 Research
 Open Access
 Published:
iVUN: interactive Visualization of Uncertain biochemical reaction Networks
BMC Bioinformatics volume 14, Article number: S2 (2013)
Abstract
Background
Mathematical models are nowadays widely used to describe biochemical reaction networks. One of the main reasons for this is that models facilitate the integration of a multitude of different data and data types using parameter estimation. Thereby, models allow for a holistic understanding of biological processes. However, due to measurement noise and the limited amount of data, uncertainties in the model parameters should be considered when conclusions are drawn from estimated model attributes, such as reaction fluxes or transient dynamics of biological species.
Methods and results
We developed the visual analytics system iVUN that supports uncertaintyaware analysis of static and dynamic attributes of biochemical reaction networks modeled by ordinary differential equations. The multivariate graph of the network is visualized as a nodelink diagram, and statistics of the attributes are mapped to the color of nodes and links of the graph. In addition, the graph view is linked with several views, such as line plots, scatter plots, and correlation matrices, to support locating uncertainties and the analysis of their time dependencies. As demonstration, we use iVUN to quantitatively analyze the dynamics of a model for Epoinduced JAK2/STAT5 signaling.
Conclusion
Our case study showed that iVUN can be used to perform an indepth study of biochemical reaction networks, including attribute uncertainties, correlations between these attributes and their uncertainties as well as the attribute dynamics. In particular, the linking of different visualization options turned out to be highly beneficial for the complex analysis tasks that come with the biological systems as presented here.
Background
Biomolecules, such as genes, RNAs and proteins, are the building blocks of cells. Via different modes of interaction, these biomolecules (also called biochemical species) form gene regulatory, signaling and metabolic pathways. In systems biology, biochemical reaction network (BRN) models are used to describe the structure of these pathways and the interaction between biochemical species [1, 2]. As BRN models can be employed to summarize all available information, they are a powerful tool that can be used to gain a holistic understanding of cellular processes and their crosstalk.
A variety of approaches are available to model BRNs. In particular ordinary differential equations (ODEs) are widely used. ODE models allow for the description of the time evolution of the concentrations of the chemical species based upon knowledge of the reactions, their rates constants and other parameters. While the set of possible reactions is often known, the parameters can in general not be measured. To ensure reliability and predictive power of the BRN models, the unknown parameters have to be estimated from the available measurement data. Due to the limited availability of data and the ubiquity of measurement noise, the parameter estimation does in general not yield a unambiguous result, i.e., the parameters remain uncertain. To analyze the uncertainty of the parameters as well as the model prediction, often a sample of parameters is collected for which model simulations and data agree reasonably well [3–5]. To draw grounded conclusions about the systems' behavior, the uncertainties encoded in this sample have to be studied. Although there are various tools available that help simulating and visualizing BRN models, hardly any tool exists that supports the visual analysis of uncertainties in BRN models.
In the following, we present our visual analytics system iVUN. iVUN supports an indepth study of BRNs with uncertain properties. We compute the uncertainties of parameters and model predictions using a Bayesian estimation approach, which provides the statistics of model attributes (parameters, reaction fluxes and states) in form of a sample. Given this sample, iVUN facilitates the study of attribute uncertainties and their timedependence by visualizing them in the graph view, a nodelink diagram. Biochemical species and reaction related attributes are mapped to the color of the nodes and links, respectively. Furthermore, a multitude of linked views, such as line plots, scatter plots, and correlation matrices, are available to enable the user to explore the BRN model and its uncertainties. We note that this manuscript is based on a conference paper we published at the 2nd IEEE Symposium on Biological Data Visualization [6] and uses original material thereof. In contrast to this visualization paper, here, we focus on the application to biological data obtained from experiments and included an extensive case study. Furthermore, iVUN has been extended to analyze the dynamics of measured quantities of the BRNs, which are neither states nor fluxes, within one and across different experimental conditions. This allows for the direct comparison of model predictions and measurement data, as well as the comparison of different experimental conditions. To improve the visual analytics capabilities of iVUN, we also introduced additional links between the available views.
In the next section, we provide a brief review on ODEbased modeling approaches for BRNs. Furthermore, we introduce Bayesian parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis methods for ODEs (see Figure 1). Based upon these backgrounds, we define the aims of the analysis and hence visualization requirements.
Computational modeling of biochemical reaction networks
Biochemical reaction networks
BRNs are defined by sets of biochemical species $\left({X}_{\mathsf{\text{1}}},{X}_{\mathsf{\text{2}}},\dots ,{X}_{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{x}}}}\right)$ and biochemical reactions $\left({R}_{\mathsf{\text{1}}},{R}_{\mathsf{\text{2}}},\dots ,{R}_{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{r}}}}\right)$. Biochemical species are ensembles of chemically identical molecular entities, e.g., RNAs and proteins [7]. Reactions are processes which result in the interconversion of some biochemical species (reactants, r) in some others (products, p), and can be written as:
Here, ${s}_{ij}^{\left(\mathsf{\text{r}}\right)}\in {\mathbb{N}}_{0}$ and ${s}_{ij}^{\left(\mathsf{\text{p}}\right)}\in {\mathbb{N}}_{0}$ are the stoichiometric coefficients of species i in reaction j, which denote the number of molecules consumed and produced when the reaction takes place [1], respectively. The overall reaction stoichiometry is
in which $S=\left\{{S}_{ij}\right\}\in {\mathbb{Z}}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{x}}}\times {n}_{\mathsf{\text{r}}}}$.
The species and reactions of a BRN can be interpreted as vertices and edges of a graph. This graph contains two types of edges: regular directed edges representing the interconversions between species (these vertices are encoded in the stoichiometric matrix S); and directed hyperedges from a species to a reaction. The hyperedges describe dependencies of the reaction rates on biochemical species (often called modifiers) which are not consumed by the reaction.
Ordinary differential equation models of BRNs
The dynamics of BRNs can be described using many different approaches. In this manuscript we considered ODE models of BRNs which are commonly written as:
in which $x\left(t\right)\in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{x}}}}$ is the state at time t, with x_{ i } being the concentration of the chemical species X_{ i }. Furthermore, ${x}_{0}\left(\theta ,u\right)\in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{x}}}}$ is the parameter and experiment dependent initial condition, $S\in {\mathbb{Z}}^{{n}_{x}\times {n}_{\mathsf{\text{r}}}}$ is the stoichiometric matrix, $v\left(x,\theta ,u\right)\in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{r}}}}$ is the flux vector, and $\theta \in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{{n}_{\theta}}$ is the parameter vector. The potentially timedependent function $u\left(t\right)\in {\mathbb{R}}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{u}}}}$ describes the experimental setup (see explanation below).
The state x(t) is the current condition of the system, whereas the flux v(x, θ, u) determines the change of the state with time. The flux v_{ j }(x, θ, u) corresponds to the frequency with which reaction R_{ j } takes place. If mass action kinetics [1] are assumed, we obtain
In this case, the parameters $\theta ={\left({\kappa}_{1},\dots ,{\kappa}_{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{r}}}}\right)}^{\mathsf{\text{T}}}$ are reaction rate coefficients (e.g., affinities) and exactly one parameter is associated with each reaction. If more complex flux models are used, such as MichaelisMenten or Hillkinetics [1], several parameters can be associated with one reaction. A simple example is the enzymatic conversion of X_{ i } into X_{ i∗ }by the enzyme ${X}_{{i}^{E}},{X}_{i}+{X}_{{i}^{E}}\to {X}_{i*}+{X}_{{i}^{E}}$, often described using the MichaelisMenten kinetics,
In this case, two parameters are assigned to reaction j: κ_{j,max}and κ_{ j }.
In a graph theoretical context, the timedependent states x_{ i }(t) are attributes of the vertices and the timedependent fluxes v_{ j }(x(t), θ, u(t)) as well as the fixed parameters θ_{ j } are attributes of the edges.
ODEbased modeling of BRN is flexible and allows for the description of many metabolic, signal transduction, and gene regulation processes. However, like most other modeling approaches it suffers from one major problem. Due to experimental constraints, the parameters θ_{ j } cannot be measured directly, but have to be estimated.
Bayesian parameter estimation
To estimate the parameters θ_{ j }, measurement data have to be collected. The measured quantities $y\left(t\right)\in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{y}}}}$ (also called measurands, observables, or outputs),
are typically individual states (h_{ k }(x, θ) = x_{ i }), sums of states $\left({h}_{k}\left(x\right)={x}_{{i}_{\mathsf{\text{1}}}}+{x}_{{i}_{\mathsf{\text{2}}}}\right)$, or quantities that are proportional to one of the aforementioned ones. As the measurements are corrupted by noise, the available data are:
in which ${t}_{l}\in {\mathbb{R}}_{+},\u0233\left({t}_{l}\right)\in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{y}}}}$, and $\epsilon \left({t}_{l}\right)\in {\mathbb{R}}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{y}}}}$ denote the time at which the measurement was performed, the noiseaffected output, and the measurement noise, respectively.
In a graph context, the measured quantities ${y}_{k}$ represent an additional layer. This layer contains the different outputs, ${h}_{k}\left(x,\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\theta \right)$, as elements with the two timedependent attributes: the simulated output trajectories ${y}_{k}\left(t;\phantom{\rule{2.77695pt}{0ex}}\theta \right)$ for particular parameter values; and the discrete measured quantities ${\u0233}_{k}\left({t}_{l}\right)$. The measured quantities depend on one or more states (concentrations) in the network but do not interact with these components. Thus, the measured quantities represent sets of vertices of the chemical reaction network, where these sets contain all chemical species ${X}_{i}$ with $\frac{\partial}{\partial {x}_{i}}{h}_{k}\left(x,\theta \right)\ne 0$.
Measurement data are in general available for different experimental conditions. The experimental conditions are described using the function u(t), which might be timedependent. The experiment description ${u}^{e}\left(t\right)$ of the eth experiment can account for different interventions, e.g., silencing or overexpression of genes, stimuli, and medium changes. Thus, it alters the reactions rates. As ${u}^{e}\left(t\right)$ differs for the individual experiment, so do the timedependent outputs ${y}^{e}\left(t\right)$, measured outputs ${\u0233}^{e}\left(t\right)$, states ${x}^{e}\left(t\right)$, and fluxes ${v}^{e}\left(x\left(t\right),\theta ,{u}^{e}\left(t\right)\right)$. Furthermore, the data used for parameter estimation are the union of the data obtained from the individual experiments, $\mathcal{D}={\cup}_{e}{\mathcal{D}}^{e}$. As all statements hold for all experiments, in the following we skip the superscript e to simplify the notation. Given the data $\mathcal{D}$, the parameters are estimated. For this purpose, different methods can be employed. One commonly used method is Bayesian parameter estimation [4, 8], which relies on Bayes' theorem,
The expression on the right hand side of (3) provides the posterior probability $p\left(\theta \mathcal{D}\right)\in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}$ of a parameter vector θ, given the data $\mathcal{D}$. Here, the conditional probability to observe the data $p\left(\mathcal{D}\theta \right)\in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}$, the prior knowledge of the parameters $p\left(\theta \right)\in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}$, and the prior probability of the data $p\left(\mathcal{D}\right)\in {\mathbb{R}}_{+}$ are taken into account. In the case of independent normally distributed measurement noise, ${\epsilon}_{k}\left({t}_{l}\right)~\mathcal{N}\left(\epsilon 0,{\sigma}_{k}^{2}\left({t}_{l}\right)\right)$, the conditional probability becomes
in which ${y}_{k}\left({t}_{l};\theta \right)={h}_{k}\left(x\left({t}_{l};\theta \right),\theta \right)$ is the simulated output of the model (1) and (2). The conditional probability and thus the posterior probability is large, if the distance between measurement and data is small. A high value of $p\left(\mathcal{D}\theta \right)$ indicates that the considered parameter vector θ is plausible and might be close to the true parameter of the biological process.
Uncertainties of parameters, fluxes, and states
In general, the parameters θ_{ j } cannot be determined precisely but remain uncertain. This uncertainty is encoded in the shape of the posterior probability $p\left(\theta \mathcal{D}\right)$. Large uncertainty is indicated by a broad distribution, while, e.g., dependencies between a subset of the parameters might result in a narrowing of distributions in certain subspaces or manifolds. As the number of unknown parameters θ is often large, n_{ θ } ≫ 1, the analysis of $p\left(\theta \mathcal{D}\right)$ is challenging. To analyze the uncertainty, a sample ${\left\{{\theta}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$ is generated from $p\left(\theta \mathcal{D}\right)$, using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling [9]. Associated with this parameter sample, we have a flux sample ${\left\{{v}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$ and a state sample ${\left\{{x}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$. The individual members of this sample are flux trajectories ${v}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)=v\left({x}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right),{\theta}^{\left(\alpha \right)},u\left(t\right)\right)$ and state trajectories ${x}^{\alpha}\left(t\right)$, respectively. These trajectories are obtained by simulating the model (1) for parameter ${\theta}^{\alpha}$. The samples ${\left\{{\theta}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}},{\left\{{v}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$, and ${\left\{{x}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$ carry the statistical properties of $p\left(\theta \mathcal{D}\right)$ as well as its image in flux and concentration space. Hence, the samples can be used to gain insight into the parameter and prediction uncertainties.
Analysis goals: understanding uncertainty and process dynamics
Understanding the parameter and prediction uncertainties is crucial to ensure a good understanding of the model and its limitations, and to support the comparison of performed experiments as well as the selection of future experiments. Unfortunately, the indepth analysis of model uncertainty is ambitious because it requires the analysis of hidden dependencies between the static and dynamic attributes of the model. While these dependencies could theoretically be detected algorithmically, the fact that the interesting features—the things we are looking for during the exploration phase—are not known a priori, complicates algorithmic searches in practice. Visualization in combination with human perception has proven to be more powerful for exploration tasks [10] than algorithmic approaches.
So far, mainly tables, scatter plots, and line plots of existing systems have been used by domain experts to investigate parameter, flux and state samples. Using such visualizations independently, it is not possible to obtain a detailed view of the distributions and, hence, it is hard to detect complex patterns within the data. In contrast, using linked visualizations for the analysis of individual attributes of the BRN model allows to achieve this analysis goal. In particular, exploration approaches, which allow the user to subsequently focus on different aspects of interest, are essential ingredients. These include the assessment of relatively high uncertainties and the identification of uncertainty hubs. Besides, the analysis of time dependence of outputs, fluxes, and states and their timedependent uncertainties as well as localizing hubs involved in fast or slow process dynamics is of interest. Furthermore, it is necessary to characterize correlations between attributes, e.g., between parameters, fluxes, or states. Finally, the comparison of uncertain fluxes, states, and outputs between different experimental conditions is important to understand how particular aspects of the dynamics are altered.
Related work
BRNs are usually displayed as nodelink diagrams, where chemical species (vertices) are represented as nodes and reactions (directed edges) by links with arrow heads connecting the nodes. The vertices and edges of a network carry domainspecific attributes; here parameters, fluxes, and states. These can be mapped to visual attributes of nodes and links, such as their thickness, brightness, shape, or color [11]. While the structure of BRNs is static, attributes attached to vertices (states) and edges (fluxes) may be dynamic. There are three common approaches to integrate the evolution of multidimensional information into graph visualizations [12]: small multiples [13], animation, and complex glyphs, such as small charts embedded into the graph.
Although there is a large number of visualization tools for BRNs, only few of them support the visualization and the visual comparison of dynamic node attributes of experimental data collected under different experimental conditions. For the simultaneous visualization of gene regulatory networks and their states at different time points Cerebral [14], Pathline [15], GENeVis [16], VANTED [17] and the Pathway Tools software [18], can be used. Cerebral and Pathline exploit small multiple views of the graph or line charts of the timeseries data, respectively. GENeVis and VANTED make use of small charts embedded into the vertices. All these visualization approaches perform well if the number of time points is small, however, they do not scale well. Furthermore, small multiples and small embedded charts do not allow for the comparison of the time series of different fluxes or different states for one experimental condition. To avoid some of these problems, in the Pathway Tools software the attribute dynamics are visualized using animation instead of a static representation. However, this does not facilitate the analysis of dynamic attributes across different experimental conditions.
Beyond the visual analysis of time dependencies of BRN attributes, also the attribute uncertainties have to be studied to assess the reliability of model predictions. Unfortunately, hardly any tool exists that can visualize the uncertainties associated with the graphs attributes. Commonly used tools like COPASI [19] and CellDesigner [20] support the simulation of BRN models and visualization of model predictions for a given parameter value, however, they do not provide visualizations of the prediction uncertainties. In addition, the available tools do neither support a visual exploration of the dynamics and uncertainties, nor link the information with the underlying graph structure of the BRN.
The visualization of uncertainties has been recognized as one of the key challenges in scientific visualization [21]. Therefore, in different scientific disciplines, e.g., flow field visualization and surface representations [22, 23], much research has been carried out on uncertainty visualization. In contrast, little work has been done on visualizing the uncertainties of graph attributes. To study multiple static node attributes Cesario et al. [24] introduced a method which employs spatial layouts in combination with different linked views including parallel coordinates, scatter plots, comparative columns and bullseyes. To visualize structural uncertainties of graphs, Lee et al. [25] developed CandidTree. We are not aware of tools that visualize attribute uncertainties, quantified in terms of standard deviation, percentiles or other uncertainty measures, directly within the graph. This could by achieved by animation, adding glyphs or geometry to the rendered scene, modifying geometry, or addressing other human senses [26].
Methods
We developed the visual analytics system iVUN, a JAVA based tool facilitating the interactive visualization of uncertain BRNs. iVUN has been developed in a participatory design process together with two target users. To assess the utility of the individual visualization approaches and multiple linked views of iVUN, a qualitative user study with 10 domain experts was performed. A more detailed description of the design process as well as the design and results of the qualitative user study can be found in our previous work on the uncertaintyaware visual analysis of BRNs [6].
Overview about iVUN
iVUN imports the BRN from an xml file following the specifications SBML [27]. The BRN is visualized as a nodelink diagram (graph view), where nodes represent species and links (arrows) represent reactions (see Figure 2: graph view).
As presented in the section Computational Modeling of Biochemical Reaction Networks, the BRNs have different attributes. MCMC sampling does not only provide a sample of the parameters ${\left\{{\theta}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$, but also of the outputs ${\left\{{y}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$, the states ${\left\{{x}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$, and the fluxes ${\left\{{v}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$. The individual samples can be imported from text files in txt or csv format as described in the tutorial. The output, state, and flux samples depend on the experimental condition u^{(e)}. This experimental context has to be conserved.
As mentioned in section Bayesian Parameter Estimation, outputs are typically individual state variables or sums of states and can therefore be assigned to one or more species and hence nodes in the graph. Thus, the outputs are visualized using convex hulls that surround the respective nodes.
To analyze the uncertainty of static parameters (θ) and experimentdependent dynamic properties—utputs (y), states (x, also referred to as concentrations), and fluxes (v)—iVUN offers multiple linked views showing information at different levels of granularity. Brushing and linking techniques are used to connect views that share the same data attributes [28], i.e., to visually link the elements in the different views. A change in selection within one view by brushing directly results in the highlighting of the respective elements within all views. In particular, the elements are first highlighted by short flashing to attract the users attention before they stay highlighted.
An overview of the summary statistics of samples, like mean and standard deviation, can be obtained from the graph view by mapping them to visual attributes of the graph but also in a linked table view. Further linked views support the analysis of the distribution of values within samples, the dynamic change of samples as well as correlations between sample members or time courses (see Figure 2). In addition, iVUN supports the comparison of different experiments and hence sets of outputs, flux samples, and state samples.
In the following subsection, we present the visualization methods included in iVUN:

Histograms and color mapping in the graph view and table views for the analysis of parameter uncertainties.

Different types of line plots and animation of the graph view for the analysis of attribute dynamics.

Scatter plots and correlation matrices for the analysis of attribute correlations.

Combinations of different tools and the linking between them to explore complex, hidden dependencies.
The different visualization methods have been combined to meet the aforementioned analysis goals.
Visualization of statistics of attribute samples
One analysis task is the localization of large uncertainties and uncertainty hubs in the BRN. To support this, statistical properties of the parameter sample ${\left\{{\theta}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$, the flux sample ${\left\{{v}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$, and state sample ${\left\{{x}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$ can be colorcoded in the graph. iVUN supports the mapping of the mean and standard deviation of the samples to the color of links (for parameters and fluxes) and nodes (for states). As edges possess two attributes, the user can select whether the parameters or the fluxes are visualized.
For kinetic rate laws with several parameters, the links are split into the respective number of segments. Each segment is colored according to the statistical properties of one parameter: starting with the first parameter of the kinetic law at the starting point of the edge and ending with the last parameter of the kinetic law at the arrowhead. A disadvantage of this approach is the fact that the number of parameters as well as the link length can differ for different reactions. For that reason, the length of individual link segments is not necessarily uniform. Nevertheless, this approach enables the simultaneous assessment of the uncertainty of all parameters and avoids the switching between different parameters. Therefore, it is possible to perceive whether all parameters of a reaction are (un)certain or whether the uncertainties differ for the different parameters of the reaction. For an individual mapping of mean values or standard deviations, iVUN offers different colormaps created with ColorBrewer [29]. Based on these color maps, users can identify relatively low and high values. For the simultaneous visualization of mean and standard deviation, bivariate multihue colormaps are provided. If several experiments are imported with different output, state, and flux samples, nodes and links are colored based on the statistical attributes of the currently selected experiment.
In addition to the graphbased visualization, means and standard deviations of the parameters are summarized in a table view. This table is linked to the graph view. All reactions associated with the parameter selected in the table view are highlighted in the graph view. Furthermore, when selecting a reaction, all associated parameters are highlighted in the table view. The cells of the table are colored using the same color maps as used for the links to visualize mean values and standard deviations. Hence, the lowest and highest mean values and standard deviations for the parameters of the system can be identified at a glance. This supports the assessment of relatively low and high uncertainties.
For the detailed investigation of the parameter distributions, iVUN provides a histogram view. This view includes the histograms for all selected parameters (see Figure 2: statistics). The histograms of the different parameters are comparable as they are computed with the same bin width.
Visualization of the attribute dynamics
BRNs are dynamical systems and therefore fluxes, states, and outputs are timedependent. These timedependent attributes have to be compared within and across experiments to understand the systems' behavior. In addition, outputs, states, and fluxes are intertwined: the fluxes determine the states, and the states determine the outputs. This hierarchical structure of BRNs is exploited by iVUN, which is why we study the flux, the state, and the output layers. iVUN incorporates animation and linked line plots to visualize attribute dynamics (see Figure 2: dynamics). The animation allows the user to obtain an overview, e.g., to detect drastic changes, and to identify hubs of similar dynamics [6]. Thereby, the timedependent means or standard deviations of the sample ${\left\{{v}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}\left({\left\{{x}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}\right)$ are mapped to the color of the respective link (node). iVUN supports a navigation through time either stepwise using the forward or backward button or rapidly with the help of a slider. Continuous animation is obtained by keeping these buttons pressed.
Animation poses a natural way to convey dynamic data, whereas at the same time its effectiveness is limited due to perceptual and cognitive limitations in the processing of changing visual presentations [30]. To improve the perception during the continuous animation, drastic changes of the mean or standard deviation of the samples are automatically detected and respective links (nodes) are briefly highlighted within the graph view [31]. While this yields some improvement, it still does not allow for a detailed analysis and a quantitative comparison of all time series for fluxes or states. Therefore, we visualize the dynamic behavior of outputs ${\left\{{x}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$, states ${\left\{{x}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$, and fluxes ${\left\{{v}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\left(t\right)\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$ in separate line plots. Each line within the respective plot represents the timedependent median of one output, one state, or one flux. To visualize the uncertainties, we frame the lines corresponding to the medians by a semitransparent area those boundaries are the timedependent percentiles of the respective sample (by default the 5thpercentile, P_{5}, and the 95thpercentile, P_{95}). The use of the median and the percentile intervals allows for the study of asymmetries in the distribution.
For the outputs, median and percentile intervals of the simulated trajectories as well as the measured data are included in the line plot. As the measured values ${\u0233}_{k}\left({t}_{l}\right)$ are only available at discrete time points, they are depicted as dots. The colors of simulated trajectories y_{ k }(t) and measured points ${\u0233}_{k}\left({t}_{l}\right)$ are identical. To visually link the outputs in the line plot with the respective set of nodes (convex hull) in the graph view, the same color is also used for the convex hull. One essential feature of iVUN that supports the analysis of complex networks is that line plots and graph view are directly linked. A selection in a line plot results in the highlighting of the corresponding nodes or links in the graph view, and vice versa. As outputs are in general weighted sums of states and hence associated with more than one species, several species (nodes) are highlighted. Conversely, the selection of a species that belongs to several outputs, results in the highlighting of all these outputs in the line plot.
As the number of species and reactions increases for more complex BRNs, the line plots for states, outputs, and fluxes become cluttered. Furthermore, if the number of lines is greater 10, the corresponding colors become difficult to distinguish. Therefore, instead of just highlighting selected elements to focus on fluxes, states, or outputs of interest, lines can be faded out using check boxes.
For all dynamic attributes, two types of line plots are available: a line plot to compare time series of different attributes for the currently selected experiment (see Figure 2: withinexperiment comparison line plots); and a line plot to compare the currently selected attributes for all experimental conditions (see Figure 2: betweenexperiment comparison line plots). With these views, users can investigate and compare uncertainties and dynamics under different experimental conditions.
Visualization of correlations between attributes
The uncertainty of one attribute often comes along with uncertainties in some other attributes. Furthermore, the values of two attributes, e.g., two parameters in ${\left\{{\theta}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$, might be correlated. Identifying these interdependencies is essential to understand the behavior of the system. Therefore, iVUN supports the identification of correlations between uncertain attributes.
Two different matrix views are available that can be used to investigate dependencies of or correlation between different dimensions of the parameter sample ${\left\{{\theta}^{\left(\alpha \right)}\right\}}_{\alpha =1}^{{n}_{\mathsf{\text{s}}}}$: an eigenvalueratiomatrix and a correlation matrix. The former is based on principal component analysis (PCA), whereas the latter provides the Pearson's correlation coefficients for all pairwise combinations of parameters. For dynamic attributes, the correlation matrix displays the pairwise Pearson's correlation coefficients between the sample members of the currently selected time point or between time courses of either mean values or standard deviations. The cells within this matrix include the numerical values and are colored with respect to the sign and absolute value of the ratio (see Figure 3B).
Similar to the line plots, also the matrix views are linked to the graph view. If a cell within a matrix is selected, the two respective elements within the graph as well as the respective columns within the table and lines within the line plots are highlighted. Vice versa, if the user selects a set of elements (θ, v, or x) within the graph, all pairwise combinations and hence respective cells within the matrix views are highlighted.
While correlation matrices allow for an overview of occurring correlations, scatter plots can be used to gain further insights into the type of correlation and the properties of the distribution (see Figure 2: correlations and Figure 3B and 3C). To facilitate the exploration, the scatter plot of two elements can be obtained by selecting either the respective elements in the graph or the respective cell in the matrix. For fluxes and states, the sample for the currently selected time point t_{ k } is visualized within the scatter plot.
For more details on the visualization tools and the implementation, we refer to the documentation of iVUN (http://www.vis.unistuttgart.de/iVUN) and our previous publication [6].
Results and discussion
JAK2/STAT5 signaling pathway
For this case study, we consider the Epoinduced JAK2/STAT5 signaling pathway. The hormone Erythropoietin (Epo) regulates the production of red blood cells. Initially, Epo binds to the Eporeceptor inducing a rapid phosphorylation of JAK2. Phosphorylated JAK2 activates the transcription factor STAT5 by phosphorylation. Phosphorylated STAT5, pSTAT5, can be translocated from the cytosol to the nucleus where it induces the transcription of CIS and SOCS, two inhibitors of JAK2 and STAT5 phosphorylation. The dual feedback loop established by CIS and SOCS adjusts STAT5 phosphorylation levels over the entire range of Epo concentrations. This is essential as in vivo a broad dynamic range of Epo concentration is observed [32] and STAT5 influences the cell fate. It has been shown that pSTAT5 promotes the survival of erythroid progenitor cells [33].
In the following, we consider the ODE model of the Epoinduced JAK2/STAT5 signaling pathway introduced by Bachmann et al. [33] (see Figure 3A). This model describes the timedependent concentrations of 25 chemical species under 24 experimental conditions. It is highly nonlinear and possesses 113 unknown parameters. Due to the high dimensionality of the parameter space, Bayesian parameter estimation for this problem is challenging. Recently, a novel adaptive hierarchical MCMC sampling scheme suited for this highdimension problem was proposed [34]. Using the resulting MCMC sample, the uncertainty of the individual parameters and the prediction uncertainty of the concentration of nuclear pSTAT5 and SOCS3 was evaluated using classical approaches. Here, we use the same MCMC sample to study the uncertainties and correlations of parameters, fluxes, states, and outputs in more detail. To simplify the analysis slightly, we focus on the 27 dynamic parameters and initial conditions that influence the biochemical process. The 86 nuisance parameters, which are necessary to compare the model with the experimental data, are not analyzed in detail because this does not promise additional biological insight.
Note that the outputs of the model are logtransforms of concentrations and can thus be negative. The logtransformation is necessary to account for the noise distributions observed in biological systems. As the logarithmic scale is a natural choices for the strictly positive physical quantities [35], such as reaction rates, we analyze the logarithmic values of the parameters, log_{10}(θ), and their statistics throughout this section.
Analysis of parameter uncertainties and correlations
To improve our understanding of interdependencies and correlations of the unknown parameters, we investigated the graph view of the BRN, the Pearson correlation matrix, and the scatter plots. The Pearson correlation matrix provides a rough overview of the correlation structure, whereas the linking to the graph view—reactions associated to selected parameter pairs are highlighted—allows us to locate the parameters in the BRN. Using this linking, we can analyze visually whether strongly correlated parameters are in proximity to each other—as one would expect. This is an essential advantage of the linking as the model equations are complex and the parameter names are not fully intuitive.
Furthermore, for this system several states and reaction rates have been scaled to circumvent structural nonidentifiability. This increases the model complexity and renders the identification of parameters in the BRN, without the need to study the model equations, a powerful feature.
For the JAK2/STAT5 pathway, our analysis using the graph view in combination with the correlation matrices and scatter plots indeed revealed that most of the strongly correlated parameters are in close proximity to each other, influencing, e.g., the in and outflux in one state (positive correlation) or two influxes (negative correlation). In Figure 3(A) one such parameter pair is highlighted. Using iVUN, we could easily detect several existing "correlation clusters" that are a result of the strong, localized correlations. Figure 3B depicts these correlation clusters which determine: the modulation of STAT5 phosphorylation via CIS (cluster 1); the inhibition of JAK2 phosphorylation by SOCS3 (cluster 2); and the STAT5 activation by different forms of the receptor (cluster 3). In addition to these correlation clusters, there are some parameters, e.g., 'SOC3Inh', which influence many reaction rates and are therefore correlated with many reaction rates.
Beyond the analysis of the Pearson correlation matrix, we employed scatter plots and histograms to assess a few interesting parameter combinations, e.g., parameters that belong to different mechanisms. One interesting example is the pair of 'SOCS3RNADelay' and 'SOCS3RNATurn', which shows medium negative correlation. The scatter plot reveals that the dependence between these parameters is highly nonlinear, and the histogram shows that the distribution of 'SOCS3RNATurn' is indeed bimodal. This has also been observed in [34] and analyzed using support vector machines, but our visual exploration requires less time and is in this regard advantageous.
Analysis of output, state and flux dynamics and uncertainties
In most systems biology projects, the prediction of the response of a process, e.g., a signaling pathway, to altered experimental conditions is of primary interest. This requires the analysis of the dynamics attributes: outputs, states, and fluxes. The uncertainties of these three timedependent quantities are expected to be significantly different. As the outputs have been measured at different discrete points, the uncertainty in the simulated output trajectories should be small. In contrast, states and fluxes are not directly measured but merely constrained by their relation to the output. Since one output is in general a weighted sum of several states, and only the sum of these states has to agree with the measured data, we expect that the uncertainty in the state trajectories is larger than in the output trajectories. Accordingly, the combination of several fluxes determines the timeevolution of the states, which can result in a further increase of the uncertainty.
To assess these hypotheses, we analyzed the different layers of the JAK2/STAT5 pathway using a zooming approach. Starting with the animated graph view (Figure 4A) to gain an overview of the attribute dynamics, iVUN allows a stepbystep exploration of the output, state, and flux layers. Therefore, the corresponding line plots are linked. The selection of an output trajectory in the output line plot (Figure 4B) results in highlighting of the corresponding state trajectories in the state line plot (Figure 4C). Similarly, states and flux trajectories are linked (Figure 4D). Finally, the scatter plot of the flux can be depicted for different time points.
Using this zooming approach, we gained the impression that for the JAK2/STAT5 pathway the output uncertainty is indeed small compared to the uncertainty in the state trajectories. However, the state uncertainty appeared to be compatible with the flux uncertainty. This has also been confirmed using a numerical evaluation. We argue that the uncertainties of the fluxes are not larger than the uncertainties of the states, as most biological species are conserved. This provides an additional restriction on the fluxes. Furthermore, the highest node degree is 5 and most nodes have degrees 2 or 3. This small node degree limits the uncertainty of the fluxes further and results in significant correlations between fluxes, as illustrated in Figure 4E.
To compare the dynamics observed for different experimental conditions, iVUN allows for a "betweenexperiment comparison" of measurement data and simulation results using line plots. The line plots can directly reveal differences in: concentrations, slower/faster dynamics, peak concentrations and timing. In combination with the 90% confidence interval, we can furthermore conclude that, e.g., the pSTAT5 concentration varies significantly for different experimental conditions (Figure 4F).
A detailed description of how all plots for the case study were obtained can be found on the iVUN web page: http://www.vis.unistuttgart.de/iVUN.
Conclusions
In this manuscript, we introduced the visual analytics system iVUN. iVUN has been devised to allow for the analysis of static and dynamic properties of BRNs described by ODEs. In many projects, the amount of available data is limited and the data are affected by noise. Therefore, the parameters, fluxes, states, and outputs of BRNs are not fully determined. A rigorous analysis requires the consideration of the limitation of the model. Therefore, iVUN supports an uncertaintyaware visualization by providing visualizations to study the statistics of uncertain parameters and confidence intervals for uncertain model predictions. These statistics are extracted from MCMC samples of parameters and the associated flux, state, and output trajectories.
The visualization of model uncertainties is one of two key advantages of iVUN compared to existing tools. The second key advantage is the linking of many different views (see Figure 2). iVUN provides a graph view to visualize the BRN, as well as secondary views depicting the timedependence of samples (line plots), correlations between samples (scatter plot, correlation matrix), and statistics of samples (tables containing mean and variances). As the selection of elements in the secondary plots results in highlighting of the respective elements in the graph view, the user can explore the model properties without going forward and backward between plots and model equations. This allows for an improved understanding and a faster perception of the properties. A user study proved that a variety of questions can be answered using iVUN while accounting for the preferences of the individual users [6].
As illustrated in the case study of Epoinduced JAK2/STAT5 signaling, also new insight can be gained using iVUN. Concerning the parameters, one finding is that strong pairwise correlations occur mainly between parameters which are in close proximity to each other in the graph. With respect to output, state, and flux uncertainties, we could improve the understanding of uncertainty propagation across the layers in the presence of conservation relations.
Furthermore, due to its extensions compared to the previous version [6], iVUN allows for a detailed analysis of the agreement of model and data, as well as for the comparison of dynamic properties across different experimental conditions.
Beyond the analysis of BRNs governed by ODEs, iVUN is also capable of supporting the analysis of stochastic dynamics. iVUN merely requires a representative set of trajectories to evaluate the statistics. This set can also originate from a stochastic description of the BRN using, e.g., stochastic differential equation [36] or continuous time Markov processes [37], or a combination of parameter uncertainties and stochastic effects. Furthermore, besides samplebased Bayesian confidence intervals also other types of confidence intervals can be considered, e.g., profile likelihoods based confidence intervals [38, 39].
In the future, we plan to extend the capabilities of iVUN even further toward a comprehensive analysis tool for BRNs. We want to allow for the abstraction of signaling pathways by aggregating subnetworks. To this end, the users will be enabled to define supernodes that represent these subnetworks. This is crucial as models become more and more complex. In addition to this coarsening, we want to allow for the assignment of detailed metainformation, e.g., references to the different species and reactions. Furthermore, additional views are planned for the assessment of highdimensional dependencies, e.g., parallel coordinate plots, and we are awaiting the feedback of additional users. In summary, this paper introduced the software tool iVUN which has been devised for the study of graphs with uncertain, dynamic attributes. Using a model of the Epoinduced JAK2/STAT5 signaling pathway, the advantages of visual analytic approaches for the analysis of BRNs has been demonstrated on a realworld problem. While the tool is certainly not limited to this application, there is a particular need for uncertaintyaware visualizations. To inspire other researches to work on this problem and to test their methods, we propose the Epoinduced JAK2/STAT5 signaling pathway as a benchmark problem and provide all data at http://www.vis.unistuttgart.de/iVUN.
Availability and requirements
iVUN is implemented in the Java™ programming language. For the network visualization, the Java Universal Network/Graph Framework Version 2.0.1 [40] is used. As basis for the diverse plots, including line plots, histograms and scatter plots, we use the Java library JMathTools [41]. The software and detailed documentation are available at www.vis.unistuttgart.de/iVUN. Furthermore, this web page provides all data for the case study and a description of how the plots shown in 'Results and Discussion' were obtained.
References
 1.
Klipp E, Herwig R, Kowald A, Wierling C, Lehrach H: Systems Biology in Practice. 2005, WileyVCH, Weinheim
 2.
Schöberl B: Therapeutically targeting ErbB3: a key node in ligandinduced activation of the ErbB receptorPI3K axis. Science Signaling. 2009, 2: ra3110.1126/scisignal.2000352.
 3.
Brännmark C, Palmer R, Glad ST, Cedersund G, Strålfors P: Mass and information feedbacks through receptor endocytosis govern insulin signaling as revealed using a parameterfree modeling framework. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2010, 285: 2017120179. 10.1074/jbc.M110.106849.
 4.
Kramer A, Hasenauer J, Allgöwer F, Radde N: Computation of the posterior entropy in a Bayesian framework for parameter estimation in biological networks. In Proceedings of IEEE MultiConference on Systems and Control (MCS). IEEE. 2010, 493498.
 5.
Wilkinson DJ: Parameter inference for stochastic kinetic models of bacterial gene regulation: a Bayesian approach to systems biology. In Proceedings of 9th Valencia International Meeting on Bayesian Statistics. Oxford University Press. 2010, 679705.
 6.
Vehlow C, Hasenauer J, Kramer A, Heinrich J, Radde N, Allgöwer F, Weiskopf D: Uncertaintyaware visual analysis of biochemical reaction networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Biological Data Visualization (Biovis). IEEE. 2012, 9198.
 7.
McNaught A, Wilkinson A: IUPAC Compendium of Chemical Terminology. 1997, Blackwell Science, 2
 8.
Wilkinson DJ: Bayesian methods in bioinformatics and computational systems biology. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2007, 8: 109116.
 9.
MacKay DJC: Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. 2005, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7.2
 10.
Thomas JJ, Cook KA: Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. 2005, IEEE Computer Society Press
 11.
Huang ML: Graph visualization of web data with domainspecific attributes. In Proceedings of the 16th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS '02, IEEE Computer Society. 2002, 168174.
 12.
Beck F, Burch M, Diehl S: Towards an aesthetic dimensions framework for dynamic graph visualisations. In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Information Visualization, IV. IEEE. 2009, 592597.
 13.
Tufte ER: Envisioning Information. 1990, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press
 14.
Barsky A, Munzner T, Gardy J, Kincaid R: Cerebral: visualizing multiple experimental conditions on a graph with biological context. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 2008, 14: 12531260.
 15.
Meyer M, Wong B, Styczynski M, Munzner T, Pfister H: Pathline: a tool for comparative functional genomics. Computer Graphics Forum. 2010, 29: 10431052. 10.1111/j.14678659.2009.01710.x.
 16.
Westenberg MA, van Hijum SAFT, Kuipers OP, Roerdink JBTM: Visualizing genome expression and regulatory network dynamics in genomic and metabolic context. Computer Graphics Forum. 2008, 27: 887894. 10.1111/j.14678659.2008.01221.x.
 17.
Junker B, Klukas C, Schreiber F: VANTED: a system for advanced data analysis and visualization in the context of biological networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006, 7: 109121. 10.1186/147121057109.
 18.
Karp PD, Paley S, Romero P: The Pathway Tools software. Bioinformatics. 2002, 18 (Suppl 1): 225232. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.S225.
 19.
Hoops S, Sahle S, Gauges R, Lee C, Pahle J, Simus N, Singhal M, Xu L, Mendes P, Kummer U: COPASI  a COmplex PAthway SImulator. Bioinformatics. 2006, 22: 30673074. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl485.
 20.
Funahashi A, Matsuoka Y, Jouraku A, Morohashi M, Kikuchi N, Kitano H: CellDesigner 3.5: a versatile modeling tool for biochemical networks. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2008, 96: 12541265.
 21.
Johnson CR: Top scientific visualization research problems. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: Visualization Viewpoints. 2004, 24: 1317.
 22.
Griethe H, Schumann H: The visualization of uncertain data: methods and problems. In Proceedings of SimVis '06. SCS Publishing House e.V. 2006, 143156.
 23.
Johnson CR, Sanderson AR: A next step: visualizing errors and uncertainty. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 2003, 23: 610.
 24.
Cesario N, Pang A, Singh L: Visualizing node attribute uncertainty in graphs. Proceedings of the SPIE (Visualization and Data Analysis 2011). 2011
 25.
Lee B, Robertson GG, Czerwinski M, Sims Parr C: CandidTree: visualizing structural uncertainty in similar hierarchies. Information Visualization. 2007, 6: 233246. 10.1057/palgrave.ivs.9500157.
 26.
Pang AT, Wittenbrink CM, Lodha SK: Approaches to uncertainty visualization. The Visual Computer. 1997, 13: 370390. 10.1007/s003710050111.
 27.
The Systems Biology Markup Language. 2012, [http://sbml.org/Main_Page]
 28.
Roberts JC: Encouraging coupled views for visualization exploration. Proceedings of SPIE, Visual Data Exploration and Analysis VI. 1999, 3643: 1424. 10.1117/12.342832.
 29.
ColorBrewer. 2011, [http://colorbrewer2.org/]
 30.
Tversky B, Bauer Morrison J, Betrancourt M: Animation: can it facilitate?. International Journal of HumanComputer Studies. 2002, 57: 247262. 10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017.
 31.
von Landesberger T, Kuijper A, Schreck T, Kohlhammer J, van Wijk J, Fekete JD, Fellner D: Visual analysis of large graphs: stateoftheart and future research challenges. Computer Graphics Forum. 2011, 30: 17191749. 10.1111/j.14678659.2011.01898.x.
 32.
Becker V, Schilling M, Bachmann J, Baumann U, Raue A, Maiwald T, Timmer J, Klingmüller U: Covering a broad dynamic range: information processing at the erythropoietin receptor. Science. 2010, 328: 14041408. 10.1126/science.1184913.
 33.
Bachmann J, Raue A, Schilling M, Böhm ME, Kreutz C, Kaschek D, Busch H, Gretz N, Lehmann WD, Timmer J, Klingmüller U: Division of labor by dual feedback regulators controls JAK2/STAT5 signaling over broad ligand range. Molecular Systems Biology. 2011, 7 (516): 115.
 34.
Hug S, Raue A, Hasenauer J, Bachmann J, Klingmüller U, Timmer J, Theis FJ: Highdimensional Bayesian parameter estimation: case study for a model of JAK2/STAT5 signaling. Mathematical Biosciences. 2013, [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mbs.2013.04.002]
 35.
Tarantola A: Inverse Problem Theory and Methods for Model Parameter Estimation. 2005, SIAM
 36.
Gillespie DT: The chemical Langevin equation. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2000, 113: 297306. 10.1063/1.481811.
 37.
Gillespie DT: A rigorous derivation of the chemical master equation. Physica A. 1992, 188: 404425. 10.1016/03784371(92)90283V.
 38.
Raue A, Kreutz C, Maiwald T, Bachmann J, Schilling M, Klingmüller U, Timmer J: Structural and practical identifiability analysis of partially observed dynamical models by exploiting the profile likelihood. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25: 19231929. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp358.
 39.
Kreutz C, Raue A, Timmer J: Likelihood based observability analysis and confidence intervals for predictions of dynamic models. BMC Systems Biology. 2012, 6: 19. 10.1186/1752050961.
 40.
Java universal network/graph framework. 2008, [http://jung.sourceforge.net/]
 41.
JMathPlot: interactive 2D and 3D plots. 2009, [http://jmathtools.berlios.de/]
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the German Research Foundation (DFG) for financial support of the project within the Cluster of Excellence in Simulation Technology (EXC 310/1) at the University of Stuttgart. Furthermore, this work was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [Virtual Liver (Grant No. 0315766), LungSys II (Grant No. 0316042G), SysMBO (Grant No. 0315494A)], the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association within the Helmholtz Alliance on Systems Biology (SBCancer DKFZ I.2, V.2 and CoReNe HMGU), the Excellence Initiative of the German Federal and State Governments (EXC 294), and the European Union within the ERC grant "LatentCauses".
Declarations
This publication was funded by the IEEE Symposium on Biological Data Visualization (BioVis) as a supplement of highlights.
The articles in this supplement have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. The Supplement Editors declare that they have no competing interests.
This article has been published as part of BMC Bioinformatics Volume 14 Supplement 19, 2013: Highlights from the 2nd IEEE Symposium on Biological Data Visualization. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcbioinformatics/supplements/14/S19.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors' contributions
CV, JH, AK, and DW devised and CV developed the visual analytics system iVUN. JH, SH, and AR analyzed the JAK2/STAT5 signaling pathway. SH, AR, JH, JT, and FT performed to the Bayesian parameter estimation for the JAK2/STAT5 signaling pathway. All authors wrote, read, and approved the final manuscript.
Corinna Vehlow, Jan Hasenauer contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Vehlow, C., Hasenauer, J., Kramer, A. et al. iVUN: interactive Visualization of Uncertain biochemical reaction Networks. BMC Bioinformatics 14, S2 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471210514S19S2
Published:
Keywords
 Markov Chain Monte Carlo
 Glyph
 Line Plot
 Markov Chain Monte Carlo Sample
 Graph View