GenePainter: a fast tool for aligning gene structures of eukaryotic protein families, visualizing the alignments and mapping gene structures onto protein structures
- Björn Hammesfahr†1,
- Florian Odronitz†1,
- Stefanie Mühlhausen1,
- Stephan Waack2 and
- Martin Kollmar1Email author
© Hammesfahr et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 10 September 2012
Accepted: 24 February 2013
Published: 4 March 2013
All sequenced eukaryotic genomes have been shown to possess at least a few introns. This includes those unicellular organisms, which were previously suspected to be intron-less. Therefore, gene splicing must have been present at least in the last common ancestor of the eukaryotes. To explain the evolution of introns, basically two mutually exclusive concepts have been developed. The introns-early hypothesis says that already the very first protein-coding genes contained introns while the introns-late concept asserts that eukaryotic genes gained introns only after the emergence of the eukaryotic lineage. A very important aspect in this respect is the conservation of intron positions within homologous genes of different taxa.
GenePainter is a standalone application for mapping gene structure information onto protein multiple sequence alignments. Based on the multiple sequence alignments the gene structures are aligned down to single nucleotides. GenePainter accounts for variable lengths in exons and introns, respects split codons at intron junctions and is able to handle sequencing and assembly errors, which are possible reasons for frame-shifts in exons and gaps in genome assemblies. Thus, even gene structures of considerably divergent proteins can properly be compared, as it is needed in phylogenetic analyses. Conserved intron positions can also be mapped to user-provided protein structures. For their visualization GenePainter provides scripts for the molecular graphics system PyMol.
GenePainter is a tool to analyse gene structure conservation providing various visualization options. A stable version of GenePainter for all operating systems as well as documentation and example data are available at http://www.motorprotein.de/genepainter.html.
All eukaryotic genomes that have been sequenced so far have been shown to possess at least a few introns including the unicellular organisms that were previously suspected to be intron-less[1, 2]. These data has fuelled the lively debate between the introns-early and introns-late concepts that is ongoing since the discovery of splicing. The introns-early hypothesis says that already the very first protein-coding genes contained introns while the introns-late concept asserts that eukaryotic genes gained introns only after the emergence of the eukaryotic lineage. Support for either of the concepts has been revealed by modelling the rates of intron gain and loss in eukaryotic genomes, by analysing the conservation of intron positions of example genes from a selection of genomes, or by population-genetic considerations. Intron position conservation has also been used to improve gene predictions and multiple protein sequence alignments, and to reconstruct ancient genes.
A few software packages are available for the analysis of the conservation of intron positions. Exalign is a software using only gene structure information to reveal intron conservation. Exalign uses gene structures from RefSeq gene annotations and from user definitions and calculates an alignment solely based on exon lengths and reading frames. Accordingly, Exalign fails if exon lengths between genes do not match. This is usually the case if genes encode less conserved proteins (e.g. differing in the lengths of surface loop regions) or if genes from more divergent species, which have been subject to complex intron loss and gain events, are compared. To overcome these limitations, it would be beneficial to use the information contained in protein sequence alignments. Tools that combine protein multiple sequence alignment (MSA) data and gene structures are CIDA/CIWOG, GECA, Malin, and scripts developed for large-scale analyses[14, 15]. CIDA/CIWOG comes with a web interface coupled to a database thus providing a barrier for installation while Malin requires a species phylogeny as starting point. GECA builds on the CIWOG output and provides the visualization of sequence similarity between subsequent genes. However, multiple sequence alignments are automatically generated and there is no option to use manually improved own alignments. In addition, sequence similarity is only computed for subsequent genes, which is inappropriate for large data sets. XdomView is the only software combining protein structures with intron and domain positions. In XdomView the user specifies a PDB-ID and domain definitions from SCOP, CATH, DALI, 3DEE, and MMDB are subsequently mapped to the specified structure. In addition, the protein sequence from the PDB file is used to identify eukaryotic homologs in the ExInt database to map intron positions and phase. However, XdomView is strongly limited by accepting only PDB codes as input and the reference databases are far out of date (PDB of June 2003, SCOP release of March 2003, ExInt based on Genbank 122 of February 2001).
