| Slice width | Dist cutoff | Shell radius | Angle cutoff | acc | sens | spec |
---|
Default
|
10
|
10
|
6
|
65
|
91.2
|
89.4
|
91.7
|
|
5
| 10 | 6 | 65 | 89.5 | 91.4 | 88.9 |
|
7.5
| 10 | 6 | 65 | 90.5 | 90.3 | 90.6 |
| 10 |
5
| 6 | 65 | 87.4 | 92.3 | 86.0 |
| 10 |
15
| 6 | 65 | 91.5 |
81.3
| 94.5 |
| 10 | 10 |
4
| 65 | 91.9 |
82.0
| 94.8 |
| 10 | 10 |
8
| 65 | 90.0 | 91.1 | 89.7 |
| 10 | 10 | 6 |
50
| 90.9 | 89.5 | 91.4 |
| 10 | 10 | 6 |
80
| 91.1 | 87.8 | 92.1 |
-
acc accuracy = (TP + TN)/(TP + TN + FP + FN); sens = TP/(TP + FN); spec = TN/(TN + FP) with TP number of residues predicted as true positives, TN true negatives, FP false positives, FN false negatives
- The meaning of the parameters is explained in the Methods section. Our algorithm is stable with respect to smaller slice widths (Fig. 1a) and different angle cutoffs (Fig. 1b). For larger distance cutoffs (Fig. 2d and e) and smaller shell radii (from Fig. 2e to f) the number of predicted true positives decreases while the number of false negatives increases, resulting in a substantial drop in sensitivity (numbers in bold)