Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Bioinformatics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

Bioinformatics and systems biology research update from the 15th International Conference on Bioinformatics (InCoB2016)

BMC BioinformaticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617(Suppl 19):524

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-1409-7

Published: 22 December 2016

Abstract

The International Conference on Bioinformatics (InCoB) has been publishing peer-reviewed conference papers in BMC Bioinformatics since 2006. Of the 44 articles accepted for publication in supplement issues of BMC Bioinformatics, BMC Genomics, BMC Medical Genomics and BMC Systems Biology, 24 articles with a bioinformatics or systems biology focus are reviewed in this editorial. InCoB2017 is scheduled to be held in Shenzen, China, September 20–22, 2017.

Keywords

InCoBInternational Conference on BioinformaticsAPBioNetAsia-Pacific Bioinformatics Network

Introduction

InCoB2016, the 15th International Conference on Bioinformatics was held in Singapore from September 21st to 23rd, 2016 [1]. An update on the annual conference of Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Network [2] including review process and best paper awards is available in the introduction to the InCoB2016 supplement issue of BMC Genomics [3]

The papers introduced in this introduction are arranged by topics: (1) sequence analysis and ontologies; (2) networks and systems biology; (3) protein structural bioinformatics, (4) ligand design and ligand-target interactions, and (5) bioimaging.

Sequence analysis and ontologies

The presentations in this session covered a variety of topics ranging from algorithm and development to motif finding. Abbas and Bahig [4] investigated the partial digestion problem by proposing two algorithm "branch and bound based on breadth" (BBb) and "branch and bound based on breadth two times" (BBb2). The latter requires less memory than BBb as the partial digestion problem is solved in two stages in breadth-first mode. Gan et al. [5] have developed a comparative transcriptomic analysis webserver, PARRoT, for non-reference organisms, using a homologue-based virtual transcriptome reference, which provided homologues from sequence databases as well as gene ontology (GO) terms. For entire microbial communities, Xie et al. [6] have developed RiboTagger, for fast and accurate recovery of small subunit ribosomal RNA sequences, from all three domains of life. Zheng et al. [7] profiled small RNAs in soybean primary root tips under conditions of water deficiency. The study reported 22 novel miRNAs and one miRNA which was significantly down-regulated under water deficiency.

Molecular recognition factors (MoRFs) located within longer intrinsically disordered proteins perform important cellular functions such as signalling and regulation, but are very difficult to accurately detect. Sharma et al. [8] have addressed this challenge using Hidden Markov Model (HMM) profiles, with their results better with other similar approaches, MoRFpred and ANCHOR. Vasylenko et al. [9] have developed SCMBYK, to predict and characterise bacterial tyrosine kinases from protein sequence information, using dipeptide propensity scores. Their analysis of bacterial tyrosine kinases from Mycobacetrium tuberculosis could explain how azathioprine could suppress the pathogenicity of this organism in transplant patients. Le and Ou [10] have developed an excellent model for predicting guanosine triphosphate (GTP) binding sites in transport proteins using radial basis function networks, trained on position specific scoring matrix profiles and significant amino acid pairs. This predictive model is available to the community as a webserver.

Gutierrez and Nakai [11] have built a correlated topic model to find transcription factor binding motifs, which enhanced the performance of their earlier model significantly. Lan et al. [12] analysed the grouping miRNAs of similar functions using a weighted gene ontology information content. The authors demonstrated improved clustering performance of miRNA into subgroups of similar functions and utility in annotating new miRNAs.

Networks and systems biology

Castiglione et al. [13] have developed a minimalist gene regulatory network model to simulate macrophage differentiation into the pro-inflammatory and the anti-inflammatory phenotypes. The model was tested in a statistical ensemble and showed robust gene regulatory logic as well as overall dynamics. The authors plan to extend this model to simulate gene knockouts and ectopic expressions, to better understand macrophage biology. To comprehend the regulatory behaviour of microRNAs (miRNAs), Lee and Lee [14] propose a new framework for identifying direct miRNA-mRNA association networks, called DMirNet, which can contribute to the construction of direct regulatory pathways, by identifying novel miRNA-mRNA interactions. In order to characterize cell-specific gene expression as well as gene co-expression. At the single cell level, Ghazanfar et al. [15] have developed a versatile modelling framework for transcriptional state analysis and coactivation detection across multiple datasets. Their results on olfactory neurons enable unique cell-specific coactivation network delineation. At the biological system level, Pennisi et al. [16] have used Petri nets to model the immune system. In particular, coloured Petri nets have provided features for modelling signalling pathways, improving on the classical discrete and continuous models.

Protein structural bioinformatics

One of the fundamental assumptions of structural bioinformatics is that hydrophobic residues prefer to be buried in protein structures. By analysing the standard Barton502 dataset using support vector regression on informative physicochemical properties, Liou et al. [17] show that an aligned row (called spline) of solvent-exposed hydrophobic residues actually stabilise ɑ-helices in proteins. Su et al. [18] have used structural bioinformatics approaches to correlate recent clinically identified mutation in HIV-1 protease with different protease inhibitors used as drugs. Their results provide an insight into the mechanism for HIV-1 drug resistance and suggest a protease inhibitor drug may selection strategy for clinical applications.

Ligand design and drug-target interactions

Small organic molecules as drug lead compounds is an important area of structural bioinformatics research, where knowledge of the target’s 3D structure enables rational ligand design, for therapeutic applications. Using a series of derivatives from the influenza drug zanamivir, Dholakia et al. [19] have generated group-wise quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR) for inhibiting the neuraminidase protein from H1N1 and H3N2 influenza strains. Their model was then applied to identify a new lead compound with drug-like properties and binding stably to both H1N1 and H3N2 neuraminidase active sites. GQSAR with combinatorial design has been adopted by Joshi et al. [20] to identify two novel inhibitors for casein kinase 1 δ isoform, as potential drugs for neuronal protection in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Given the spiralling cost of drug development, a growing number of approved drug molecules are being considered for medical conditions different from their original purpose, known as repurposing or repositioning. As the number of known drug-target interactions far exceeds the potential interactions of these drugs with other potential targets, predicting the repurposing of a drug appears to be extremely challenging. Ezzat et al. [21] have addressed this class imbalance problem using an ensemble learning approach to successfully predict several new drug-target interactions. Sun et al. [22] have addressed the same challenge using a Physarum-inspired Prize-Collecting Steiner Tree algorithm, to build drug similarity networks, from which ten frequently occurring drug molecules have been reported as potential new cardiovascular therapeutic agents.

Bioimaging

Computer-based morphological analysis present a rapid and efficient way to analyse biological samples. Skull analysis can be used for clinical applications as well as for species classification. Based on human orthodontic parameters used in clinical analysis, Mosleh et al. [23] have developed Ceph-X, for automated cephalometric analysis, with excellent concordance with expert manual analysis results. On the other hand, Abu et al. [24] have developed a novel, rapid and accurate computer-assisted taxonomical classification system for the house shrew, with seven morphological parameters and artificial neural networks (ANN). Kalafi et al. [25] have extended cephalometric analysis to species classification, using images of hard parts of the haptoral organs of flatworms, such as bars and anchors and K-nearest neighbour approach. Such an approach is important for monitoring species density and mobility, for biodiversity informatics and ecological modelling.

In pathology applications, cell-based microscopic analysis suffer from out-of-focus images due to depth effects. Intarapanich et al. [26] have developed an object-based extended depths of field (OEDoF) processing approach, which is more accurate and much faster than the state-of-the-art complex wavelet algorithm. Their method has been applied to malaria samples and suitable for medical diagnostic applications. Multiple reporter gene tagging provides fluorescence in different colours for tracking biological processes. However, segmentation issues in identifying cell boundaries in multicolour genetic labelling strategies pose serious problems. Nguyen et al. [27] have developed a novel strategy to overcome these issues, by integrating an edge detector into a superpixel framework with customization for multi-channel images. Their method has been applied successfully to muscle fibres and can be adapted for stem cell regeneration and cell lineage tracking.

Conclusion

The quality of the articles reviewed in this introduction are comparable with earlier InCoB conferences while the subject coverage has extended substantially into bioimaging. Next year's conference, InCoB2017 will be held in Shenzhen from Sept. 20–22, 2017 [28], with paper submissions on Easychair available from January 2017.

Abbreviations

APBioNet: 

Asia-Pacific Bioinformatics Network

BBb: 

Branch and bound based on breadth

BBb2: 

Branch and bound based on breadth two times

GO: 

Gene ontology

GTP: 

Guanosine triphosphate

HIV-1: 

Human immunodeficiency virus 1

InCoB: 

International Conference on Bioinformatics

OEDoF: 

Object-based extended depths of field

QSAR: 

Quantitative structure activity relationships

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank all reviewers for their time and effort. We also thank Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, NUS Centre for Bioimaging Sciences, National Supercomputing Centre Singapore, Biomedical Research Council, Experimental Therapeutics Centre, Genome Institute of Singapore, Biomedical Sciences Institute P53 Laboratory and Institute for Medical Biology supporting InCoB2016 through sponsorships. We are grateful the excellent support by staff of the APBioNet Secretariat and Bioinformatics Institute.

Declaration

This article has been published as part of BMC Bioinformatics Volume 17 Supplement 19, 2016. 15th International Conference On Bioinformatics (INCOB 2016): bioinformatics. The full contents of the supplement are available online https://bmcbioinformatics.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-17-supplement-19.

Funding

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests, excepting CV who is co-author of one article in this supplement, which was summarized by the other co-authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
International Research Center for Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University
(2)
Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (ASTAR)
(3)
Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Macquarie University

References

  1. InCoB 2016. http://incob.apbionet.org/incob16. Accessed 27 Nov 2016.
  2. APBioNet. https://www.apbionet.org/. Accessed 18 Nov 2016.
  3. Schönbach C, Verma C, Wee LJK, Bond PJ, Ranganathan S. 2016 update on APBioNet's annual International Conference on Bioinformatics (InCoB). BMC Genomics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12864-016-3362-2.
  4. Abbas MM, Bahig HM. A fast exact sequential algorithm for the partial digest problem. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1365-2.
  5. Gan RC, Chen TW, Wu TH, Huang PJ, Lee CC, Yeh YM, et al. PARRoT- A homology-based strategy to quantify and compare RNA-sequencing from non-model organisms. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1366-1.
  6. Xie C, Goi CLW, Huson DH, Little PFR, Williams RBH. RiboTagger: fast and unbiased 16S/18S profiling using whole community shotgun metagenomic or metatranscriptome survey. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1378-x.
  7. Zheng Y, Hivrale V, Zhang X, Balliyodan B, Lelandais-Brière C, Farmer AD, et al. Small RNA profiles in soybean primary root tips under water deficit. BMC Systems Biol. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0374-0.
  8. Sharma R, Kumar S, Tsunoda T, Patil A, Sharma A. Predicting MoRFs in protein sequences using HMM profiles. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1375-0.
  9. Vasylenko T, Liou TF, Chiou PC, Chu HW, Lai YS, Chuo YL, et al. SCMBYK: prediction and characterization of bacterial tyrosine-kinases based on propensity scores of dipeptides. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1371-4.
  10. Le NQK, Ou YY. Incorporating efficient radial basis function networks and significant amino acid pairs for predicting GTP binding sites in transport proteins. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1369-y.
  11. Gutierrez JB, Nakai K. A study on the application of topic models to motif finding algorithms. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1364-3.
  12. Lan C, Chen Q, Li J. Grouping miRNAs of similar functions via weighted information content of gene ontology. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1367-0.
  13. Castiglione F, Tieri P, Palma A, Jarrah AS. Statistical ensemble of gene regulatory networks of macrophage differentiation. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1363-4.
  14. Lee M, Lee HJ. DMirNet: inferring direct microRNA-mRNA association networks. BMC Systems Biol. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0373-1.
  15. Ghazanfar S, Bisogni AJ, Ormerod JT, Lin DM, Yang JYH. Integrated single cell data analysis reveals cell specific networks and novel coactivation markers. BMC Systems Biol. 2016;1. doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0370-4.
  16. Pennisi M, Cavalieri S, Motta1 S, Pappalardo F. A methodological approach for using high-level Petri nets to model the immune system response. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1361-6.
  17. Liou YF, Huang HL, Ho SY. A hydrophobic spine stabilizes a surface-exposed α-helix according to analysis of the solvent-accessible surface area. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1368-z.
  18. Su CTT, Ling WL, Lua WH, Gan SKE. Structural analyses of 2015-updated drug-resistant mutations in HIV-1 protease: an implication of protease inhibitor cross-resistance. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1372-3.
  19. Dholakia D, Goyal S, Jamal S, Singh A, Das A, Grover A. Molecular modeling and lead design of substituted zanamivir derivatives as potent anti-influenza drugs. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1374-1.
  20. Joshi K, Goyal S, Grover S, Jamal S, Singh A, Dhar P, et al. Novel group-based QSAR and combinatorial design of CK-1δ inhibitors as neuroprotective agents. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1379-9.
  21. Ezzat A, Wu M, Li XL, Kwoh CK. Drug-target interaction prediction via class imbalance-aware ensemble learning. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1377-y.
  22. Sun Y, Hameed N, Verspoor K, Halgamuge, S. A physarum-inspired prize-collecting Steiner tree approach to identify subnetworks for drug repositioning. BMC Systems Biol. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0371-3.
  23. Mosleh MAA, Baba MS, Sorayya M, Almaktari RA. Ceph-X: development and evaluation of 2D cephalometric system. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1370-5.
  24. Abu A, Leow LK, Ramli R, Omar H. Classification of Suncus murinus species complex (Soricidae: Crocidurinae) in peninsular Malaysia using image analysis and machine learning approaches. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1362-5.
  25. Kalafi EY, Boon TW, Town C, Dhillon SK. Automated identification of Monogeneans using digital image processing and k-nearest neighbour approaches. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1376-z.
  26. Intarapanich A, Kaewkamnerd S, Pannarut M, Shaw PJ, Tongsima S. Fast processing of microscopic images using object based extended depth of field. BMC Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1373-2.
  27. Nguyen BP, Heemskerk H, So PTC, Tucker-Kellogg, L. Superpixel-based segmentation of muscle fibers in multi-channel microscopy. BMC Systems Biol. 2016. doi:10.1186/s12918-016-0372-2.
  28. The 16th International Conference on Bioinformatics (InCoB 2017): http://incob.apbionet.org/incob17. Accessed 18 Nov 2016.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement