Open Access

Design, structure prediction and molecular dynamics simulation of a fusion construct containing malaria pre-erythrocytic vaccine candidate, PfCelTOS, and human interleukin 2 as adjuvant

BMC BioinformaticsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:71

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-016-0918-8

Received: 6 October 2015

Accepted: 29 January 2016

Published: 6 February 2016

Abstract

Background

Malaria infection is still widespread in some parts of the world and threatens the lives of millions of people every year. Vaccines, especially oral vaccines are considered to be effective in reducing the burden of malaria morbidity and mortality. By using recombinant technology, suitable oral hosts could serve as antigen delivering vehicles in developing oral vaccines. This study was aimed towards designing and computational analysis of a fusion protein consisting of Plasmodium falciparum cell-traversal protein for ookinetes and sporozoites (PfCelTOS) fused to human interleukin-2 (IL-2) and M cell-specific peptide ligand (Co1), as a step toward developing a vaccine candidate.

Results

To our best knowledge, the three dimensional (3D) structure of CelTOS is not reported in protein database. Therefore, we carried out computational modeling and simulation in the hope of understanding the properties and structure of PfCelTOS. Then we fused IL-2 to PfCelTOS by a flexible linker and did in silico analysis to confirm the proper folding of each domain in the designed fusion protein. In the last step, Co1 ligand was added to the confirmed fusion structure using a rigid linker and computational analysis was performed to evaluate the final fusion construct. One structure out of five predicted by I-TASSER for PfCelTOS and fusion constructs was selected based on the highest value for C-score. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation analysis indicated that predicted structures are stable during the simulation. Ramchandran Plot analysis of PfCelTOS and fusion constructs before and after MD simulation also represented that most residues were fallen in favorable regions.

Conclusion

In silico study showed that Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS construct has a constant structure and the selected linkers are effectively able to separate the domains. Therefore, data reported in this paper represents the first step toward developing of an oral vaccine candidate against malaria infection.

Keywords

Malaria Fusion protein Molecular modeling Molecular dynamics simulations

Background

Infectious diseases are the leading cause of death all over the world [1, 2]. Malaria, also called plasmodium infection, is one of the most important human infectious diseases threatening the lives of millions of people every year. According to WHO malaria report, globally, about 3.2 billion people in 97 countries and territories are at risk of being infected with malaria, and 1.2 billion are at high risk [3]. Although the disease has been eradicated in most areas, it’s still widespread in some regions [3]. The biggest challenges in controlling malaria disease are the emergence of anti-malarial drug resistance and insecticide resistance in parasite and mosquito, respectively [46]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop novel intervention strategies such as vaccines to reduce the burden of malaria morbidity and mortality. Malaria is most common in poor and developing regions of the world and has a strong negative effect on economic growth [7]. Oral immunogenicity has opened new avenues for the development of vaccines potentially effective in reducing the burden of diseases especially in low-income and developing countries. Oral vaccines are Low cost, easily administered (needle-free), in most cases capable of being stored and transported without refrigeration (Non-Refrigerated) and painless [8]. In contrast to injected vaccines, oral vaccines target mucosal surfaces, which cause stimulation of systemic as well as mucosal immune responses [911]. Considering the fact that most pathogens enter the body through mucosal surfaces, mucosal immune system provides the first line of defense against invading bacteria and viruses. Therefore, the simultaneous induction of systemic and mucosal immunity offers an ideal strategy to fight infectious diseases. Despite many advantages that oral vaccines have, only limited numbers of them have been approved for human commercial use and yet significant challenges must be overcome to make oral vaccines closer to reality [12]. One of the challenges is the complexity of mucosal immune system that must discriminate between harmless and dangerous antigens. One way to overcome this problem is to use adjuvants. Oral adjuvants offer exciting possibilities for the formulation of oral vaccines [1315].

During the past decades considerable progress in recombinant DNA technology has led to the development of fusion proteins. Fusion proteins are novel biomolecules obtained by genetically fusing two or more genes that originally code for separate proteins. Thereby fusion proteins have distinct functions derived from each of their domains. Fusion proteins have wide applications in industry and pharmaceutical protein production.

The general objective of the current study was the design and computational analysis of a fusion protein consisting of Plasmodium falciparum cell-traversal protein for ookinetes and sporozoites (PfCelTOS) fused to human interleukin-2 (IL-2) and M cell-specific peptide ligand (Co1), as a step toward developing a candidate recombinant oral vaccine against malaria. CelTOS is a protein that mediates malarial invasion into its hosts (both vertebrate and mosquito) and is required for effective malaria infection [1618]. On the other hand, CelTOS amino acid sequence is highly conserved among the Plasmodium species. CelTOS highly conserved amino acid sequence and vital role for malaria infection indicate its important function across all species [19]. Therefore, targeting the immune response to this highly conserved and crucial protein and interfering with its biological function could possibly result in protection against infection by heterologous species of Plasmodium [19].

In the designed construct, human interleukin 2 (IL-2) is thought to act as mucosal adjuvant. It should be considered that the type of desired immune response (cellular or humoral) will influence the choice of adjuvants for immunization regimens [20]. In case of malaria disease, parasites and infected red blood cells which activate dendritic cells through pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) are phagocytosed and their antigens are presented to T cells. PRR signaling causes the secretion of cytokines that initiate the inflammation that underlies malaria pathogenesis and direct TH1 cell to differentiate. TH1 cells help B cells differentiation and antibody secretion and also secrete IFN-γ, which activates macrophages that phagocytose opsonized parasites and infected red blood cells and subsequently kill them by NO- and O2-dependent pathways. Inflammation induces expression of endothelial adhesion molecules to which infected red blood cells bind. Finally the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines from macrophages and regulatory populations of T cells curtailed the Inflammation [21]. To the best of our understanding, adjuvants that increase the TH1 response are more appropriate in malaria vaccine development. Here we focus on human interleukin 2 (IL-2) as mucosal adjuvant. IL-2 has a central role in the cascade of events involved in immune responses and can function as a vaccine adjuvant to increase the immune response to vaccine immunogens [20, 2226].

Specific advantages of IL-2 as adjuvant for malaria vaccine are as follow:
  1. 1)

    IL-2 stimulates T cells to secrete INF-γ. INF-γ is known as immune interferon due to activating macrophages and enhancing phagocytic activity which leads to activation of immune responses. On the other hand, INF-γ results in the expression of MHCI and MHCII molecules on the surface of infected cells and antigen presenting cells, respectively, therefore enhancing antigen presenting and immune system activity. In addition, INF-γ activates the secretion of IgG and its subclasses by effecting on B lymphocytes (The positive effect of INF-γ on immune responses to malaria parasite is discussed above).

     
  2. 2)

    Activation of T cells under the influence of IL-2 leads to the secretion of cytokines such as IL-10. Unlike many other interleukins, IL-10 inhibits macrophage activity and secretion of IL-1, IL-12 and TNF. IL-12 acts as inducer for INF-γ and is an effective factor in cellular and innate immune responses against intracellular microbes. Inhibition of IL-12 leads to inhibition of INF-γ production. In fact, IL-10 is well known as the inhibitor of immune responses, especially responses that are set up by macrophages, thereby immune responses are terminated. As mentioned above, the enhancement of inflammation and thereby endothelial adhesion of blood vessels is one of the outcomes of immune system responses to malaria parasite and malaria vaccine. In this case, repressive role of IL-10 prevents excessive inflammation.

     

Although reported studies have indicated the potential of cytokines as mucosal adjuvants, in order to increase the probability of vaccine candidate binding to intestinal cells, we adopted another strategy. Co1 is a peptide ligand that promotes the binding of ligand-fused antigen to human M-like cells and has also comparable levels of adjuvant activity to Cholera Toxin (CT) [27]. Conjugation of Co1 to the designed construct should result in delivery of antigen to M cells.

Since most of the biological functions of proteins depend upon their 3D structure, in designing multi domain recombinant proteins, proper folding, stability and interaction between domains must be considered. Fusion proteins are much more susceptible to misfolding than single-domain proteins due to the interaction between their different peptide domains. Therefore, in silico analysis of multi domain proteins is an indispensible stage in recombinant protein production projects.

