Skip to content


  • Proceedings
  • Open Access

SNP@Promoter: a database of human SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) within the putative promoter regions

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1Email author
BMC Bioinformatics20089 (Suppl 1) :S2

  • Published:



Analysis of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is becoming a key research in genomics fields. Many functional analyses of SNPs have been carried out for coding regions and splicing sites that can alter proteins and mRNA splicing. However, SNPs in non-coding regulatory regions can also influence important biological regulation. Presently, there are few databases for SNPs in non-coding regulatory regions.


We identified 488,452 human SNPs in the putative promoter regions that extended from the +5000 bp to -500 bp region of the transcription start sites. Some SNPs occurring in transcription factor (TF) binding sites were also predicted (47,832 SNP; 9.8%). The result is stored in a database: SNP@promoter. Users can search the SNP@Promoter database using three entries: 1) by SNP identifier (rs number from dbSNP), 2) by gene (gene name, gene symbol, refSeq ID), and 3) by disease term. The SNP@Promoter database provides extensive genetic information and graphical views of queried terms.


We present the SNP@Promoter database. It was created in order to predict functional SNPs in putative promoter regions and predicted transcription factor binding sites. SNP@Promoter will help researchers to identify functional SNPs in non-coding regions.


  • Transcription Factor Binding Site
  • Conservation Score
  • Functional SNPs
  • Putative Promoter Region
  • Predict Transcription Factor Binding Site


After finishing the Human Genome Project, biologists' interest has shifted to non-repetitive sequence variants in genome, by far the most common of which are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). For a variation to be considered an SNP, it must occur in at least 1% of the population. SNPs, which make up about 90% of all human genetic variation, occur every 100 to 300 bases along the 3-billion-base human genome [1, 2]. It is generally believed that the complete human sequence will reveal at least a million SNPs of coding regions, including introns and promoters. As a general rule, many SNPs have no effect on cell function, but some SNPs are reported to be highly related to diseases or to influence cells' response to a drug. Although more than 99% of human DNA sequences are the same across all populations, some SNPs can have a major impact on how humans respond to diseases; environmental insults such as bacteria, viruses, toxins, and chemicals; and drugs and other therapies. This makes SNPs of great value for biomedical research and for developing pharmaceutical products and for medical diagnostics.

New bioinformatics tools and public SNP resources for SNP studies, specifically for linkage disequilibrium and disease association studies, will form part of the new scientific landscape [39]. These public SNP resources are possible through the large-scale and high-throughput systems to screen SNPs on many individuals. The challenge is to accomplish this while reducing the cost per genotype and required completion time. The public SNP resources are producing information about SNPs which are related to diseases or that modify biological function. Many functional studies of SNPs were focused on SNPs located in coding regions that can influence phenotype by altering the encoded proteins [9, 10]. They can also influence premature termination that can cause nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) [11]. Another function of SNPs is that they affect splice sites which results in alternative splicing [12].

Additionally, there are many SNPs in non-coding regulatory regions. The exact functions of the non-coding regulatory region SNPs are not clear yet. However, some SNPs are predicted to be related to genes by influencing the binding affinity of transcription factors. For example, the G/C polymorphism in the promoter region of the FCGR2B promoter regulates gene expression [13]. -783A/G and -1438A/G polymorphisms in the promoter of HTR2A gene regulate gene expression. -783 G allele and -1438 G allele are known to reduce the binding activity of transcription factors [14]. However, there are no public resources that provide promoter information of SNPs influencing the non-coding regulatory regions in the human genome. The rSNP_Guide system is the only one that has reported SNPs that are related to potential transcription factor candidates among 41 types of known transcription factor binding sites. [15, 16]. ORegAnno is focused not on SNP information of the regulatory regions in the human genome but on the registration and validation of SNPs from promoters, transcription factor binding sites, and regulatory variation [17].

SNP@Promoter is a large database that contains various types of information on the location and function for putative promoter regions in the human genome for gene regulation study. In particular, SNP@Promoter provides a platform for biologists including disease associated genes, transcription factor binding sites, and a graphic viewer.

Methods and results

We developed an integrated computational system for identifying SNPs in non-coding regulation regions (Fig 1). In this system, we: 1) predicted TF binding sites in putative promoter regions, 2) identified SNPs in the putative promoter regions and selected SNPs within predicted TF binding sites, 3) examined evolutionary conservation of predicted TF binding sites, and 4) integrated a variety of gene annotation information.
Figure 1
Figure 1

Flow chart for identifying SNPs in putative promoter regions. Cylinders represent databases. Rectangles are computational applications. (a) Putative promoter regions are identified in the human genome sequence. (b) Transcription binding sites are predicted in the putative promoter regions by using TransFac database. (c) SNPs are mapped. (d) Evolution conservation scores are calculated within transcription factor binding sites. (e) The disease association and functional annotation of target genes carried out by using an in-house functional annotation database.

Prediction of TF binding sites in putative promoter region

We identified TF binding sites in the putative promoter regions in the human genome. The promoter region is defined as the sequence of 5 kb upstream to 500 downstream bases of a transcription start site. The annotation information of genes, which is mapped to the genome, was obtained from the NCBI Gene database. To find TF binding sites in the putative promoter regions, we used the MATCH (Matrix Search For Transcription Factor Binding Site) program from the Transfac database (ver. 8.4) [18, 19]. As a result, we predicted 1,497,317 TF binding sites from 28,644 human genes.

Identification of SNPs on predicted TF binding sites

The SNP annotation information was derived from a public SNP database (dbSNP ver. 126). We identified SNPs in putative promoter regions and selected SNPs that are predicted to be within TF binding sites. As a result, we mapped 488,452 SNPs and filtered out 47,832 SNPs within the putative TF binding sites.

Applying a conservation score

Using computational methods for predicting TFBS (TF binding sites) is not optimal due to a high false positive rate. However, recent algorithms have been improved in their reliability in TFBS prediction. Popular algorithms examine well-conserved regulatory sequences by comparing upstream sequences of orthologous genes across species [2028]. Therefore, as an index of reliability for such an approach, we calculated an evolutionary conservation score for all the predicted TF binding sites. Users can see how reliable their predicted TF binding sites are. We used the phastcons16way file derived from UCSC human genome data. This file contains a conservation score from multiple genome alignment data calculated by the phastCons program [29].

Integration with functional annotation

The SNP@Promoter database adopted various gene annotations including pathways (KEGG), gene ontology (GOA), and disease information such as GAD, HGMD, and OMIM. The raw data files were integrated into the SNP@Promoter database based on a gene synonym table from HGNC (HUGO). These annotations provide insight into the effects of SNPs within TF binding sites and help users to characterize target genes regulated by SNPs.

User interface

As shown in Fig. 2(A), a user can search the SNP@Promoter database using three kinds of entries: 1) an SNP identifier (rs number from dbSNP), 2) a gene (Gene name, gene symbol, refSeq ID), or (3) a disease term. When the user submits a gene or a disease term, SNP@Promoter returns a gene list related to queries. In the case of accessing details of the query gene, it shows SNP information, gene information, and transcription factor binding site information of target genes as shown Fig. 2(B). SNP@Promoter provides graphical views of the queried SNPs and genes. Fig. 3 shows a putative promoter region browser.
Figure 2
Figure 2

SNP@Promoter user interface. SNP@Promoter main page. (A) Users can search using three entries: 1) an SNP identifier (rs number from dbSNP), 2) a gene (Gene name, gene symbol, refSeq ID), or 3) a disease term. (B) SNP@Promoter gene retrieval page. The SNP Information table shows identified SNPs within putative promoter region and TF biding sites. The Gene Information table shows various gene annotations including pathways (KEGG), gene ontology (GOA). The Information of Transcription Factor Binding Sites table shows a variety off TF information such as TF start position, upstream position, TF strand, match score, TF binding sequences, conservations score.

Figure 3
Figure 3

A graphic viewer of transcription regulatory region. The green bar represents a putative promoter region (5500 bp). The arrows in the green bar show a strand of transcription, orange box is transcription start region, yellow inverted triangles are SNP positions, and purple triangles are predicted transcription binding sites.


SNP@Promoter is a database for functional SNPs within putative promoter regions and predicted TF binding sites. The database provides genetic information and graphical views of queried terms. SNP@Promoter will help researchers to identify functional SNPs in non-coding regions. Users can access the SNP@Promoter at or directly at



We thank our colleagues at KOBIC, especially Areum Han. This project was supported by a grant from the KRIBB Research Initiative Program of Korea, by the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) grant funded by the Korea government (MOST) (No. M10508040002-07N0804-00210), and by the MIC (Ministry of Information and Communication), Korea, under the KADO (Korea Agency Digital Opportunity and Promotion) support program (07-83).

This article has been published as part of BMC Bioinformatics Volume 9 Supplement 1, 2008: Asia Pacific Bioinformatics Network (APBioNet) Sixth International Conference on Bioinformatics (InCoB2007). The full contents of the supplement are available online at

Authors’ Affiliations

Korean BioInformation Center (KOBIC), KRIBB, Daejeon, 305-806, Korea


  1. Collins FS, Brooks LD, Chakravarti A: A DNA polymorphism discovery resource for research on human genetic variation. Genome Res 1998, 8: 1229–1231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brookes AJ: The essence of SNPs. Gene 1999, 234: 177–186. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00219-XView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kang HJ, Choi KO, Kim BD, Kim S, Kim YJ: FESD: a Functional Element SNPs Database in human. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33: D518–522. 10.1093/nar/gki082PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang H, Fujita T: PicSNP: a browsable catalog of nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001, 287: 288–291. 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5576View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Riva A, Kohane IS: SNPper: retrieval and analysis of human SNPs. Bioinformatics 2002, 18: 1681–1685. 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.12.1681View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yue P, Melamud E, Moult J: SNPs3D: candidate gene and SNP selection for association studies. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7: 166. 10.1186/1471-2105-7-166PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Reumers J, Schymkowitz J, Ferkinghoff-Borg J, Stricher F, Serrano L, Rousseau F: SNPeffect: a database mapping molecular phenotypic effects of human non-synonymous coding SNPs. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33: D527–532. 10.1093/nar/gki086PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dantzer J, Moad C, Heiland R, Mooney S: MutDB services: interactive structural analysis of mutation data. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33: W311–314. 10.1093/nar/gki404PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Han A, Kang HJ, Cho Y, Lee S, Kim YJ, Gong S: SNP@Domain: a web resource of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within protein domain structures and sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 1(34):W642-W644. 10.1093/nar/gkl323View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ng PC, Henikoff S: SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31: 3812–3814. 10.1093/nar/gkg509PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Han A, Kim WY, Park SM: SNP2NMD: a database of human single nucleotide polymorphisms causing nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Bioinformatics 2007, 23: 397–399. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl593View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. ElSharawy A, Manaster C, Teuber M, Rosenstiel P, Kwiatkowski R, Huse K, Platzer M, Becker A, Nurnberg P, Schreiber S, Hampe J: SNPSplicer: systematic analysis of SNP-dependent splicing in genotyped cDNAs. Hum Mutat 2006, 27: 1129–1134. 10.1002/humu.20377View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Blank MC, Stefanescu RN, Masuda E, Marti F, King PD, Redecha PB, Wurzburger RJ, Peterson MG, Tanaka S, Pricop L: Decreased transcription of the human FCGR2B gene mediated by the -343 G/C promoter polymorphism and association with systemic lupus erythematosus. Hum Genet 2005, 117: 220–227. 10.1007/s00439-005-1302-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Myers RL, Airey DC, Manier DH, Shelton RC, Sanders-Bush E: Polymorphisms in the regulatory region of the human serotonin 5-HT2A receptor gene (HTR2A) influence gene expression. Biol Psychiatry 2007, 61: 167–173. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.12.018View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ponomarenko JV, Orlova GV, Merkulova TI, Gorshkova EV, Fokin ON, Vasiliev GV, Frolov AS, Ponomarenko MP: rSNP_Guide: An integrated database-tools system for studying SNPs and site-directed mutations in transcription factor binding sites. Hum Mutat 2002, 20: 239–248. 10.1002/humu.10116View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ponomarenko JV, Merkulova TI, Orlova GV, Fokin ON, Gorshkova EV, Frolov AS, Valuev VP, Ponomarenko MP: rSNP_Guide, a database system for analysis of transcription factor binding to DNA with variations: application to genome annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31: 118–121. 10.1093/nar/gkg112PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Montgomery SB, Griffith OL, Sleumer MC, Bergman CM, Bilenky M, Pleasance ED, Prychyna Y, Zhang X, Jones SJ: ORegAnno: an open access database and curation system for literature-derived promoters, transcription factor binding sites and regulatory variation. Bioinformatics 2006, 22: 637–640. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btk027View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Matys V, Fricke E, Geffers R, Goßling E, Haubrock M, Hehl R, Hornischer K, Karas D, Kel AE, Kel-Margoulis OV, Kloos DU, Land S, Lewicki-Potapov B, Michael H, Munch R, Reuter I, Rotert S, Saxel H, Scheer M, Thiele S, Wingender E: TRANSFAC: transcriptional regulation, from patterns to profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31: 374–378. 10.1093/nar/gkg108PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kel AE, Gossling E, Reuter I, Cheremushkin E, Kel-Margoulis OV, Wingender E: MATCH: A tool for searching transcription factor binding sites in DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31: 3576–3579. 10.1093/nar/gkg585PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Gumucio DL, Shelton DA, Zhu W, Millinoff D, Gray T, Bock JH, Slightom JL, Goodman M: Evolutionary strategies for the elucidation of cis and trans factors that regulate the developmental switching programs of the beta-like globin genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1996, 5: 18–32. 10.1006/mpev.1996.0004View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardison RC, Oeltjen J, Miller W: Long human-mouse sequence alignments reveal novel regulatory elements: A reason to sequence the mouse genome. Genome Res 1997, 7: 959–966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardison RC: Conserved noncoding sequences are reliable guides to regulatory elements. Trends Genet 2000, 16: 369–372. 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02081-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Levy S, Hannenhalli S, Workman C: Enrichment of regulatory signals in conserved non-coding genomic sequence. Bioinformatics 2001, 17: 871–877. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.10.871View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Loots GG, Ovcharenko I, Pachter L, Dubchak I, Rubin EM: rVista for Comparative Sequence-Based Discovery of Functional Transcription Factor Binding Sites. Genome Res 2002, 12: 832–839. 10.1101/gr.225502. Article published online before print in April 2002PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Steffens NO, Galuschka C, Schindler M, Bulow L, Hehl R: AthaMap web tools for database-assisted identification of combinatorial cis-regulatory elements and the display of highly conserved transcription factor binding sites in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33: W397-W402. 10.1093/nar/gki395PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sinha S, Schroeder MD, Unnerstall U, Gaul U, Siggia ED: Cross-species comparison significantly improves genome-wide prediction of cis-regulatory modules in Drosophila. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5: 129. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-129PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Elnitski L, King D, Hardison RC: Computational Prediction of cis-Regulatory Modules from Multispecies Alignments Using Galaxy, Table Browser, and GALA. Methods Mol Biol 2006, 338: 91–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Pierstorff N, Bergman CM, Wiehe T: Identifying cis-regulatory modules by combining comparative and compositional analysis of DNA. Bioinformatics 2006, 22: 2858–64. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl499View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Siepel A, Bejerano G, Pedersen JS, Hinrichs A, Hou M, Rosenbloom K, Clawson H, Spieth J, Hillier LW, Richards S, Weinstock GM, Wilson RK, Gibbs RA, Kent WJ, Miller W, Haussler D: Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Res 2005, 15: 1034–1050. 10.1101/gr.3715005PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar


© Kim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.