based on [9]. A graph is defined as a pair $\mathcal{G}=(V,E)$, where V is a set of vertices or nodes and E is a set of edges. Each edge is associated with a pair of nodes, its endpoints. Here only undirected graphs are considered, that is, with graphs undirected edges only. Two vertices α and β are said to be adjacent, written α∼β, if there is an edge between them. The neighbours of a vertex is the set of nodes that are adjacent to it. A subset A⊆V is complete if all vertex pairs in A are connected by an edge. A clique is a maximal complete subset, that is to say, a complete subset that is not contained in a larger complete subset.
A path (of length n) between vertices α and β in an undirected graph is a set of vertices $\alpha ={\alpha}_{0},{\alpha}_{1},\dots ,{\alpha}_{n}=\beta $ where α_{i−1}∼α_{ i } for $i=1,\dots ,n$. If a path $\alpha ={\alpha}_{0},{\alpha}_{1},\dots ,{\alpha}_{n}=\beta $ has α=β then the path is said to be a cycle of length n. If a cycle $\alpha ={\alpha}_{0},{\alpha}_{1},\dots ,{\alpha}_{n}=\alpha $ has adjacent elements α_{ i }∼α_{ j } with j∉{i−1,i+1} then it is said to have a chord. If it has no chords it is said to be chordless. A graph with no chordless cycles of length ≥4 is called triangulated or chordal.
A subset D⊂V in an undirected graph is said to separate A⊂V from B⊂V if every path between a vertex in A and a vertex in B contains a vertex from D. The graph ${\mathcal{G}}_{0}=({V}_{0},{E}_{0})$ is said to be a subgraph of $\mathcal{G}=(V,E)$ if V_{0}⊆V and E_{0}⊆E. For A⊆V, let E_{ A } denote the set of edges in E between vertices in A. Then ${\mathcal{G}}_{A}=(A,{E}_{A})$ is the subgraph induced by A.
for some functions ${g}_{1}()\dots {g}_{k}()$ where g_{ j }() depends on x only through ${x}_{{C}_{j}}$ then f() is said to factorize according to $\mathcal{G}$. If all the densities in a model factorize according to $\mathcal{G}$, then the model is said to be $\mathcal{G}$-Markov. When this is true $\mathcal{G}$ encodes the conditional independence structure of the model, through the following result (the global Markov property): whenever sets A and B are separated by a set C in $\mathcal{G}$, A and B are conditionally independent given C under the model. This is written as A⊥ ⊥B | C. A decomposable graphical model is one whose dependence graph is triangulated.
Selecting graphical models for chromosome-wide LD
where ${\widehat{\ell}}_{\mathcal{G}}$ is the maximized log-likelihood under $\mathcal{G}$, $dim(\mathcal{G})$ is the number of free parameters under $\mathcal{G}$, and α is a penalization constant. For the AIC, α=2 and for the BIC, α= log(N). The latter penalizes complex models more heavily and so selects simpler models. Under suitable regularity conditions, the BIC is consistent in the sense that for large N it will select the simplest model consistent with the data ([25], Sect. 2.6).
A technical but nonetheless important point is that calculation of the correct model dimension is not straightforward for high-dimensional models, since not all parameters may be estimable. A simple expression exists however for the difference in model dimension between two decomposable models that differ by a single edge ([10], pp. 37-40). This is useful when the search space is restricted to decomposable models and the search algorithm only involves comparison of models differing by single edges (as here).
A forward-backward approach to estimate the graphical model for V is used. The first (forward) step is based on a greedy forward search algorithm. To take account of the physical ordering of the SNPs, the algorithm starts from a model ${\mathcal{G}}_{0}=(V,{E}_{0})$ where E_{0} is the set of edges between physically adjacent SNPs: this model is called the skeleton. To seek the minimum BIC (or AIC) model, the algorithm repeatedly adds the edge associated with the greatest reduction in BIC (AIC): only edges whose inclusion results in a decomposable model are considered. The process continues until no more edges improve the criterion. The search space in this step is the class of decomposable models that include the skeleton. Note that this algorithm - as with almost all greedy algorithms — is not guaranteed to find the global optimum.
There are several advantages to initially constraining the search space to include the skeleton. An unconstrained search starting off from the null model (with no edges) would not take the physical ordering into account. Since the graphs considered are consistent with this ordering, they are conveniently displayed as LD maps, as illustrated below. Because decomposable models contain no chordless cycles of length ≥4, two distal loci cannot be linked by an edge unless there are sufficiently many intermediate (chordal) edges to prevent the occurrence of such cycles. Thus the algorithm proceeds by filling out around the skeleton by incrementally adding edges. The effect of this is that only local LD is modelled. Since both association and (implicitly) proximity are required, the edges included are more likely to be for real (that is, less likely to be due to chance), so in this sense the model selection process is more reliable. In addition, restricting the search space in this way improves computational efficiency. The linear-time algorithm described in the following section also builds on the physical vertex ordering.
In the second (backward) step the graph found in the first step is pruned, again using a greedy algorithm that seeks to minimize the BIC (AIC) criterion by removing edges, without requiring that the skeletal edges are retained. Keeping these in the model would be appropriate if adjacent SNPs are in high LD, but this is not always the case. For example, there may be recombination hotspots, or genome assembly errors may have led to errors in positioning the SNPs. The graphs may be used to examine whether this has occurred.
To display the resulting graph, a suitable graph layout is needed. After some experimentation, one such was obtained by modifying the horizontal dot layout in Rgraphviz [26], by exponentially smoothing the y-coordinates and replacing the x-coordinates with the SNP-number. In this way the y-coordinates are chosen so as to clarify the graphical structure: a consequence of this is that nodes with large absolute y-coordinates tend to signal genomic regions of high structural complexity.
For some purposes it is helpful to use more objective measures of complexity, and two such measures are used here. Consider a chromosome with p SNPs. For each $i=1,\dots p-1$, the height h_{ i } of the interval between SNPs i and i+1 is defined to be the number of edges of the form (j,k), where j≤i and i+1≤k, and the width w_{ i } is defined to be the maximum value of |k−j| of such edges. Note that by the global Markov property, when h_{ i }=0 or equivalently w_{ i }=0, the SNPs V_{≤i}={v_{ j }:j≤i} are independent of V_{>i}={v_{ j }:j>i}. Similarly, when h_{ i }=1 or equivalently w_{ i }=1, V_{<i}⊥⊥V_{>i}|v_{ i }.
As a measure of haplotype diversity, the entropy[27] is used here. Suppose that in some genomic interval there are k distinct haplotypes with relative frequencies ${f}_{1},\dots {f}_{k}$. Then the entropy is defined as $H=-{\sum}_{i=1\dots k}{f}_{i}log{f}_{i}$. It is large when there are many distinct haplotypes that are equally frequent.
A useful way to display marker data over short genomic intervals is the sample tree[23]. This summarizes a set of discrete longitudinal data of the form ${x}^{(v)}=({x}_{1}^{(v)},\dots {x}_{q}^{(v)})$ for $v=1\dots N$. A rooted tree is constructed in which the non-root nodes represent partial outcomes of the form $({x}_{1},\dots {x}_{k})$ for k≤q present in the sample data. Edges may be coloured with the marker value and labelled with the corresponding sample counts, or drawn with width proportional to the sample counts.
A fast selection algorithm
For high-dimensional models, the first step of the algorithm described above can be computationally demanding. To address this a much faster algorithm for the same task is now described. This involves combining a series of overlapping marginal models of lower dimension. Call the block length (model dimension) L and the overlap K. Thus the first block is ${V}_{1}=\{{v}_{1},\dots {v}_{L}\}$, the second is ${V}_{2}=\{{v}_{L-K+1}\dots {v}_{2L-K}\}$ and so on. In the applications described here L=100 and K=20 are used.
Suppose that the true model for $V=({v}_{1},\dots {v}_{p})$ is $\mathcal{G}$, and that $\widehat{\mathcal{G}}$ is the estimate of $\mathcal{G}$ obtained by performing the first step of the algorithm described in the previous section. The goal is to construct an approximation $\stackrel{~}{\mathcal{G}}$ to $\widehat{\mathcal{G}}$ by combining models ${\widehat{\mathcal{G}}}_{i}=({V}_{i},{\xca}_{i})$ obtained by applying that same algorithm to blocks V_{ i } for $i=1,2\dots \phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}$.
A way to construct a model ${\stackrel{~}{\mathcal{G}}}_{12}$ for V_{1}∪V_{2} by combining ${\widehat{\mathcal{G}}}_{1}$ and ${\widehat{\mathcal{G}}}_{2}$ is now described. Let ${m}^{\ast}=max\{w:\exists \phantom{\rule{.5em}{0ex}}(v,w)\in {\xca}_{1}\phantom{\rule{.5em}{0ex}}\text{with}\phantom{\rule{.5em}{0ex}}v\le L-K\}$. Then ${\stackrel{~}{\mathcal{G}}}_{12}$ is defined as ${\stackrel{~}{\mathcal{G}}}_{12}=({V}_{1}\cup {V}_{2},{\xca}_{1}^{0}\cup {\xca}_{2}^{0})$, where ${\xca}_{1}^{0}=\{(v,w)\in {\xca}_{1}:w\le {m}^{\ast}\}$ and ${\xca}_{2}^{0}=\{(v,w)\in {\xca}_{2}:w>{m}^{\ast}\}$.
The rationale for this is that marginal models may include spurious associations on the boundaries. For example, let ${\mathcal{G}}_{1}$ and ${\mathcal{G}}_{2}$ be the subgraphs of $\mathcal{G}$ induced by V_{1} and V_{2}, respectively. Then the marginal distribution of V_{2} will not in general be ${\mathcal{G}}_{2}$-Markov, but it will be ${\mathcal{G}}_{2}^{\ast}$-Markov for a graph ${\mathcal{G}}_{2}^{\ast}$ derived from ${\mathcal{G}}_{2}$ by completing the boundary of each connected component of ${\mathcal{G}}_{V\setminus {V}_{2}}$ in $\mathcal{G}$[28]. So ${\widehat{\mathcal{G}}}_{2}$ will tend to contain edges not in ${\mathcal{G}}_{2}$. To estimate the boundary of V_{1}∖V_{2} in $\mathcal{G}$, ${\widehat{\mathcal{G}}}_{1}$ is used: the boundary is estimated to be contained in the set $L-K+1,\dots ,{m}^{\ast}$. Hence by only including edges $(v,w)\in {\xca}_{2}$ with w>m^{∗} edges in this boundary are omitted. Similarly, the boundary of V_{2}∖V_{1} in ${\mathcal{G}}_{1}$ may contain spurious associations, so ${\xca}_{1}^{0}$ may contain unnecessary edges. To avoid this the overlap length K is chosen to be sufficiently large so that m^{∗}< min{v:∃ (v,w)∈E_{2} with w≥L+1}. If the maximum width was known in advance this inequality could be ensured by setting K to be twice the maximum width, but so large a value appears to be unnecessary in practice.
The algorithm proceeds in the obvious fashion combining ${\stackrel{~}{\mathcal{G}}}_{12}$ with ${\widehat{\mathcal{G}}}_{3}$ and so on. Since the construction may result in chordless cycles it is necessary to triangulate the resulting graph $\stackrel{~}{\mathcal{G}}$. This can be done using the maximum cardinality search algorithm [29] which can be implemented in linear time.
Assuming that the time for deriving the estimates ${\widehat{\mathcal{G}}}_{i}$ for fixed L is bounded, the algorithm described here is by construction linear in p. But the proportionality constant can be expected to be depend on various factors, such as the density of the minimum AIC/BIC model.
Implementation
The methods are implemented in a set of R functions which are provided as Additional files 1 and 2 to the paper. The selection algorithms build on the forward search algorithm implemented in the stepw function in the gRapHD package [30]. Currently this function requires that there are no missing data. The backward search algorithm was developed by the author in the course of preparing this paper, and has subsequently been implemented in the gRapHD package. The functions to perform the selection algorithms, and others to work with and display the graphs, build on the following packages: igraph [31], graph [32], Rgraphviz [26] and gRapHD. The triangular heatmaps were produced using the LDheatmap package [33]. Simulation from a fitted decomposable model was carried out using the gRain package [34]. The package rJPSGCS provides an interface between R and the FitGMLD program which was used to perform the algorithm of [15].
Results
To illustrate the methods described above, they were applied to SNP data obtained from three commercial pig breeds. In all 4239, 1979 and 2123 pigs of the Duroc, Landrace and Yorkshire breeds were genotyped using the Illumina Porcine SNP60 BeadChip [35]. After preprocessing on the basis of call rate, minimal allele frequency and other quality criteria, missing values were imputed using BEAGLE [22]. Using the methods described above, decomposable graphical models were selected for each chromosome and breed, using data at the genotype level. The BIC penalizing constant α= log(N) was used throughout.
The performance of the two algorithms
Breed | chr | N | p | |E _{ s } | | under | over | |E _{ sp } | | under | over | t _{ s } | t _{ f } | t _{ sp } | t _{ fp } | width |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
duroc | 1 | 4249 | 2863 | 4762 | 0 | 0 | 4340 | 0 | 0 | 35084 | 1153 | 37 | 37 | 15 |
duroc | 2 | 4249 | 2113 | 3676 | 0 | 3 | 3339 | 2 | 2 | 18450 | 920 | 26 | 27 | 10 |
duroc | 3 | 4249 | 1535 | 2873 | 1 | 13 | 2643 | 4 | 15 | 8695 | 679 | 20 | 20 | 8 |
duroc | 4 | 4249 | 2211 | 4392 | 0 | 0 | 4012 | 0 | 0 | 24005 | 1007 | 35 | 36 | 11 |
duroc | 5 | 4249 | 1255 | 2357 | 7 | 2 | 2166 | 8 | 2 | 6030 | 559 | 16 | 16 | 10 |
duroc | 6 | 4249 | 1937 | 3358 | 0 | 0 | 3069 | 0 | 0 | 15396 | 778 | 24 | 24 | 12 |
duroc | 7 | 4249 | 1911 | 3978 | 0 | 3 | 3621 | 0 | 2 | 19112 | 966 | 36 | 36 | 12 |
duroc | 8 | 4249 | 1694 | 3136 | 3 | 3 | 2871 | 3 | 3 | 12193 | 808 | 24 | 24 | 12 |
duroc | 9 | 4249 | 1749 | 3399 | 3 | 14 | 3087 | 5 | 17 | 13904 | 841 | 26 | 27 | 14 |
duroc | 10 | 4249 | 1078 | 2178 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0 | 0 | 3991 | 482 | 15 | 15 | 12 |
duroc | 11 | 4249 | 1145 | 2493 | 0 | 2 | 2294 | 0 | 3 | 6206 | 680 | 19 | 19 | 16 |
duroc | 12 | 4249 | 973 | 1857 | 0 | 0 | 1689 | 0 | 0 | 3138 | 399 | 13 | 13 | 10 |
duroc | 13 | 4249 | 2365 | 3998 | 0 | 7 | 3634 | 0 | 2 | 23112 | 1019 | 29 | 29 | 9 |
duroc | 14 | 4249 | 2252 | 4037 | 0 | 3 | 3731 | 0 | 2 | 23291 | 1016 | 29 | 29 | 14 |
duroc | 15 | 4249 | 1605 | 2977 | 0 | 0 | 2717 | 0 | 0 | 10757 | 707 | 22 | 22 | 11 |
duroc | 16 | 4249 | 1148 | 2249 | 0 | 0 | 2032 | 0 | 0 | 4936 | 549 | 16 | 16 | 10 |
duroc | 17 | 4249 | 941 | 1856 | 1 | 3 | 1703 | 1 | 3 | 3034 | 427 | 12 | 12 | 10 |
duroc | 18 | 4249 | 792 | 1402 | 0 | 0 | 1262 | 0 | 0 | 2032 | 341 | 9 | 10 | 9 |
landrace | 1 | 1979 | 4071 | 7679 | 0 | 5 | 7020 | 0 | 4 | 87941 | 1295 | 63 | 64 | 12 |
landrace | 2 | 1979 | 2153 | 4058 | 0 | 0 | 3690 | 0 | 0 | 14868 | 595 | 28 | 29 | 12 |
landrace | 3 | 1979 | 1957 | 4036 | 1 | 5 | 3664 | 4 | 3 | 13841 | 605 | 30 | 31 | 17 |
landrace | 4 | 1979 | 2210 | 4498 | 1 | 1 | 4111 | 3 | 2 | 16629 | 634 | 33 | 33 | 12 |
landrace | 5 | 1979 | 1489 | 3368 | 0 | 7 | 3090 | 1 | 4 | 6511 | 447 | 24 | 25 | 16 |
landrace | 6 | 1979 | 2163 | 4113 | 0 | 0 | 3753 | 0 | 0 | 14664 | 577 | 28 | 28 | 12 |
landrace | 7 | 1979 | 2116 | 4634 | 0 | 0 | 4238 | 0 | 0 | 16385 | 666 | 36 | 37 | 13 |
landrace | 8 | 1979 | 1836 | 3989 | 2 | 4 | 3682 | 4 | 4 | 11989 | 611 | 28 | 29 | 14 |
landrace | 9 | 1979 | 2301 | 4897 | 0 | 4 | 4415 | 0 | 5 | 20077 | 758 | 40 | 40 | 13 |
landrace | 10 | 1979 | 1077 | 2285 | 3 | 11 | 2074 | 9 | 9 | 2997 | 334 | 16 | 16 | 14 |
landrace | 11 | 1979 | 999 | 2150 | 0 | 0 | 1954 | 0 | 0 | 2492 | 289 | 15 | 15 | 11 |
landrace | 12 | 1979 | 1098 | 2573 | 0 | 0 | 2332 | 0 | 0 | 3420 | 376 | 21 | 21 | 11 |
landrace | 13 | 1979 | 2734 | 5295 | 0 | 7 | 4868 | 3 | 6 | 30046 | 870 | 39 | 40 | 12 |
landrace | 14 | 1979 | 2709 | 4819 | 1 | 4 | 4454 | 5 | 3 | 26602 | 673 | 33 | 33 | 17 |
landrace | 15 | 1979 | 1666 | 3507 | 8 | 13 | 3202 | 10 | 12 | 9888 | 486 | 25 | 25 | 15 |
landrace | 16 | 1979 | 1181 | 2403 | 0 | 0 | 2179 | 0 | 0 | 3747 | 339 | 15 | 16 | 10 |
landrace | 17 | 1979 | 1025 | 2227 | 1 | 3 | 2017 | 3 | 3 | 2390 | 279 | 15 | 15 | 11 |
landrace | 18 | 1979 | 934 | 1890 | 0 | 2 | 1721 | 3 | 3 | 1981 | 256 | 12 | 12 | 9 |
yorkshire | 1 | 2123 | 3904 | 6700 | 1 | 3 | 6112 | 1 | 1 | 65538 | 1065 | 51 | 52 | 11 |
yorkshire | 2 | 2123 | 2202 | 4311 | 1 | 8 | 3968 | 3 | 9 | 16548 | 644 | 32 | 33 | 11 |
yorkshire | 3 | 2123 | 1994 | 4440 | 0 | 9 | 4016 | 1 | 10 | 17020 | 751 | 39 | 39 | 13 |
yorkshire | 4 | 2123 | 2246 | 4359 | 3 | 3 | 3979 | 4 | 3 | 15429 | 550 | 32 | 32 | 12 |
yorkshire | 5 | 2123 | 1525 | 3145 | 0 | 0 | 2864 | 0 | 0 | 6471 | 454 | 22 | 22 | 16 |
yorkshire | 6 | 2123 | 2045 | 3876 | 2 | 2 | 3513 | 2 | 2 | 13313 | 556 | 27 | 27 | 11 |
yorkshire | 7 | 2123 | 2363 | 5342 | 0 | 11 | 4894 | 4 | 10 | 27929 | 866 | 44 | 46 | 14 |
yorkshire | 8 | 2123 | 1868 | 3887 | 1 | 5 | 3593 | 1 | 3 | 14254 | 662 | 27 | 28 | 11 |
yorkshire | 9 | 2123 | 2119 | 4174 | 0 | 3 | 3757 | 1 | 5 | 15108 | 653 | 31 | 31 | 11 |
yorkshire | 10 | 2123 | 1193 | 2518 | 0 | 0 | 2268 | 0 | 0 | 3757 | 360 | 19 | 19 | 12 |
yorkshire | 11 | 2123 | 1269 | 2851 | 0 | 0 | 2633 | 0 | 0 | 5501 | 483 | 20 | 20 | 12 |
yorkshire | 12 | 2123 | 1061 | 2287 | 0 | 0 | 2068 | 0 | 0 | 2885 | 324 | 17 | 17 | 10 |
yorkshire | 13 | 2123 | 2759 | 4935 | 0 | 0 | 4544 | 0 | 0 | 27100 | 785 | 35 | 35 | 13 |
yorkshire | 14 | 2123 | 2482 | 4732 | 0 | 6 | 4353 | 1 | 4 | 22286 | 749 | 34 | 33 | 11 |
yorkshire | 15 | 2123 | 1669 | 3321 | 0 | 4 | 3030 | 2 | 5 | 8385 | 501 | 24 | 24 | 12 |
yorkshire | 16 | 2123 | 1207 | 2575 | 1 | 5 | 2345 | 2 | 5 | 3734 | 339 | 17 | 17 | 10 |
yorkshire | 17 | 2123 | 1176 | 2446 | 2 | 7 | 2223 | 3 | 8 | 3621 | 339 | 16 | 17 | 14 |
yorkshire | 18 | 2123 | 825 | 1618 | 2 | 6 | 1445 | 6 | 6 | 1434 | 215 | 10 | 11 | 9 |
Thus low complexity regions tend to consist of series of haplotype blocks with high LD and low haplotype complexity, and may be dominated by a few common haplotypes. In contrast, regions of high complexity tend to have high haplotype diversity and little or no haplotype block structure. It must be stressed that the SNPs in such regions are not generally in linkage equilibrium: on the contrary, complex patterns of association, not marginal independences, are observed.
Results from simulations
Skeleton | LD graph | ||
---|---|---|---|
Undershoot | Overshoot | Undershoot | Overshoot |
81 | 0 | 117 | 73 |
84 | 0 | 146 | 82 |
82 | 0 | 138 | 81 |
84 | 0 | 122 | 94 |
83 | 0 | 161 | 84 |
76 | 1 | 141 | 77 |
88 | 2 | 127 | 70 |
81 | 0 | 133 | 92 |
79 | 3 | 138 | 79 |
85 | 1 | 133 | 90 |
Discussion
This paper has introduced an efficient, linear-time forward-backward algorithm to estimate chromosome-wide probabilistic graphical models of fine-scale linkage disequilibrium, and has described a convenient way to display these models. In illustration, the methods have been applied to data obtained from three commercial breeds of pigs using the Illumina Porcine SNP60 BeadChip.
The forward part of the algorithm proceeds by combining a series of overlapping marginal decomposable models of dimension L and overlap length K. This implicitly assumes that the maximum width of the true graph is at most K. The resulting model is then triangulated and backward selection performed. The search space closely resembles that of [15], which samples from decomposable models with a given maximum width, using sliding windows. The difference in approaches lies primarily in the search method: here greedy search to optimize a penalized likelihood criterion is used, whereas in [15] MCMC sampling methods are applied.
The R function used for greedy forward search currently requires that the input data contain no missing values, so it was necessary to impute missing values prior to performing the algorithm, and the BEAGLE software [22] was used for this. This raises the possibility of circularity, or more precisely, that the model selection is influenced by constraints or assumptions implicit in the models used by BEAGLE. But given BEAGLE’s high imputation accuracy with such data it seems unlikely that this plays an important role here.
The algorithm was found to have high accuracy when applied to simulated data sets of the dimensions considered here (N∼4000;p∼3000), with edgewise false positive and negative rates of around 3%. That it is good at reconstructing the model generating the data is reassuring. Needless to say, the algorithm does not necessarily identify the “true” model, which may not be in the search space. As noted previously, the approach captures short range associations, but not long range ones. Moreover, higher edgewise false negative rates may occur when observed data are used if there are infinitesimal departures from a model that are not detectable at the given sample size, as these are filtered out when data are simulated under a selected model.
A comparison of triangular heatmaps with LD graphs is instructive. The former are compact graphical representations of all pairwise marginal associations for a set of SNPs. They are particularly well-suited to identify LD blocks, which stand out as highlighted triangles. LD graphs supplement heatmaps by showing patterns of association but not their strength. Since they are parametric models they can be put to a number of quantitative uses as described in the background section. At one level, heatmaps and LD graphs convey similar information, since intervals with simple dependence structures tend to appear as series of LD blocks in the heatmap, whereas those with complex structures tend to occur in the inter-block regions and have a more mosaic appearance. But the graphs provide a more incisive characterisation of genetic variation, building on the concept of conditional rather than marginal dependence. In this regard, it may be helpful to regard conditional independence statements as expressing the notion of irrelevance, in the sense that A⊥ ⊥B | C implies that if we know C, information about A is irrelevant for knowledge of B. Thus the graphs say something about connections between specific SNPs, for example about which SNPs are required to predict a specific SNP.
The graphs may also be useful in fine mapping. Genome-wide association studies seek to find the genetic basis of complex traits, typically using single locus methods - that is, by identifying SNPs with strong marginal association with the complex trait. Due to LD, many SNPs in a genomic region may exhibit strong association with the trait, making it hard to identify the causal loci. A way to address this is to assess the effect of a putative causal SNP on the complex trait in a linear model that also includes terms for the two flanking SNPs, in order to adjust for confounding with nearby effects due to LD. This implicitly assumes a simple serial dependence structure between the SNPs, and when the dependence structure is more complex such adjustment might be insufficient, leading to false positives. This may be prevented by including terms for the neighbours of the putative causal SNP, not just for the flanking SNPs. Any SNP is separated from the remaining SNPs by its neighbours, so by the global Markov property it is independent of the remaining SNPs given its neighbours. A similar method has been proposed based on Bayesian networks [38].
