- Open Access
bioSyntax: syntax highlighting for computational biology
BMC Bioinformatics volume 19, Article number: 303 (2018)
Computational biology requires the reading and comprehension of biological data files. Plain-text formats such as SAM, VCF, GTF, PDB and FASTA, often contain critical information which is obfuscated by the data structure complexity.
bioSyntax (https://biosyntax.org/) is a freely available suite of biological syntax highlighting packages for vim, gedit, Sublime, VSCode, and less. bioSyntax improves the legibility of low-level biological data in the bioinformatics workspace.
bioSyntax supports computational scientists in parsing and comprehending their data efficiently and thus can accelerate research output.
A major component of computational biology research involves the reading and comprehension of data in biological file-formats including FASTA , FASTQ , gene transfer format (GTF) , variant calling format (VCF) , protein database format (PDB) [5, 6], and sequence alignment map (SAM)  amongst others . While being easy to parse computationally, these and other biological files often become illegible as their size and complexity increases, including header sections that contain critical data descriptors often required for downstream processing.
Syntax highlighting is designed to improve the interpretability of text files with well-defined structures through the application of colour, font, and formatting to differentiate content; typically a set of keywords, structures, and symbols. Originally developed for the code editor Emily in 1971  and later LEXX in the late 1980s , syntax highlighting is now ubiquitous in the computer sciences. There are contradictory findings whether syntax highlighting offers performance benefits on computer programming comprehension or efficiency but syntax highlighting consistently decreases the reported difficulty of work tasks [11,12,13,14,15]. In terms of human perception, colour (via syntax highlighting) increases the visual saliency of data thereby decreasing search times to find a particular symbol in a visual search task [16,17,18].
A plethora of tools, both stand-alone and web-based, exist to help scientists visualize and process biological data [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. However, there is no comprehensive set of software to assist in direct inspection and interpretation of raw biological data and their headers.
The objective of bioSyntax is to improve the human readability of scientific data-formats through seamlessly integrated syntax highlighting and to assist scientists in performing visual search tasks when working with low-level data.
bioSyntax is currently ported for four common text editors, Vim (and GVim), gedit (and other linux editors using the GTKSourceView library), Sublime-Text-3, and Visual Studio Code (VSCode), as well as the command-line pager program, less. Additionally, bioSyntax functions as a repository into which syntax highlighting definition files may be deposited by the community for additional scientific file formats.
At its core, bioSyntax is a set of syntax-highlighting definition files specific to each port which are themselves a programmed set of regular expressions.
Where available, syntax-files are designed using a combination of; official file specifications for SAM v1.5 (https://samtools.github.io/hts-specs/SAMv1.pdf), VCF v4.2 (https://samtools.github.io/hts-specs/VCFv4.2.pdf) PDB v3.30 (ftp://ftp.wwpdb.org/pub/pdb/doc/format_descriptions/Format_v33_Letter.pdf), BED6 (https://genome.ucsc.edu/FAQ/FAQformat.html), and GTF v2.2 (http://mblab.wustl.edu/GTF22.html); example files from databases (NCBI Nucleotide/Protein , Sequence Read Archive , dbSNP , RefSeq , RCSB  and UCSC Genome Browser ); publically available consortium data (1000 genomes project , ENCODE ); and standard outputs from commonly used software (samtools , GATK , bowtie2 , cufflinks  and ClustalX ).
Within each program, highlighting of FASTA, FASTQ, CLUSTAL, BED, GTF, PDB, VCF and SAM files is automatically detected by file extension and can also be manually set within text-editors for files with non-standard file-extensions. In gedit, sublime and vim, amino acid FASTA files can be coloured using CLUSTAL , Taylor , Zappo  or hydrophobicity  colour schemes.
Large and compressed data can be manipulated on a unix command pipe with the output directly ported into less using explicit bioSyntax format commands: `sam-less`, `vcf-less`, etc. (Fig. 1). For example `samtools view -h NA12878.bam | sam-less - `, or `gzip -dc gencode.v26.gtf.gz | grep ‘MYC’ - | gtf-less -x 10 `.
Results and discussion
Syntax highlighting for computational biology file formats
bioSyntax currently recognizes FASTA, FASTQ, CLUSTAL, BED, GTF, PDB, SAM and VCF formats across all four text editors and less. Upon installation, bioSyntax automatically recognizes file-extensions and seamlessly assigns syntax highlighting to these data files.
The main benefit of syntax highlighting is immediately apparent through its increased legibility (Fig. 1, Additional file 1: Figures S1 and S2), especially in the deconstruction of verbose content such as plain-text CIGAR strings (Fig. 1a). In each file-format data is organized using contrasting colours to accentuate keywords or data fields. Nucleotides and amino acids are highlighted with distinct colours allowing for users to read sequences and interpret patterns in the alignment. Data fields containing scores such as PHRED base quality or mapping scores are gradient coloured.