Attempts to model the structure of proteins on the computer began about 30 years ago. Since that time our understanding of protein structure and dynamics has significantly increased and now Protein Data Bank (PDB) contains more than 10,000 high resolution protein structures. Valuable 3D models of a protein that has a clear sequence homology to known proteins can be predicted by homology modeling method. However, even in cases where there is no sequence homology, threading methods relate protein sequences to a library of known structures and predict the likely protein structure. The crystallographic structure of CelTOS has not been reported yet. In the present study, we carried out a molecular modeling study of PfCelTOS protein and designed fusion proteins using iterative threading assembly refinement (I-TASSER) to obtain their 3D structures. Then energy minimization and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation were run to refine the models. The simulations of PfCelTOS and fusion proteins were performed for long time duration of 10 ns and the obtained structures were analyzed to verify further.

Methods

Sequence retrieval and fusion protein construction

The amino acid sequences of PfCelTOS, human IL-2 and M cell-targeting ligand, Co1, were retrieved from UniProt (PfCelTOS id: Q53UB8; human IL-2 id: P60568). Amino acid sequences were used to design fusion protein construct. The designed construct consisted of PfCelTOS and human IL-2 mature parts linked together by a flexible linker, whereas Co1 is linked to this construct through a rigid (helical) linker.

Primary structural analysis

Expasy’s Prot Param server [28] was used to study the physiochemical characters of PfCelTOS and designed fusion constructs such as theoretical isoelectric point (pI), molecular weight, molecular formula, total number of positive and negative residues, instability index [29], aliphatic index [30] and grand average hydropathicity (GRAVY) [31]. The instability index provides an estimate of a protein’s stability in vitro. Proteins with instability index smaller than 40 are predicted as stable. A value above 40 indicates that the protein may be unstable.

The aliphatic index of a protein is regarded as a positive factor for the increase of thermostability of globular proteins and is mainly defined as the relative volume occupied by aliphatic side chains (alanine, valine, isoleucine and leucine). The GRAVY score is calculated as the sum of hydropathy values of all the amino acids, divided by the number of residues in the sequence.

Secondary structure prediction

Secondary structure elements of PfCelTOS and designed fusion proteins were determined using Phyre2 [32] and I-TASSER [33] online servers.

Three-Dimensional (3D) model prediction

The 3D structure of PfCelTOS and fusion proteins were modeled using I-TASSER online server. The raw amino acid sequences of PfCelTOS and fusion proteins were uploaded in FASTA format to I-TASSER server. Tertiary structures were predicted in PDB format. The results generated five top models for each entry which the one with the highest confidence score (c-score) represented the best model and was the structure selected for this study [33].

Structure Validation

Visualization was carried out by PyMOL version v1.7.2 software [34]. Traceable structural errors were proofed and global charges replaced by Vega ZZ version 3.0.5.12 software [35]. Ramachandran plots were calculated by RAMPAGE Ramachandran Plot Assessment [36]. Hydropathicity index were calculated by Marvin view version 14.7.7 software (http://www.chemaxon.com). Molecular dynamics were performed by GROMACS version 5.0.1 software [37, 38]. PDB file format were analyzed for MD approaches-molecular dynamics algorithm including an initial cubic salvation with 3 point simple water model, followed by ionization and neutralization of simulation cube with Na and Cl ions. Geometry optimization was performed with constrain method. This procedure continued with two separate temperature and pressure unconstrained global dynamics. Final unconstrained dynamics performed with coupled temperature (300° K) and pressure (1 bar) for 10 ns. A schematic sketch of molecular dynamics procedure is presented in Table 1.
Table 1

A schematic sketch of molecular dynamics procedure

Step

Constrain/Algorithm

Temperature

Pressure

Time

Neighborsearching

Electrostatic interactions (long-range)

Temperature coupling

Pressure coupling

Geometry Optimization

No

-

-

2 ns

grid

Particle Mesh Ewald (PME)

-

-

Temperature constant

No

300 K

-

0.1 ns

grid

PME

V-rescale

-

Pressure constant

No

-

1 bar

0.1 ns

grid

PME

-

Parrinello-Rahman

Total molecular dynamics

Yes/steep = steepest descent minimization

300 K

1 bar

10 ns

grid

PME

V-rescale

Parrinello-Rahman

Analysis of simulation

After the simulation had finished, the output data were analyzed according to Energy (kinetic, potential & total energy), root-mean-square deviation (RMSD), Gyration radius and H bond formation/deformation. The following plot is represented as screening procedure of modeled structures (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Screening procedure of modeled structures

Results and discussion

To our knowledge, the crystallographic structure of CelTOS has not been reported in the protein database. Therefore, in silico analysis of CelTOS 3D structure could be of benefit in predicting its probable structure. Computer prediction and simulation methods can be used to generate representative conformations of a molecule in equilibrium and provide a picture of the way in which a molecule changes from one configuration to another [39]. Therefore, we carried out computational modeling and simulation in the hope of understanding the properties and structure of PfCelTOS. Then we fused IL-2 to PfCelTOS by a flexible linker and did in silico analysis to confirm the proper folding of each domain in the designed fusion protein. In the last step, Co1 ligand was added to the confirmed fusion structure using a rigid linker and computational analysis was performed to evaluate the final fusion construct.

Primary structure analysis

The primary structure of PfCelTOS (accession number Q53UB8) is composed of 182 amino acid residues, encoded by 546 nucleotides. A fragment of 9 amino acids at the N-terminal is a signal peptide and the next 173 amino acids fragment is a mature peptide. Human IL-2 (accession number P60568) composed of 153 amino acid residues, encoded by 459 nucleotides. A fragment of 20 amino acids at the N-terminal was found to be a signal peptide and the remaining 133 amino acids fragment was a mature peptide [40]. The 173 amino acids fragment of PfCelTOS (mature part) and 133 amino acids fragment of IL-2 were used to design the fusion protein construct. The length of the designed construct is 321 amino acids, which within 1 to 133 is IL-2. Amino acids 133 to 148 (15 aa) are linker sequence, which is (GGGGS)3. Amino acids 149 to 321 (173 aa) are PfCelTOS. Based on previous studies, N-terminal of IL-2 and C-terminal of PfCelTOS seems more important in their biological function than the other end. Therefore we designed the fusion construct in a way to make free the N- and C-terminals of IL-2 and PfCelTOS, respectively. The Co1 ligand peptide was added to the computationally confirmed structure of IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS. To present the Co1 ligand to human M-like cells better, a rigid linker ((AEEEK)3) was used between Co1 ligand and designed fusion protein and the new construct was designed as follow: Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS. Figure 2 shows schematic view of designed fusion protein construct.
Fig. 2

Schematic view of the designed fusion protein construct

The primary structural features of PfCelTOS and two designed fusion constructs determined by Prot Param are summarized in Table 2. Prot Param is a tool which allows the computation of various physical and chemical parameters for a given protein. The calculated isoelectric points (pI) for PfCelTOS, IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS and Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS were 4.58, 5.11 and 5.32, respectively, suggesting the presence of more negatively charged residues. Although, proteins were found to be stable due to their high aliphatic index, an instability index of more than 40 suggests instability and thus predicted that the proteins were thermally unstable. The value of aliphatic index for PfCelTOS, IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS and Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS were 89.48, 91.06 and 89.11, respectively, while that of instability index were 41.67, 48.01 and 49.75. GRAVY (Grand average hydropathy) values of PfCelTOS, IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS and Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS were −0.106, −0.151 and −0.172, respectively, suggesting a hydrophilicity pattern with better interaction with water.
Table 2

Properties of PfCelTOS, human IL-2 and designed constructs determined by ProtParam

Protein

PfCelTOS

Fusion protein1

Fusion protein2

(IL-2-linker-PfCelTOS)

(Co1-linker-IL-2-linker-PfCelTOS)

No. of amino acids

173

321

348

Molecular weight

19087.4

35433.2

38176.4

Theoretical pI

4.58

5.11

5.32

Total No. of negatively charged residues (Asp + Glu)

23

38

41

Total No. of positively charged residues (Arg + Lys)

13

28

32

Formula

C855H1326N212O274S4

C1581H2495N405O494S11

C1703H2691N441O530S11

Instability index

41.67

48.01

49.75

Aliphatic index

89.48

91.06

89.11

Grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY)

−0.106

−0.151

−0.172

Secondary structure prediction

Among protein structure prediction software, the on-line servers seem more appropriate since they have access to all structures available in databases. Secondary structure of PfCelTOS and designed fusion constructs were predicted by Phyre2 and I-TASSER servers. phyre2 (Protein Homology/AnalogY Recognition Engine; pronounced as ‘fire’) is among the most popular methods for protein structure prediction having been cited over 1500 times and has been designed to ensure a user-friendly interface for users inexpert in protein structure prediction methods. Both programs established that PfCelTOS structure is predominantly made of α-helices and coil–coils and there was no significant strand in PfCelTOS. The location of rigid linker fragment within amino acids 13–27 in Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS was shown by helical structures. Phyre2 prediction and analysis of secondary structure of proteins is shown in Table 3. In case of the fusion constructs also, amount of α-helices exceeded β-sheets. The presence of only 5 % β-sheets is related IL-2 structure (a bend created by proline residue at position 47 0f IL-2).
Table 3