Like graphical models, the APFA models that underlie BEAGLE may be represented as graphs that encode a set of conditional independence relations, but in a very different way. In the present context, for example, nodes in APFA graphs represent haplotype clusters rather than SNPs. Where the model classes intersect, APFA graphs are much more complex than the corresponding dependence graphs, and so less amenable to visualization.
A striking feature of the LD graphs for the pig data was that for roughly 80% of the genome, simple serial or near-serial LD patterns were found, but for the remaining 20%, more complex patterns were observed. The regions with the simple serial structure tend to have low haplotype diversity, which is to be expected in livestock breeds with small effective population sizes [39]. Perhaps more unexpected is that roughly 20% of the porcine genome exhibits complex LD patterns, forming islands of relatively high genetic diversity. This information may be useful in an animal breeding context, to identify regions with high genetic variation. It will also be interesting to compare graphs obtained using different SNP densities in a given breed or species to examine whether and how their topologies change with varying marker densities.
Conclusions
The proposed algorithm is efficient and makes it feasible to estimate and visualize chromosome-wide LD models on a routine basis.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The data were kindly provided by the Danish Pig Research Centre and in particular Tage Ostersen. The work was performed in a project funded through the Green Development and Demonstration Programme (grant no. 3405-11-0279) by the Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, the Pig Research Centre and Aarhus University. Ole F. Christensen, Peter Sørensen, Luc Janss and Lei Wang are acknowledged for helpful discussions.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
- Barrett J, Fry B, Maller J, Daly M: Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (2): 263-265. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth457.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abad-Grau M, Montes R, Sebastiani P: Building chromosome-wide LD maps. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22 (16): 1933-1934. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl288.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cardon L, Abecasis G, et al: Using haplotype blocks to map human complex trait loci. Trends Genet. 2003, 19 (3): 135-140. 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00022-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daly M, Rioux J, Schaffner S, Hudson T, Lander E: High-resolution haplotype structure in the human genome. Nat Genet. 2001, 29 (2): 229-232. 10.1038/ng1001-229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gabriel S, Schaffner S, Nguyen H, Moore J, Roy J, Blumenstiel B, Higgins J, DeFelice M, Lochner A, Faggart M, et al: The structure of haplotype blocks in the human genome. Science. 2002, 296 (5576): 2225-2229. 10.1126/science.1069424.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stumpf M: Haplotype diversity and the block structure of linkage disequilibrium. Trends Genet. 2002, 18 (5): 226-228. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)02641-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Crawford D, Carlson C, Rieder M, Carrington D, Yi Q, Smith J, Eberle M, Kruglyak L, Nickerson D: Haplotype diversity across 100 candidate genes for inflammation, lipid metabolism, and blood pressure regulation in two populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 74 (4): 610-10.1086/382227.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas A, Camp N: Graphical modeling of the joint distribution of alleles at associated loci. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 74 (6): 1088-1101. 10.1086/421249.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lauritzen SL: Graphical Models. 1996, Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Højsgaard S, Edwards D, Lauritzen S: Graphical Models with. 2012, R. New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: SpringerView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Edwards D: Linkage analysis using loglinear models. Comput Stat Data Anal. 1992, 13 (3): 281-290. 10.1016/0167-9473(92)90136-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thomas A: Characterizing allelic associations from unphased diploid data by graphical modeling. Genet Epidemiol. 2005, 29: 23-35. 10.1002/gepi.20076.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas A: Estimation of graphical models whose conditional independence graphs are interval graphs and its application to modelling linkage disequilibrium. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009, 53 (5): 1818-1828. 10.1016/j.csda.2008.02.003.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas A: A method and program for estimating graphical models for linkage disequilibrium that scale linearly with the number of loci, and their application to gene drop simulation. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (10): 1287-1292. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp146.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abel H, Thomas A: Accuracy and computational efficiency of a graphical modeling approach to linkage disequilibrium estimation. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2011, 10: 1-15.Google Scholar
- Mourad R, Sinoquet C, Leray P, et al: A Bayesian network approach to model local dependencies among SNPs. MODGRAPH 2009 Probabilistic Graphical Models for Integration of Complex Data and Discovery of Causal Models in Biology, Satellite meeting of JOBIM 2009. 2009Google Scholar
- Mourad R, Sinoquet C, Dina C, Leray P: Visualization of Pairwise and Multilocus Linkage Disequilibrium Structure Using Latent Forests. PloS one. 2011, 6 (12): e27320-10.1371/journal.pone.0027320.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mourad R, Sinoquet C, Leray P: Probabilistic graphical models for genetic association studies. Brief Bioinform. 2012, 13: 20-33. 10.1093/bib/bbr015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morota G, Valente B, Rosa G, Weigel K, Gianola D: An assessment of linkage disequilibrium in Holstein cattle using a Bayesian network. J Anim Breed Genet. 2012, 129 (6): 474-487. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12002]PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Browning S: Multilocus association mapping using variable-length Markov chains. Am J Hum Genet. 2006, 78 (6): 903-913. 10.1086/503876.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Browning B, Browning S: Efficient multilocus association testing for whole genome association studies using localized haplotype clustering. Genet Epidemiol. 2007, 31 (5): 365-375. 10.1002/gepi.20216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Browning S, Browning B: Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Gen. 2007, 81 (5): 1084-1097. 10.1086/521987.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ron D, Singer Y, Tishby N: On the Learnability and Usage of Acyclic Probabilistic Finite Automata. J Comput Sys Sci. 1998, 56: 133-152. 10.1006/jcss.1997.1555.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thomas A: Assessment of SNP streak statistics using gene drop simulation with linkage disequilibrium. Genet Epidemiol. 2010, 34 (2): 119-124. 10.1002/gepi.20440.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ripley BD: Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. 1996, Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gentry J, Long L, Gentleman R, Falcon S, Hahne F, Sarkar D, Hansen K: Rgraphviz: Provides plotting capabilities for R graph objects. [R package version 2.2.1]Google Scholar
- Su SC, Kuo CC, Chen T: Inference of missing SNPs and information quantity measurements for haplotype blocks. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (9): 2001-2007. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti261.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Asmussen S, Edwards D: Collapsibility and response variables in contingency tables. Biometrika. 1983, 70 (3): 567-578. 10.1093/biomet/70.3.567.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tarjan R, Yannakakis M: Simple linear-time algorithms to test chordality of graphs, test acyclicity of hypergraphs, and selectively reduce acyclic hypergraphs. SIAM J Comput. 1984, 13: 566-579. 10.1137/0213035.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Abreu G, Edwards D, Labouriau R: High-Dimensional Graphical Model Search with the gRapHD R Package. J Stat Softw. 2010, 37: 1-18. [http://www.jstatsoft.org/v37/i01/]View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gabor C, Tamas N: The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal. 2006, Complex Systems: 1695-[http://igraph.sf.net]Google Scholar
- Gentleman R, Whalen E, Huber W, Falcon S: graph: A package to handle graph data structures. [R package version 1.36.0]Google Scholar
- Shin JH, Blay S, McNeney B, Graham J: LDheatmap: An R Function for Graphical Display of Pairwise Linkage Disequilibria Between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. J Stat Softw. 2006, 16: Code Snippet 3-[http://jstatsoft.org/v16/c03]View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Højsgaard S: Graphical Independence Networks with the gRain Package for R. J Stat Softw. 2012, 46 (10): 1-26. [http://www.jstatsoft.org/v46/i10/]Google Scholar
- Ramos AM, Crooijmans R, Affara N, Amaral A, Archibald A, Beever J, Bendixen C, Churcher C, Clark R, Dehais P, et al: Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology. PLoS One. 2009, 4 (8): e6524-10.1371/journal.pone.0006524.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morris A, Whittaker J, Balding D: Little loss of information due to unknown phase for fine-scale linkage-disequilibrium mapping with single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotype data. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 74 (5): 945-10.1086/420773.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thomas A: The conditional independences between variables derived from two independent identically distributed Markov random fields when pairwise order is ignored. Math Med Bio. 2010, 27 (3): 283-288. 10.1093/imammb/dqp022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Han B, Park M, Chen Xw: A Markov blanket-based method for detecting causal SNPs in GWAS. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010, 11 (Suppl 3): S5-10.1186/1471-2105-11-S3-S5.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uimari P, Tapio M: Extent of linkage disequilibrium and effective population size in finnish landrace and finnish yorkshire pig breeds. J An Sci. 2011, 89 (3): 609-614. 10.2527/jas.2010-3249.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.