Skip to main content

Volume 16 Supplement 14

Proceedings of the 13th Annual Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB) Satellite Workshop on Comparative Genomics: Bioinformatics

Proceedings

Edited by Joao Meidanis and Jens Stoye

Publication of this supplement has not been supported by sponsorship. Information about the source of finding for publication charges can be found in the individual articles. Articles have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. The Supplement Editors declare that they have no competing interests.

13th Annual Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB) Satellite Workshop on Comparative Genomics.

Frankfurt, Germany4-7 October 2015

Related articles have been published in a supplement to BMC Genomics.

  1. The accessibility of almost complete genome sequences of uncultivable microbial species from metagenomes necessitates computational methods predicting microbial phenotypes solely based on genomic data. Here we...

    Authors: Roman Feldbauer, Frederik Schulz, Matthias Horn and Thomas Rattei

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2015 16(Suppl 14):S1

    Content type: Research

    Published on:

  2. This paper presents new structural and algorithmic results around the scaffolding problem, which occurs prominently in next generation sequencing. The problem can be formalized as an optimization problem on a ...

    Authors: Mathias Weller, Annie Chateau and Rodolphe Giroudeau

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2015 16(Suppl 14):S2

    Content type: Research

    Published on:

  3. Combining a set of trees on partial datasets into a single tree is a classical method for inferring large phylogenetic trees. Ideally, the combined tree should display each input partial tree, which is only po...

    Authors: Manuel Lafond, Aïda Ouangraoua and Nadia El-Mabrouk

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2015 16(Suppl 14):S4

    Content type: Research

    Published on:

  4. Even for moderate size inputs, there are a tremendous number of optimal rearrangement scenarios, regardless what the model is and which specific question is to be answered. Therefore giving one optimal solutio...

    Authors: István Miklós and Heather Smith

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2015 16(Suppl 14):S6

    Content type: Research

    Published on:

  5. We study statistical estimators of the number of genomic events separating two genomes under a Double Cut-and Join (DCJ) rearrangement model, by a method of moment estimation. We first propose an exact, closed...

    Authors: Priscila Biller, Laurent Guéguen and Eric Tannier

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2015 16(Suppl 14):S7

    Content type: Research

    Published on:

  6. Reconstructing evolution provides valuable insights into the processes of gene evolution and function. However, while there have been great advances in algorithms and software to reconstruct the history of gen...

    Authors: Maureen Stolzer, Katherine Siewert, Han Lai, Minli Xu and Dannie Durand

    Citation: BMC Bioinformatics 2015 16(Suppl 14):S8

    Content type: Research

    Published on:

  • Editorial Board
  • Sign up for article alerts and news from this journal
  • As a result of the significant disruption that is being caused by the COVID-19 pandemic we are very aware that many researchers will have difficulty in meeting the timelines associated with our peer review process during normal times.  Please do let us know if you need additional time. Our systems will continue to remind you of the original timelines but we intend to be highly flexible at this time.

2019 Journal Metrics

  • Citation Impact
    3.242 - 2-year Impact Factor
    3.213 - 5-year Impact Factor
    1.156 - Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)
    1.626 - SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)

    Usage 
    4,058,323 downloads

    Social Media Impact
    6067 mentions