Phyre2 prediction and analysis of secondary structure

Protein

α-helix

β sheets

Coils

PfCelTOS

79 %

0 %

25 %

IL-2-linker-PfCelTOS

65 %

5 %

24 %

Co1-linker-IL-2-linker-PfCelTOS

63 %

5 %

27 %

Three-Dimensional (3D) structure prediction

Prediction of 3D structure was performed by I-TASSER online server using the best aligned template obtained by searching against Protein Data Bank database. I-TASSER (Iterative Threading ASSEmbly Refinement) server (as ‘Zhang-Server’) is a web-based service for the prediction of protein structures and functions. It’s free for academic users and allows them to automatically generate high-quality models of 3D structure of proteins from their amino acid sequences. It detects structure templates from PDB by threading technique. I-TASSER is one of the most successful servers in the community-wide CASP (Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction) experiments and was ranked as the No 1 server for protein structure prediction in recent CASP7 CASP8, CASP9, CASP10, and CASP11 experiments.

3D structure prediction by I-TASSER generates five top models with C-scores ranging from −5 to 2. The one with the highest C-score represents the best model. The highest value for predicted models of PfCelTOS, IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS and Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS were −2.94, −2.23 and −2.67, respectively. These models were selected for this study. The best selected model for PfCelTOS based on C-score represented that the 3D structure is consistent with secondary structure elements generated by Phyre2. Based on Phyre2 SS confidence, amino acids 3–15, 25–28, 32–47, 85–112 and 122–145 are α-helices with high confidence, which are also predicted as α-helix structures in 3D model of PfCelTOS generated by I-TASSER (shown in different colors in Fig. 3). It is important to note that further fusion protein constructs linked by other flexible linkers were designed but the one with (GGGGS)3 linker resulted in the best 3D structure based on C-score. Predicted model for IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS showed a protein with two separate domains linked together through a small linker. Glycine-rich peptides confer flexibility, which allows the domains to move independently of one another while maintaining their individual three dimensional shapes [41]. 3D structure prediction of Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS showed a protein with three domains linked together by two small linkers. (AEEEK)3 rigid linker keeps domains apart and ensure a relatively rigid separation of the domain and carrier [41]. The pre-simulated 3D structures of PfCelTOS and fusion proteins are shown in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3

I-TASSER predicted 3D structures of (a) PfCelTOS, (b) IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS and (c)Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS

Structural model refinement

The structural refinement was carried out using molecular dynamics simulation as described in methods. Simulation acts as a bridge between theory and experiment. Indeed we test a theory by conducting a simulation using the same or computationally predicted models and provide a guess at the possible interactions between molecules [39, 42]. Gromacs is a molecular dynamics application developed by Groningen University. Gromacs is able to work in the operating system Linux. The main ability of Gromacs is to perform MD simulation and minimization energy. However, Gromacs does not work alone and should interact with PyMOL and Grace. PyMOL is an application to visualize molecule structure and Grace is an application in Linux to display graphs. Both applications support analysis of MD simulation.

The MD simulation output data were analyzed based on Energy (kinetic, potential & total energy), RMSD [43], Gyration radius [44] and H bond formation/deformation [45]. The total energy should be constant throughout the simulation process, as it is the sum of kinetic and potential energy of the molecules. Kinetic energy should be constant or following a decreasing trend since the constant increasing of kinetic energy level reflects the general confusion of protein structure. Potential energy level should be increasing or constant to show the stability of structure. RMSD is the measure of the average distance between the backbone atoms of proteins. The structural refinement was carried out using molecular dynamics simulation over the equilibration course and exhibits RMSD plots for predicted models of PfCelTOS and fusion constructs that flattens during 10 ns. RMSD plots indicated that the proteins are stable during the simulation. Gyration radius is an indicative of the level of compaction in the structure, i.e., how folded or unfolded is the protein. H bond formation/deformation factor represents the number of hydrogen bonds formed or broken during molecular simulation. During 10 ns of simulation, this number was almost constant indicating the stability of the molecular structures. Figures 4, 5 and 6 represents simulation analysis of PfCelTOS, IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS and Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS, respectively, that validated the accuracy of our designed fusion protein structure.
Fig. 4

Structural model refinement analysis of PfCelTOS predicted structure. a Energy plots for the molecular dynamics simulation of PfCelTOS predicted structure. b Total RMSD, c the radius of gyration and d Hydrogen bond formation/deformation of PfCelTOS predicted structure. RMSD of PfCelTOS stable conformation observed after the extension of a 10 ns simulation run

Fig. 5

Structural model refinement analysis of IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS predicted structure. a Total, Potential and Kinetic energies for MD simulation of IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS predicted structure. b Total RMSD, c the radius of gyration and d Hydrogen bond formation/deformation of IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS predicted structure

Fig. 6

Structural model refinement analysis of Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS predicted structure. a Total, Potential and Kinetic energies for MD simulation of Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS Structural model refinement analysis. b Total RMSD, c the radius of gyration and d Hydrogen bond formation/deformation of Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS predicted structure

Structure validation of predicted models

To validate the modeled structures, Ramachandran maps were drawn before as well as after MD simulation and structures were analyzed using RAMPAGE Ramachandran Plot Assessment. The Ramchandran plot analysis obtained by RAMPAGE Ramachandran Plot Assessment is summarized in Table 4 and the plots are provided in Fig. 7. This provides an insight into the correctness of the modeled structures. As it’s obvious Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS has a well modeled structure in terms of RAMPAGE Ramachandran Plot Assessment.
Table 4

The Ramchandran plot analysis of the proteins before and after MD simulation obtained by RAMPAGE Ramachandran Plot Assessment

Proteins

 

Favored region

Allowed region

Outlier region

PfCelTOS

Pre-MD

57.3 %

26.3 %

16.4 %

 

Post-MD

74.7 %

19.4 %

5.9 %

IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS

Pre-MD

58.3 %

22.9 %

18.8 %

 

Post-MD

76.4 %

17.6 %

6.0 %

Co1-(AEEEK)3-IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS

Pre-MD

76.3 %

15.9 %

7.8 %

 

Post-MD

85.8 %

11.6 %

2.6 %

Fig. 7

Comparative diagram depicting Ramchandran Plot analysis of PfCelTOS an fusion proteins before and after molecular dynamic simulations (a) PfCelTOS (b) IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS (c) Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS. The plots were analyzed by RAMPAGE Ramachandran Plot Assessment. The general favored region and Pro-Pro favored region are indicated with dark blue color. The general allowed region and Pro-Pro allowed region is shown in pale blue. The Glycine favored and allowed regions are shown in dark and pale orange, respectively. The disallowed region is in white color

Comparison of predicted structures before and after MD simulation

3D Structures of PfCelTOS and fusion constructs were also investigated after MD simulation (Fig. 8). Overlaying of 3D structure of PfCelTOS and designed fusion proteins before and after MD simulation showed that the predicted structures are constantly stable and the selected linkers are able to separate the domains of designed fusion constructs effectively. As it’s obvious, rigid linker ensures the separation of domains and carrier and leads to the better presentation of construct to human M-like cells (Fig. 9). Structural comparison of predicted models of PfCelTOS and Co1-(AEEEK)3− IL-2-(GGGGS) 3 -PfCelTOS, obtained after molecular dynamics simulations is shown in Fig. 10. This comparison indicates the proper folding of PfCelTOS in fusion construct.
Fig. 8

3D structures of (a) PfCelTOS, (b) IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS and (c) Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS after molecular dynamics simulations

Fig. 9

Structural comparison of predicted models for (a) PfCelTOS (b) IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS (c) Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS, obtained before (shown in yellow) and after molecular dynamics simulations (shown in red) from different views

Fig. 10

Structural comparison of predicted models of PfCelTOS and Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS, obtained after molecular dynamics simulations

Conclusion

The procedure of our study (as shown in Fig. 1) helps to rapid analysis of designed fusion constructs before initializing the recombinant fusion protein lab experiments. As it is obvious, this procedure is fast, inexpensive (since all the servers are free) and simple, especially for inexpert users in this field.

In silico study of Co1-(AEEEK)3- IL-2-(GGGGS)3-PfCelTOS structure through this procedure revealed that designed construction is suitable for fusion protein expression in edible host cells for oral delivery. Flexible linker separates PfCelTOS and IL-2 domains effectively to maintain their proper individual three dimensional structures and allows them to move independently of one another. On the other hand, rigid linker ensures the separation of fusion protein and carrier and lead to the better presentation of fusion construct to human M-like cells. Therefore, data reported in this paper represents the first step toward developing of an oral vaccine candidate against malaria infection.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Mohammad Reza Khoramizadeh for his good immunological advice and also thank to Mr. Hojat Borna for his help in computational techniques.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biotechnology, Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology

References

  1. Debast S, Bauer M, Kuijper E, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. European society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20 Suppl 2:1–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brower J, Chalk P. The global threat of new and reemerging infectious diseases: reconciling US national security and public health policy. Rand Corporation; 2003Google Scholar
  3. WHO. World malaria report 2013. World Health Organization; 2014Google Scholar
  4. O’Brien C, Henrich P, Passi N, Fridock D. Recent clinical and molecular insights into emerging artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24(6):570.Google Scholar
  5. McNamara C, Winzeler EA. Target identification and validation of novel antimalarials. Future Microbiol. 2011;6(6):693–704.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ranson H, N’Guessan R, Lines J, Moiroux N, Nkuni Z, Corbel V. Pyrethroid resistance in African anopheline mosquitoes: what are the implications for malaria control? Trends Parasitol. 2011;27(2):91–8.Google Scholar
  7. Ingstad B, Munthali A, Braathen S, Grut L. The evil circle of poverty: a qualitative study of malaria and disability. Malar J. 2012;11(11):15.Google Scholar
  8. Dhama K et al. Plant based oral vaccines for human and animal pathogens-a new era of prophylaxis: Current and future prospective. J Exp Biol Agric Sci. 2013;1:1–12.Google Scholar
  9. Lycke N. Recent progress in mucosal vaccine development: potential and limitations. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(8):592–605.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Czerkinsky C, Holmgren J. Mucosal delivery routes for optimal immunization: targeting immunity to the right tissues. Mucosal Vaccines, Springer. 2010;354:1-18. Google Scholar
  11. Pasetti MF et al. Immunology of gut mucosal vaccines. Immunol Rev. 2011;239(1):125–48.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Price JD, Tarbell KV. The role of dendritic cell subsets and innate immunity in the pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes and other autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol. 2015;6:288.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kraehenbuhl J-P, Neutra MR. Mucosal vaccines: where do we stand? Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13(20):2609–28.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rhee JH, Lee SE, Kim SY. Mucosal vaccine adjuvants update. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2012;1(1):50–63.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Newsted D, Fallahi F, Golshani A, Azizi A. Advances and challenges in mucosal adjuvant technology. Vaccine. 2015;33(21):2399–405.Google Scholar
  16. Kariu T, Ishino T, Yano K, Chinzei Y, Yuda M. CelTOS, a novel malarial protein that mediates transmission to mosquito and vertebrate hosts. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59(5):1369–79.Google Scholar
  17. Bergmann-Leitner E, Legler P, Savranskaya T, Ockenhouse C, Angov E. Cellular and humoral immune effector mechanisms required for sterile protection against sporozoite challenge induced with the novel malaria vaccine candidate CelTOS. Vaccine. 2011;29(35):5940–9.Google Scholar
  18. Bergmann-Leitner E, Li Q, Caridha D, O’Neil M, Ockenhouse C, Hickman M, Angov E. Protective immune mechanisms against pre-erythrocytic forms of Plasmodium berghei depend on the target antigen. Trials Vaccinology. 2014;3:6–10.Google Scholar
  19. Bergmann-Leitner E, Mease R, Vega P, Savranskaya T, Polhemus M, Ockenhouse C, Angov E. Immunization with pre-erythrocytic antigen CelTOS from Plasmodium falciparum elicits cross-species protection against heterologous challenge with Plasmodium berghei. Plos one. 2010;5(8):1-9.Google Scholar
  20. Giedlin M.A. Cytokines as vaccine adjuvants: the use of interleukin-2. Vaccine Adjuvants, Springer. 2000;42:283–297.Google Scholar
  21. Riley EM, Stewart VA. Immune mechanisms in malaria: new insights in vaccine development. Nature Med. 2013;19(2):168–78.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Nohria A, Rubin RH. Cytokines as potential vaccine adjuvants. chapter: Cytokines in the Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Springer. 1995;261–9.Google Scholar
  23. Derosa D, Sordillo L. Efficacy of a Bovine Staphylococcus aureus Vaccine using Interleukin‐2 as an Adjuvant. J Veterinary Med Ser B. 1997;44(1–10):599–607.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang H, Qiu Y,  Zhao Y, Liu X, Liu M, Yu A. Immunogenicity of oral vaccination with Lactococcus lactis derived vaccine candidate antigen (UreB) of Helicobacter pylori fused with the human interleukin 2 as adjuvant. Mol Cell Probes. 2014;28(1):25–30.Google Scholar
  25. Nunberg J, Doyle M, York S, York C. Interleukin 2 acts as an adjuvant to increase the potency of inactivated rabies virus vaccine. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1989;86(11):4240–3.Google Scholar
  26. Overwijk WW, Theoret MR, Restifo NP. The future of interleukin-2: enhancing therapeutic anticancer vaccines. Cancer J Sci Am. 2000;6(Suppl 1):S76–S80. Google Scholar
  27. Kim S,  Seo K, Kim J, Lee K, Jang Y. The M cell-targeting ligand promotes antigen delivery and induces antigen-specific immune responses in mucosal vaccination. J Immunol. 2010;185(10):5787–95.Google Scholar
  28. Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Duvaud S, Wilkins M, Appel R, Bairoch A. Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server. Springer; 2005.Google Scholar
  29. Guruprasad K, Reddy BB, Pandit MW. Correlation between stability of a protein and its dipeptide composition: a novel approach for predicting in vivo stability of a protein from its primary sequence. Protein Eng. 1990;4(2):155–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Atsushi I. Thermostability and aliphatic index of globular proteins. J Biochem. 1980;88(6):1895–8.Google Scholar
  31. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982;157(1):105–32.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kelley L, Mezulis S, Yates C,  Wass M, Sternberg M. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2015;10(6):845–58.Google Scholar
  33. Yang J, Yan R, Roy A,  Xu D, Poisson J, Zhang Y. The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat Methods. 2015;12(1):7–8.Google Scholar
  34. DeLano WL. The PyMOL molecular graphics system. 2002.Google Scholar
  35. Pedretti A, Villa L, Vistoli G. VEGA-an open platform to develop chemo-bio-informatics applications, using plug-in architecture and script programming. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2004;18(3):167–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lovell S, Davis I, Arendall III B, Bakker P, Word M, Prisant M, Richardson J, Richardson D. Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ, ψ and Cβ deviation. Proteins: Struct, Funct, Bioinf. 2003;50(3):437–50.Google Scholar
  37. Hess BD, van der Spoel, Lindahl E. GROMACS Groningen Machine for Chemical Simulations. User Manual. Version 4.5. 4.Google Scholar
  38. Abraham M, Hess B, Spoel D, Lindahl E. GROMACS User Manual version 5.0.1. 2014. http://www.gromacs.org.
  39. Allen MP. Introduction to molecular dynamics simulation. Computational Soft Matter: Synthetic Polymers Proteins. 2004;23:1–28.Google Scholar
  40. Ju G, Collins L, Kaffka KL, Tsien WH, Chizzonite R, Crow R, Bhatt R, Kilian PL. Structure-function analysis of human interleukin-2. Identification of amino acid residues required for biological activity. J Biol Chem. 1987;262(12):5723–31.Google Scholar
  41. Wriggers W, Chakravarty S, Jennings PA. Control of protein functional dynamics by peptide linkers. Pept Sci. 2005;80(6):736–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Astuti A, Mutiara A. Performance Analysis on Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Protein Using GROMACS. arXiv preprint arXiv:0912.0893. 2009.Google Scholar
  43. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Significance of root-mean-square deviation in comparing three-dimensional structures of globular proteins. J Mol Biol. 1994;235(2):625–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lobanov MY, Bogatyreva N, Galzitskaya O. Radius of gyration as an indicator of protein structure compactness. Mol Biol. 2008;42(4):623–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Konermann L, Wilson DJ, Simmons DA. Stopped-flow Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Methods in Protein Structure and Stability Analysis: NMR and EPR Spectroscopies, Mass-Spectrometry and Protein Imaging. Chapter 2.1. pp. 95-119Google Scholar

Copyright

© Shamriz and Ofoghi. 2016

Advertisement