Skip to main content

Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of Raffinose synthetase family in cotton

Abstract

Background

The Raffinose synthetase (RAFS) genes superfamily is critical for the synthesis of raffinose, which accumulates in plant leaves under abiotic stress. However, it remains unclear whether RAFS contributes to resistance to abiotic stress in plants, specifically in the Gossypium species.

Results

In this study, we identified 74 RAFS genes from G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. raimondii by using a series of bioinformatic methods. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the RAFS gene family in the four Gossypium species could be divided into four major clades; the relatively uniform distribution of the gene number in each species ranged from 12 to 25 based on species ploidy, most likely resulting from an ancient whole-genome polyploidization. Gene motif analysis showed that the RAFS gene structure was relatively conservative. Promoter analysis for cis-regulatory elements showed that some RAFS genes might be regulated by gibberellins and abscisic acid, which might influence their expression levels. Moreover, we further examined the functions of RAFS under cold, heat, salt and drought stress conditions, based on the expression profile and co-expression network of RAFS genes in Gossypium species. Transcriptome analysis suggested that RAFS genes in clade III are highly expressed in organs such as seed, root, cotyledon, ovule and fiber, and under abiotic stress in particular, indicating the involvement of genes belonging to clade III in resistance to abiotic stress. Gene co-expressed network analysis showed that GhRFS2A-GhRFS6A, GhRFS6D, GhRFS7D and GhRFS8A-GhRFS11A were key genes, with high expression levels under salt, drought, cold and heat stress.

Conclusion

The findings may provide insights into the evolutionary relationships and expression patterns of RAFS genes in Gossypium species and a theoretical basis for the identification of stress resistance materials in cotton.

Background

Raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFOs) accumulating in leaves during plant development are thought to play a vital role in the stress tolerance of plants [1]. Raffinose synthetase (RAFS) and Galactinol synthetase (GOLS) are two major watersoluble carbohydrates from RFOs that are responsible for raffinose biosynthesis in plants [2, 3]. Raffinose, the smallest member of RFOs, is widely found in the leaves, roots, seeds and tubers of plants [1, 4]. Studies have indicated that raffinose synthetase has homology with stachyose synthetase [5]. Heterologous expression of the RAFS gene in peas has shown that RAFS is a transglycosidase similar to galactosidase in structure and biochemical properties [6]. RAFS catalyzes the synthesis of raffinose, with galactinol as a galactosyl donor and sucrose as an acceptor [2]. The function and expression profile of GOLS under abiotic stress have been well clarified in many plant species. Some GOLS are expressed under the induction of abiotic stress, such as heat shock, drought, osmotic shock and salinity [7, 8]. Over-expression of GOLS has been found to increase the content of galactinol and raffinose and then improve abiotic stress tolerance [7, 9, 10]. Compared with synthetase GOLS, there have been few studies on the plant RAFS gene. The earliest reported RAFS gene was cloned from peas [1, 11], and later, the RAFS genes were cloned [2, 3, 12] from cucumbers [4, 13], rice [5, 14] and Arabidopsis thaliana [6]. In particular, six putative RAFS genes (AtRFS1-6) have been identified in Arabidopsis Thaliana [15, 16], but only AtRFS5 has demonstrated RFS activity, while AtRFS4 has shown little raffinose synthetic capacity. Except for AtRFS4 and AtRFS5, AtRFS2 has been predicted as drought induced RAFS in Arabidopsis thaliana [17]. Based on bioinformatics methods, few maize RAFS genes have been identified [18]. A unique maize RAFS gene has been found to play a vital role in seed viability and longevity [19]. However, there is no evidence to show that over-expression of RAFS can increase the content of raffinose. Despite extensive research on the role of gossyps in regulating or responding to abiotic stress in plants, the role of gossyps in drought resistance in plants remains unclear.

Synthetase RAFS plays an important role in the plant seed acquisition of drought resistance and the extension of seed life [20, 21]. Owing to the instability of raffinose synthetase, however, there have been relatively few research reports on synthetase RAFS, especially systematic research on the RAFS gene family in Gossypium species [22]. Cotton is an important industrial crop in national economic production, and improving its stress resistance is the focus of current cotton cultivation research [23]. To comprehensively study the evolution and expression patterns of the RAFS gene superfamily in Gossypium species, we identified RAFS genes and constructed a phylogenetic tree in the present study. We also analyzed the synteny, promoters and co-expression network associated with these RAFS genes. The constructed phylogenetic tree showed that RAFS genes could be grouped into four subfamilies. Through research of the cotton RAFS gene family, this study provides a certain theoretical basis for further research on cotton’s stress resistance mechanism and the improvement of cotton’s stress resistance.

Results

Identification of RAFS genes in Gossypium species

Using 21 known RAFS protein sequences of Arabidopsis, rice and maize as a query for BLAST, along with a Pfam search, a total of 74 RAFS genes in G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. hirsutum and G. barbadense were identified. Among them, there were 12 G. raimondii RAFS genes named GrRFS1-GrRFS12, 12 G. arboreum RAFS genes named GaRFS1-GaRFS12 according to their locations on the chromosome, and 25 G. hirsutum RAFS genes named GhRFS1A-GhRFS13A and GhRFS1D-GhRFS12D based on their locations to the At and Dt sub-genomes, respectively. Moreover, 25 G. barbadense RAFS genes were named GbRFS1A-GbRFS12A, GhRFS1D-GhRFS10D and GbRFS23-GbRFS25 within the scaffold (Additional file 1: Table S1). The prediction of subcellular localization showed that most of the 74 RAFS genes were localized in the periplasm and a few were in the cytoplasm and outermembrane (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Phylogenetic analysis, chromosomal distribution and structural features of cotton RAFS genes

To investigate the evolutionary history of the RAFS gene family, phylogenetic trees were constructed using all 95 full-length RAFS protein sequences in different species. The result showed that all of the RAFS genes in the Arabidopsis, rice, maize and four cotton species were divided into four clades (Fig. 1). Clade I was the largest clade, with 32 members, including five, four, nine and eight RAFS genes of G. raimondii, G. arboreum, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum, respectively. Clade II had 22 members, including three, three, six and eight RAFS genes of G. raimondii, G. arboreum, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum, respectively. Clade III had 20 members, including two, three, six and four RAFS genes belonging to G. raimondii, G. arboreum, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum, respectively. Clade IV had 21 members, including two, two, four and five RAFS genes belonging to G. raimondii, G. arboreum, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum, respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure1

Phylogenetic trees of RAFS genes. The neighbor joining phylogenetic tree of 95 RAFS genes of the following seven species: G. hirsutum, G. arboreum, G. barbadense, G. raimondii, A. thaliana, O. sativa and Z. mays. The gene family was divided into four RAFS subfamilies, named clade I, II, III, and IV

Combined with evolutionary tree analysis, the result of the conserved motifs of cotton RAFS genes showed that the motif distribution of 21 genes in group one was relatively consistent, of which all of the genes, except GhRFS3A, contained 11 conserved motifs with a consistent order (Fig. 2a, b). For group two, RAFS genes GbRFS1D and GhRFS1D only contained motif five and motif seven, while the other five genes almost contained the same motifs, showing that there were significant differences for the structure of RAFS genes in this group (Fig. 2a, b). Genes in group three and four had relatively consistent motif distributions. Generally, there were significant differences in the motif structure of cotton genes in the four branches. The motif distribution of genes in groups one and three was similar (Fig. 2a, b). RAFS genes in group four were relatively conservative. Genes in group two had the greatest variation. The difference in protein structure between different subfamilies may be the result of long-term gene genetic evolution.

Fig. 2
figure2

Conserved motifs and exon–intron organization of RAFS genes in four Gossypium species. a Neighbor joining phylogenetic tree of the RAFS genes in four Gossypium species. b Conserved motifs. c Gene structures. Yellow, blue, silver gray reperesent CDS, upstream/downstream acting elements, Intron, respectively

The analysis of exon–intron configurations of the RAFS genes revealed that there were differences in the number of exons among genes of different subfamilies, but most RAFS genes of the same subfamily had the same exon–intron structure (Fig. 2c). GaRFS11, GbRFS4, GbRFS1D and GhRFS1D had the fewest exons, with fewer than 4, while GrRFS2 and GhRFS2 had 18 exons. The distribution of exons showed that RAFS genes clustering in the same subfamily in the phylogenetic tree usually had similar gene structures and exon numbers, which was highly conservative. However, there were also a few RAFS genes with different lengths and exon numbers within each subfamily.

The chromosomal distribution of cotton RAFS genes showed that the ten G. arboreum RAFS genes were localized to the At-subgenome and two were localized to scaffolds. Moreover, 12 G. raimondii RAFS genes were localized to Dt-subgenome, 12 G. barbadense RAFS genes were localized to the At-subgenome, and ten G. barbadense RAFS genes were localized to the Dt-subgenome. Furthermore, three G. barbadense RAFS genes were localized to three scaffolds, respectively. Thirteen and 12 G. hirsutum RAFS genes were localized to the At and Dt-subgenomes, respectively (Additional file 2: Table S2). The syntenic relationships among these genes were visualized in circular maps (Fig. 3). A total of 74 pairs of homologous genes exhibited a collinear relationship in G. raimondii, G. arboreum, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum.

Fig. 3
figure3

 Circos map of RAFS homologous gene pairs among G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense, and G. hirsutum 

Expression analysis of RAFS genes in G. hirsutum

To investigate the possible functional roles of different RAFS homologs in G. hirsutum, we analyzed the expression patterns of a total of 25 G. hirsutum candidate RAFS genes based on published RNA-seq data (Fig. 4, Additional file 3: Table S3). The expression profiles were analyzed for seeds, roots, cotyledons, ovules and fibers, as well as different time series of seeds under conditions of cold, heat, salt and drought stresses. As shown in Fig. 4b, the GhRFS genes in clades I and IV were almost not expressed in the development processes of seed, cotyledon and root, whereas the genes in clade II were partially expressed with GhRFS12A, GhRFS11A and GhRFS11D having the highest expression level in the early stage of seed germination. In clade III, GhRFS1A, GhRFS2D, GhRFS8A and GhRFS8D had the highest expression level in any of the tissues, which indicates that these four genes may play vital roles in promoting the vegetative growth of G. hirsutum. For the RAFS gene expression profile during development stages of ovule and fiber, results showed that the four genes GhRFS9D, GhRFS7D, GhRFS8D and GhRFS2D were not expressed, while the other genes were expressed (Fig. 4c). Genes in subfamilies I and IV were also not expressed, and some genes in subfamily II were expressed. For instance, GhRFS11D was partially expressed and had the highest expression level at 25 DPA of ovule development. In clade III, the genes GhRFS1A and GhRFS2D were expressed during ovule development, but the relative expression level decreased compared with that during the development of the seed, cotyledon and root, indicating that the genes may play a certain role in the early development stage of the ovule. Similarly, GhRFS4A, GhRFS4D and GhRFS8A were highly expressed in the early development stage of the ovule but were decreased at 20–35 DPA.

Fig. 4
figure4

Promoters and expression analysis of GhRFS genes in G. hirsutum a Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of the GhRFS gene family in G. hirsutum. b Expression profile of GhRFS genes in the development process of seed, cotyledon and root. c Expression profile of GhRFS genes in the development process of ovule and fiber. d Expression profile of GhRFS genes under cold, hot, salt and PEG stress. e cis-elements in promoters of RAFS genes

To further assess the potential role of G. hirsutum RAFS genes in response to abiotic stress processes, we analyzed gene expression patterns under different abiotic stress conditions (Fig. 4d). Genes GhRFS1A and GhRFS2D were highly expressed in all of the abiotic stress conditions. The expression levels of GhRFS8A and GhRFS8D were relatively low at early stages of abiotic stress (cold, heat, salt and drought stresses), while it sharply increased in the late stages, which suggested that these genes may be involved in responding to abiotic stresses by over-expression to increase raffinose content when subjected to abiotic stresses. Noteworthy, not all of the genes from the same clade, with similar sequences, had the same expression level and gene functions. For example, most of the other GhRFS genes were not expressed or lowly expressed in any of the abiotic stress conditions. Moreover, to clarify whether cis-acting elements influenced the expression levels, we analyzed the 2000 bp sequence upstream of the start codon of GhRFS gene. The results showed that the promoters of almost all GhRFS contained hormone-related cis-acting elements, such as GA3, except for GhRFS6A, GhRFS11D and GhRFS6A. In addition, GhRFS1A, GhRFS2D, GhRFS8A and GhRFS8D, expressed highly under abiotic stress conditions, specifically possessed cis-acting elements MYB and ANX, which proved to be relevant to abiotic stresses in plants (Fig. 4e).

Co-expression network of GhRFS genes under abiotic stress

Pearson’s correlation coefficient was frequently used to construct the gene co-expression network. In this study, the method was used to construct the co-expression networks of 25 GhRFS genes in G. hirsutum to further understand its role in abiotic stresses (Fig. 5). As a result, 166 gene pairs were positively correlated and 111 gene pairs were negatively correlated under cold stress (Fig. 5a) with hub genes GhRFS3A, GhRFS6A, GhRFS8A, GhRFS9A and GhRFS6D. Similarly, 177 gene pairs and 77 gene pairs were positively and negatively correlated, respectively, under heat stress with hub genes GhRFS2A, GhRFS5A, GhRFS6A, GhRFS9A and GhRFS6D (Fig. 5b). Under salt stress, 198 gene pairs were positive correlated and 79 gene pairs were negative correlated with hub genes GhRFS5A, GhRFS9A, GhRFS10A, GhRFS11A and GhRFS10D (Fig. 5c). Moreover, 134 gene pairs were positively correlated and 120 gene pairs were negatively correlated under drought stress with hub genes GhRFS4A, GhRFS6A, GhRFS9A, GhRFS10A and GhRFS7D (Fig. 5d). Co-expression network analysis indicated that these hub GhRFS genes in the network may play an important role in responding to abiotic stress of cold, heat, salt and drought for G. hirsutum.

Fig. 5
figure5

Co-expression networks of GhRFS genes under stress treatments. a Cold stress b Hot stress c Salt stress d PEG stress

Discussion

Raffinose accumulates in higher levels in plants when responding to abiotic stress [10]. Several studies of RAFS have been carried out in Arabidopsis thaliana and Zea mays previously, which predicted their role as a strong drought stress resistance. In Arabidopsis, the knockout mutant involved in raffinose biosynthesis has shown no abnormalities during normal growth, except for disturbed raffinose content and reduced germination completion in the dark [3, 24, 25]. By studying the characteristics of maize knockout mutant (ZmRFS) and Arabidopsis plants expressing ZmRFS, we found that raffinose could directly and positively regulate drought stress tolerance of plants [26]. Despite extensive research, the function of raffinose in response to plant abiotic stress remains unclear, and there is no evidence that over-expression of RAFS genes can regulate raffinose content in vegetative tissue of in cotton, which is cultivated worldwide and faces severe biotic and abiotic stresses. Raffinose participates not only in the development of plant seeds but also in the response of plants to external stresses. With the completion of cotton genome sequencing, it is very important to study cotton RAFS genes from the whole genome. In this study, we performed a whole-genome identification of candidate RAFS genes in G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. raimondii, mainly focusing on the allotetraploid cotton G. hirsutum, with the aim of understanding its roles, their evolutionary relationships and expression in response to various abiotic stresses. The results can provide basic information and serve as an important resource for further investigations into the candidate RAFS gene.

A total of 74 candidate RAFS genes in the genomes of G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. raimondii were identified. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that all of the candidate RAFS genes were divided into four subfamilies, and the numbers of identified candidate RAFS genes in different cotton species were almost the same based on the species ploidy. That is, tetraploid cotton had about twice the number of candidate RAFS genes as diploid cotton, for example, only 12 genes in G. barbadense and G. arboreum as compared to 25 genes in upland cotton and G. raimondii, illustrating that candidate RAFS genes were conserved during evolution and underwent large-scale expansion in higher plants. Moreover, clade I was the least abundant member of the candidate RAFS clade.

Combined transcription factors and cis-elements upstream of the promoter regions can regulate gene transcription, which ultimately causes gene expression. We predicted that various cis-elements in the candidate RAFS gene promoter region were associated with plant hormone response elements and abiotic stress response elements (Fig. 2b). Previous studies also supported our predictions about the involvement of most RAFS genes in plant phytohormones responses, the most important one being abiotic stress. For example, ZmRAFS, a member of the raffinose gene family in maize, is a key gene that protects plants from abiotic stress. Constitutive over-expression of the ZmRAFS gene has been found to enhance plant drought stress tolerance without causing adverse effects to the plants under normal conditions [26]. Furthermore, manipulation of raffinose family oligosaccharides metabolic pathway can also improve the seed vigor [27]. Manipulating raffinose to enhance both plant drought stress tolerance and seed longevity has become promising in crop plants. Based on species ploidy, the even distribution of RAFS genes among all four species of cotton, G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. raimondii, may have occurred because of gene tandem, segmental, or whole-genome duplication events during evolution (Fig. 3). Gene structure analysis showed that GhRFS1D, GhRFS5A and GhRFS6A were intron less frequently, and their proteins exhibited similar patterns of protein motif distribution (Fig. 2c). These structural differences in exons/introns may have been due to splicing selectivity and can be used to identify their evolutionary mechanisms [28]. Such low-intron genes can evolve rapidly through replication or reverse transcription and can then be incorporated into the genome. Genes with more introns are thought to have gained new functions in the evolutionary process [29, 30]. Limited variation in the exon/intron structure of GhGRXs was observed compared to other plants.

The gene expression profile of candidate RAFS genes in upland cotton was also determined based on RNA-seq data. For example, the FPKM values for GhRFS12A, GhRFS11A and GhRFS11D had the highest expression level in the early stage of seed germination, and GhRFS1A, GhRFS2D, GhRFS8A and GhRFS8D had the highest expression level in all of the tissues, which indicates that these four genes may play vital roles in promoting the vegetative growth of G. hirsutum; moreover, GhRFS9D, GhRFS7D, GhRFS8D and GhRFS2D were not expressed, while the other genes were expressed in the development process of the ovule and fiber (Fig. 5b).

In this study, the structure, evolution, gene location and gene co-expression network of the cotton candidate RAFS genes were explored. The results showed that the RAFS gene family contained one conserved domain and could be divided into four subfamilies across the four cotton species. Most of the genes were evenly distributed on the chromosomes of the four cotton species, and there were differences in gene expression and co-expression network during the plant development process and under abiotic stresses. This study provides some clues that clarify the role of RAFS genes in ovule formation and seed, root, cotyledon and fiber development of plants, as well as the specific role they play in how plants respond to abiotic stresses. It also provides a basis for further exploration of the identification of stressresistant new materials in cotton. Based on the results of this study, scientists can further confirm the role of these candidate RAFS genes in cotton with in vitro validation experiments.

Conclusion

Raffinose synthetase (RAFS) is a key enzyme in the synthesis process of raffinose. Although RAFS genes of some species have been identified and functionally characterized, whether RAFS contributes to resistance to abiotic stress in Gossypium species had not been investigated. In this study, we conducted a complete genome wide survey of RAFS gene family in four Gossypium species which results into identification of 74 RAFS genes distributed into evolutionary conserved four groups. RNA-seq and promoter analyses revealed genes GhRFS1A, GhRFS2D, GhRFS8A and GhRFS8D, with ANX and MYB motifs, were highly expressed in plant seeds, cotyledonsroots, and under heat, cold, salt and drought stress conditions, which implied that plant hormones may enhance the expression of genes and then contribute to resist stress. These results elucidate the potential function in response to abiotic stress for RAFS genes in Gossypium species.

Methods

Delimitation of RAFS homologous genes in Gossypium species

Whole-genome data of all four Gossypium species (G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. hirsutum and G. barbadense) used in this study were downloaded from CottonFGD database (https://cottonfgd.org/about/download.html). A local BLASTp search [31] using the known RAFS genes of Arabidopsis thaliana (AtRAFS1-AtRAFS5), Oryza sativa (OsRAFS1-OsRAFS6) and Zea mays (ZmRAFS1-ZmRAFS10) as a query against all of the protein sequences in each genome was implemented to obtain RAFS homologs with an E-value cutoff of 10−5. To identify raffinose synthetase family members more accurately, the profile hidden Markov model (PF05691) of the HMMER3.0 program [32] was further applied to search all of the hits with the default parameters.

RAFS sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree construction

MAFFT, an accurate alignment software, was used to align multiple sequences with default parameters [33]. The neighbor joining (NJ) model in software MEGA7.0 was used to construct phylogenetic trees, and the bootstrap value was set to 1000 [34]. The phylogenetic tree was displayed and beautified using iTOL (https://itol.embl.de/). The subcellular location of the RAFS genes was predicted through the CELLO v.2.5 website (http://cello.life.nctu.edu.tw/) [35].

Motif analysis and chromosome location of RAFS genes

Conserved functional motifs of RAFS genes were identified using the program Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME, http://meme-suite.org/tools/meme) with the following parameters: the width of a motif was between 6 and 50aa, and the number of motifs was no more than 20 [36]. The website GSDS2.0 (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/) was used to draw gene structure diagrams[2]. Data for four cotton species (G. arboreum, G. raimondii, G. barbadense and G. hirsutum) were used to compile MAP files of RAFS genes, and MapInspect software was used to draw the physical location map of chromosomes.

Promoter prediction and gene expression pattern of RAFS in G. hirsutum

For G. hirsutum RFS genes in all four RFS clades, the promoter sequences, including at least 2 kb of the upstream regions, were downloaded from the CottonFGD databases (http://cottonfgd.org). The conserved cis-regulatory elements in the promoter regions were predicted using the PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) and PLACE (https://www.dna.affrc.go.jp/PLACE/?action=newplace) databases. Transcriptome expression data of RAFS genes in G. hirsutum TM-1 were downloaded from the NCBI database, with project number PRJNA248163, which had three biological replications per time point for each stress condition and was normalized against the control comparison group. A gene expression heatmap was produced with TBtools software. Reads were mapped to the G. hirsutum genome using Hisat2 software [37]. StringTie software was used to assemble and quantify the reads [38]. Fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped fragments (FPKM) were calculated as gene expression levels. The expression levels of RAFS genes in the development of seeds, fibers, roots, cotyledons and ovules under the conditions of cold, heat, salt and drought stress could reflect their response to abiotic stress.

Synteny analysis of RAFS genes in Gossypium species

To determine whether the RAFS gene family expanded through tandem duplication events or segmental duplication, a collinear analysis was completed with TBtools software [39].

Co-expression network analysis of RAFS genes

Transcriptome data of G. hirsutum under cold, heat, salt, and drought stress conditions were used to build a gene co-expression network with Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r), which were calculated using the ‘cor’ function of R package. The criteria for co-expression genes identification were set at r ≥ 0.9 or r ≤ -0.9 and P-values ≤ 0.05 [36]. Cytoscape 3.4.0 software (http://www.cytoscape.org/) was used to visualize the gene co-expression network with graph [40]. The hub genes within the network were identified according to the topological coefficient of each node with degree N40.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article and its additional files. The transcriptome data of G. hirsutum were downloaded from the NCBI's (National Center for Biotechnology Information) sequence read archive (SRA) with Bioproject numbers PRJNA248163.

Abbreviations

G.:

Gossypium

RFOs:

Raffinose family oligosaccharides

DPA:

Day post anthesis

FPKM:

Fragments per kilobase of exon model per million mapped fragments

References

  1. 1.

    Downie B, Gurusinghe S, Dahal P, Thacker RR, Snyder JC, Nonogaki H, Yim K, Fukanaga K, Alvarado V, Bradford KJ. Expression of a GALACTINOL SYNTHASE gene in tomato seeds is up-regulated before maturation desiccation and againafter imbibition whenever radicle protrusion is prevented. Plant Physiol. 2003;131(3):1347–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Peterbauer T, Mach L, Mucha J, Richter A. Functional expression of a cDNA encoding pea (Pisum sativum L.) raffinose synthase, partial purification of the enzyme from maturing seeds, and steady-state kinetic analysis of raffinose synthesis. Planta. 2002;215(5):839–46.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gangl R, Behmüller R, Tenhaken R. Molecular cloning of AtRS4, a seed specific multifunctional RFO synthase/galactosylhydrolase in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci. 2015;29(6):789.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hannah MA, Zuther E, Buchel K, Heyer AG. Transport and metabolism of raffinose family oligosaccharides in transgenic potato. J Exp Bot. 2006;57(14):3801–11.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Jing Y, Lang S, Wang D, Xue H, Wang XF. Functional characterization of galactinol synthase and raffinose synthase in desiccation tolerance acquisition in developing Arabidopsis seeds. J Plant Physiol. 2018;230:109–21.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Zhou J, Yang Y, Yu J, Wang L, Yu X, Ohtani M, Kusano M, Saito K, Demura T, Zhuge Q. Responses of Populus trichocarpa galactinol synthase genes to abiotic stresses. J Plant Res. 2014;127(2):347–58.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Taji T, Ohsumi C, Iuchi S, Seki M, Kasuga M, Kobayashi M, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Important roles of drought and cold inducible genes for galactinol synthase in stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2002;29(4):417–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Santos TB, de Lima RB, Nagashima GT, Petkowicz CL, Carpentieri-Pipolo V, Pereira LF, Domingues DS, Vieira LG. Galactinol synthase transcriptional profile in two genotypes of Coffea canephora with contrasting tolerance to drought. Genet Mol Biol. 2015;38(2):182–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Shimosaka E, Ozawa K. Overexpression of cold-inducible wheat galactinol synthase confers tolerance to chilling stress in transgenic rice. Breed Sci. 2015;65(5):363–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gu L, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Li T, Dirk LM, Downie B, Zhao T. ZmGOLS2, a target of transcription factor ZmDREB2A, offers similar protection against abiotic stress as ZmDREB2A. Plant Mol Biol. 2016;90(1–2):157–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Lahuta LB, Pluskota WE, Stelmaszewska J, Joanna S. Dehydration induces expression of GALACTINOLSYNTHASE and RAFFINOSE SYNTHASE in seedlings of pea (Pisum sativum L.)[J]. J Plant Physiol. 2014;171(14):1306–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zhang X, Henriques R, Lin SS, Niu QW, Chua NH. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana using the floral dip method. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(2):641–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Gu H, Lu M, Zhang Z, Xu J, Cao W, Miao M. Metabolic process of raffinose family oligosaccharides during cold stress and recovery in cucumber leaves. J Plant Physiol. 2018;224–225:112–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Li, S., Li, T., Kim, W.D., Kitaoka, M., Yoshida, S., Nakajima, M., Kobayashi, H. Characterization of raffinose synthase from rice (Oryza sativa L. var. Nipponbare). Biotechnol Lett. 2007,29(4):635–640.

  15. 15.

    Egert A, Keller F, Peters S. Abiotic stress-induced accumulation of raffinose in Arabidopsis leaves is mediated by a single raffinose synthase (RS5, At5g40390). BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:213–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nishizawa A, Yabuta Y, Shigeoka S. Galactinol and raffinose constitute a novel function to protect plants from oxidative damage. Plant Physiol. 2008;147(3):1251–63.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Gangola, M.P., Jaiswal, S., Kannan, U., Gaur, P.M., Baga, M., and Chibbar, R.N. Galactinol synthase enzyme activity influences raffinose family oligosaccharides (RFO) accumulation in developing chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds. Phytochemistry 2016,125:88–98.

  18. 18.

    Zhou ML, Zhang Q, Zhou M, Sun ZM, Zhu XM, Shao JR, Tang YX, Wu YM. Genome-wide identification of genes involved in raffinose metabolism in Maize. Glycobiology. 2012;22(12):1775.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Li T, Zhang Y, Wang D, Liu Y, Dirk LMA, Goodman J, Downie AB, Wang J, Wang G, Zhao T. Regulation of seed vigor by manipulation of raffinose family oligosaccharides in Maize and Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Plant. 2017;10(12):1540–55.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Blochl A, Peterbauer T, Hofmann J, Richter A. Enzymatic breakdown of raffinose oligosaccharides in pea seeds. Planta. 2008;228(1):99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Naumoff DG. Hierarchical classification of glycoside hydrolases. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2011;76(6):622–35.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bohan, h., Dagnall, i.j. The DAG family of glycosyl hydrolases combines two previously identified protein families. Biochem J. 1995,311(Pt1):349–350.

  23. 23.

    Wang C, Ulloa M, Shi X, Yuan X, Saski C, Yu JZ, Roberts PA. Sequence composition of BAC clones and SSR markers mapped to Upland cotton chromosomes 11 and 21 targeting resistance to soil-borne pathogens. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:791.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Gu L, Jiang T, Zhang C, Li X, Wang C, Zhang Y, Li T, Dirk LMA, Downie AB, Zhao T. Maize HSFA2 and HSBP2 antagonistically modulate raffinose biosynthesis and heat tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2019;100(1):128–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gangl R, Tenhaken R. Raffinose family oligosaccharides act as galactose stores in seeds and are required for rapid germination of Arabidopsis in the dark. Front Plant Sci. 2016;6:1107–15.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Li T, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Li X, Hao G, Han Q, Dirk LMA, Downie AB, Ruan YL, Wang J, Wang G, Zhao T. Raffinose synthase enhances drought tolerance through raffinose synthesis or galactinol hydrolysis in maize and Arabidopsis plants. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(23):8064–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhang Y, Sun Q, Zhang C, Hao G, Wang C, Dirk LMA, Downie AB, Zhao T. Maize VIVIPAROUS1 Interacts with ABA INSENSITIVE5 to Regulate GALACTINOL SYNTHASE2 Expression Controlling Seed Raffinose Accumulation. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67(15):4214–23.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lecharny, A., Boudet, N., Gy, I.S., Aubourg, M., Kreis. Introns in, introns out in plant gene families: a genomic approach of the dynamics of gene structure. J Struct Funct Genomics. 2003,3(1–3):111–6.

  29. 29.

    Lurin C, Andrés C, Aubourg S, Bellaoui M, Bitton F, Bruyère C, Caboche M, Debast C, Gualberto J, Hoffmann B. Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis pentatricopeptide repeat proteins reveals their essential role in organelle biogenesis. Plant Cell. 2004;16(8):2089–103.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jain M, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. Genome-wide analysis, evolutionary expansion, and expression of early auxin-responsive SAUR gene family in rice (Oryza sativa). Genomics. 2006;88(3):360–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Stephen F, Altschul WG, Webb M, Eugene WM, David JL. Basic local Alignment Search Tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215(3):403–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Johnson LS, Eddy SR, Portugaly E. Hidden Markov model speed heuristic and iterative HMM search procedure. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(4):772–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yu CS, Chen YC, Lu CH, Hwang JK. Prediction of protein subcellular localization. Proteins. 2006;64:643–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Zhang Z, Dunwell JM, Zhang YM. An integrated omics analysis reveals molecular mechanisms that are associated with differences in seed oil content between Glycine max and Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2018;18(1):328.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kim D, Langmead B, Salzberg SL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat Methods. 2015;12(4):357–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kovaka S, Zimin AV, Pertea GM, Razaghi R, Salzberg SL, Pertea M. Transcriptome assembly from long-read RNA-seq alignments with StringTie2. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, He Y, Xia R. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant. 2020;13(8):1194–202.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, Amin N, Schwikowski B, Ideker T. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498–504.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Du Xiongming and He Shoupu for providing the FPKM data of RNA- seq.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD0100401); it had no influence over the experimental design, data analysis or interpretation, or writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: WY and RC; methodology: RC, XW and WAM, software: RC, XW and WAM; validation: XL, XC and DW; formal analysis: by RC and JW; investigation: SW; obtained the resources: CC did the data curation, CC and LG did the original draft preparation, RC did the writing review and editing, WY, XW and WAM did the visualization, WY, QC and RC did the supervision; WY and QC did the project administration; WY did the funding acquisition, all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Quanjia Chen or Wuwei Ye.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

: Table S1. Basic characteristic of RAFS genes in G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. raimondii.

Additional file 2

: Table S2. Chromosomal locations of RAFS genes in G. hirsutum, G. barbadense, G. arboreum and G. raimondii.

Additional file 3

: Table S3. Expresstion level of RAFS genes in G. hirsutum under abiotic stress

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, R., Wang, X., Malik, W.A. et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of Raffinose synthetase family in cotton. BMC Bioinformatics 22, 356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04276-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • RAFS
  • Gossypium species
  • Gene co-expression network
  • Abiotic stresses
  • Gene duplication