MCGH: Analysing microarraybased CGH experiments
 Junbai Wang^{1, 2}Email author,
 Leonardo A MezaZepeda^{1, 2},
 Stine H Kresse^{1, 3} and
 Ola Myklebost^{1, 2}
https://doi.org/10.1186/14712105574
© Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 19 March 2004
Accepted: 09 June 2004
Published: 09 June 2004
Abstract
Background
Microarraybased comparative genomic hybridisation (array CGH) is a technique by which variation in relative copy numbers between two genomes can be analysed by competitive hybridisation to DNA microarrays. This technology has most commonly been used to detect chromosomal amplifications and deletions in cancer. Dedicated tools are needed to analyse the results of such experiments, which include appropriate visualisation, and to take into consideration the physical relation in the genome between the probes on the array.
Results
MCGH is a MATLAB toolbox with a graphical user interface designed specifically for the analysis of array CGH experiments, with multiple approaches to ratio normalization. Specifically, the distributions of three classes of DNA copy numbers (gains, normal and losses) can be estimated using a maximum likelihood method. Amplicon boundaries are computed by either the fuzzy Knearest neighbour method or a wavelet approach. The program also allows linking each genomic clone with the corresponding genomic information in the Ensembl database http://www.ensembl.org.
Conclusions
MCGH, which encompasses the basic tools needed for analysing array CGH experiments, is freely available for academics http://www.uio.no/~junbaiw/mcgh, and does not require any other MATLAB toolbox.
Background
In cancer, gene amplification and deletion frequently contribute to alterations in the expression of oncogenes and tumoursuppressor genes, respectively. Thus, detection and mapping of these DNA copy number changes are important for both the basic understanding of cancer and its diagnosis [1]. Comparative genomic hybridisation to DNA microarrays (array CGH) allows efficient, genomewide analyses of relative genome copy number in a single experiment. In array CGH [1, 2], copy numbers would be related to the Cy3:Cy5 fluorescence ratios (hereafter called CGH ratios) of the microarray targets bound to each probe spot. There are some public available tools for array CGH analysis, but they either only run in Excel [3] or the software does not support the preprocessing (filtering or normalization) of array CGH data [4]. Therefore, there is a need for tools, preferably platform independent, which are capable of assessing the quality of CGH arrays as well as identifying the DNA copy number changes and link these with relevant genome information. We describe here the development of MCGH, a MATLAB toolbox for analysing CGH ratios, which has the ability to reliably locate the copy number changes.
Implementation
Following this analysis, we use data from within each experiment to determine the upper and lower threshold for scoring amplified and deleted chromosomal segments. This is not trivial, since some aneuploid samples may have many copy number deviations, complicating the determination of the "normal" ratio. In particular, dedicated arrays may be enriched for genes that are targets of amplification or deletion, thus making normalization difficult. We accomplish this by using a maximum likelihood method to fit a mixture of three Gaussian distributions (representing amplifications, normal and deletion) to a histogram of normalized log_{2} CGH ratios from the array CGH analysis [3]. The fitted distribution is
where P_{i}, μ_{i} and σ_{i} are the relative proportion, mean and standard deviation of the i^{th} distribution respectively (figure 1b) and . CGH ratios representing normal DNA copy numbers are centered at a mean closest to zero, decreased copy numbers less than zero, and increased copy numbers greater than zero. We obtain the fit by first applying the Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm [6] to estimate P_{i}, μ_{i} and σ_{i} for each Gaussian distribution, and then plotting an interactive histogram (figure 1f) of normalized log_{2} CGH ratios, with initial fitting of the three Gaussian distributions. The interactive histogram provides visual feedback with a smooth fit line superimposed on the observed data histogram. Users can assess the quality of the initial fitting, and manually adjust the control sliders of P_{i}, μ_{i} and σ_{i} in the MCGH main window (figure 1b) until the sum of the three Gaussian distributions fits the histogram of CGH ratios (as in figure 1f, a solid red line shows the result of the fit of the sum of the three distributions). After a fit is obtained, we use the distribution fitted to the part of the histogram representing normal DNA copy number to determine the 3σ upper and lower thresholds for determining amplifications and deletions (as in figure 1g, 3σ upper and lower thresholds are represented by two solid green lines). Array CGH experiments in which the central distribution has a σ greater than 0.2 will be considered unreliable, and may be eliminated from further studies. MCGH also provides an interactive plot of log_{2} CGH ratios as a function of its location in the genome (figure 1g) or chromosome (figure 1e). When a data point is clicked on, the CGH ratio, clone name and location will be displayed in the main window (figure 1b). Detailed clone information, such as gene content, can be obtained from the Ensembl database by pressing the Clone2Web button (figure 1b).
Fuzzy Knearest neighbour method and wavelet approach
For computing the amplicon boundaries from the CGH array analysis, we first use the nearest neighbour interpolation to smooth observed CGH ratios (users may modify the window size for the interpolation, figure 1b). Then we apply the fuzzy Knearest neighbour method [7] to classify the data points into three classes (gains, normal and losses) based on estimated means μ_{i} of the three Gaussian distributions, and the fuzzy membership values will represent the level of copy number changes. Alternatively, we may use the wavelet approach [8] to estimate the amplicon boundaries (as in figure 1e, the pink smooth line is the amplicon boundaries computed by wavelet approach).
Results
The performance of MCGH was tested on a genomic microarray containing approximately 4000 unique elements (BACs and PACs). The array included a representation of the human genome at 1 Mb resolution, as well as the tiling path of a segment of chromosome 1 (1q12q25) and 600 genomic clones containing known oncogenes and tumoursuppressor genes. A panel of human sarcomas, malignant tumours of mesenchymal origin, was used to assess the performance of the software (MezaZepeda, Kresse, Wang, Myklebost et al., unpublished). Total genomic DNA from approximately 20 tumours was labelled by random priming using Cy3dCTP, in parallel normal reference DNA was labelled using Cy5dCTP. Labelled tumour and reference DNA was competitively hybridised to the genome representation present on the array. Hybridisation was performed using an automated hybridisation station, GeneTAC (Genomic Solutions/Perkin Elmer), agitating the hybridisation solution for 48 hours at 37 °C. After hybridisation, slides were washed and scanned using an Agilent G2565BA scanner (Agilent Technologies). Images were analysed using GenePix Pro 4.1 (Axon Laboratories) or QuantArray 3.0 (Packard Biosciences). The spots were automatically segmented and manually adjusted where necessary. Export files were generated, transformed to tab delimited format and imported to MCGH for further analysis. Figure 1 shows a sarcoma sample analysed using MCGH.
Conclusions
Overall, we have presented a package for analyzing array CGH experiments, interactive data analysis with a user friendly graphical interface is available, and an online genomic information database (Ensembl) is linked. MCGH is entirely platform independent and only requires MATLAB installed (the student version will suffice).
MCGH states the number of spots that pass the quality control, allows all plots to be saved as image files, and further export of the filtered dataset, with normalized ratios and clone location, as a text file. Our future development of MCGH will include applying visualization methods capable of assessing the DNA copy number changes of multiple CGH arrays simultaneously, filtering of misbehaving clones, implementing changepoint analysis techniques such as those described by Lucito et al. [9], i.e. representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis, and developing a web tool so that it can be run without MATLAB software.
Availability and requirements

Project name: MCGH: Analysing microarraybased CGH experiments

Project home page: http://www.mikromatrise.no/arraycgh/index.html

Operating system(s): Platform independent

Programming language: MATLAB

Other requirements: MATLAB Version 6.1

License: GNU

Any restrictions to use by nonacademics: Please inform the corresponding author if you are a nonacademic user
Declarations
Acknowledgements
We thank one anonymous reviewer for constructive comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Norwegian Cancer Society http://www.kreft.no, the FUGE (functional genomics) program http://www.fuge.no, and the University of Oslo (EMBIO). The arrays were produced by the Norwegian Microarray Consortium.
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, Clark S, Poole I, Kowbel D, Collins C, Kuo WL, Chen C, Zhai Y, Dairkee SH, Ljung BM, Gray JW: High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 1998, 20(2):207–211. 10.1038/2524View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Pollack JR, Sorlie T, Perou CM, Rees CA, Jeffrey SS, Lonning PE, Tibshirani R, Botstein D, BorresenDale AL, Brown PO: Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional programs of human breast tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99(20):12963–12968. 10.1073/pnas.162471999PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Hodgson G, Hager JH, Volik S, Hariono S, Wernick M, Moore D, Albertson DG, Pinkel D, Collins C, Hanahan D, Gray JW: Genome scanning with array CGH delineates regional alterations in mouse islet carcinomas. Nat Genet 2001, 29(4):459–464. 10.1038/ng771View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Autio R, Hautaniemi S, Kauraniemi P, YliHarja O, Astola J, Wolf M, Kallioniemi A: CGHPlotter: MATLAB toolbox for CGHdata analysis. Bioinformatics 2003, 19(13):1714–1715. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg230View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Churchill GA: Fundamentals of experimental design for cDNA microarray. Nat Genet Sup 2002, 32: 490–495. 10.1038/ng1031View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J Roy Stat Soc 1977, 39: 1–38.Google Scholar
 Keller JM, Gray MR, Givens JA JR: A fuzzy knearest neighbour algorithm. IEEE SMC 1985, 15: 580–585.Google Scholar
 Mallat S: A wavelet tour of signal processing. 2 Edition San Diego: Academic Press 1999.Google Scholar
 Lucito R, Healy J, Alexander J, Reiner A, Esposito D, Chi M, Rodgers L, Brady A, Sebat J, Troge J, West AJ, Rostan S, Nguyen KCQ, Powers S, Ye QK, Olshen A, Venkatraman E, Norton L, Wigler M: Representational Oligonucleotide Microarray Analysis: A HighResolution method to detect genome copy number variation. Genome Res 2003, 13(10):2291–2305. 10.1101/gr.1349003PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.