The overall system of highlighting is also designed to group biological classes, even across file formats (Additional file 2: Table S1). For instance, dark-green is reserved for genomic coordinates in BED, GTF, SAM and VCF, so even if a user is unfamiliar with the SAM format, previous experience associating dark-green in BED or GTF will inform them of the meaning of those fields when presented in a SAM file (Additional file 1: Figure S2).
Ultimately, bioSyntax aims to help computational biologists comprehend data using graphical highlighting rather than simple syntactic highlighting. When the data does not have to be read per character or per word, but can be viewed as graphical patterns, underlying information in the data becomes salient, similar to alternative nucleotide representations [37, 38]. This is best seen in complex files such as SAM in which PCR-duplicate reads form block patterns and read density can be approximated by the diagonal similarity of reads at a locus (Fig. 1b). In a user-experience survey of bioinformaticians (Additional file 3: Text 1), 98.6% of users (N = 72) selected bioSyntax highlighted alignments as being easier to identify nucleotide variants compared to a standard monochrome text. Future research on how syntax highlighting can be refined to optimize for user performance is necessary.
bioSyntax nucleotide representation
bioSyntax implements a novel nucleotide colouring scheme for the complete IUPAC ambiguous base set , unlike other colour-sets which are designed for four or five bases (Fig. 2). The four primary base colours are chosen such that additive colour mixing also represents complete base ambiguity. For instance, thymine (blue) and cytosine (red) are pyrimidines (magenta), and the “any base”, N, is white. This colour-set visually distinguishes the strong bases (G,C) and weak bases (A,T) as warm and cool colours respectively, allowing for an intuitive approximation of the sequence GC-content (Fig. 2c). Additionally, a high-contrast colour-scheme is available to aid visually impaired or colour-blind users (Additional file 1: Figure S3).
The bioSyntax repository
There are scores of biological and scientific file-formats which would benefit from syntax highlighting. To facilitate future development of syntax definition files in science, the bioSyntax repository (https://bioSyntax.org) was set-up. The repository is both a library for scientific syntax highlighting and a community-oriented resource for learning syntax highlighting development. In this manner, researchers experienced in the use-cases of a file-format can quickly develop and share new syntax definition files.
bioSyntax assists researchers to intuitively read and navigate biological files in the context of familiar and common text editing tools. The cross-format unifying colour theme for biological data classes aids users in the rapid and accurate parsing of data with minimal prior knowledge regarding the file-format. Altogether, bioSyntax offers a substantial improvement to the legibility of biological data and helps researchers to grok their data.
Availability and requirements
Project name: bioSyntax
Project home page: https://biosyntax.org
Source page: https://github.com/bioSyntax/bioSyntax
Operating system(s): Linux, MacOS, Windows
Programming language: vim-script, xml, yaml
Other requirements: gedit 3.18+ or GTKSourceView3-dependent editors; Sublime-text-3; Visual Studio Code 1.25+; vim or gvim 7.4+; less and source-highlight
License: GNU General Public License v3.0
Any restrictions to use by non-academics: none
Gene Transfer Format
International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
Protein Database Format
Sequence Alignment Map
Variant Call Format
Lipman DJ, Pearson WR. Rapid and sensitive protein similarity searches. Science. 1985;227:1435–41.
Cock PJA, Fields CJ, Goto N, Heuer ML, Rice PM. The sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:1767–71.
Keibler E, Brent MR. Eval: a software package for analysis of genome annotations. BMC Bioinformatics. 2003;4:50.
Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2156–8.
Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, et al. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:235–42.
Berman HM. The protein data Bank: a historical perspective. Acta Crystallogr A. 2008;64:88–95.
Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.
Zhang H. Overview of sequence data formats. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ. 2016;1418:3–17.
Hansen WJ. Creation of hierarchic text with a computer display [internet]. Department of Computer Science, Stanford University.; 1971 [cited 2017 Dec 11]. Available from: https://books.google.ca/books?id=IZVFAAAAIAAJ.
Cowlishaw MF. LEXX—A programmable structured editor. IBM J Res Dev. 1987;31:73–80.
Sarkar A. The impact of syntax colouring on program comprehension. Proc 26th Annu Conf Psychol Program Interest Group Ppig. 2015:49–58.
Dimitri G. The impact of syntax highlighting in sonic pi. Psychol Program Interest Group. 2015;2015
Hakala T, Nykyri P, Sajaniemi J. An experiment on the effects of program code highlighting on visual search for local patterns. Psychol Program Interest Group. 2006:38–52.
Beelders TR, du Plessis J-PL. Syntax highlighting as an influencing factor when reading and comprehending source code. J Eye Mov Res. 2015;9
Hannebauer C, Hesenius M, Gruhn V. Does syntax highlighting help programming novices? Empir Softw Eng. 2018:1–34.
Duncan J, Humphreys G. Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992;18:578–88. discussion 589-593
Ramachandran VS, Hubbard EM. Psychophysical investigations into the neural basis of synaesthesia. Proc Biol Sci. 2001;268:979–83.
Wilkinson KM, Carlin M, Jagaroo V. Preschoolers’ speed of locating a target symbol under different color conditions. Augment Altern Commun Baltim Md 1985. 2006;22:123–33.
Procter JB, Thompson J, Letunic I, Creevey C, Jossinet F, Barton GJ. Visualization of multiple alignments, phylogenies and gene family evolution. Nat Methods. 2010;7:S16–25.
Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2009;25:1189–91.
Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–4.
Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. Integrative genomics viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 2013;14:178–92.
Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, et al. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002;12:996–1006.
Afgan E, Baker D, van den Beek M, Blankenberg D, Bouvier D, Čech M, et al. The galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W3–10.
Carver T, Bleasby A. The design of Jemboss: a graphical user interface to EMBOSS. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2003;19:1837–43.
Resource NCBI. Coordinators. Database resources of the National Center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D12–7.
Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D19–21.
Sherry ST, Ward MH, Kholodov M, Baker J, Phan L, Smigielski EM, et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:308–11.
O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, McVeigh R, et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D733–45.
1000 Genomes Project Consortium. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature. 2012;491:56–65.
ENCODE Project Constorium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome: Nature nature publishing group. Nature. 2012;489:57–74.
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303.
Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.
Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, Kelley DR, et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and cufflinks. Nat Protoc. 2012;7:562–78.
Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. 2007;23:2947–8.
Taylor WR. The classification of amino acid conservation. J Theor Biol. 1986;119:205–18.
Rozak DA, Rozak AJ. Using a color-coded ambigraphic nucleic acid notation to visualize conserved palindromic motifs within and across genomes. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:52.
Jarvius J, Landegren U. DNA skyline: fonts to facilitate visual inspection of nucleic acid sequences. BioTechniques. 2006;40:740.
Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry (NC-IUB). Nomenclature for incompletely specified bases in nucleic acid sequences. Recommendations 1984. Biochem J. 1985;229:281–6.
hackseq Organizing Committee 2016. hackseq: Catalyzing collaboration between biological and computational scientists via hackathon. F1000Research. 2017;6:197.
bioSyntax was initiated at the hackseq17 (https://www.hackseq.com/) genomics hackathon . We would like to thank the organizers for their dedication to making the event happen. We’d like to thank the developers who have contributed to bioSyntax; Ching Pan Eric Chu and Benjamin A Barad; and Joseph O’Brien for his artistic insight in developing a high-contrast palette for nucleotide colouring.
AB conceived and led the design/development of bioSyntax. AB, AE, AF, HYK, GEN and JW developed the initial release of bioSyntax and wrote the manuscript. DA packaged bioSyntax for Linux releases. LY ported bioSyntax for VSCode. All authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.
AB is supported by the Roman M. Babicki Fellowship in Medical Research. GN is supported by the UBC International Doctoral Fellowship award. No funding body influenced the development of this software or writing of the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
Source code and all development materials are available at https://github.com/bioSyntax/bioSyntax.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure S1. Screenshots of bioSyntax in; A) gedit for the nucleotide sequence FASTA, an amino acid FASTA with CLUSTAL colour scheme and a FASTQ file and; B) sublime-text-3 for a PDB file. Figure S2. Screenshots of bioSyntax in; A) vim for the human dbSNP (hg38 build-150) VCF file and; B) less for the Gencode v26 Annotation GTF and C) an example SAM file. In the GTF format, note how background colouring of “start_codon”, “stop_codon”, “CDS”, and “UTR” graphically distinguishes protein-coding transcripts from non-coding transcripts. Figure S3. The standard and high-contrast bioSyntax colour set for IUPAC nucleotides under the different forms of simulated colour-blindness. Hue and lightness variations in the standard theme allow for accesibility with colour-blindness. The alternative high-contrast set retains higher visual distinction between bases, even at the monochrome level. (PDF 3125 kb)
Table S1. Biological class definitions and colour definitions for the default bioSyntax theme in hexadecimal (gedit, sublime, VSCode, and gvim), cterm (vim), and 8-bit ANSI escape character (less) colours. (XLS 186 kb)
Text 1. bioSyntax user-experience survey of bioinformaticians. (PDF 3063 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Babaian, A., Ebou, A., Fegen, A. et al. bioSyntax: syntax highlighting for computational biology. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 303 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2315-y
- Syntax highlighting
- Command line interface