Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Bioinformatics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access

SBMLmod: a Python-based web application and web service for efficient data integration and model simulation

  • Sascha Schäuble1,
  • Anne-Kristin Stavrum2,
  • Mathias Bockwoldt3,
  • Pål Puntervoll4 and
  • Ines Heiland3Email author
Contributed equally
BMC BioinformaticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:314

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1722-9

Received: 10 February 2017

Accepted: 9 June 2017

Published: 24 June 2017

Abstract

Background

Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) is the standard model representation and description language in systems biology. Enriching and analysing systems biology models by integrating the multitude of available data, increases the predictive power of these models. This may be a daunting task, which commonly requires bioinformatic competence and scripting.

Results

We present SBMLmod, a Python-based web application and service, that automates integration of high throughput data into SBML models. Subsequent steady state analysis is readily accessible via the web service COPASIWS. We illustrate the utility of SBMLmod by integrating gene expression data from different healthy tissues as well as from a cancer dataset into a previously published model of mammalian tryptophan metabolism.

Conclusion

SBMLmod is a user-friendly platform for model modification and simulation. The web application is available at http://sbmlmod.uit.no, whereas the WSDL definition file for the web service is accessible via http://sbmlmod.uit.no/SBMLmod.wsdl. Furthermore, the entire package can be downloaded from https://github.com/MolecularBioinformatics/sbml-mod-ws. We envision that SBMLmod will make automated model modification and simulation available to a broader research community.

Keywords

Web applicationWeb serviceData integrationModel simulation

Background

Theoretical models of complex biological entities are fundamental to systems biology and systems medicine research [1, 2]. They provide summaries of metabolic, signalling or gene regulatory networks including information on e. g. stoichiometry or kinetic rate laws. To gain new biological insights into pathways of interest it is nevertheless crucial to integrate experimental data. The type of appropriate data is context dependent: While dynamic signalling or metabolic pathway studies may require metabolome or time course data, gene regulatory networks commonly ask for gene expression datasets. Such data are increasingly available from data repositories such as the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) [3], the NCI-60 tumour cell line screens [4, 5] and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, https://cancergenome.nih.gov).

Theoretical model generation and distribution itself is commonly achieved via multiple toolboxes and databases. Pathway Tools [6] and CellDesigner [7] are examples of software packages for biological model construction. Whereas COPASI [8] and Data2Dynamics [9] are toolboxes for investigating dynamic behaviour, the COBRA toolbox [10] is suited for constraint-based model analyses. Theoretical models are stored in public databases such as the BioModels database [11], which mainly covers small to medium scale models, or the BiGG model database (http://bigg.ucsd.edu/) for genome-scale models. Model accessibility is achieved by model definition standards, such as the Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) [12].

Both vast amounts of data and standardised models are readily available, yet integrating and analysing data with a given model can still be a discouraging task. Nevertheless, programmatic access is commonly necessary to perform more complex operations than loading and simulating the initial model.

In recent years software packages have been made available to simplify model manipulation and simulation tasks [10, 1315]. A Taverna workflow published by Li et al. [14] focuses on reconstruction, model manipulation and simulation. Data integration is realised via accessing the enzyme kinetics database SABIO-RK [16], or via an in-house database for specific metabolomics and proteomics datasets. It does not, however, include the possibility to integrate gene expression data. Setting up the workflow itself requires programmatic configuration including resolving software dependencies on e. g. the libSBML package [17]. Yizhak et al. [13] introduced a method termed IOMA, which quantitatively integrates proteomic and metabolomic data with genome-scale metabolic models and calculates steady state solutions. IOMA assumes Michaelis-Menten-like kinetics and delivers steady state flux distributions, but no metabolite concentrations. GAM presented by Sergushichev et al. [15] provides a convenient network analysis platform to analyse metabolic networks. So far it covers four pre-assembled models and is specifically tailored towards identification of the most regulated subnetwork between two conditions.

These toolboxes are appropriate ways to create, modify or simulate theoretical models. Yet because they require a minimum level of programming proficiency, they are all effectively restrictive for scientists with little or no computational biology background.

We present and describe SBMLmod, a slim and easily accessible SBML model loading, data integrating and model simulation platform. SBMLmod can be accessed within any common web browser, circumventing the need to install or program software. Any valid SBML model and a dataset for parametrisation can be chosen to perform model modification and simulation operations. Advanced users can access SBMLmod programmatically via its Web Services Description Language (WSDL) interface. The WSDL interface circumvents the need to resolve software dependencies and allows for the integration of SBMLmod into analysis pipelines. Finally, the complete package can be downloaded, installed, set up locally and accessed from any Python shell prompt.

Implementation

Every SBMLmod task is based on a theoretical biological model encoded in SBML, which might be downloaded from e. g. the BioModels database [11]. Single or multiple data sets on either kinetic rate law or species concentration can be provided by the user. Steady state simulations can be calculated by making use of the web service COPASIWS from COPASI [8] to obtain system wide concentration and flux solutions feasible at steady state. SBMLmod can be accessed as a web application or as a web service for customised workflows. The respective WSDL file guarantees the same functionality as the web application.

SBMLmod is written in Python 2.7. Accessing and modifying SBML models is enabled via libSBML [17]. All model modification and simulation features are computed on the fly and scale efficiently with the number of data sets and data volume.

Web application guarantees OS independent access of SBMLmod

The welcome screen of SBMLmod’s web application is organised into two panels: A) choosing the input files; B) choosing the task to perform (Fig. 1 a). The general workflow is shown in Fig. 1 b.
Fig. 1

SBMLmod: basic workflow and input data outline. a Welcome screen of the web application. SBMLmod is organised into two panels. Input files are chosen in panel a. Mapping files are optional. Model modification and/or steady state analysis may be chosen in panel B. b Simplified workflow scheme of web application. An SBML model might be calibrated based on available data. Optionally, IDs might be mapped, if SBML model and data differ in the used identifier standard. Steady state concentration of metabolites and reaction flux analysis is feasible with COPASIWS [8]. c Basic outline of data file format. The first column comprises data specific IDs (e. g. gene identifier). The first row contains identifiers of the data in the respective column

Input files are comprised of a mandatory SBML model file and optional data files. The latter may concern either parameters of reaction rate laws or the initial concentrations of considered species in the model. An additional mapping file is mandatory whenever the identifiers given in the data file do not match the identifiers of the respective species or reaction in the model file. This may be the case, if, for instance, different identifier standards (e. g. ensembl, or entrez gene id) are used in the model and data file(s), or if different synonyms for the same species or reaction are used.

Users may furthermore choose to analyse multiple data sets by selecting the ‘batch mode’ option. If selected, each column of a given data file is processed individually and will yield a separate data specific model or simulation.

After selecting the necessary files, the user can either calibrate or simulate the given model by selecting the respective options (Fig. 1 a, panel B). Calibrating the model parameters is accomplished by replacing or scaling reaction parameters such as the total amount of available enzyme concentrations. Replacing and scaling reaction parameters can be accomplished system-wide (globally) or on a per-reaction basis (locally). Should multiple rows of a given data file be associated with the same reaction (e. g. if isozymes are considered in the data file, but not in the model), the user may choose a specific merge mode. All merge options (e. g. maximum value selection) are described in detail in the online documentation and in the Additional file 1: S1. The initial concentrations of model species can also be modified. The most recently modified models are always available for download. They are identified by the respective column header in the data file (cf. Fig. 1 c and Additional file 1: S1 for details on the data file format).

A warning feedback functionality is established and ensures that models are correctly encoded, all identifiers are assignable and mappings are unambiguous. The web application of SBMLmod is set up using Python Django [18] and is hosted at http://sbmlmod.uit.no. To demonstrate data format and warning feedback, example files are available at the website and in Additional file 2: S2.

Calculation of steady state concentrations and fluxes are enabled by linking the web application to the COPASI web service. Our web application returns the original output file(s) generated. In addition, results of generated and simulated models (in batch mode) are returned as accumulated, tab separated tables for the calculated concentrations and fluxes. To allow an initial inspection of the results, the web application generates a customisable graph showing all non-constant metabolite concentrations and fluxes (cf. Additional file 3: Figure S3 for an example output). Customisation includes selecting metabolite species and fluxes to be shown and also allows for grouping together different values (if batch mode was selected). See Additional file 1: S1 for details of customisation options.

Web service accessibility enables automated high throughput data integration and analysis

Next to the web application, a web service functionality of SBMLmod is available. It can be accessed via the WSDL interface, either from http://sbmlmod.uit.no/SBMLmod.wsdl or by downloading the whole package including the WSDL file at https://github.com/MolecularBioinformatics/sbml-mod-ws. The web service enables complete analysis workflows including a full sequence of model modification and simulation operations of the aforementioned features. By providing the WSDL file, we enable more advanced users to run data integration without the need to install software packages and resolve software dependencies. SBMLmod can thus be integrated into other existing or newly developed workflows for model manipulation or steady state simulation. Alternatively the web service can be installed and run locally (source files and technical documentation are available at https://github.com/MolecularBioinformatics/sbml-mod-ws). This enables faster processing especially for large datasets. Simulation results are summarised in textual output files. These can be further processed using our Python toolbox PyCopasi for parsing and manipulating COPASI files. PyCopasi is available at https://github.com/MolecularBioinformatics/PyCopasi.

Feasible model manipulations and basic scripts to run the data integration are exemplified by files provided in the ‘testClient’ folder of the package.

Results & discussion

To demonstrate the usage of SBMLmod we analysed two publicly available datasets by integrating them into an existing model of tryptophan metabolism [19] (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biomodels-main/MODEL1310160000). Tryptophan, an essential amino acid, has received increasing interest in recent years, since it is the precursor of several bioactive metabolites such as serotonin, kynurenine, melatonin and NAD. Consequently, imbalances in tryptophan metabolism have been related to several diseases, including neurodegeneration, gastrointestinal disorders and cancer. Tryptophan metabolism underlies tissue specific regulation [20], resulting in a remarkable difference in metabolite concentrations and fluxes. In our earlier analyses we focused on differential tryptophan pathway activity in two human tissues (brain and liver), as well as the metabolite exchange between these tissues and its consequences for neurodegenerative diseases and potential treatments [19]. We implemented a data driven modelling approach [21, 22] by scaling maximal reaction velocities based on expression data [19]. By integrating data from a tissue specific expression profiling study [23], we showed that we were able to quantitatively reproduce metabolite concentrations measured in vivo as well as qualitative flux changes reported upon treatment with inhibitors specific for enzymes of sub-pathways in mice. Since the tryptophan catabolite kynurenine has been associated with increased malignancy in brain tumours [24], we recently applied our model to calculate changes in tryptophan metabolism in different subtypes of breast cancer patients using RNA-sequencing datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA: https://cancergenome.nih.gov). We were able to show that our predictions are in agreement with kynurenine concentrations measured in patients [25]. Thus, incorporating theoretical model predictions allows us to predict patient specific diagnostic markers important for further treatment, emphasising the need for easily accessible data integration tools.

Tissue specific differences in tryptophan metabolites

Kynurenine and serotonin are products of competing branches of tryptophan metabolism (see simplified pathway scheme Fig. 2). Their ratio has been recognized to be important in depressive disorders, especially in the context of chronic inflammation [26].
Fig. 2

Calculation of steady state concentrations of kynurenine and serotonin. A simplified scheme of tryptophan metabolism (including network location of kynurenine and serotonin) is depicted in the middle. All depicted kynurenine and serotonin concentrations were calculated by integrating gene expression data into a model of mammalian tryptophan metabolism [19]. a, b Calculated steady state concentrations of kynurenine (a) and serotonin (b) for models of ten different tissues [23]. Bar height equals mean, error resembles standard error of the mean (SEM), three replicates per tissue. c, d Calculated steady state concentrations of kynurenine (c) and serotonin (d) for models derived by intergration of expression data from five different cancer types (data downloaded from the cancer genome atlas TCGA). Asterisks show statistically significant differences in comparison to acute myeloid leukemia. (BRCA: Breast invasive carcinoma, n=805; OV: Ovarian serous cystadenocarcinoma, n=228; PRAD: Prostate adenocarcinoma, N=441; COAD: Colon adenocarcinoma, n=421; LAML: Acute myeloid leukemia, n=51; Box plots represent median and the 75% and 25% percentiles. Whiskers extend to the most extreme data point which is no more than 1.5 times the interquartile range from the box. Outliers are omitted for the sake of visibility)

Here we extend our earlier analysis [19] to better understand the tissue specific activity of tryptophan metabolism. For this purpose we integrated a published tissue specific gene expression dataset from 32 human tissues [23] (dataset: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE7905) and calculated steady state concentrations of kynurenine and serotonin with SBMLmod.

Our modelling approach predicts that liver as well as immuno-active tissues like lung and spleen have high kynurenine concentrations (Fig. 2 a). In lung and spleen the activity of the kynurenine pathway depends on the induction of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), especially during infection (for review cf. [27, 28]). The tryptophan pathway activity in the liver is regulated via the expression of tryptohpan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) catalysing the same reaction as IDO. TDO is furthermore known to be down-regulated when peripheral kynurenine levels are increased, for example during infection [29]. Changes in tryptophan metabolism during pregnancy have been described previously, for example high expression of IDO in the placenta might play a role in immune tolerance [30]. The calculated concentrations for the placental model resemble these observations. In contrast, brain tissues are predicted to have a low activity of the kynurenine branch in healthy individuals. This is reasonable as several intermediates of the kynurenine branch are known to be neurotoxic [31].

Serotonin production is predicted to be high in neuroendocrine tissues such as the prostate, but low in tissues with high kynurenine pathway activity (Fig. 2 b) due to the competition for the substrate tryptophan. The comparatively high serotonin production in prostate epithelial cells has been described in the literature [32]. Our modelling approach furthermore predicts serotonin production to be high in the colon, but in this tissue the kynurenine route of the tryptohpan pathway is also partially active. This dual pathway activity in the colon has been reported earlier [33] and imbalances between the two branches might cause the development of irritable bowel syndrome [34, 35].

For a full overview of steady state concentrations of kynurenine and serotonin in all 32 available tissues see Additional file 4: Figure S4. Details on the statistical procedure are provided in the Additional file 5: S5. All pairwise statistical test results between all tissues are provided in Additional file 6: Table S6. The full dataset, mapping file and model are provided in Additional file 2: S2 and as example files in the web application (limited to the 10 tissues presented in Fig. 2 a and b).

Different cancer types possess notable differences in kynurenine and serotonin concentrations

In a second analysis, we integrated RNA-sequencing data from approx. 2000 patients available at TCGA (https://cancergenome.nih.gov; corresponding TCGA-IDs are provided in Additional file 7: S7). Using this approach, we predicted activation of the kynurenine pathway and thus increased kynurenine production for ovarian, prostate and colorectal cancer (Fig. 2 c). Whereas the serotonin branch appears to be activated in acute myeloid leukemia, the kynurenine branch is largely inactive (Fig. 2 d). This is supported by statistical analysis showing that the distributions of kynurenine and serotonin concentrations are significantly different between the different cancer types (Kruskal-Wallis test, p=1.5e-93 and p=7.2e-33, respectively). Subsequent pairwise comparison reveals that kynurenine concentrations are predicted to be significantly higher in breast, ovarian, prostate and colorectal cancer as compared to acute myeloid leukemia (Fig. 2, Bonferroni corrected p-values 2.6e-42, 2.3e-83, 8.2e-32, 3.5e-56, respectively). In contrast, pairwise comparison of serotonin concentrations among different cancer types shows significantly lower concentrations of serotonin in ovarian, prostate and colorectal cancer, but not in breast cancer, when compared to acute myeloid leukemia (Fig. 2, Bonferroni corrected p-values 1.1e-4, 2.2e-5, 1.7e-9, 1, respectively). This is in agreement with known changes in these tumour types [24, 25, 36, 37]. An extended statistical analysis is provided in Additional file 8: Table S8.

Conclusion

We presented SBMLmod, an SBML model modification and simulation tool. The platform-independent web application of SBMLmod allows for the automated integration of experimental data into theoretical models without requiring programming knowledge from the user. SBMLmod has two major advantages over existing methods: first, data integration and analysis are possible with a minimal number of user required operations; second, all operations can be performed without further software or programming dependencies. The easy accessibility of SBMLmod is accomplished by focusing on a limited number of essential model modification functions. These are complemented with steady state calculations of metabolite concentrations and fluxes. Additional flexibility is offered by accessing the application as a web service., which allows to further optimise and accelerate data integration and subsequent theoretical analyses.

Even though SBMLmod minimises the effort required by the user, we emphasise the need to ensure an accurate reaction or gene identifier mapping. Though models of sizes up to a genome-scale can be calibrated and simulated, ensuring correct mapping files is increasingly challenging if thousands of identifiers must be handled. Furthermore, increased simulation times due to the size of large models alone have to be considered; thus, SBMLmod is more suited for the manipulation and simulation of small and medium scale models. Of note, SBML is an XML format and is therefore not designed to be human readable. This can be compensated for by making use of the recently developed SBtab [38], which allows users to read and filter SBML files for relevant information such as metabolite names or reaction identifiers.

We demonstrated the usefulness of SBMLmod by calibrating a given tryptophan model to recapitulate an existing analysis of tryptophan metabolism and by evaluating the steady state concentrations of kynurenine and serotonin, two potential prognostic biomarkers in different diseases including cancer. We expect that SBMLmod will contribute to further improve data integration into modelling approaches especially with respect to accessibility.

Availability and requirements:

Project name: SBMLmod

Project home page: http://sbmlmod.uit.no and https://github.com/MolecularBioinformatics/sbml-mod-ws

OS: any

Programming language: Python 2.7

Licence: GNU General Public License v2.0

Abbreviations

IDO: 

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

TDO: 

Tryptohpan 2,3-dioxygenase

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Christane A. Opitz for helpful comments and support with respect to tryptophan metabolism analysis, Siv Hollup and Espen Tangen for supporting us with the deployment of SBMLmod and Gabriela Wagner and Matthew Richards for proofreading the manuscript.

Funding

The project has been funded by the DAAD-exchange program between Norway and Germany (57150435 and 244770/F11), by the Norwegian Research Council (178885/V30) and by the BMBF funded e:Med project GlioPATH (01ZX1402). The funding bodies played no role in the design or conclusion of our study.

Availability of data and materials

The web application is accessible at http://sbmlmod.uit.no. The web service can be reached via its WSDL interface at http://sbmlmod.uit.no/SBMLmod.wsdl. The source for local use is available at https://github.com/MolecularBioinformatics/sbml-mod-ws.

Authors’ contributions

AS, MB, SS, PP have developed and revised the web application and web service SBMLmod. IH and SS integrated and analysed the expression datasets. SS and IH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Jena University Language & Information Engineering (JULIE) Lab, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
(2)
Department of Informatics, University of Bergen
(3)
Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
(4)
Centre for Applied Biotechnology, Uni Research Environment

References

  1. Eddy JA, Funk CC, Price ND. Fostering synergy between cell biology and systems biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2015.04.005.
  2. Wang RS, Maron BA, Loscalzo J. Systems medicine: evolution of systems biology from bench to bedside. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2015; 7(4):141–61. doi:10.1002/wsbm.1297.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, Marshall KA, Phillippy KH, Sherman PM, Holko M, Yefanov A, Lee H, Zhang N, Robertson CL, Serova N, Davis S, Soboleva A. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets–update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013; 41(Database issue):991–5. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1193.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Stinson SF, Alley MC, Kopp WC, Fiebig HH, Mullendore LA, Pittman AF, Kenney S, Keller J, Boyd MR. Morphological and immunocytochemical characteristics of human tumor cell lines for use in a disease-oriented anticancer drug screen. Anticancer Res. 1992; 12(4):1035–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Shoemaker RH. The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006; 6(10):813–23. doi:10.1038/nrc1951.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Karp PD, Latendresse M, Paley SM, Krummenacker M, Ong QD, Billington R, Kothari A, Weaver D, Lee T, Subhraveti P, Spaulding A, Fulcher C, Keseler IM, Caspi R. Pathway Tools version 19.0 update: software for pathway/genome informatics and systems biology. Brief Bioinform. 2015. doi:10.1093/bib/bbv079.
  7. Funahashi A, Matsuoka Y, Jouraku A, Morohashi M, Kikuchi N, Kitano H. CellDesigner 3.5: A Versatile Modeling Tool for Biochemical Networks. Proc IEEE. 2008; 96(8):1254–65. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2008.925458.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoops S, Sahle S, Gauges R, Lee C, Pahle J, Simus N, Singhal M, Xu L, Mendes P, Kummer U. COPASI–a COmplex PAthway SImulator. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(24):3067–74. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl485.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Raue A, Steiert B, Schelker M, Kreutz C, Maiwald T, Hass H, Vanlier J, Tönsing C, Adlung L, Engesser R, Mader W, Heinemann T, Hasenauer J, Schilling M, Höfer T, Klipp E, Theis F, Klingmüller U, Schöberl B, Timmer J. Data2Dynamics: a modeling environment tailored to parameter estimation in dynamical systems. Bioinformatics. 2015. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv405.
  10. Schellenberger J, Que R, Fleming RMT, Thiele I, Orth JD, Feist AM, Zielinski DC, Bordbar A, Lewis NE, Rahmanian S, Kang J, Hyduke DR, Palsson BO. Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0. Nat Protoc. 2011; 6(9):1290–1307. doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.308.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chelliah V, Juty N, Ajmera I, Ali R, Dumousseau M, Glont M, Hucka M, Jalowicki G, Keating S, Knight-Schrijver V, Lloret-Villas A, Natarajan KN, Pettit JB, Rodriguez N, Schubert M, Wimalaratne SM, Zhao Y, Hermjakob H, Le Novère N, Laibe C. BioModels: ten-year anniversary. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(Database issue):542–8. doi:10.1093/nar/gku1181.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, Bolouri H, Doyle JC, Kitano H, Arkin AP, Bornstein BJ, Bray D, Cornish-Bowden A, Cuellar AA, Dronov S, Gilles ED, Ginkel M, Gor V, Goryanin II, Hedley WJ, Hodgman TC, Hofmeyr JH, Hunter PJ, Juty NS, Kasberger JL, Kremling A, Kummer U, Le Novère N, Loew LM, Lucio D, Mendes P, Minch E, Mjolsness ED, Nakayama Y, Nelson MR, Nielsen PF, Sakurada T, Schaff JC, Shapiro BE, Shimizu TS, Spence HD, Stelling J, Takahashi K, Tomita M, Wagner J, Wang J. SBML Forum The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(4):524–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Yizhak K, Benyamini T, Liebermeister W, Ruppin E, Shlomi T. Integrating quantitative proteomics and metabolomics with a genome-scale metabolic network model. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26(12):255–60. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq183.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Li P, Dada JO, Jameson D, Spasic I, Swainston N, Carroll K, Dunn W, Khan F, Malys N, Messiha HL, Simeonidis E, Weichart D, Winder C, Wishart J, Broomhead DS, Goble CA, Gaskell SJ, Kell DB, Westerhoff HV, Mendes P, Paton NW. Systematic integration of experimental data and models in systems biology. BMC Bioinforma. 2010; 11:582. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-582.Google Scholar
  15. Sergushichev AA, Loboda AA, Jha AK, Vincent EE, Driggers EM, Jones RG, Pearce EJ, Artyomov MN. GAM: a web-service for integrated transcriptional and metabolic network analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016; 44(W1):194–200. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw266.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Wittig U, Kania R, Golebiewski M, Rey M, Shi L, Jong L, Algaa E, Weidemann A, Sauer-Danzwith H, Mir S, Krebs O, Bittkowski M, Wetsch E, Rojas I, Müller W. SABIO-RK–database for biochemical reaction kinetics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(Database issue):790–6. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1046.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Bornstein BJ, Keating SM, Jouraku A, Hucka M. LibSBML: an API library for SBML. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24(6):880–1. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn051.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Django Software Foundation. Django (Version 1.7). 2013. https://djangoproject.com.
  19. Stavrum AK, Heiland I, Schuster S, Puntervoll P, Ziegler M. Model of tryptophan metabolism, readily scalable using tissue-specific gene expression data. J Biol Chem. 2013; 288(48):34555–4566. doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.474908.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Bender DA. Biochemistry of tryptophan in health and disease. Mol Asp Med. 1983; 6(2):101–97. doi:10.1016/0098-2997(83)90005-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Blazier AS, Papin JA. Integration of expression data in genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions. Front Physiol. 2012; 3:299. doi:10.3389/fphys.2012.00299.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Imam S, Schäuble S, Brooks AN, Baliga NS, Price ND. Data-driven integration of genome-scale regulatory and metabolic network models. Front Microbiol. 2015; 6:409. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.00409.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Dezső Z, Nikolsky Y, Sviridov E, Shi W, Serebriyskaya T, Dosymbekov D, Bugrim A, Rakhmatulin E, Brennan RJ, Guryanov A, Li K, Blake J, Samaha RR, Nikolskaya T. A comprehensive functional analysis of tissue specificity of human gene expression. BMC Biol. 2008; 6(1):49. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-6-49.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Opitz CA, Litzenburger UM, Sahm F, Ott M, Tritschler I, Trump S, Schumacher T, Jestaedt L, Schrenk D, Weller M, Jugold M, Guillemin GJ, Miller CL, Lutz C, Radlwimmer B, Lehmann I, von Deimling A, Wick W, Platten M. An endogenous tumour-promoting ligand of the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nature. 2011; 478(7368):197–203. doi:10.1038/nature10491.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dewi DL, Mohapatra SR, Blanco Cabañes S, Adam I, Somarribas Patterson LF, Berdel B, Kahloon M, Thürmann L, Loth S, Heilmann K, Weichenhan D, Mücke O, Heiland I, Wimberger P, Kuhlmann JD, Kellner KH, Schott S, Plass C, Platten M, Gerhäuser C, Trump S, Opitz CA. Suppression of indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase 1 expression by promoter hypermethylation in ER-positive breast cancer. OncoImmunology. 2017. doi:10.1080/2162402X.2016.1274477.
  26. Oxenkrug G. Serotonin-Kynurenine Hypothesis of Depression: Historical Overview and Recent Developments. Curr Drug Targets. 2013; 14(5):514–21. doi:10.2174/1389450111314050002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Moffett JR, Namboodiri MA. Tryptophan and the immune response. Immunol Cell Biol. 2003; 81:247–65. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1711.2003.t01-1-01177.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Munn DH, Mellor AL. Ido in the tumor microenvironment: Inflammation, counter-regulation, and tolerance. Trends Immunol. 2016; 37:193–207. doi:10.1016/j.it.2016.01.002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Espey MG, Namboodiri MA. Selective metabolism of kynurenine in the spleen in the absence of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase induction. Immunol Lett. 2000; 71:67–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ligam P, Manuelpillai U, Wallace EM, Walker D. Localisation of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase and kynurenine hydroxylase in the human placenta and decidua: implications for role of the kynurenine pathway in pregnancy. Placenta. 2005; 26:498–504. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2004.08.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schwarcz R, Bruno JP, Muchowski PJ, Wu HQ. Kynurenines in the mammalian brain: when physiology meets pathology. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012; 13:465–77. doi:10.1038/nrn3257.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Cockett AT, di Sant’Agnese PA, Gopinath P, Schoen SR, Abrahamsson PA. Relationship of neuroendocrine cells of prostate and serotonin to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 1993; 42:512–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Keszthelyi D, Troost FJ, Masclee AAM. Understanding the role of tryptophan and serotonin metabolism in gastrointestinal function. Neurogastroenterol Motil : Off J Eur Gastrointest Motil Soc. 2009; 21:1239–49. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01370.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Clarke G, Fitzgerald P, Cryan JF, Cassidy EM, Quigley EM, Dinan TG. Tryptophan degradation in irritable bowel syndrome: evidence of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activation in a male cohort. BMC Gastroenterol. 2009; 9:6. doi:10.1186/1471-230X-9-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Berstad A, Raa J, Valeur J. Tryptophan: ’essential’ for the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome?Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014; 49:1493–8. doi:10.3109/00365521.2014.936034.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Puccetti P, Fallarino F, Italiano A, Soubeyran I, MacGrogan G, Debled M, Velasco V, Bodet D, Eimer S, Veldhoen M, Prendergast GC, Platten M, Bessede A, Guillemin GJ. Accumulation of an endogenous tryptophan-derived metabolite in colorectal and breast cancers. PLoS One. 2015; 10(4):0122046. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122046.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Heng B, Lim CK, Lovejoy DB, Bessede A, Gluch L, Guillemin GJ. Understanding the role of the kynurenine pathway in human breast cancer immunobiology. Oncotarget. 2016; 7(6):6506–520. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.6467.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Lubitz T, Hahn J, Bergmann FT, Noor E, Klipp E, Liebermeister W. SBtab: a flexible table format for data exchange in systems biology. Bioinformatics. 2016. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw179.

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement