Skip to main content

HiCdat: a fast and easy-to-use Hi-C data analysis tool



The study of nuclear architecture using Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) technologies is a novel frontier in biology. With further reduction in sequencing costs, the potential of Hi-C in describing nuclear architecture as a phenotype is only about to unfold. To use Hi-C for phenotypic comparisons among different cell types, conditions, or genetic backgrounds, Hi-C data processing needs to be more accessible to biologists.


HiCdat provides a simple graphical user interface for data pre-processing and a collection of higher-level data analysis tools implemented in R. Data pre-processing also supports a wide range of additional data types required for in-depth analysis of the Hi-C data (e.g. RNA-Seq, ChIP-Seq, and BS-Seq).


HiCdat is easy-to-use and provides solutions starting from aligned reads up to in-depth analyses. Importantly, HiCdat is focussed on the analysis of larger structural features of chromosomes, their correlation to genomic and epigenomic features, and on comparative studies. It uses simple input and output formats and can therefore easily be integrated into existing workflows or combined with alternative tools.


The development of Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) techniques and their high throughput derivatives (e.g., 4C and Hi-C) has enabled the analysis of nuclear architecture (i.e. chromatin organization) at an unprecedented resolution [1]. Hi-C data analysis comprises a large variety of approaches, including point-to-point looping interactions (e.g., promoter-enhancer interactions), three-dimensional modeling of chromatin [2], identification of structural domains (e.g., topologically associated domains, TADs [3]), or comparison of different genetic backgrounds (e.g., wild-type versus mutant tissues [46]).

The large number of reads produced by Hi-C experiments (e.g., around 200–300 mio aligned read-pairs per sample in [3]) requires efficient tools for processing, filtering, and simplification of the data to best match the demands of the downstream analyses. Several open-source tools are available, each with its own scope and requirements. HiCUP [7] performs mapping and quality control on Hi-C data but no downstream analysis. Sushi [8] and HiTC [9] provide data visualization functionality, but no pre-processing or statistical analysis of Hi-C data. HiCseg specifically focusses on identification of domains in Hi-C data [10]. ChromoR [11] offers data pre-processing and sample comparison, but does not support the analysis of additional genomic and epigenomic features. HiCpipe [12] implements a computationally very intense normalization method, which does not perform better than the parametric approach in HiCNorm [13] (normalization method). HOMER [14] and hiclib [15] offer a large variety of functionalities, including pre-processing and higher-level data analysis. However, these tools may be inaccessible to users with limited programming experience: HOMER requires some command-line skills and only generates plain-text output, which needs to be further processed by the user; hiclib requires familiarity with Python. The latter is less well known among molecular biologists and geneticists who are likely more familiar with R. Alternatively, HiBrowse offers many functionalities in an easy-to-use web-interface [16], which, however, constrains the users by forcing them to adhere to the available procedures and the requirement of uploading their data to a web server.

Envisioning nuclear architecture (i.e. chromatin organization) as an ordinary phenotype of an organism or a specific tissue type (e.g. like the transcriptome), comparative Hi-C experiments may soon be of very broad interest, raising the need for data analysis tools that are not only well-accessible to bioinformaticians. We therefore developed HiCdat. It includes a fast and easy-to-use GUI tool for Hi-C data pre-processing and an R [17] package, which implements all data analysis approaches employed in [5].


HiCdat was developed with a focus on speed, user-friendliness, and flexibility in terms of file formats. The GUI tool for data pre-processing serves to convert large-scale genomic and epigenomic data into simple tables, which can be efficiently loaded and processed within R. The R-package provides a collection of functions, which allow higher-level data analysis (e.g., as in [5]) with only a few lines of code. Data formats are kept as simple as possible to ensure that the user can easily integrate HiCdat into a pre-existing workflow or combine it with other tools.

Results and discussion

HiCdat is divided into two parts (Fig. 1): (i) a GUI tool for data pre-processing (termed HiCdatPre) and (ii) an R-package for higher-level data analysis (termed HiCdatR).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Schematic HiCdat workflow. (a-b) After sequencing and initial quality checks have been performed, the read-ends (f: forward, r: reverse) are aligned separately to a reference genome. (c-d) After pairing the separately aligned read-ends, each end is mapped to genomic fragments, which are either genomic bins with a fixed size or restriction fragments with variable size. (e) Genomic fragments can be associated with various data types to test for correlation and enrichment of Hi-C data with genomic and epigenomic features. (f) Finally, the data can be conveniently analyzed in R using HiCdatR

Data pre-processing with HiCdat

HiCdat takes as input two alignment files (forward and reverse reads, hereafter termed read-ends) in BAM format (Binary Alignment/Map), a reference genome, and various data types from additional experiments (e.g., genome annotation, RNA-Seq, ChIP-Seq, BS-Seq data). There are five automated steps during data pre-processing: (i) pairing aligned reads, (ii) creating fragments, (iii) mapping of read-ends to fragments, (iv) processing data from additional experiments, and (v) creating organism-specific R-code.

Pairing aligned reads

The read-ends are first aligned seperately to the reference genome using, for example, Subread [18]. Uniquely aligning read-ends are then paired based on their common read name to create read-paris (around 12.6 million read-ends per minute1).

Creating fragments

Hi-C data analysis can either be carried out on restriction fragments or genomic bins with fixed size. Both types of fragments can be created by supplying the reference genome sequence and one or more restriction enzymes or a fixed bin size.

Mapping read-ends to fragments

To calculate the interaction frequency between two fragments, the read-pairs are first mapped to the fragments’ coordinates and then summarized as number of interactions per fragment pair (around 7.5 million read-pairs per minute1). During this procedure, the read-pairs can optionally be filtered using the approach proposed by [19]. Read-pairs with each end aligning at the opposite strand are thereby removed if they are too close to each other. There are two cases: (i) A read-pair where the two ends point towards each other (“inward-pair”), and (ii) a read-pair where the two ends point away from each other (“outward-pair”). Inward-pairs spanning only a short region may be caused by uncut DNA. Outward-pairs spanning only a short region can be a result of self-ligation.

Processing data from additional experiments

To analyze the interplay between the Hi-C interactome and genomic/epigenomic features, a large variety of such information can be automatically added to the fragments. In principle there are two fundamentally different types of data: counts and densities. During higher-level data analysis, counts are generally log-transformed, whereas densities are kept as percentages. Likewise, if data are summarized over multiple fragments (e.g. to obtain the annotation for 1 Mb bins directly from the fragment annotation), counts are summed up, whereas densities are averaged. Both data types comprise two sub-types, resulting in four different types of “tracks” which can be processed: (i) genome annotation features (e.g., genes and transposons), (ii) short count features (e.g., RNA-Seq and smallRNA-Seq), (iii) density features (e.g., ChIP-Seq), and (iv) DNA-methylation density (e.g., BS-Seq).

Genome annotation features (GFF/GTF files with multiple feature types per file) can generally be very long and possibly span multiple fragments. The number of elements per fragment is therefore counted as follows: If the feature spans the entire fragment, a value of 1 is added. If the feature only partly overlaps (or is within) the fragment, a value of 0.5 is added. In contrast, short count features (BAM files with one feature type only) are mostly entirely within a fragment and are therefore simply summed up per fragment.

Density of a certain feature (BAM files with one feature type only) is calculated as the number of bases covered by at least one element (e.g. short read) divided by the length of the fragment (times 100 to obtain percentages). Likewise, DNA cytosin-methylation density corresponds to the percentage of methylated C’s per fragment.

Creating the organism-specific R-code

Higher-level data analysis requires some organism-specific R-code, which can be obtained by supplying the reference genome sequence and the restriction enzyme(s) used for the Hi-C library preparation.

Data analysis with HiCdatR

In-depth Hi-C data analysis is done in R with HiCdatR. The only inputs required are the interaction counts per fragment pair and, optionally, the annotation of the fragments holding the genomic and epigenomic tracks. For most of the functions, it is furthermore possible to supply tables specifying genomic regions of interest (e.g. chromosome arms or pericentromeres as in [5]). The functionalities include (i) data normalizations as proposed by [13, 20, 21], (ii) sample correlation matrices, (iii) data visualization, (iv) sample comparisons, (v) calculation of distance decay exponents, (vi) principle component analysis (PCA) including correlation of the first principle component to genomic and epigenomic features, (vii) test for increased interaction frequencies between genomic regions of interest compared to randomly sampled regions, and (viii) test for enrichment or depletion of genomic and epigenomic features within genomic regions of interest compared to randomly chosen regions.

Data normalization

Multiple data normalization strategies have been proposed and implemented in various languages and packages [1113, 15, 20, 21]. Three of them have been re-implemented in HiCdat: (i) the distance (intrachromosomal interactions) and coverage (inter-chromosomal interactions) normalization described in [20], (ii) the iterative coverage normalization proposed by [21], and (iii) the more sophisticated but highly efficient normalization using Poisson regression as implemented in HiCNorm [13], which performs similar or better [11, 13] than the procedures from [12, 15].

Sample correlation

To visualize the similarities between samples and replicates, HiCdat uses sample correlation matrices. Correlation between two samples is thereby calculated as the average, or median, correlation between all the individual bins of the interaction matrices (i.e. the virtual 4C tracks, see Additional file 1: Figure S1).

Data visualization

Hi-C interaction frequencies and differences between multiple samples are visualized as heatmap-like images. Individual samples can either be displayed natively (i.e. with their normalized interaction frequencies, Additional file 2: Figure S2) or in a correlated manner (Additional file 3: Figure S3).

Sample comparison

Three different approaches to compare two samples to each other are implemented. In a first approach, the difference of a given fragment pair between the two samples is divided by the average interaction frequency among the two samples resulting in “relative differences” [4] (Additional file 4: Figure S4). Considering that neighboring genomic regions are physically linked to each other, it is likely that they change accordingly. To visualize these domains, the relative differences can be correlated to each other (“correlated differences”, Additional file 5: Figure S5). The disadvantage of these approaches is that they rely on visual inspection of the difference matrices. To estimate the significance of the difference and identify the affected regions, we introduced signed difference matrices (SDMs) [5]. Additionally, they also provide an overall estimate of the extent and significance of the difference between two samples (Additional file 6: Figure S6).

Calculation of distance decay exponents (IDEs)

The extent to which interaction frequencies change dependent on the distance to a given point in the genome can be characterized with the interaction decay exponent (IDE). IDEs are calculated as the slope of a linear fit to the average interaction frequencies observed at given distances (both log-transformed, Additional file 7: Figure S7). IDEs were initially used to predict the folding principles of the human genome using two polymer-folding models (the fractal and equilibrium globule module, respectively), which result in distinct values for the expected IDE [20]. Alternatively, they can also be used to describe differences between certain sub-compartments of the genome, or between samples [5].

Identification of structural domains using principle component analysis (PCA)

The correlation between the interactomes of different genomic regions can be used to identify larger compartments [20] or structural domains [5]. The approach relies on principal component analysis (PCA) of the distance-normalized and correlated intra-chromosomal interactions (Additional file 8: Figure S8). The first principal component (FPC) can then be used to differentiate for example the A and B compartments in Homo sapiens [20], or loose and compact structural domains in Arabidopsis thaliana [5]. The interplay between the FPC and the epigenomic/genomic landscape can be analyzed with two methods: (i) either by using the built-in cor.test() [17] function to test for significance of correlation between FPC and the density/count of a given feature (Additional file 9: Figure S9), or (ii) by using an approach in which the fragments are split into two groups according to the sign of the FPC (Additional file 10: Figure S10, Additional file 11: Figure S11). Enrichment of a given feature can then be calculated as the ratio of the average density/count in one over the other group, and tested for significance using a two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test [5]. For the identification of more refined structural domains, as for example topologically associated domains (TADs), HiCdatR provides a simple wrapper around the HiCseg package [10]. Its algorithm relies on two-dimensional segmentation to identify cis-interacting regions, and the results were shown to be in good concordance with biologically confirmed regions [10].

Testing selected regions for increased interaction frequency and enrichment/depletion of epigenomic/genomic features

Given a set of genomic regions of interest, HiCdat can test for increased interaction frequencies between the regions of interest compared to randomly sampled regions. Considering that the interactome can be strongly influenced by the linear position of a certain region along the chromosome (e.g. close to telomere or centromere), or the chromosome number itself [5, 22], random sampling is performed in a “balanced” fashion: Within each random set, the randomly chosen regions reflect the numbers, as well as the locations, of the regions of interest. The procedure creates an empirical distribution of interaction frequencies between random sets, which can then be used to calculate an empirical P-value (one-sided) for the enrichment of interactions between the sets of interest [5]. The same sampling approach can be applied to test for enrichment or depletion of epigenomic or genomic features within a set of genomic regions of interest.


In short, HiCdat allows rapid Hi-C data analysis as described in [5], requiring only little programming experience. The focus lies on the identification of larger structural features of chromosomes, their interplay with the epigenomic/genomic landscape, and on comparative studies. Input and output is kept as simple as possible to enable easy integration into pre-existing workflows, or the combination of a part of the tool with another tool.

Availability and requirements

  • Project name: HiCdat

  • Project home page:

  • Operating systems: Windows (7), MacOSX (> 10.8), Ubuntu-like Linux distributions (all 64 bit)

  • Programming language: C++ and R

  • Other requirements: R-packages: randomizeBE, gplots, MASS, HiCseg [10]

  • License: GNU GPL v3

  • Any restrictions to use by non-academics: None


1 Run-times were measured on a 64 bit Kubuntu running on an Intel Core i7 930@2.8 GHz with 24 Gb RAM and a 7’200 rpm Samsung HDD using Hi-C data from mouse embryonic stem cell (GSM862720, GSM862721) and cortex (GSM862750, GSM862751) samples from [3] (NCBI37 assembly, and 1 Mb bins for the higher-level data analysis, and 823’377 HindIII restriction fragments for mapping to fragments).



General feature format


Gene transfer format


Binary alignment map


Interaction decay exponent


Principle component analysis


First principle component


  1. Dekker J, Marti-Renom MA, Mirny LA. Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat Rev Genet. 2013; 14:390–403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Duan Z, Andronescu M, Schutz K, McIlwain S, Kim YJ, Lee C, et al. A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature. 2010; 465:363–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y, et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature. 2012; 485:376–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Moissiard G, Cokus SJ, Cary J, Feng S, Billi AC, Stroud H, et al. MORC family ATPases required for heterochromatin condensation and gene silencing. Science. 2012; 336(6087):1448–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Grob S, Schmid MW, Grossniklaus U. Hi-C analysis in Arabidopsis identifies the KNOT, a structure with similarities to the flamenco locus of Drosophila. Mol Cell. 2014; 55(5):678–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Feng S, Cokus SJ, Schubert V, Zhai J, Pellegrini M, Jacobsen SE. Genome-wide Hi-C analyses in wild-type and mutants reveal high-resolution chromatin interactions in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell. 2014; 55(5):694–707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. HiCUP.

  8. Phanstiel DH, Boyle AP, Araya CL, Snyder MP. Sushi.r: flexible, quantitative and integrative genomic visualizations for publication-quality multi-panel figures. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(19):2808–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Servant N, Lajoie BR, Nora EP, Giorgetti L, Chen C, Heard E, et al. HiTC : exploration of high-throughput ‘C’ experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(21):2843–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lévy-Leduc C, Delattre M, Mary-Huard T, Robin S. Two-dimensional segmentation for analyzing Hi-C data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30:386–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Shavit Y, Lio P. Combining a wavelet change point and the Bayes factor for analysing chromosomal interaction data. Mol Biosyst. 2014; 10(6):1576–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yaffe E, Tanay A. Probabilistic modeling of Hi-C contact maps eliminates systematic biases to characterize global chromosomal architecture. Nat Genet. 2011; 43(11):1059–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu M, Deng K, Selvaraj S, Qin ZS, Ren B, Liu JS. HiCNorm: removing biases in Hi-C data via Poisson regression. Bioinformatics. 2012; 28(23):3131–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Heinz S, Benner C, Spann N, Bertolino E, Lin YC, Laslo P, et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol Cell. 2010; 38(4):576–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Imakaev M, Fudenberg G, McCord RP, Naumova N, Goloborodko A, Lajoie BR, et al. Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(10):999–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Paulsen J, Sandve GK, Gundersen S, Lien TG, Trengereid K, Hovig E. HiBrowse: multi-purpose statistical analysis of genome-wide chromatin 3D organization. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(11):1620–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. R-Project.

  18. Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(10):108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jin F, Li Y, Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Ye Z, Lee AY, et al. A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature. 2013; 503:290–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Liebermann-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 2009; 326(5950):289–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang Y, McCord RP, Ho YJ, Lajoie BR, Hildebrand DG, Simon AC, et al. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell. 2012; 148(5):908–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Grob S, Schmid MW, Grossniklaus U. Characterization of chromosomal architecture in Arabidopsis by chromosome conformation capture. Genome Biol. 2013; 14:129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 2009; 10:25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012; 9(4):357–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kasschau KD, Fahlgren N, Chapman EJ, Sullivan CM, Cumbie JS, Givan SA, et al. Genome-wide profiling and analysis of Arabidopsis siRNAs. PLoS Biol. 2007; 5(3):57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gregory BD, O’Malley RC, Lister R, Urich MA, Tonti-Filippini J, Chen H, et al. A link between RNA metabolism and silencing affecting Arabidopsis development. Dev Cell. 2008; 14(6):854–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lister R, O’Malley RC, Tonti-Filippini J, Gregory BG, Berry CC, Millar AH, et al. Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis. Cell. 2008; 133(3):523–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Jacob Y, Stroud H, LeBlanc C, Feng S, Zhuo L, Caro E, et al. Regulation of heterochromatic DNA replication by histone H3 lysine 27 methyltransferases. Nature. 2010; 466:987–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Luo C, Sidote DJ, Zhang Y, Kerstetter RA, Michael TP, Lam E. Integrative analysis of chromatin states in Arabidopsis identified potential regulatory mechanisms for natural antisense transcript production. Plant J. 2013; 73:77–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stroud H, Greenberg MVC, Feng S, Bernatavichute YV, Jacobsen SE. Comprehensive analysis of silencing mutants reveals complex regulation of the Arabidopsis methylome. Cell. 2013; 152(1–2):352–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the University of Zurich, an iPhD project of, the Swiss Initiative in Systems Biology, and grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) and the European Research Council (ERC) to UG.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc W. Schmid.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

Conceived and discussed approaches for Hi-C data analysis: MWS, SG, UG. Designed andimplemented the pre-processing tool: MWS. Designed and implemented higher-level data analysis in R: MWS SG. Wrote the manuscript: MWS. Helped to write manuscript: SG UG. All authors read and approved the final manuscript;

Additional files

Additional file 1

Figure S1. Correlation between five samples of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings [4, 5] aligned with either Bowtie [23], Bowtie 2 [24], or Subread [18], and processed with either HiCdat or hiclib [15] using a resolution of 100 kb. (PNG 601 kb)

Additional file 2

Figure S2. Visualization of Hi-C interaction frequencies in a pooled wild-type sample of A. thaliana [4, 5] (100 kb bins). (PNG 3328 kb)

Additional file 3

Figure S3. Visualization of distance-normalized and correlated Hi-C interaction frequencies in a pooled wild-type sample of A. thaliana [4, 5] (100 kb bins). (PNG 3102 kb)

Additional file 4

Figure S4. Enrichment (blue) and depletion (red) of interaction frequencies in the wild-type compared to the crowded nuclei4 (crwn4) mutant sample of A. thaliana [5] (100 kb bins). (PNG 6354 kb)

Additional file 5

Figure S5. Correlation of differences between the wild-type and the crwn4 mutant samples of A. thaliana [5] (100 kb bins). (PNG 2877 kb)

Additional file 6

Figure S6. Visualization of the difference between the wild-type and crwn4 mutant samples of A. thaliana, [5] using the signed difference matrix (100 kb bins). (PNG 1689 kb)

Additional file 7

Figure S7. Distance-dependent decay of interaction frequencies along entire chromosomes in a pooled wild-type sample of A. thaliana [4, 5] (100 kb bins). (PNG 872 kb)

Additional file 8

Figure S8. Visualization of distance-normalized and correlated Hi-C interaction frequencies (top), the resulting first principle component (mid), and the distribution of the correlation values (bottom). Data shown for the right arms of chromosomes 1, 4, and 5 from a pooled wild-type sample of A. thaliana [4, 5] (100 kb bins). (PNG 565 kb)

Additional file 9

Figure S9. Significant correlation (blue: positive, red: negative) of the first principle component with various genomic and epigenomic features. Data shown for the right arms of chromosomes 1, 4, and 5 from a pooled wild-type sample of A. thaliana [4, 5] (100 kb bins). Additional data from and [2530]. (PNG 603 KB)

Additional file 10

Figure S10. Significant enrichment (blue) and depletion (red) of genomic and epigenomic features in regions with positive Eigenvalues compared to regions with negative Eigenvalues. Data shown for the right arms of chromosomes 1, 4, and 5 from a pooled wild-type sample of A. thaliana [4, 5] (100 kb bins). Additional data from and [2530]. (PNG 602 kb)

Additional file 11

Figure S11. Distribution of epigenomic and genomic features in the structural domains with either positive (blue) or negative (red) Eigenvalues. Data from and [2530]. (PNG 915 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmid, M.W., Grob, S. & Grossniklaus, U. HiCdat: a fast and easy-to-use Hi-C data analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics 16, 277 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: