Skip to main content

Comparison of codon usage in mycobacteriophages with and without tRNAs in their genomes

Background

Mycobacterium smegmatis is a soil bacterium. Over 448 mycobacteriophages specific for M. smegmatis have been sequenced and grouped into clusters of related genomes based on the similarity of their products and genome organization [1]. Eighty-one of these sequenced phage genomes contain at least one tRNA.

Materials and methods

In this study we compared the codon frequencies between the phages that carry tRNA in their genome (Clusters A2, A3, A5, A6, A9, C1, C2, E, J, K1, L1, L2, M) to those phages without tRNA in their genome (Clusters A1, A4, B1, B2, D, F1, G) in order to determine whether the tRNAs being carried by the mycobacteriophages were needed to survive in M. smegmatis. The phages with embedded tRNAs were drawn from http://phagesdb.org/data/. The coding sequences for the mycobacteriophages were obtained from NCBI GenBank [2]. Codon frequencies were derived for each mycobacteriophage and a BoxWhiskerChart (Figure 1) was made using a program written in Mathematica®.

Figure 1
figure 1

BoxWhiskerChart of codon frequencies in phage without tRNA (blue boxes) and those with tRNA in their genomes (red boxes). Colored boxes encompass the 25%-75% quantile while the whiskers encompass the 0-25% and 75-100% quantiles. Dark dots are outliers while gray dots are far outliers. The brown line is the mean and the cyan line is the median. The numbers on the left margin represent the number of observations, n.

To determine which codons may require expression of phage tRNAs, Figure 1 plot regions for phages containing tRNA (red) that show frequencies in excess of those not containing tRNA (blue) have been circled in magenta. Only a few codons meet this criteria: ACT, ATG, CAG***, CGT, GAC**, GAG*, TAC, TAT, TGG. A significant number of mycobacteriophages lay outside the non-tRNA phage boundaries for codons CAG, GAC and GAG, therefore, these phages may be dependent on internally coded tRNAs.

References

  1. Hatfull GF: Mycobacteriophages: genes and genomes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2010, 64: 331-356. 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Clark K, Lipman DJ, Ostel J, Sayers EW: GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40 (Database issue): D48-D53.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire A Rinehart.

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gill, E.S., Rinehart, C.A. Comparison of codon usage in mycobacteriophages with and without tRNAs in their genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 14 (Suppl 17), A9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-S17-A9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-S17-A9

Keywords