With GenePainter we developed a tool that combines protein MSA data, gene and protein structures. GenePainter maps the intron positions obtained from the gene structures to the MSA taking reading frames into account. Additionally, conserved intron positions can be displayed in provided protein structures. The output can be used to compare gene structures from the exon/intron level down to the nucleotide sequences and to resolve and improve potentially ambiguous regions in the MSAs. GenePainter does not require any additional software/database to be installed and is unique compared to previous tools in its output options and the possible application in small- as well as larges-scale analyses.
GenePainter was written in Ruby, does not require any additional library, and can be used on any operating system (Additional file1). As input, GenePainter requires a protein MSA in FASTA format and corresponding gene structures in YAML format, which can be obtained for example from Scipio or via the WebScipio interface[18, 19]. User-specified options control the part of the alignment used in the comparison and the type of output. In addition, a PDB file can be provided to map gene structure conservation onto a protein structure. GenePainter starts with comparing sequence and gene structure file names. After processing the gene structure files, intron positions including phase information (phase 0, 1 or 2 depending on the intron’s position relative to the reading frame) and intron sequences are mapped to each sequence in the MSA. Introns are then grouped into clusters based on identical alignment positions and matched to each other. As matched introns are aligned, exons are filled with the respective placeholder for the text-based output. In the graphical output, exons are represented with their respective length, but stretched by placeholders if needed.
The text and SVG output can be processed with any appropriate software. The output to visualize intron positions mapped to structures is scripts for PyMOL. The software as well as a comprehensive documentation can be found athttp://www.motorprotein.de/genepainter.html.
The mapping of intron positions and phases onto a PDB file is based on an alignment of the PDB sequence with one of the sequences from the protein MSA as reference. Thus, both the reference sequence and the chain of interest from the PDB file need to be specified. The alignment is calculated as described in. By default, gaps at the end of the alignment are not penalized. This adaptation is of particular importance, as reference and protein sequence may vary greatly in length, possibly leading to an inappropriate alignment. Reasons for length differences can be full-length sequence in the alignment versus sequence of a single domain in the crystal structure, protein sequence in the alignment versus sequence joined to an expression/purification tag in the structure, and missing parts in the structure due to missing electron density.
Results and discussion
Because GenePainter compares gene structures based on multiple sequence alignments of proteins it can be used to analyse proteins of any degree of similarity. The coronins from the sample data comprise sequences from apicomplexans, fungi and mammals. Accordingly, the similarity of the gene structures is not obvious at first glance (Figure1A). By scaling the exons and introns the similarity of exon lengths between homologs of closely related organisms becomes suggestive (Figure1B. Note the different scaling of exons and introns in this figure). Exons and introns were scaled up and down, respectively, so that the average length of the exons equals the average length of the introns. GenePainter maps intron positions including phase to the sequences as provided in the multiple sequence alignments.
Gene structure alignments
The gene structure information can also be incorporated into the protein MSA as additional lines (option -a) where intron positions are either displayed as vertical bars “|“ or as numbers defining the phase of the respective introns (Figure4C). This format is most useful if the MSA will be re-evaluated to identify miss-aligned positions and regions.
Visualizing conserved intron positions on protein structures
Limits and possible applications of GenePainter
In the current version, GenePainter is limited to group introns to common introns only if these appear at the exact same position and exact same reading frame in the aligned protein sequences. In contrast CIWOG defines introns, which happen in closely neighbouring amino acids, as common introns. However, there are many examples of very short exons not only in mammals but also in other branches of the eukaryotes, which would unnecessarily be grouped as common introns. As we showed (Figure4C) more and more conserved introns will appear in the alignment as soon as more sequences and gene structures are added. For instance, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe (Sp Coro) and Caenorhabditis elegans (Ce Coro1) coronin genes share an intron at the N-terminus (Figure4C). We believe that almost all introns are shared between at least two genes from two different species. However, most analyses do not cover enough data, not enough sequences and not enough species. We have shown previously that all introns within the arthropod muscle myosin heavy chain genes are shared between at least two species, which became only obvious after having analysed genes from 22 species. It is highly unlikely that introns would have been introduced at the exact same position with exact same reading frame independently in species whose last common ancester had been millions of years ago (600 myr in case of the arthropods). Data from further arthropods showed, that introns initially found to be shared by only two species are actually shared by more species, and that the last common ancestor of the arthropods must have had even more introns than assumed before (data available from CyMoBase). If data from more species and more protein families would be included, shared introns in genes present in the last common ancestor of the eukaryotes could be identified. For other applications that do not demand strict intron conservation, GenePainter could be extended to allow variable positional flexibility.
Binary data can be very useful to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships and is often created from morphological data[26-28]. We used binary data obtained from protein family inventories (subfamily homolog present or absent) to reconstruct the phylogeny of 21 arthropod species. The resulting phylogeny was in agreement with that derived from protein sequence data. The intron pattern of a protein family (Figure3) can therefore also be used for phylogenetic tree reconstructions, or for combined data analyses. Depending on the taxonomic distribution of the included sequences, intron pattern data of several protein families need to be included to derive discriminative and meaningful information.
GenePainter is a tool to analyse the conservation of gene structures of eukaryotic proteins. It aligns the gene structures to the respective protein sequences in a multiple sequence alignment. Gene structure conservation can be displayed in a binary format (exons and introns) and based on the nucleotide sequences. GenePainter can map gene structure conservation on protein structures and provides scripts for visualization in PyMol. Therefore, GenePainter will be a valuable tool for gene structure guided improvements of multiple sequence alignments and for phylogenetic analyses including or focusing on the conservation of intron positions within eukaryotic genes.
Availability and requirements
Project name: GenePainter
Project home page: http://www.motorprotein.de/genepainter.html
Operating system: Platform independent
Programming languages: Ruby
Software requirements: Ruby version 1.9.2 or higher
License: GenePainter can be downloaded and used under a GNU General Public License.
Any restrictions to use by non-academics: Using GenePainter by non-academics requires permission.
We would like to thank Klas Hatje, Oliver Keller, Malte Hübner, and other members of the Kollmar and Waack groups for helpful suggestions and discussions. MK has been funded by grant KO 2251/6-1 and SW by grant WA 766/6-1 of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. This work was partly supported by the Göttingen Graduate School of Neurosciences and Molecular Biosciences (DFG Grant GSC 226/1).
- Nixon JEJ, Wang A, Morrison HG, McArthur AG, Sogin ML, Loftus BJ, Samuelson J: A spliceosomal intron in Giardia lamblia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99: 3701-3705. 10.1073/pnas.042700299PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vaňáčová Š, Yan W, Carlton JM, Johnson PJ: Spliceosomal introns in the deep-branching eukaryote Trichomonas vaginalis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102: 4430-4435. 10.1073/pnas.0407500102PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koonin EV: The origin of introns and their role in eukaryogenesis: a compromise solution to the introns-early versus introns-late debate? Biol Direct 2006, 1: 22. 10.1186/1745-6150-1-22PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carmel L, Wolf YI, Rogozin IB, Koonin EV: Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes. Genome Res 2007, 17: 1034-1044. 10.1101/gr.6438607PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- De Roos AD: Conserved intron positions in ancient protein modules. Biol Direct 2007, 2: 7. 10.1186/1745-6150-2-7PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynch M: Intron evolution as a population-genetic process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99: 6118-6123. 10.1073/pnas.092595699PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hsieh SJ, Lin CY, Liu NH, Chow WY, Tang CY: GeneAlign: a coding exon prediction tool based on phylogenetical comparisons. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34: W280-W284. 10.1093/nar/gkl307PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Csűrös M, Holey JA, Rogozin IB: In search of lost introns. Bioinformatics 2007, 23: i87-i96. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm190View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Odronitz F, Kollmar M: Comparative genomic analysis of the arthropod muscle myosin heavy chain genes allows ancestral gene reconstruction and reveals a new type of “partially” processed pseudogene. BMC Mol Biol 2008, 9: 21. 10.1186/1471-2199-9-21PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pavesi G, Zambelli F, Caggese C, Pesole G: Exalign: a new method for comparative analysis of exon-intron gene structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36: e47-e47. 10.1093/nar/gkn153PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilkerson MD, Ru Y, Brendel VP: Common introns within orthologous genes: software and application to plants. Brief Bioinform 2009, 10: 631-644. 10.1093/bib/bbp051View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fawal N, Savelli B, Dunand C, Mathé C: GECA: a fast tool for gene evolution and conservation analysis in eukaryotic protein families. Bioinformatics 2012, 28: 1398-1399. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts153View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Csűrös M: Malin: maximum likelihood analysis of intron evolution in eukaryotes. Bioinformatics 2008, 24: 1538-1539. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn226PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fedorov A, Merican AF, Gilbert W: Large-scale comparison of intron positions among animal, plant, and fungal genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99: 16128-16133. 10.1073/pnas.242624899PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rogozin IB, Wolf YI, Sorokin AV, Mirkin BG, Koonin EV: Remarkable Interkingdom Conservation of Intron Positions and Massive, Lineage-Specific Intron Loss and Gain in Eukaryotic Evolution. Curr Biol 2003, 13: 1512-1517. 10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00558-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vivek G, Tan TW, Ranganathan S: XdomView: protein domain and exon position visualization. Bioinformatics 2003, 19: 159-160. 10.1093/bioinformatics/19.1.159View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keller O, Odronitz F, Stanke M, Kollmar M, Waack S: Scipio: using protein sequences to determine the precise exon/intron structures of genes and their orthologs in closely related species. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9: 278. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-278PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Odronitz F, Pillmann H, Keller O, Waack S, Kollmar M: WebScipio: an online tool for the determination of gene structures using protein sequences. BMC Genomics 2008, 9: 422. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-422PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hatje K, Keller O, Hammesfahr B, Pillmann H, Waack S, Kollmar M: Cross-species protein sequence and gene structure prediction with fine-tuned Webscipio 2.0 and Scipio. BMC Res Notes 2011, 4: 265. 10.1186/1756-0500-4-265PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. Schrödinger, LLC; http://www.pymol.org
- Needleman SB, Wunsch CD: A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. J Mol Biol 1970, 48: 443-453. 10.1016/0022-2836(70)90057-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eckert C, Hammesfahr B, Kollmar M: A holistic phylogeny of the coronin gene family reveals an ancient origin of the tandem-coronin, defines a new subfamily, and predicts protein function. BMC Evol Biol 2011, 11: 268. 10.1186/1471-2148-11-268PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Appleton BA, Wu P, Wiesmann C: The crystal structure of murine coronin-1: a regulator of actin cytoskeletal dynamics in lymphocytes. Structure 2006, 14: 87-96. 10.1016/j.str.2005.09.013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- GFF - GMOD. http://gmod.org/wiki/GFF
- CyMoBase - a database for cytoskeletal and motor proteins. http://www.cymobase.org
- Endress PK, Doyle JA: Reconstructing the ancestral angiosperm flower and its initial specializations. Am J Bot 2009, 96: 22-66. 10.3732/ajb.0800047View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiens JJ: Paleontology, genomics, and combined-data phylogenetics: can molecular data improve phylogeny estimation for fossil taxa? Syst Biol 2009, 58: 87-99. 10.1093/sysbio/syp012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Werneburg I, Sánchez-Villagra MR: Timing of organogenesis support basal position of turtles in the amniote tree of life. BMC Evol Biol 2009, 9: 82. 10.1186/1471-2148-9-82PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Odronitz F, Becker S, Kollmar M: Reconstructing the phylogeny of 21 completely sequenced arthropod species based on their motor proteins. BMC Genomics 2009, 10: 173. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-173PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.