 Software
 Open Access
Mocapy++  A toolkit for inference and learning in dynamic Bayesian networks
 Martin Paluszewski^{1}Email author and
 Thomas Hamelryck^{1}
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471210511126
© Paluszewski and Hamelryck; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
 Received: 2 October 2009
 Accepted: 12 March 2010
 Published: 12 March 2010
Abstract
Background
Mocapy++ is a toolkit for parameter learning and inference in dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs). It supports a wide range of DBN architectures and probability distributions, including distributions from directional statistics (the statistics of angles, directions and orientations).
Results
The program package is freely available under the GNU General Public Licence (GPL) from SourceForge http://sourceforge.net/projects/mocapy. The package contains the source for building the Mocapy++ library, several usage examples and the user manual.
Conclusions
Mocapy++ is especially suitable for constructing probabilistic models of biomolecular structure, due to its support for directional statistics. In particular, it supports the Kent distribution on the sphere and the bivariate von Mises distribution on the torus. These distributions have proven useful to formulate probabilistic models of protein and RNA structure in atomic detail.
Keywords
 Hide Markov Model
 Expectation Maximization
 Hide Node
 Expectation Maximization Algorithm
 Dynamic Bayesian Network
Background
A Bayesian network (BN) represents a set of variables and their joint probability distribution using a directed acyclic graph [1, 2]. A dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) is a BN that represents sequences, such as timeseries from speech data or biological sequences [3]. One of the simplest examples of a DBN is the well known hidden Markov model (HMM) [4, 5]. DBNs have been applied with great success to a large number of problems in various fields. In bioinformatics, DBNs are especially relevant because of the sequential nature of biological molecules, and have therefore proven suitable for tackling a large number of problems. Examples are protein homologue detection [6], protein secondary structure prediction [7, 8], gene finding [5], multiple sequence alignment [5] and sampling of protein conformations [9, 10].
Here, we present a general, open source toolkit, called Mocapy++, for inference and learning in BNs and especially DBNs. The main purpose of Mocapy++ is to allow the user to concentrate on the probabilistic model itself, without having to implement customized algorithms. The name Mocapy stands for Markov chain Mo nte Ca rlo and Py thon: the key ingredients in the original implementation of Mocapy (T. Hamelryck, University of Copenhagen, 2004, unpublished). Today, Mocapy has been reimplemented in C++ but the name is kept for historical reasons. Mocapy supports a large range of architectures and probability distributions, and has proven its value in several published applications [9–13]. This article serves as the main single reference for both Mocapy and Mocapy++.
Existing Packages
Some popular Free BN packages with an API. Extracted from Murphy [14].
Name  Authors  Source  Inference  Learning 

Bayes Blocks  Harva et al. [30]  Python/C++  Ensemble learning  VB 
BNT  Murphy [31]  Matlab/C  JTI, MCMC  EM 
BUGS  Lunn et al. [32]  N  Gibbs  Gibbs 
Elvira  Elvira Consortium [33]  Java  JTI, IS  EM 
Genie  U. Pittsburgh [34]  N  JTI  EM 
GMTk  Blimes, Zweig [35]  N  JTI  EM 
Infer.NET  Winn and Minka [36]  C#  BP, EP, Gibbs, VB  EP 
JAGS  Plummer  C++  Gibbs  Gibbs 
Mocapy++  Paluszewski and Hamelryck  C++  Gibbs  SEM, MCEM 
In bioinformatics, models are typically trained using large datasets. Some packages in Table 1 only provide exact inference algorithms that are often not suitable for training models with large datasets. Other packages have no or little support for DBNs, which is important for modelling biomolecular structure. To our knowledge none of the publically available open source toolkits support directional statistics, which has recently become of crucial importance for applications in structural bioinformatics such as modelling protein and RNA structure in 3D detail [9, 10, 12, 15]. Furthermore, Mocapy++ is the only package that uses the stochastic EM [16–18] algorithm for parameter learning (see the Materials and Methods section). These features make Mocapy++ an excellent choice for many tasks in bioinformatics and especially structural bioinformatics.
Implementation
Mocapy++ is implemented as a program library in C++. The library is highly modular and new node types can be added easily. For object serialization and special functions the Boost C++ library [19] is used. All relevant objects are serializable, meaning that Mocapy++ can be suspended and later resumed at any state during training or sampling. The LAPACK library [20] is used for linear algebra routines.
Mocapy++ uses CMake [21] to locate packages and configure the build system and can be used either as a static or shared library. The package includes a Doxygen configuration file for HTML formatted documentation of the source code. An example of a Python interface file for SWIG http://www.swig.org is also included in the package.
Data structures
Most of the internal data is stored in simple Standard Template Library (STL) [22] data structures. However, STL or other public libraries offer little support for multidimensional arrays when the dimension needs to be set at runtime. In Mocapy++ such a multidimensional array is for example needed to store the conditional probability table (CPT) of the discrete nodes. The CPT is a matrix that holds the probabilities of each combination of node and parent values. For example, a discrete node of size 2 with two parents of sizes 3 and 4, respectively, will have a 3 × 4 × 2 matrix as its CPT. Mocapy++ therefore has its own implementation of a multidimensional array, called MDArray. The MDArray class features dynamic allocation of dimensions and provides various slicing operations. The MDArray is also used for storing the training data and other internal data.
Specifying a DBN in Mocapy++
Node Types
Mocapy++ supports several node types, each corresponding to a specific probability distribution. The categorical distribution (discrete node), multinomial (for vectors of counts), Gaussian (uni and multivariate), von Mises (uni and bivariate; for data on the circle or the torus, respectively) [23], Kent (5parameter FisherBingham; for data on the sphere) [24] and Poisson distributions are supported. Some node types, such as the bivariate von Mises and Kent nodes, are to our knowledge only available in Mocapy++. The bivariate von Mises and Kent distributions are briefly described here. These distributions belong to the realm of directional statistics, which is concerned with probability distributions on manifolds such as the circle, the sphere or the torus [23, 25].
Kent Distribution
where x is a random 3D unit vector that specifies a point on the 2D sphere.
The various parameters can be interpreted as follows:

κ: a concentration parameter. The concentration of the density increases with κ.

β: determines the ellipticity of the equal probability contours of the distribution. The ellipticity increases with β. If β = 0, the Kent distribution becomes the von MisesFisher distribution on the 2D sphere.

γ_{1}: the mean direction.

γ_{2}: the main axis of the elliptical equal probability contours.

γ_{3}: the secondary axis of the elliptical equal probability contours.
The Kent distribution can be fully characterized by 5 independent parameters. The concentration and the shape of the equal probability contours are characterized by the κ and β parameters, respectively. Two angles are sufficient to specify the mean direction on the sphere, and one additional angle fixes the orientation of the elliptical equal probability contours. The latter three angles are in practice specified by the three orthonormal γ vectors, which form a 3 × 3 orthogonal matrix.
Bivariate von Mises Distribution
where C(κ_{1}, κ_{2}, κ_{3}) is the normalizing factor and ϕ, ψ are random angles in [0, 2π[. Such an angle pair defines a point on the torus.
The distribution has 5 parameters:

μ and ν are the means for ϕ and ψ respectively.

κ_{1} and κ_{2} are the concentration of ϕ and ψ respectively.

κ_{3} is related to their correlation.
Inference and Learning
Mocapy++ uses a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique called Gibbs sampling [1] to perform inference, i.e. to approximate the probability distribution over the values of the hidden nodes. Sampling methods such as Gibbs sampling are attractive because they allow complicated network architectures and a wide range of probability distributions.
Parameter learning of a DBN with hidden nodes is done using the expectation maximization (EM) method, which provides a maximum likelihood point estimate of the parameters. In the Estep, the values of the hidden nodes are inferred using the current DBN parameters. In the subsequent Mstep, the inferred values of the hidden nodes are used to update the parameters of the DBN using maximum likelihood estimation. The E and Mstep cycle is repeated until convergence. Parameter learning using the EM algorithm requires a method to perform inference over the possible hidden node values. If one uses a stochastic procedure to perform the Estep (as in Mocapy++), a stochastic version of the EM algorithm is obtained. There are two reasons to use a stochastic Estep. First, deterministic inference might be intractable. Second, certain stochastic versions of the EM algorithm are more robust than the classic version of EM [16]. EM algorithms with a stochastic Estep come in two flavors [1, 17]. In Monte Carlo EM (MCEM), a large number of samples is generated in the EM step. In Stochastic EM (SEM) [16–18] only one sample is generated for each hidden node, and a 'completed' dataset is obtained. In contrast to MCEM, SEM has some clear advantages over deterministic EM algorithms: SEM is less dependent on starting conditions, and has a lower tendency to get stuck at saddle points, or insignificant local maxima. Because only one value needs to be sampled for each hidden node in the Estep, SEM can also be considerably faster than MCEM. SEM is especially suited for large datasets, while for small datasets MCEM is a better choice. Mocapy++ supports both forms of EM.
Results and Discussion
Hamelryck et al.[9] sample realistic protein Cαtraces using an HMM with a Kent output node. Boomsma et al.[10] extend this model to full atomic detail using the bivariate von Mises distribution [23]. In both applications, Mocapy was used for parameter estimation and sampling. Zhao et al.[11] used Mocapy for related work. Mocapy has also been used to formulate a probabilistic model of RNA structure [12] (Figure 1) and to infer functional interactions in a biomolecular network [13].
In practice, the most time consuming step in parameter learning is Gibbs sampling of the hidden nodes. The running time for one sweep of Gibbs sampling for a hidden discrete node is O(l × s) where l is the total number of slices in the data and s is the size of the node. The largest model that, to our knowledge, has been successfully trained with Mocapy++ is an extension of TorusDBN [10]. The dataset consisted of 9059 sequences with a total of more than 1.5 million slices. The model has 11897 parameters and one EMiteration takes 860 seconds. The number of SEM iterations needed for likelihood convergence is around 100.
Toolkits for inference and learning in Bayesian networks use many different algorithms and are implemented in a variety of computer languages (Matlab, R, Java,...); comparisons are thus necessarily unfair or even irrelevant. Therefore, we feel it suffices to point out that Mocapy++ has some unique features (such as the support for directional statistics), and that the benchmarks clearly show that its performance is more than satisfactory for real life problems  both with respect to speed and data set size.
Future Directions of Mocapy++
The core of Mocapy++ described here is not expected to change much in future versions of Mocapy++. However, Mocapy++ is an evolving project with room for new features and additions. We therefore encourage people to propose their ideas for improvements and to participate in the development of Mocapy++. Potential directions include:

Additional probability distributions

Structure learning

Graphical user interface

Plugins for reading data in various formats
Conclusions
Mocapy++ has a number of attractive features that are not found together in other toolkits [14]: it is open source, implemented in C++ for optimal speed efficiency and supports directional statistics. This branch of statistics deals with data on unusual manifolds such as the sphere or the torus [25], which is particularly useful to formulate probabilistic models of biomolecular structure in atomic detail [9–12]. Finally, the use of SEM for parameter estimation avoids problems with convergence [16, 17] and allows for the use of large datasets, which are particularly common in bioinformatics. In conclusion, Mocapy++ provides a powerful machine learning tool to tackle a large range of problems in bioinformatics.
Availability and Requirements

Project name: Mocapy++

Project home page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mocapy

Operating system(s): Linux, Unix, Mac OS X, Windows with Cygwin

Programming language: C++

Other requirements: Boost, CMake and LAPACK, GNU Fortran

License: GNU GPL
Declarations
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the colleagues at the Bioinformatics centre who have helped in the development of Mocapy++: Christian Andreetta, Wouter Boomsma, Mikael Borg, Jes Frellsen, Tim Harder and Kasper Stovgaard. We also thank John T. Kent and Kanti Mardia, University of Leeds, UK and Jesper FerkinghoffBorg, Technical University of Denmark for helpful discussions. We acknowledge funding from the Danish Council for Strategic Research (Program Commission on Nanoscience, Biotechnology and IT, Project: simulating proteins on a millisecond time scale, 2106060009).
Authors’ Affiliations
References
 Bishop CM: Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer; 2006.Google Scholar
 Pearl J: Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Morgan Kaufmann; 1997.Google Scholar
 Ghahramani Z: Learning dynamic Bayesian networks. Lect Notes Comp Sci 1998, 1387: 168–197. full_textView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Rabiner LR: A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition. Proc IEEE 1989, 77(2):257–286. 10.1109/5.18626View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Durbin R, Eddy SR, Krogh A, Mitchison G: Biological sequence analysis. Cambridge University Press; 1999.Google Scholar
 Raval A, Ghahramani Z, Wild DL: A Bayesian network model for protein fold and remote homologue recognition. Bioinformatics 2002, 18(6):788–801. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.6.788View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Schmidler SC, Liu JS, Brutlag DL: Bayesian segmentation of protein secondary structure. J Comp Biol 2000, 7(1–2):233–248. 10.1089/10665270050081496View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Chu W, Ghahramani Z, Podtelezhnikov A, Wild DL: Bayesian segmental models with multiple sequence alignment profiles for protein secondary structure and contact map prediction. IEEE/ACM Trans Comp Biol Bioinf 2006, 3(2):98–113. 10.1109/TCBB.2006.17View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Hamelryck T, Kent JT, Krogh A: Sampling realistic protein conformations using local structural bias. PLoS Comp Biol 2006., 2(9): 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020131Google Scholar
 Boomsma W, Mardia KV, Taylor CC, FerkinghoffBorg J, Krogh A, Hamelryck T: A generative, probabilistic model of local protein structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105(26):8932–8937. 10.1073/pnas.0801715105View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
 Zhao F, Li S, Sterner BW, Xu J: Discriminative learning for protein conformation sampling. Prot Struct Func Bioinf 2008, 73: 228–240. 10.1002/prot.22057View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Frellsen J, Moltke I, Thiim M, Mardia KV, FerkinghoffBorg J, Hamelryck T: A probabilistic model of RNA conformational space. PLoS Comp Biol 2009., 5(6): 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000406Google Scholar
 KwangHyun C, HyungSeok C, SangMok C: Unraveling the functional interaction structure of a biomolecular network through alternate perturbation of initial conditions. J Biochem Biophys Met 2007, 70(4):701–707. 10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.01.008View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Murphy KP: Software for graphical models: A review. Int Soc Bayesian Anal Bull 2007, 14(4):13–15.Google Scholar
 Hamelryck T: Probabilistic models and machine learning in structural bioinformatics. Stat Met Med Res 2009, 18(5):505–526. 10.1177/0962280208099492View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Nielsen SF: The stochastic EM algorithm: estimation and asymptotic results. Bernoulli 2000, 6(3):457–489. 10.2307/3318671View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter D: Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall/CRC; 1995.Google Scholar
 Celeux G, Diebolt J: The SEM algorithm: a probabilistic teacher algorithm derived from the EM algorithm for the mixture problem. Comp Stat Quart 1985, 2: 73–92.Google Scholar
 Abrahams D, Gurtovoy A: C++ template metaprogramming: concepts, tools, and techniques from Boost and beyond. AddisonWesley Professional; 2004.Google Scholar
 Angerson E, Bai Z, Dongarra J, Greenbaum A, Mckenney A, Du Croz J, Hammarling S, Demmel J, Bischof C, Sorensen D: LAPACK: A portable linear algebra library for highperformance computers. Proc Supercomp '90 1990, 2–11. full_textView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Wojtczyk M, Knoll A: A cross platform development workflow for C/C++ applications. ICSEA '08 2008, 224–229.Google Scholar
 Musser DR, Saini A: STL: Tutorial and Reference Guide: C++ Programming with the Standard Template Library. AddisonWesley Professional Computing Series; 1996.Google Scholar
 Mardia KV, Taylor CC, Subramaniam G: Protein bioinformatics and mixtures of bivariate von Mises distributions for angular data. Biometrics 2007, 63(2):505–512. 10.1111/j.15410420.2006.00682.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
 Kent JT: The FisherBingham distribution on the sphere. J Roy Stat Soc 1982, 44: 71–80.Google Scholar
 Mardia KV, Jupp PE: Directional statistics. Wiley; 2000.Google Scholar
 Leong P, Carlile S: Methods for spherical data analysis and visualization. J Neurosci Met 1998, 80: 191–200. 10.1016/S01650270(97)00201XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Peel D, Whiten W, McLachlan G: Fitting mixtures of Kent distributions to aid in joint set identification. J Am Stat Ass 2001, 96: 56–63. 10.1198/016214501750332974View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Kent J, Hamelryck T: Using the FisherBingham distribution in stochastic models for protein structure. In Quantitative Biology, Shape Analysis, and Wavelets. Volume 24. Edited by: Barber S, Baxter P, Mardia K, Walls R. Leeds University Press; 2005:57–60.Google Scholar
 Boomsma W, Kent J, Mardia K, Taylor C, Hamelryck T: Graphical models and directional statistics capture protein structure. In Interdisciplinary Statistics and Bioinformatics. Volume 25. Edited by: Barber S, Baxter P, Mardia K, Walls R. Leeds University Press; 2006:91–94.Google Scholar
 Raiko T, Valpola H, Harva M, Karhunen J: Building blocks for variational Bayesian learning of latent variable models. J Mach Learn Res 2007, 8: 155–201.Google Scholar
 Murphy KP: The Bayes net toolbox for MATLAB. Comp Sci Stat 2001, 33: 2001.Google Scholar
 Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D: WinBUGS  A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comp 2000, 10(4):325–337. 10.1023/A:1008929526011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
 Lacave C, Atienza R, Díez FJ: Graphical explanation in Bayesian networks. In ISMDA '00: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Medical Data Analysis. London, UK: SpringerVerlag; 2000:122–129.Google Scholar
 Druzdzel MJ: SMILE: Structural modeling, inference, and learning engine and GeNIE: A development environment for graphical decisiontheoretic models. AAAI/IAAI; 1999:902–903.Google Scholar
 Bilmes J, Zweig G: The graphical models toolkit: An open source software system for speech and timeseries processing. IEEE ICASSP 2002, 4: 3916–3919.Google Scholar
 Minka T, Winn J, Guiver J, Kannan A: Infer.NET 2.2.Microsoft Research Cambridge; 1999. [http://research.microsoft.com/infernet]Google Scholar
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.