Skip to main content

iDPGK: characterization and identification of lysine phosphoglycerylation sites based on sequence-based features

Abstract

Background

Protein phosphoglycerylation, the addition of a 1,3-bisphosphoglyceric acid (1,3-BPG) to a lysine residue of a protein and thus to form a 3-phosphoglyceryl-lysine, is a reversible and non-enzymatic post-translational modification (PTM) and plays a regulatory role in glucose metabolism and glycolytic process. As the number of experimentally verified phosphoglycerylated sites has increased significantly, statistical or machine learning methods are imperative for investigating the characteristics of phosphoglycerylation sites. Currently, research into phosphoglycerylation is very limited, and only a few resources are available for the computational identification of phosphoglycerylation sites.

Result

We present a bioinformatics investigation of phosphoglycerylation sites based on sequence-based features. The TwoSampleLogo analysis reveals that the regions surrounding the phosphoglycerylation sites contain a high relatively of positively charged amino acids, especially in the upstream flanking region. Additionally, the non-polar and aliphatic amino acids are more abundant surrounding phosphoglycerylated lysine following the results of PTM-Logo, which may play a functional role in discriminating between phosphoglycerylation and non-phosphoglycerylation sites. Many types of features were adopted to build the prediction model on the training dataset, including amino acid composition, amino acid pair composition, positional weighted matrix and position-specific scoring matrix. Further, to improve the predictive power, numerous top features ranked by F-score were considered as the final combination for classification, and thus the predictive models were trained using DT, RF and SVM classifiers. Evaluation by five-fold cross-validation showed that the selected features was most effective in discriminating between phosphoglycerylated and non-phosphoglycerylated sites.

Conclusion

The SVM model trained with the selected sequence-based features performed well, with a sensitivity of 77.5%, a specificity of 73.6%, an accuracy of 74.9%, and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient value of 0.49. Furthermore, the model also consistently provides the effective performance in independent testing set, yielding sensitivity of 75.7% and specificity of 64.9%. Finally, the model has been implemented as a web-based system, namely iDPGK, which is now freely available at http://mer.hc.mmh.org.tw/iDPGK/.

Background

Protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) are generally enzymatic and covalent chemical modification of proteins following protein biosynthesis. Of the 20 amino acids that make up proteins, lysine is one of the most highly modified residues. According to the various studies reviewed, there are numerous common types of PTMs that occurred at lysine residues such as acetylation, ubiquitination, sumoylation, methylation, hydroxylation. These PTMs and enzymes are associated with a myriad of human diseases, including heart diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, neurodegenerative diseases, celiac diseases and cancers.

Lysine phosphoglycerylation is a non-enzymatic PTM, which be identified in both human cells and mouse liver by Moellering and Cravatt [1], they found that phosphoglycerylation plays a key role in regulating glucose metabolism and glycolytic process. It exploits the electrophilicity of 1,3-bisphosphoglycerate (1,3-BPG) to modify specific lysine residues and thus form a 3-phosphoglyceryl-lysine (pgK) that function in glycolysis. A comprehensive proteomics analysis reveals that pgK-modified proteins create a potential feedback mechanism by inhibiting and accumulating glycolytic enzymes that leads to the accumulation of glycolytic intermediates to alternate biosynthetic pathways [2]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that abnormal phosphoglycerylation has a high chance to cause the congestive heart failure [3].

Due to the labile nature of PGK bond and the low abundance of endogenously phosphoglycerylated proteins in vivo, further research is needed to clarify the characteristics and mechanisms of lysine phosphoglycerylation. Although mass spectrometry has been available for detection of variety of PTMs in laboratories [4, 5], but there are still many deficiencies, the process is expensive, time-consuming and not as effective. Thus, it is necessary to develop a systematic method for identifying phosphoglycerylation sites of proteins in silico. As listed in Additional File 1: Table S1, Xu et al. [6] developed a computational analysis tool named Phogly-PseAAC evaluated using K-nearest neighbor (KNN) classifier and pseudo-amino acid composition to detect the phosphoglycerylation sites. Another prediction tool named CKSAAP_PhoglySite was developed to predict the phosphoglycerylation sites on human proteins using composition of k-spaced amino acid pairs (CKSAAP) and fuzzy support vector machine (SVM) with tenfold cross-validation, and they indicated that the effectiveness of predicted secondary structure features seems to have very little practical use for discriminating between phosphoglycerylation sites and non-phosphoglycerylation sites [7]. However, data size is a very crucial part of model training, more than total 2000-dimensional features was obtained by the CKSAAP encoding scheme which may cause overfitting with small sample size [8]. PhoglyPred is another predictor which focused on selecting the important sequence-based features using the F-score, and evaluated using SVM and jackknife test to predict the phosphoglycerylation sites; moreover, to improve the classification for the imbalanced dataset, the authors set the different parameters for positive and negative datasets [9]. Except for the sequence-based features, EvolStruct-Phogly has incorporated local structure conformations, accessible surface area (ASA) and position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) to predict phosphoglycerylated lysine residues [10]. More recently, another prediction tool named Bigram-PGK which used evolutionary information in PSSM of protein sequences and its transformation to bigram occurrences appears to predict phosphoglycerylated sites [11]. Numerous analytical methods were proposed for predicting the phosphoglycerylation sites, which provide effective performance in cross-validation using training dataset. However, choosing the most reliable prediction method has been a challenge for researchers, because of there is a lack of independent testing to verify the objective effectiveness of these predictors.

In this study, we provide a full characterization of phosphoglycerylated substrate sites based on various features, including linear sequences and evolutionary information of amino acids. Subsequently, we build predictive models with both balance and imbalance datasets using decision tree (DT), random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) algorithms. Furthermore, five-fold cross-validation was conducted to assess the effectiveness of the proposed models. Most important of all, an additional phosphoglycerylation dataset was divided from the raw dataset which completely blind to the training dataset, and an independent testing of state-of-the-art methods was performed on these data. To facilitate the study of protein lysine phosphoglycerylation, we are motivated to develop a web tool for the identification of phosphoglycerylation sites.

Results

Composition of amino acids around phosphoglycerylation sites

In order to investigate the consensus motif surrounding phosphoglycerylated lysine residues, the frequency of occurrence around phosphoglycerylation sites of each of the 20 amino acids was measured based on a 19-mer window length, and the phosphoglycerylated lysine residue of each peptide was excluded from this calculation. Figure 1a indicates that, valine (V) residue occurs at a highest frequency surrounding the phosphoglycerylation sites; on the contrary, cystine (C) and tryptophan (W) which residues have the lowest frequencies. Comparison of the frequency of occurrence between phosphoglycerylation sites and non-phosphoglycerylation sites, for phosphoglycerylation sites, K residue has a relatively higher frequency, while aspartate (D), glycine (G), serine (S) and V residues also occur more frequently; in contrast, C, glutamate (E), leucine (L), proline (P) and threonine (T) have relatively fewer frequency. Furthermore, we performed a measurement of the position-specific amino acid composition surrounding the phosphoglycerylated sites based on the training dataset using WebLogo [12].

Fig. 1
figure1

Composition of amino acids surrounding phosphoglycerylation sites. a Comparison of AAC between 89 positive and 178 negative sequences. b Position-specific AAC of 89 phosphoglycerylated fragment sequences. c Comparison of position-specific AAC between phosphoglycerylated and non-phosphoglycerylated sequences based on TwoSampleLogo analysis

However, as shown in Fig. 1b, both of the frequency and entropy plots indicated that it is difficult to identify the phosphoglycerylated sites based on the position-specific residue composition. Thus, we utilized Two-SampleLogo tool [13] to identify the significance of enrichment or depletion in position-specific amino acid composition between phosphoglycerylated and non-phosphoglycerylated sites. A total of 89 phosphoglycerylated sites and 178 non-phosphoglycerylated sites were compared in Fig. 1c, it was realized that two positively amino acids K and H residues reach significant enrichment in the upstream flanking region (from positions − 1 to − 9), excepted at the position + 1. In particular, downstream on the peptide compared to the non-phosphoglycerylated site, the acidic amino acid D residue has the highest proportion at the position + 8 with p value < 0.01. On the contrary, for non-phosphoglycerylated sites, it shows that E is slightly more abundant at position − 2 that suggested a lack of negatively charged K, H and R residues closing to non-phosphoglycerylated sites.

Besides composition of amino acids, the composition of amino acid pairs was also measured to explore the statistically significant dipeptides around phosphoglycerylation sites. As shown in Fig. 2, the over-represented amino acid pairs were highlighted in red color and the under-represented pairs were highlighted in green color by displaying in a 20 × 20 matrix. After ranking the amino acid pairs according to occurrence frequency, the dipeptides formation from K or G were found in the top ranking such as KV, AK, GL, GG and GK. This result indicated that most of the dipeptides involved the two residues are enriched surrounding the modified residues and were considered as statistically significant pairs for the identification of protein phosphoglycerylation sites.

Fig. 2
figure2

The frequency differences of 20 × 20 amino acid pairs between phosphoglycerylated sites and non-phosphoglycerylated sites

Identification of the sequence motifs based on position-specific background amino-acid probabilities

With the frequency plot of sequence logo representation given in Fig. 1b, there is no obvious feature representation for each position. To further investigate the potential phosphoglycerylation motif in primary sequence, we applied a program PTM-Logo [14] that identify the significantly enriched and underrepresented amino acids surrounding the phosphoglycerylation site based on the training dataset. The program makes appropriate adjustments to probabilities of amino acids at each position according to the PTM type and the positions relative to the modified site. But there is a limitation of length for input sequences, the maximum acceptable length of the program 15-mer (− 7, + 7) is selected as the window length in the following evaluation and implementation.

Herein, Fig. 3a reveals that the one motif was detected based on the occurrence of R and D residues at upstream position − 6 of the peptide. It also shows that non-polar and aliphatic amino acids such as alanine (A), G, and V are more abundant surrounding phosphoglycerylated lysine at position − 2 to + 3 and 5. Position + 4 was exhibiting the highest proportion of polar amino acids namely glutamine (Q), and the positively charged and polar amino acid H had the highest ratios at position − 3. Additionally, the other motif was observed as shown in Fig. 3b, it was displaying the highest proportion of aromatic residues F (Phenylalanine) at position + 6 and + 7. Position − 5 was a special case, showing more abundant positively charged amino acid. The results indicated that the upstream region of the phosphoglycerylation sites harbor a notable abundance of positively charged amino acids, which is corresponding to the result of the TwoSampleLogo analysis. This analysis shows that, in a sequence, the amino acids with special properties surrounding PTM sites plays an important role in identifying the phosphoglycerylated sites.

Fig. 3
figure3

The motif analysis based on position-specific amino-acid probability backgrounds of 89 phosphoglycerylated sequences

Cross-validation performance of the models trained with single type and multiple types of features

To determine sequence-based features can be adopted to distinguish between the phosphoglycerylation sites and non-phosphoglycerylation sites, various kinds of features were extracted to build the prediction models, including AAC, AAPC, BLOSUM62 and PSSM. In addition, the composition of positively charged amino acids (PCAAC) such as H, R and K residues, were especially extracted from AAC to build a prediction model. Each of above listed feature sets alone with the training dataset were fed into three different classification algorithms, such as support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF) and decision tree (DT), and the models were evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. As shown in Table 1, the models were trained with single type of features using RF could provide the best overall performance in classifying between phosphoglycerylated and non-phosphoglycerylated lysine residues. The RF model trained with AAC has the great performance with a sensitivity of 59.6%, specificity of 59%, accuracy of 59.2%, and MCC value of 0.18, while that trained with AAPC gives a passable specificity of 62.9%. In particular, the SVM model trained with PCAAC alone provides the best overall performance comparing to the other models with a sensitivity of 58.4%, specificity of 68.0%, accuracy of 64.8%, MCC value of 0.25.

Table 1 Five-fold cross validation results of the DT, RF and SVM models trained on single type of features

Moreover, to improve the predictive power, the hybrid models were trained by combining two or more different types of features that were also evaluated by five-fold cross-validation. Table 2 shows that comparing to the models trained with single type of features, the RF model trained with the combination of AAC, AAPC and PSSM features could significantly improve the performance with a sensitivity of 62.9%, a specificity of 62.9%, an accuracy of 62.9%, and the MCC value of 0.24. The models trained for each feature combination using RF still have the best performance when comparing to DT and SVM, thus Fig. 4 provides the comparison of ROC curves only among the models trained on different multiple types of features based on their five-fold cross-validation performance. According to the evaluation criteria, the model trained by combining AAC, AAPC and PSSM using RF classifier exhibited the best overall performance among various predictive models.

Table 2 Five-fold cross validation results of the DT, RF and SVM models trained with multiple types of features
Fig. 4
figure4

Comparison of ROC curves among the models trained using various features based on five-fold cross-validation

Performance evaluation of the models trained with the selected sequence-based features

Based on the cross-validation results presented above, there is a significant difference in the predictive performance between the models trained with the same features but using different classifiers. In this study, no matter which features are used, the models trained using RF classifier that provide the better performance compared to others. Notable, according to the random forest algorithm, a random subset of the features was selected at each candidate split in the learning process, it means that the performance was not influenced by all the features. Therefore, in order to investigate the selected sequence-based features, a total of 4 kinds of features were ranked by F-score, including AAC, AAPC, B62 and PSSM. Subsequently, according to the process of forward feature selection, sequentially add only one attribute into the model to evaluate the performance at each step, continuing until the integration of features could not further improve the predictive performance.

And lastly, a total of 25 selected attributes were considered as the final combination for further classification as listed in Additional file 2: Table S2, the predictive models trained on these crucial features using DT, RF and SVM classifiers, the performance of each model was also evaluated by five-fold cross-validation as presented in Table 3, and the ROC curves of the models also shown in Fig. 4. The results show that the RF model could provide a better performance than previous ones, which has the sensitivity of 70.8%, the specificity of 70.8%, the accuracy of 70.8% and the MCC value of 0.40. In a surprise twist, the SVM model gave the best predictive performance comparing to DT and RF models, which could reach the sensitivity of 77.5%, the specificity of 73.6%, the accuracy of 74.9 and the MCC value of 0.49. In summary, the SVM model trained with the top 25 features selected by F-score and SFS can significantly enhance the performance of the model for predicting the protein phosphoglycerylation sites.

Table 3 Five-fold cross validation results of the DT, RF and SVM models trained with the selected features

Implementation of web-based tool for identifying phosphoglycerylation sites

Given a protein sequence, tandem mass spectrometry is the main technology currently used for identification of the post-translational modified sites [15]; however, the researchers still encounter equipment and technical difficulties such expensive, time-consuming and labor-intensive process. Thus, an effective prediction tool should be developed to efficiently identify potential phosphoglycerylation sites. In this work, the SVM model trained with the selected sequence-based features is utilized to develop a web-based online tool for automatic prediction of phosphoglycerylation sites, named iDPGK. The system allows users to submit the protein sequences of interest in FASTA format, which efficiently returns the predictive results including the potential position of phosphoglycerylated sites and the bar plot for amino acid composition surrounding the modified residue. To demonstrate the performance of iDPGK, an experimentally-verified phosphoglycerylated proteins are used as case studies which are not included in the training data set. The human gamma-enolase (ENOG_HUMAN) contains one verified phosphoglycerylation site at Lys-351, out of 23 lysine residues in the protein sequence, iDPGK could make an accurate prediction for the only one validated site.

Discussion

In classifying between the phosphoglycerylation and non-phosphoglycerylation sites, the model trained on the training dataset might be overestimated, which could lead to the overfitting problem. Thus, an independent testing dataset of phosphoglycerylation sites was split from the non-homologous dataset and used to verify the predictive power of the final model, which consisted of 37 positive sites and 74 negative sites.

As given in Table 4, the SVM model constructed with the top 25 selected features provides 75.7%, 64.9%, 70.3% and 0.41 for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and MCC value, respectively. In summary, based upon independent testing, the result shows that the proposed SVM model can outperform other models in overall and can handle class imbalance in classification between phosphoglycerylation sites and non-phosphoglycerylation sites.

Table 4 Comparison of independent testing results between our method and the available prediction tools

Conclusion

This study contributes to providing a comprehensive characterization of phosphoglycerylation sites based on sequence analysis of the experimentally verified modified sites due to the lack of experimentally determined phosphoglycerylation protein structures. Through observation of the results of WebLogo and TwoSampleLogo, the analysis of position-specific amino acids composition between phosphoglycerylation and non-phosphoglycerylation site reveals that the regions surrounding the modified sites contain a high relatively of positively charged amino acids, especially in the upstream flanking region. Additionally, the non-polar and aliphatic amino acids are more abundant surrounding phosphoglycerylated lysine following the results of PTM-Logo. As stated previously, these investigations suggested that the composition of amino acids can play a crucial role in distinguishing between phosphoglycerylation and non-phosphoglycerylation sites. In summary, based on the results of this study, it is suggested that the phosphoglycerylation sites generally occur not only within a positively charged region but also within a conserved motif. According to the evaluation by five-fold cross-validation, the SVM model was trained on all the training data using the top 25 sequence-based features ranked by F-score measurements, which was used to predict the phosphoglycerylation sites.

Moreover, to further demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model, a comparison between our model and previous models using the independent test dataset is given. Considering previously published studies, there are only two existing prediction tools, namely Phogly-PseAAC [6] and iPGK-PseAAC [16]. The results, as shown in Table 3, Phogly-PseAAC provided a sensitivity of 59.5%, a specificity of 67.4%, an accuracy of 67.2%, and an MCC of 0.09. Meanwhile, the iPGK-PseAAC provides 37.8%, 96.2%, 94.5% and 0.27 for sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and MCC value, respectively. The independent testing demonstrated that iDPGK provided a better predictive performance with balanced sensitivity and specificity, 75.7% and 64.9%, respectively. Moreover, as shown Fig. 5, the ROC curve displays that our model yielded a slightly higher true positive rate (sensitivity) when at the same level of false positive rate (1-specificity) for each tool. Consequently, the proposed model was employed to develop a web-based tool to identify phosphoglycerylation sites based on sequence-based features, named iDPGK (http://mer.hc.mmh.org.tw/iDPGK). Most important of all, with the availability of data increasing rapidly, the proposed method is applicable for analysis of the large-scale proteomics dataset with no adjustment required.

Fig. 5
figure5

Comparison of the predictive performance between the proposed models and existing prediction tools based upon independent testing

Methods

Data collection and pre-processing

In this study, the phosphoglycerylated substrate sites were collected from Protein Lysine Modification Database (PLMD) [17], a manually curated database of experimentally verified lysine modification sites which contains 187 phosphoglycerylation sites of 137 proteins. Lysine phosphoglycerylation is a recent research area in proteomics, the data are quite limited at present; therefore, the collected data were randomly split into two sets for model training (150 sites) and independent testing (37 sites) with the conventional ratio of 8:2. The testing dataset was used to evaluate the state-of-art prediction tools, which were compared with the presented method in terms of predictive performance.

The analytical flowchart of this work is described in Fig. 6. With reference to our previous work [18], sequence fragments with a window length of 2n + 1 centering at the experimentally verified phosphoglycerylation sites were extracted as the positive dataset; besides, the lysine residues without annotation on the phosphoglycerylated proteins that these fragments were extracted as the negative dataset. To determine an appropriate window size for model construction, we performed the evaluations of the models under the different window lengths on the basis of SVM classifier with amino acid composition features. As the results of five-fold cross validation, the model trained using 19-mer window length could achieve the best accuracy as shown in Additional File 1: Table S1.

Fig. 6
figure6

The analytical flowchart of the identification of protein phosphoglycerylation sites

In this work, to elude the overestimation of predictive performance, CD-HIT program [19] was used to remove homologous sequences from the training dataset with 40% sequence identity. Considering the limited positive data availability, the negative datasets were randomly extracted from the corresponding original datasets with the ratio of 1:2 between the number of positive and negative sequences. As shown in Table 5, 178 non-phosphoglycerylation sites were randomly selected for training dataset and 74 for independent testing dataset, respectively.

Table 5 Data statistics of training and testing datasets after the removal of homologous sequences using CD-HIT program

Features extraction and encoding

After the sequence extraction process, we focused on the analysis of sequence-based features, and then each sequence fragment was encoded based on the investigated features. The following sequence-based features are widely employed for analysis and prediction of various types of PTM sites in the enormous amount of research [18, 20, 21]: amino acid composition (AAC), positively charged amino acid composition (PCAAC), amino acid pair composition (AAPC), BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (B62) and position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM). In this study, the phosphoglycerylated sequences should be transformed into numeric vectors based on the above features to construct a supervised learning model.

The composition of amino acid (AAC) is a widely-used feature for calculating the frequencies of each amino acid in a given protein sequence [22]. There are 21 types of amino acids that need to be considered for feature encoding, including 20 native and 1 unnatural amino acid. The composition of amino acid pairs (AAPC) is another sequence based feature introduced by Park and Kanehisa [23], transforms a sequence fragment into a 441-dimensional vector, which includes 441 elements specifying the numbers of occurrences of amino acid dipeptides normalized with the total number of dipeptides in a sequence fragment. The scoring matrix for amino acid substitutions, also known as BLOSUM62 (B62) matrix, was built based on the frequencies of amino acid substitutions in clusters of proteins that with less than 62% identity between two sequences. With reference to our previous work [24], each fragment was represented by a matrix of (2n + 1) × w elements, where 2n + 1 represents the length of the sequence fragment and w stands for 21 elements including 20 types of amino acids and one for the non-existing residue. Position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) is a matrix which contains the evolutionary information of considered proteins calculated from the probability matrix and the background probabilities. In this work, the PSSM profiles of each phosphoglycerylated protein were derived by using PSI-BLAST search against the non-redundant database of protein sequences from NCBI [25, 26]. The matrix consists of (2n + 1) × 20 elements where 2n + 1 represents the length of the sequence fragment and 20 stands for the sums of position specific scores for each type of amino acid.

In order to investigate the important features for the prediction of protein phosphoglycerylation sites, the predictive power of each feature attribute is evaluated on the training data based on cross-validation. Additionally, to obtain the highest predictive accuracy, the hybridized-feature vectors were combined for improving predictive performance on the classification between phosphoglycerylated and non-phosphoglycerylated sites.

Selection of the best hybrid feature sets

F-score is most typically used for feature selection, which is defined as the weighted harmonic mean of both the precision and the recall of the test [27]. There is an 842-dimensional feature vector made up of sequential and statistical features, which was composed by three types of features including AAC, AAPC and PSSM. By referring to the CNN-SuccSite method [20], all the features were sorted and ranked according to F-score on training dataset prior to construction of predictive models. Furthermore, the sequential forward selection (SFS) [28] is a type of stepwise regression which involves beginning with an empty model and testing the addition of each variable, then adding the variables one at a time until none improves the model to a statistically significant extent. Finally, we determined the final combination of hybrid feature sets using SFS based on the F-score ranking results.

Construction of predictive models and performance measurement

In this study, the training dataset was composed of 89 phosphoglycerylation sites and 178 non-phosphoglycerylation sites, which used for model construction by using WEKA software. Based on the binary classification, there were three types of learning algorithms such as LIBSVM [29], Random Forests (RF) [30] and Decision Tree (DT) [31], which were used to build the predictive models for discriminating the phosphoglycerylation sites from non-phosphoglycerylation sites. For the LIBSVM classifier, the radial basis function (RBF) was adopted as the kernel function, which determined by a gamma parameter while the cost parameter was used to modulate the softness of the hyper-plane [29]. Random forests (RF) is an ensemble learning method for classification and regression by combining multitude of decision trees, and each tree depends on the values of a random feature sets sampled independently [30]. Random forest is then considered as an appropriate classifier to handle moderately imbalanced dataset refer to previous study [32]. Decision tree (DT) is a tree-like model in which each internal node represents a “test” on an attribute, each branch represents the outcome of the test, and each leaf node represents a class label [31]. J48 is a Java implementation of C4.5 decision tree algorithm integrated in WEKA software, the constructed decision tree was used as the model for classification.

To avoid overfitting, five-fold cross-validation was organized to examine the capability of the investigated features in classification between phosphoglycerylation sites and non-phosphoglycerylation sites, which was carried out for each feature set to evaluate the predictive performance. The training dataset was randomly split into five subgroups, the model was trained using 4 of the subgroups and the resulting model was validated on the remaining part of the data, and tests each subset only once, and then the process was repeated five times. The performance measure reported by five-fold cross-validation is then the average of the values computed in the loop. To estimate the predictive performance of the model, the following measures were used, sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), accuracy (Acc), and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC):

$$\begin{aligned} & Sensitivity = \frac{TP}{{TP + FN}} \\ & Specificity = \frac{TN}{{TN + FP}} \\ & Accuracy = \frac{TP + TN}{{TP + FP + TN + FN}} \\ & {\text{MCC}} = \frac{{\left( {TP \times TN} \right) - \left( {FP \times FN} \right)}}{{\sqrt {\left( {TP + FP} \right)\left( {TP + FN} \right)\left( {TN + FP} \right)\left( {TN + FN} \right)} }} \\ \end{aligned}$$

Availability of data and materials

The iDPGK tool and datasets used in this work can be accessed at the following URL: http://mer.hc.mmh.org.tw/iDPGK/.

Abbreviations

PGK:

3-Phosphoglyceryl-lysine

AAC:

Amino acid composition

AAPC:

Amino acid pair composition

B62:

BLOSUM62 scoring matrix

PSSM:

Position-specific scoring matrix

PCAAC:

Positively charged amino acid composition

Acc:

Accuracy

MCC:

Matthews correlation coefficient

PLMD:

Protein lysine modifications database

PTM:

Post-translational modification

RBF:

Radial basis function

Sn:

Sensitivity

Sp:

Specificity

SVM:

Support vector machine

RF:

Random forests

DT:

Decision tree

SFS:

Sequential forward selection

References

  1. 1.

    Moellering RE, Cravatt BF. Functional lysine modification by an intrinsically reactive primary glycolytic metabolite. Science. 2013;341(6145):549–53.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Huttlin EL, et al. A tissue-specific atlas of mouse protein phosphorylation and expression. Cell. 2010;143(7):1174–89.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kolwicz SC Jr, Tian R. Glucose metabolism and cardiac hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res. 2011;90(2):194–201.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Silva AMN, et al. Post-translational modifications and mass spectrometry detection. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;65:925–41.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chicooree N, Unwin RD, Griffiths JR. The application of targeted mass spectrometry-based strategies to the detection and localization of post-translational modifications. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2015;34(6):595–626.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Xu Y, et al. Phogly-PseAAC: prediction of lysine phosphoglycerylation in proteins incorporating with position-specific propensity. J Theor Biol. 2015;379:10–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ju Z, Cao JZ, Gu H. Predicting lysine phosphoglycerylation with fuzzy SVM by incorporating k-spaced amino acid pairs into Chous general PseAAC. J Theor Biol. 2016;397:145–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Babyak MA. What you see may not be what you get: a brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Psychosom Med. 2004;66(3):411–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Chen QY, Tang J, Du PF. Predicting protein lysine phosphoglycerylation sites by hybridizing many sequence based features. Mol Biosyst. 2017;13(5):874–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Chandra AA, et al. EvolStruct-Phogly: incorporating structural properties and evolutionary information from profile bigrams for the phosphoglycerylation prediction. BMC Genom. 2019a;19(Suppl 9):984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Chandra A, et al. Bigram-PGK: phosphoglycerylation prediction using the technique of bigram probabilities of position specific scoring matrix. BMC Mol Cell Biol. 2019b;20(Suppl 2):57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Crooks GE, et al. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 2004;14(6):1188–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Vacic V, Iakoucheva LM, Radivojac P. Two Sample Logo: a graphical representation of the differences between two sets of sequence alignments. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(12):1536–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Saethang T, et al. PTM-Logo: a program for generation of sequence logos based on position-specific background amino-acid probabilities. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(24):5313–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Larsen MR, et al. Analysis of posttranslational modifications of proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Biotechniques. 2006;40(6):790–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Liu LM, Xu Y, Chou KC. iPGK-PseAAC: identify lysine phosphoglycerylation sites in proteins by incorporating four different tiers of amino acid pairwise coupling information into the general PseAAC. Med Chem. 2017;13(6):552–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Xu H, et al. PLMD: an updated data resource of protein lysine modifications. J Genet Genom. 2017;44(5):243–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Huang KY, et al. Characterization and identification of lysine glutarylation based on intrinsic interdependence between positions in the substrate sites. BMC Bioinform. 2019;19(Suppl 13):384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Li W, Godzik A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(13):1658–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Huang KY, Hsu JB, Lee TY. Characterization and identification of lysine succinylation sites based on deep learning method. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):16175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Huang KY, et al. ViralPhos: incorporating a recursively statistical method to predict phosphorylation sites on virus proteins. BMC Bioinform. 2013;14(Suppl 16):S10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sahu SS, Panda G. A novel feature representation method based on Chou’s pseudo amino acid composition for protein structural class prediction. Comput Biol Chem. 2010;34(5–6):320–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Park KJ, Kanehisa M. Prediction of protein subcellular locations by support vector machines using compositions of amino acids and amino acid pairs. Bioinformatics. 2003;19(13):1656–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Weng SL, et al. Investigation and identification of protein carbonylation sites based on position-specific amino acid composition and physicochemical features. BMC Bioinform. 2017;18(Suppl 3):66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Altschul SF, Koonin EV. Iterated profile searches with PSI-BLAST—a tool for discovery in protein databases. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23(11):444–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Altschul SF, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25(17):3389–402.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Hripcsak G, Rothschild AS. Agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(3):296–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Somol P, Pudil P, Kittler J. Fast branch and bound algorithms for optimal feature selection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004;26(7):900–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chang CC, Lin CJ. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. Acm Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2011;2:1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Denisko D, Hoffman MM. Classification and interaction in random forests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(8):1690–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kaminski B, Jakubczyk M, Szufel P. A framework for sensitivity analysis of decision trees. Cent Eur J Oper Res. 2018;26(1):135–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    O’Brien R, Ishwaran H. A random forests quantile classifier for class imbalanced data. Pattern Recognit. 2019;90:232–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Core Laboratory of Department of Medical Research of Hsinchu Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taiwan.

Funding

This work is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST109-2320-B-195-001) and Hsinchu Mackay Memorial Hospital. The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SLW and HHL conceived and designed the experiments. KYH, FYH and HJK analyzed the results. KYH and FYH wrote the manuscript with revision by SLW and HHL. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hui-Hsuan Lau or Shun-Long Weng.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No ethics approval was required for the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Table S1. Determining the window size for further analysis based on the five-fold cross validation results of the SVM models trained on amino acid composition.

Additional file 2

. Table S2. List of the top 25 features ranking by F-score and the sequential forward selection method.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, KY., Hung, FY., Kao, HJ. et al. iDPGK: characterization and identification of lysine phosphoglycerylation sites based on sequence-based features. BMC Bioinformatics 21, 568 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-03916-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Protein phosphoglycerylation
  • 3-Phosphoglyceryl-lysine (pgK)
  • Post-translational modification (PTM)
  • Sequence-based features