Open Access

Goulphar: rapid access and expertise for standard two-color microarray normalization methods

  • Sophie Lemoine1,
  • Florence Combes1,
  • Nicolas Servant1 and
  • Stéphane Le Crom1, 2Email author
BMC Bioinformatics20067:467

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-467

Received: 12 May 2006

Accepted: 23 October 2006

Published: 23 October 2006

Abstract

Background

Raw data normalization is a critical step in microarray data analysis because it directly affects data interpretation. Most of the normalization methods currently used are included in the R/BioConductor packages but it is often difficult to identify the most appropriate method. Furthermore, the use of R commands for functions and graphics can introduce mistakes that are difficult to trace. We present here a script written in R that provides a flexible means of access to and monitoring of data normalization for two-color microarrays. This script combines the power of BioConductor and R analysis functions and reduces the amount of R programming required.

Results

Goulphar was developed in and runs using the R language and environment. It combines and extends functions found in BioConductor packages (limma and marray) to correct for dye biases and spatial artifacts. Goulphar provides a wide range of optional and customizable filters for excluding incorrect signals during the pre-processing step. It displays informative output plots, enabling the user to monitor the normalization process, and helps adapt the normalization method appropriately to the data. All these analyses and graphical outputs are presented in a single PDF report.

Conclusion

Goulphar provides simple, rapid access to the power of the R/BioConductor statistical analysis packages, with precise control and visualization of the results obtained. Complete documentation, examples and online forms for setting script parameters are available from http://transcriptome.ens.fr/goulphar/.

Background

DNA microarray technology has made it possible to monitor gene expression on a large scale. However, one of the major limitations of this technology is that biochips are subject to variations from the start of the experimental process, right to the end of the analysis. These variations depend on the experimental and technical biases inherent to the biological samples, dye incorporation methods and hybridization steps used [13]. Several normalization methods have been developed for correcting systematic biases, but there is currently no universal method that can be systematically applied [4]. Each method has its own specific features, such as correcting for dye biases by global lowess normalization or compensating for spatial artifacts using a print-tip median correction. It is not always obvious which normalization method is most appropriate. Many of these methods are implemented in the R programming language [5] and are part of the BioConductor project [6]. However, although effective methods exist, R is not easy to use for those not familiar with programming language, as is the case for most scientists using microarrays.

Goulphar combines and extends the two-color microarray normalization methods and basic graphics functions of various R/BioConductor packages, applies customizable filters to spot properties and provides information for monitoring the effects of the normalization method applied in the form of 1) images of the data before and after normalization, 2) spatial plots of the data and valid spot numbers per print tip, making it possible to adapt the normalization method to the bias present on the slide. Goulphar directly processes the scanner output files, thereby avoiding problems arising from the conversion or manipulation of such files [7].

Implementation

The Goulphar script (additional file 1) runs under the R command environment. It works with the raw data file and a parameter file created by the user. The parameter file is a simple text file containing the values for each parameter. The online documentation describes the content and available values for each parameter. A sample parameter file is provided, as additional file 2. An online Internet form has been developed for selecting parameters and threshold values. The script can also be run on our server, but with fewer options than are available when the script is used on a local computer. Goulphar creates a graphical output, in a report file (see additional file 3), and outputs the normalized expression data in a tabulated text file.

Program overview

Data pre-processing and normalization

A pre-processing step is required before normalization, to eliminate artifactual signals and to correct for the background. Goulphar includes four optional data pre-processing steps: 1) subtraction of the background signal, 2) elimination of the spots flagged up by the image analysis software, 3) filtering out of saturated spots with an intensity exceeding a given threshold value, and 4) elimination of spots with a diameter smaller than a predefined value. All filtered spots are excluded from both normalization and graphical output.

Goulphar uses various two-color microarray normalization methods from the limma package [8] for the print-tip lowess, global lowess and global median methods and for calculation of the print-tip median. This script also extends the limma package including global lowess normalization followed by print-tip median correction.

Output: diagnostic plots and normalized data

Goulphar was developed for the monitoring of normalization. We therefore focused on creating graphical output. Most of the plotting functions have been adapted and combine plots from the limma and marray BioConductor packages [9]. Goulphar generates MA plots and box plots before and after normalization, to evaluate the influence of the method used. These graphical outputs are created for each step of the normalization process. For the global lowess followed by print-tip median normalization method, graphical output is created before normalization, after the global lowess step and after the print-tip median correction. This output is essential for checking that each normalization step has been performed correctly.

For the print-tip lowess normalization method, an additional plot displays the number of unfiltered spots in each block (see additional file 4). This plot alerts the user when the number of spots in a given block is too low (the block number is shown on the graph). In such cases, the print-tip lowess normalization method must be used with care, as it may also take into account biological variation.

The script displays density distributions for both channel intensities and M values before and after normalization. Intensity plots are used to check that the dye bias encountered in two-color microarray analysis has been corrected properly. M value plots are useful for assessing the dispersion of results, as scattering must be minimal for most normalization methods.

Finally, Goulphar builds a suite of diagnostic plots. Two background intensity plots for both channels (Cy5 and Cy3), before and after data pre-processing, are used to control the hybridization and washing steps. These plots facilitate direct monitoring of the accuracy of the image analysis flagging process. A map of the filtered spots is built so that the user can localize the spots excluded from normalization. Maps representing M values on the array help detect spatial biases, such as washing-induced asymmetry. As for MA plot and box plot representations, these plots are generated before and after each normalization step. Finally, a map of mean signal intensity (A values) on the array is built. This map is used to detect intensity biases due to variations in probe concentrations between plates, for example.

All these plots can be included in a single report or saved as independent PNG or JPEG files. Goulphar also generates a tabulated text file containing the normalized ratio (M values) and information about spot intensities: A values, red and green raw intensities and background.

Advantages of Goulphar

Goulphar was designed with the primary aim of providing easy access to powerful statistical analysis methods for microarray data based on the R and BioConductor packages. Goulphar is more versatile than the R-based tools available through online web servers, such as ArrayPipe [10], CARMAWeb [11], DNMAD [12], MIDAW [13], SNOMAD [14] or WebArray [15]. It runs independently of network access, overcoming the need for large file upload and management, and provides direct access to the source code, facilitating modifications and improvements not possible in other "closed" resources (ArrayPipe, DNMAD or WebArray). Goulphar combines functions and plots found in different BioConductor packages, whereas to limmaGUI [16], the graphical user interface for the limma package is restricted to limma.

The use of Goulphar as a graphical interface simplifies and standardizes access to BioConductor functions. All the parameters selected by the user are compiled into a single file and read by the Goulphar script using only one command line. This considerably simplifies the application of a given set of parameters to various files. There is no need to adapt the input file format (as in MIDAW or SNOMAD) or to go through multiple online forms (ArrayPipe and CARMAWeb). Working with a parameter file simplifies the storage and follow-up of data during and after normalization. This tracking is important if the MIAME microarray standard is to be respected [17].

Goulphar also includes improvements to the BioConductor packages in the pre-processing of scanner output files before normalization. First, the filtering of artifactual spots can be customized, whereas this function is not fully implemented in other packages. Second, the user can choose whether to subtract the background, an issue still much debated in the microarray community [18]. The spot filtering parameters used after flagged image analysis has been detailed, making it possible to filter only spots discarded by the user, retaining the other spots flagged by the software, when using GenePix Pro image analysis software (Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA, USA), for example. Weak spots and spots with no signal are often automatically discarded but are useful for normalizing ratios for the lowest intensities by the lowess method. Other programs lack methods for handling artifactual spots (MIDAW and SNOMAD) or are restricted to the discarding or retaining of all flags (DNMAD, CARMAWeb and WebArray).

Goulphar also extends the normalization methods found in limma by combining global lowess and print-tip median corrections. The global lowess normalization is carried out first and takes dye biases into account. This method is applied to all the spots, giving the highest degree of accuracy and fewer modifications of the relevant signal. The print-tip median method then corrects for spatial artifacts, with no limitation on the number of spots used per block. Other programs allow a choice only between global or local methods, and the print-tip lowess correction is applied with no control over the number of spots used for the calculation (ArrayPipe, CARMAWeb, DNMAD, MIDAW and WebArray). SNOMAD combines global and local normalization methods but performs only a global median correction, without lowess correction. Our two-step correction results in the accurate normalization of systematic biases whilst avoiding most of the limitations of each method applied separately.

R can be used to generate graphics, but it is not straightforward to set all the parameters required to obtain high-quality figures. In the development of the Goulphar script, considerable effort went into grouping all the graphical output and parameters used into a single PDF file, so that the user only need consult this report and the normalized results. The CARMAWeb web service is the only other tool to offer this possibility. PDF reports are very useful in the daily management of core microrarray facilities involved in data analysis.

The way in which Goulphar has been developed makes it easier to implement new functions. For example, the script was initially designed to work with GenePix image analysis software, but has also been adapted to the Spot image analysis system (CSIRO, Clayton South, Australia). Goulphar is flexible, as it is can be adapted to deal with a new type of input data and new normalization methods can be introduced directly in source code.

Conclusion

Goulphar is versatile and very easy to use, with a single command line and extensive graphical output presented in a single PDF file, making it popular among users. Goulphar combines functions and plots from BioConductor packages and extends them with customizable filtering options and a larger number of plots alerting the user to particular problems. Goulphar is a flexible solution, as it can be used alone with the R environment or integrated into a more complex workflow. Finally, Goulphar is also a good starting point for experimental scientists without extensive programming skills who want to make use of the powerful R packages on their computer.

Availability and requirements

Project name: Goulphar

Project home page: http://transcriptome.ens.fr/goulphar/

Operating system(s): Multiplatform, as it uses the R software available in the Windows, MacOS and Linux environments [5].

Programming language: R

Other requirements: R software and the following packages: marray, limma, convert and hexbin

License: The R script is available and distributed under the GNU General Public License [19].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the limma and marray developers and, more generally, the R community, and the ENS transcriptome platform staff and collaborators for script testing. We thank F. Devaux and C. Jacq for their comments on the manuscript. We would also like to thank J. Aubert, M-L. Martin-Magniette and S. Robin for assistance with the anapuce package. This work was partly supported by the French RNG (Genopole National Network).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
IFR36, Plate-forme Transcriptome, École Normale Supérieure
(2)
INSERM U784, École Normale Supérieure

References

  1. Bammler T, Beyer RP, Bhattacharya S, Boorman GA, Boyles A, Bradford BU, Bumgarner RE, Bushel PR, Chaturvedi K, Choi D, Cunningham ML, Deng S, Dressman HK, Fannin RD, Farin FM, Freedman JH, Fry RC, Harper A, Humble MC, Hurban P, Kavanagh TJ, Kaufmann WK, Kerr KF, Jing L, Lapidus JA, Lasarev MR, Li J, Li YJ, Lobenhofer EK, Lu X, Malek RL, Milton S, Nagalla SR, O'Malley J P, Palmer VS, Pattee P, Paules RS, Perou CM, Phillips K, Qin LX, Qiu Y, Quigley SD, Rodland M, Rusyn I, Samson LD, Schwartz DA, Shi Y, Shin JL, Sieber SO, Slifer S, Speer MC, Spencer PS, Sproles DI, Swenberg JA, Suk WA, Sullivan RC, Tian R, Tennant RW, Todd SA, Tucker CJ, Van Houten B, Weis BK, Xuan S, Zarbl H: Standardizing global gene expression analysis between laboratories and across platforms. Nat Methods 2005, 2(5):351–356. 10.1038/nmeth754View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Finkelstein D, Ewing R, Gollub J, Sterky F, Cherry JM, Somerville S: Microarray data quality analysis: lessons from the AFGC project. Arabidopsis Functional Genomics Consortium. Plant Mol Biol 2002, 48(1–2):119–131. 10.1023/A:1013765922672View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Irizarry RA, Warren D, Spencer F, Kim IF, Biswal S, Frank BC, Gabrielson E, Garcia JG, Geoghegan J, Germino G, Griffin C, Hilmer SC, Hoffman E, Jedlicka AE, Kawasaki E, Martinez-Murillo F, Morsberger L, Lee H, Petersen D, Quackenbush J, Scott A, Wilson M, Yang Y, Ye SQ, Yu W: Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms. Nat Methods 2005, 2(5):345–350. 10.1038/nmeth756View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kreil DP, Russell RR: There is no silver bullet--a guide to low-level data transforms and normalisation methods for microarray data. Brief Bioinform 2005, 6(1):86–97. 10.1093/bib/6.1.86View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. The R project for Statistical Computing[http://www.r-project.org/]
  6. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JY, Zhang J: Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 2004, 5(10):R80. 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Zeeberg BR, Riss J, Kane DW, Bussey KJ, Uchio E, Linehan WM, Barrett JC, Weinstein JN: Mistaken identifiers: gene name errors can be introduced inadvertently when using Excel in bioinformatics. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5: 80. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-80PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Smyth GK, Speed T: Normalization of cDNA microarray data. Methods 2003, 31(4):265–273. 10.1016/S1046-2023(03)00155-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yang YH, Dudoit S, Luu P, Lin DM, Peng V, Ngai J, Speed TP: Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30(4):e15. 10.1093/nar/30.4.e15PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hokamp K, Roche FM, Acab M, Rousseau ME, Kuo B, Goode D, Aeschliman D, Bryan J, Babiuk LA, Hancock RE, Brinkman FS: ArrayPipe: a flexible processing pipeline for microarray data. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32(Web Server issue):W457–9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Rainer J, Sanchez-Cabo F, Stocker G, Sturn A, Trajanoski Z: CARMAweb: comprehensive R- and bioconductor-based web service for microarray data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34(Web Server issue):W498–503.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Vaquerizas JM, Dopazo J, Diaz-Uriarte R: DNMAD: web-based diagnosis and normalization for microarray data. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(18):3656–3658. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth401View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Romualdi C, Vitulo N, Del Favero M, Lanfranchi G: MIDAW: a web tool for statistical analysis of microarray data. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33(Web Server issue):W644–9. 10.1093/nar/gki497PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Colantuoni C, Henry G, Zeger S, Pevsner J: SNOMAD (Standardization and NOrmalization of MicroArray Data): web-accessible gene expression data analysis. Bioinformatics 2002, 18(11):1540–1541. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.11.1540View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Xia X, McClelland M, Wang Y: WebArray: an online platform for microarray data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6: 306. 10.1186/1471-2105-6-306PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Wettenhall JM, Smyth GK: limmaGUI: a graphical user interface for linear modeling of microarray data. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(18):3705–3706. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth449View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ball CA, Sherlock G, Parkinson H, Rocca-Sera P, Brooksbank C, Causton HC, Cavalieri D, Gaasterland T, Hingamp P, Holstege F, Ringwald M, Spellman P, Stoeckert CJJ, Stewart JE, Taylor R, Brazma A, Quackenbush J: Standards for microarray data. Science 2002, 298(5593):539. 10.1126/science.298.5593.539bView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ding Y, Wilkins D: The effect of normalization on microarray data analysis. DNA Cell Biol 2004, 23(10):635–642. 10.1089/dna.2004.23.635View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE[http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt]
  20. Le Crom S, Devaux F, Marc P, Zhang X, Moye-Rowley WS, Jacq C: New insights into the pleiotropic drug resistance network from genome-wide characterization of the YRR1 transcription factor regulation system. Mol Cell Biol 2002, 22(8):2642–2649. 10.1128/MCB.22.8.2642-2649.2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Lemoine et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.