Volume 16 Supplement 2

Highlights from the Tenth International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB) Student Council Symposium 2014

Open Access

Protein translational control and its contribution to oncogenesis revealed by computational methods

  • Yi Zhong1,
  • Phillip Drewe1,
  • Andrew L Wolfe1,
  • Kamini Singh1,
  • Hans-Guido Wendel1 and
  • Gunnar Rätsch1
BMC Bioinformatics201516(Suppl 2):A6

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-16-S2-A6

Published: 28 January 2015

Background

Protein translation is a fundamental biochemical process and the regulation of this process in response to a variety of changes has been demonstrated to play a key role in cellular functional activity. Recently, the translational control of oncogenes is implicated in many cancers [1].

Results

We recently reported a translation initiation factor eIF4A RNA helicase-dependent mechanism of translational control that contributes to oncogenesis and underlies the anticancer effects of drug silvestrol [2]. Inhibition of eIF4A with silvestrol has powerful therapeutic effects in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we developed novel computational tools, specifically be tailored to study high throughput ribosome footprint data (Ribo-seq) [3], to identify the genes featuring either one of the two changes between two experiment conditions: 1) translational efficiency (TE), and 2) ribosome occupancy distribution profile (ROD) on mRNA. In the parametric test of TE, we take RNA abundance and ribosome occupancy density into account in order to expeditiously identify differential translation efficiency. Whereas the non-parametric test of ROD [4] aims to identify differential occupancy profiles, such as ribosome stalling at specific sites even if overall translation efficiency remain unchanged. Using transcriptome-scale ribosome footprinting data of leukemia cell line, we defined drug-sensitive genes showing both decrease of translational efficiency (Figure 1A) and accumulation of ribosome occupancy at 5'UTR (Figure 1B). Among the most eIF4A-dependent transcripts are a number of oncogenes, super-enhancer associated transcription factors and epigenetic regulators.
Figure 1

Computational methods revealed drug effects on protein translation. A Histogram of the ratio of TE in control and drug-treated samples. Red: genes with significant TE down and up regulation were identified based on the read count of Ribo-seq data. Blue and green: TE up and down genes defined by |Z score| > 2 as often used in other analyses. B Averaged distribution profile of ribosome occupancy of 62 drug-sensitive genes. Ribosome footprint coverages and transcript lengths were normalized. C Twelve-nucleotide motif that is highly enriched in 5' UTR of TE down and ROD positive genes. We suggested that the GQ structure is responsible for ribosome stalling in the 5' UTR [2].

Conclusions

Computational and statistical methodologies facilitate the discovery of the hallmark of eIF4A-dependent transcripts, namely 5'UTR sequence harbors the 12-mer guanine quartet (CGG)4 motif associated with RNA G-quadruplex (GQ) structures (Figure 1C). Our novel computational tools provide a fast, accurate solution to gain biological insights from Ribo-seq and RNA-seq data.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

References

  1. Hay N, Sonenberg N: Upstream and downstream of mTOR. Genes Dev. 2004, 18 (16): 1926-45. 10.1101/gad.1212704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Wolfe AL, Singh K, Zhong Y, Drewe P, Rajasekhar VK, Sanghvi VR, Mavrakis KJ, Jiang M, Roderick JE, Van der Meulen J, Schatz JH, Rodrigo CM, Zhao C, Rondou P, de Stanchina E, Teruya-Feldstein J, Kelliher MA, Speleman F, Porco JA, Pelletier J, Rätsch G, Wendel HG: RNA G-quadruplexes cause eIF4A-dependent oncogene translation in cancer. Nature. 2014, 513 (7516): 65-70. 10.1038/nature13485.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ingolia NT, Brar GA, Rouskin S, McGeachy AM, Weissman JS: The ribosome profiling strategy for monitoring translation in vivo by deep sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA fragments. Nat Protoc. 2012, 7 (8): 1534-50. 10.1038/nprot.2012.086.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Drewe P, Stegle O, Hartmann L, Kahles A, Bohnert R, Wachter A, Borgwardt K, Rätsch G: Accurate detection of differential RNA processing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41 (10): 5189-98. 10.1093/nar/gkt211.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement